With construction set to begin, long-planned project takes a sudden new turn.
Mark Alan Lovewell

State Scraps Shared Use Path in Problem-Plagued Beach Road Project

The reconstruction project was thrown into further turmoil this week after the state declined to pay for relocating town water and sewer lines.

The problem-plagued Beach Road reconstruction project in Vineyard Haven was thrown into further turmoil this week after Tisbury town leaders learned that the Massachusetts Department of Transportation has declined to pay for relocating town water and sewer lines beneath the road.

As a result the shared-use path, which has been an on-and-off point of contention, will be dropped in favor of sidewalks and bike lanes.

Selectmen unanimously agreed to the changes at a meeting Tuesday after hearing a report from town administrator Jay Grande.

“I’ve waited 12 years for this,” said board member Larry Gomez during the discussion, which came near the end of a four-hour public meeting on Zoom.

Board chairman James Rogers at first suggested a two-week waiting period to gather public opinion, but after finding no support from Mr. Gomez and board member Jeff Kristal, he joined them in endorsing the new design.

The long-planned $6 million state-funded project had aimed to rebuild a half-mile stretch of road between Five Corners and Wind’s up by widening shoulders and adding a shared-use pedestrian and bicycle path that connects to the Lagoon Pond Drawbridge, among other things.

One of the Island’s most heavily traveled arteries, the ribbon of road is considered at risk from rising sea levels.

But the public works project has struggled mightily to gain forward momentum, plagued by engineering problems, grumbling from unhappy business owners along the roadway, bureaucratic tangles and tepid support from the selectmen.

The town hired an independent environmental consultant to monitor the project after preliminary work began last fall, and twice-weekly meetings have been held between the town administrator and MassDOT, but there have been few public meetings, adding to an air of confusion around the project.

Meanwhile, the decision by the selectmen Tuesday ends, for the foreseeable future, what began as a plan to improve the Island’s bicycle path network by closing a gap between two existing shared-use paths in Tisbury.

“What the [select] board did last night really gutted one of the primary reasons for the project,” Martha’s Vineyard Commission planner Bill Veno told the Gazette Wednesday.

Island officials requested the state’s support for the shared-use path nearly a decade ago through the MVC, a state-chartered regional planning agency. After that, MassDOT decided to roll in the roadwork as well, Mr. Veno said, explaining the history of the project.

Construction was due to begin mid-winter this year, but that plan was stymied in February after a series of test pits were dug that showed the town’s sewering infrastructure was not where the state’s design indicated. Steep cost increases loomed, with no clear indication of who would pay for the added work.

Town counsel David Doneski has been involved in the back-and-forth correspondence with MassDOT.

This week, in response to a letter from Mr. Doneski detailing the infrastructure conflicts, MassDOT responded with its new proposal simplifying the design of the roadway project.

“It is clear that the MassDOT drainage system as proposed by their engineering consultants cannot proceed forward without significant revisions to their drainage system and/or the town water and wastewater system at substantial cost,” Mr. Grande wrote in a memo to selectmen summarizing the state’s response.

“MassDOT is not prepared to bear that additional cost to address the problem,” he also wrote.

Mr. Grande told his board the town is at a crossroads when it comes to Beach Road.

“We desperately need the road repaired. We desperately need new sidewalks. We need the utility poles removed from the sidewalks so they can be ADA compliant, and we need bicycle accommodations,” he said.

Under the new plan, the state will proceed to widen sidewalks, relocate utility poles and repair and repave Beach Road, but instead of the shared-use path running from Wind’s Up to Tisbury Marketplace, each side of the road will have a directional bicycle lane in the roadway. From Wind’s Up to the marketplace, the only sidewalk will be on the pond side of the road, under the new plan.

At the meeting Tuesday, planning board members Cheryl Doble and Ben Robinson both urged the select board not to quickly approve the change, which also widens the roadway.

“We have to be careful about not backing ourselves into a corner with the state without a more thorough review of what they’re proposing,” Mr. Robinson said, adding that the revised plan will not resolve a conflict arising where the inbound bike path ends at the sidewalk by Wind’s Up, facing the vehicle lane.

“The building of bike lanes is not going to make people cross the road and get into traffic. They’ll just stay on the sidewalk as they do today,” he said.

But Mr. Gomez and Mr. Kristal both supported the return to what has been termed the symmetrical plan for Beach Road, calling for an immediate vote.

Speaking with the Gazette by phone later, Mr. Robinson said the revised plan is not symmetrical and squanders state money that was approved for the shared-use path.

