A Menemsha property owner who accused her neighbors of illegally cutting down more than 100 trees on her land in search of better water views won a $2.5 million settlement earlier this year.
A Menemsha property owner who accused her neighbors of illegally cutting down more than 100 trees on her land in search of better water views won a $2.5 million settlement earlier this year.
Martha Cottle sued Beach Plum Inn owners Sarah and Robert Nixon, claiming that the couple directed an associate to clear a wide swath of trees in 2019 on abutting land Ms. Cottle owns in Chilmark. In all, Ms. Cottle said 136 trees were chopped down, including beech, oak and locust trees, some as tall as 100 feet.
The lawsuit, filed in February 2022 in Dukes County Superior Court, contended that Erick Taylor, at the request of the Nixons, cleared the trees in order to improve the view of Menemsha harbor, Menemsha Pond and Menemsha Bight.
In September, the parties filed an agreement for a settlement with the court. According to the agreement, the Mr. Taylor’s insurance company paid $1 million. The Nixons, through a company they control, Swordfish Enterprises, agreed to pay $1.5 million. The first payment of $100,000 was supposed to be paid to Ms. Cottle by Oct. 5, and the other $1.4 million is supposed to be paid by Dec. 31.
In court filings, the Nixons said Mr. Taylor was staying at the Beach Plum Inn during hunting season and wanted to do the Nixons a favor by cutting down several trees.
According to the Nixons, Mr. Taylor took down a cattle fence and crossed over onto Ms. Cottle’s land, decimating the grove of trees beyond the property line. The Nixons also said their views were already “stunning and needed no improvement.”
Ms. Cottle argued that Mr. Taylor was acting on behalf of the Nixons. She originally estimated that it was going to cost $3.6 million to restore the trees.
A jury trial was scheduled to take place in June before the parties agreed to a settlement.

Comments
Good for you. Martha.
Tom Engley West TisburyGood for you.
Martha.
Oh, so a house guest did this
Bob Kelly Oak BluffsOh, so a house guest did this on their own and the hosts didn't know about it....of course. Glad to see this judgement but it still does not replace the trees that were lost. Glad that Ms Cottle pursued this and that justice was served.
I’m guessing neighborhood
John Aldeborgh KatamaI’m guessing neighborhood tensions will be high going forward. While utterly uncalled for and outrageous I find it hard to believe the damage is worth $2.5M. It’s going to be interesting to see what Ms. Cottle does going forward, will she simply plant new seedlings at minimal cost (very logical) or endeavor to plant mature trees. To me the tragedy of this story is how neighbors seem to care so little about each other, two or three wrongs don’t make anything right or better, kind of sad as the only winners are the lawyers.
They agreed to a settlement-
Suzanne Goldsmith-Hirsch ColumbusThey agreed to a settlement--which means they anticipated greater damages had the matter gone to court. The amount needed to be high enough to serve a deterrence function.
The value is actually
Cliff Hawley Sacramento, CAThe value is actually incalculable. Trees that large might be 100+ years old. There's no planting or restoration that can replace that. They got off light.
Well if she replants some
Ken Edg.Well if she replants some pine and fir trees they will block out the view in a few years. They will wish they had those rare oaks and locusts.
The winners are all of us
Rebecca ChilmarkThe winners are all of us when it doesn't happen again because there were consequences. some people don't care what their neighbors think. Thank you Martha.
Bingo. It sets the example
Steve P EdgartownBingo. It sets the example that property rights matter and are enforceable. Encroachments too often happen with no consequence, and maybe this will cause folks to think twice about it.
Also, if you tried to buy, deliver, and plant 100 somewhat mature hardwood trees, on MV, it could easily cost a million or two.
The part that truly broke my
Martha ChilmarkThe part that truly broke my heart was the 80-100' tall, 100 year-old grove of trees...which is truly irreplaceable. And, it destroyed part of my childhood memories. Not to mention the clear-cutting of a serene & lovely half-acre habitat for wildlife above a brook. Too sad for words.
So sorry for this terrible
Joanne Diamond McNeil 30 Summer St VH MA 02568So sorry for this terrible destruction on your beloved family property. No doubt this is a severe blow to you as well as precious wildlife that called this home. The action you had to take had to be terribly difficult. Again I am so sorry you had to go through this. Hopefully this will stop such ignorance in the future. There should be mandatory classes the parties would have to take also. Classes regarding trespassing, willful destruction of Habitat etc. Some type of community service. No dollar amount alone can ever replace what they have destroyed. Not in our lifetime.
Add new comment