“Essentially, we just gave up millions of dollars,” he said.

In an email to the Gazette Wednesday, MassDOT spokesperson Judith Reardon Riley said the state is now re-evaluating the project schedule and cost revisions.

“The additional time for redesign and physical work will induce some delay to the project and we will let the town and the community know once this analysis is completed,” Ms. Riley wrote. “We anticipate some work on the project will continue, including utility relocation work, through the spring until the required Memorial Day roadway construction moratorium.”

Work will resume after Labor Day, she said.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 07:14

Permalink

TisKid VH

VH - the town that desperately needs road fixes, but allows their school situation to be a disgrace.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 15:54

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

TisKidToo VH

It would be nice if there was a pill to cure incompetence. But, we all voted these folks into office. I always chuckle driving by Ernie Boch, Jr's new park on the harbor. EBJr had it right -- avoid Tisbury leadership at all cost.

TisKidThree VH

We did vote him out. It was Tristan Israel, who did a lot of good for Tisbury, for many years. Boch fight is a generation and several selectmen past. Stay current my brother Kid.

TisKid VH

To be fair the current people - (Gomez and Kristal) were for the new school. They were right. Rogers backed a multi - million dollar mistake and should admit it. Nobody expects infallibility. Just to take responsibility.

TisKidThree VH

think what TizKis is referring to would be the lack of support shown by the selectmen at both town meeting and the letter to the editor, could have turned the tide for the school project. Now it's going to cost the town millions more.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 07:44

Permalink

Mark VH

The incompetence of both the state and the town unfortunately continues to manifest itself. Inadequate due diligence originally led to insufficient scoping of this project. Now that it’s fully in hand, the state is unwilling to fund the true cost, and the town’s leadership appears poised to accept a substantially inferior outcome. How inspiring.

Louis Oak Bluffs

The water and sewer system belongs to the town not the state. It is there to provide service to property owners within the town. The towns due diligence to factor the possible costs of repairs or relocation of their system is what is in question not the states unwillingness to pay for it. The town sells water through the water system and charges for waste disposal through their sewer system. It would be nice yet unrealistic to have a business where someone else covered some of the costs.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 07:54

Permalink

JM Tisbury

Gotta love my town. Who knows what else lurks beneath the ground here. “If it’s broken, why fix it?” - Should be our town motto. The more we dig, the more we uncover.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 09:36

Permalink

Thomas Edgartown

They should bury all utilities. That is a major eyesore.

Jessica Vineyard Haven

They should definitely have that on the plan and would make so much sense for storms. Too bad VH can’t seem to do much that is sensible.

Michael OB

Utilities SHOULD be buried while the ground is opened.
Along the beach road, the difference would be spectacular.
Each time you drive through a neighborhood which had that done you always notice something.
That thing is no utility poles.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 12:54

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

Government incompetence at its finest...also explains the terrible management of Covid vaccinations.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 13:02

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

Someone should tell Mr. Robinson millions of dollars is tax payer money that did not need to be spent. I look at it as we just saved millions of dollars. To bad most of our public officials think like Mr. Robinson.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 15:54

Permalink

Understandable Vineyard Haven Business

Not sure I follow some of these comments except Bob's from Edgartown. Bob is correct, waste of taxpayers money for an SUP that is dangerous that i've been reading for years by Mr. Brunelle.

Others said they should "bury utilities" and the town didn't know what "lurks underneath". Both the State and the town knew and it was to problematic to overcome now so the State is going to address it in 15years when then raise the road. Buried utility lines were never part of the project. Nothing in inferior about the State project, roads gets fixed, sidewalks widened for tourists coming off of Packers dock can walk to town and the passengers from SSA to Vineyard Harbor Motel won't have to walk in the street. TizKid, What don't you get about Beach Road being a State Road and it is being fixed?

Owning a business along Beach Road, I applaud the Selectman for doing what is right and supporting my business during all this construction. Less is truly best and keeps this island becoming Urbanized at a speedier pace. SUP never work in an industrially zoned area with MAJOR truck and vehicle traffic. Stupid plan to have been supported years ago. Much better outcome now.

Lorraine Edgartown

Good comments, Understandable. I have done business there for decades; never had a problem coming and going. SUP not a good plan for that area; everyone slow down, be a mannerly driver, biker, walker, jogger, etc., and everything will be fine. I am enamored of that stretch of road and the businesses there, working waterfront is what it has been, what it is and IMHO, should remain. I agree with your comment about the island becoming Urbanized. Change is bound to come but at what cost? I fail to understand why the island should be altered for a few months of tourists, granted, year rounders ride bikes, jog, walk, etc., but I like it the way it is and so do many others.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 18:43

Permalink

meonmv VH

Stop knocking Tisbury! We bear the brunt of year round traffic and the negative comments are so disheartening and uncalled for. Not one of you has a solution.
I am glad the SUP plan is dead. Having driven often on a narrow road with an SUP, I can tell you they are a disaster, with people on bikes and pedestrians weaving around each other and getting in front of vehicular traffic. It is much better for all traffic traveling in the same direction to stay on the same side of the road. The Tisbury Selectmen made the right call. Thank you.
Burying the utility lines would add an even greater measure of safety.
Another problem is the number of curb cuts, which should be limited to one per property, with the exception of gas stations.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/14/2021 - 20:21

Permalink

Mike Somewhere

May be a good time to do really forward thinking here. Yes to side walks that are needed. Yes to some sort of Bike lanes. Yes to much needed infrastructure replacements. Yes to - Here it comes - A Boardwalk from the SSA to Packers, taking advantage of the potential of the waterfront you have. This kind of opportunity does not grow on trees folks. Once in a - Never - . Tisbury should buy the DeSorcy lots and do a real Harbor development, with a Ship Building Company, News Paper, Hotel, Restaurants, Park - already there. What are you waiting for? The next generation? Forward Ho!

Why if Oak Bluffs

I like your comments and thought provoking ideas. I do not agree with the "tisbury should buy desorcy". Taking more properties off the tax roles is not in the best interest of the town, especially when the properties we're talking about are (or could be) some of the highest taxable properties. A private company WILL come on to the scene, purchase the properties and then look toward the town to assist them with their plans to monetize the properties for themselves and a public benefit. Maybe a waterside walking pier would happen, maybe something we're not even thinking about materializes and the area becomes a clean, productive revenue source for the property owners and the town. I think the current climate in Tisbury is one of excitement , like an artist with a blank canvas, it can only get better with a good painter and paint. The next generation is here and I agree with you Mike, time is perfect for all of the change we've been talking about for years.

mike Somewhere

Why, The town would monetize the properties by the rents paid by the additional commercial properties created. This could be big bucks. Unless the existing properties are tax exempt they would be paying their taxes too. Many waterfront developments are city or even state funded or owned. Leasing commercial spaces to businesses that fit the planned use model programming. It's really time for clear planning for the future of the Harbor potential while the opportunity exists. Float a Harbor Development Bond. Would not be able to be administered by the current governing group though - that would be a disaster. A Harbor / Beach Road Development Department would need to be formed reporting to the MVC.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/16/2021 - 05:59

Permalink

David Forbes Lagoon Pond

Town officers and business owners abutting beach road appear not to recognize the realities of impending impacts from climate change. Without dramatic improvements, Beach road will become impassable in high tides, and access to MV hospital will be seriously compromised. Our house is on fire. We can’t really afford to debate the budgetary consideration involved in calling the fire department.

Understandable Vineyard Haven Business

With all due respect the businesses abutting Beach Road, recognize the realities of climate change, we live it daily. Dramatic improvements as you put it were not part on this plan from MA DOT to address what is needed to combat the reality of climate change in this area. Raising of the road bed would not occur for another 15 years, drainage is being addressed and a promise by MADOT, for what it is worth, to keep it maintained. Your argument about the hospital is not an issue as those of us that have lived here for years understand there is an alternate route to get to the hospital, remember the bridge project? I am sorry Mr. Forbes but we can't afford to have another summer or two (project life) like the year we just went through with the pandemic. The interruption to all of our businesses down along Beach Road, both accessibility wise and disconnection of water and sewer, would have killed many businesses in town. God forbid anyone's house is on fire, that is a horrible analogy.

The reality is, just because you're wealthy enough to afford the "budgetary" increase in your taxes, does not mean everyone else is. I repeat my gratitude for the Selectboard in making this wise decision.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/16/2021 - 16:50

Permalink

tisbury5 Tisbury

I for one am very happy the proposed plan is dead. I find it interesting that Mr. Ben Robinson is worried about giving up millions of dollars for a project he helped PUSH but thought nothing of giving up 14 million or so dollars for the new school project. This project was not good for the businesses on Beach Road nor was it good for our town. Thank you, select board, for your insightful position on this project and for being brave enough to halt it when you did. The widened sidewalks and directional bike lanes will be awesome and I as a biker look forward to using them.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.