Tisbury Selectmen Back Shipyard Expansion

<p>In the face of growing opposition to a major expansion project at the Martha&rsquo;s Vineyard Shipyard, Tisbury selectmen voted Wednesday night to send a letter of support to the shipyard.</p>

In the face of growing opposition to a major expansion project at the Martha’s Vineyard Shipyard, Tisbury selectmen voted Wednesday night to send a letter of support to the owners of the shipyard.

More than 75 people attended the meeting at the Katharine Cornell Theatre, filling seats and perched along stairways.

Most were there to urge selectmen not to back the shipyard expansion plan, which includes a 48-vessel marina on Lagoon Pond.

Selectmen have no regulatory authority over the project, but shipyard owners Phil and James Hale had asked the board earlier this month to write them a letter of support before the project goes in front of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission for review as a development of regional impact (DRI). An exhaustive review is expected by the commission, which has the plan but has not set a hearing date yet. The plan will further require review by a large number of state and federal agencies.

A letter of support from the selectmen that had been drafted earlier by town administrator John W. (Jay) Grande was made available at the meeting.

“The selectmen are pleased to see your investment and confidence in Tisbury’s and the Island’s future,” it reads in part. “The project is under review by no less than nine local, state and federal agencies and we expect them to find a net improvement over existing environmental conditions,” it continues. “Your success is critical to preserving a viable and prosperous working waterfront for the Island.”

On Wednesday critics were many, but selectmen had limited the number of speakers to four.

Lagoon Pond Association president Doug Reece said while not every member of his organization was against the plan, the group’s petition opposing the development has gathered 1,900 signatures.

Mr. Reece said he applauded the Hales for responding to earlier concerns from environmental groups by adding mitigation measures to their plan.

But he also cited a November letter from the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries recommending the Hales consider relocating the project to the Vineyard Haven inner harbor, in order to protect shellfishing in what’s called the west arm of Lagoon Pond.

“That’s one pretty impressive statement,” Mr. Reece said.

“Secondly, it’s our opinion that adding another marina in the west arm will forever alter the health of the pond,” he said.

Emma Green-Beach of the Martha’s Vineyard Shellfish Group also expressed strong concern for the health of the fishery in the west arm.

“It’s one of the most productive areas in Tisbury and in the Lagoon,” she said, citing the shallow waters where families can dipnet for bay scallops.

Even the most meticulously maintained vessels and vehicles shed toxins that threaten the way shellfish develop, she said.

“In supporting this project . . . you’re making

a choice,” she told selectmen. “If we have to make a choice to support private business and recreational boats, then we are choosing these things over traditional shellfisheries and the hard-working watermen.”

Gerard Hokanson of Tisbury Waterways Inc., a nonprofit concerned with clean water in the town’s estuaries and harbor, suggested the proposed stormwater mitigations — permeable gravel pavement and waterside plantings — are insufficient to protect water quality.

“They simply don’t work well near the water’s edge because of the high water table along the shoreline,” Mr. Hokanson said.

Shelly Edmundson, executive director of the Martha’s Vineyard Fishermen’s Preservation Trust, added her concerns.

“I wanted . . . just to say a few things for all the fishermen in the room,” Ms. Edmundson said, reading from a letter that echoed concerns expressed by earlier speakers.

“We believe this project is a direct threat to the diversified occupations that make up our working waterfront tradition and our community at large,” Ms. Edmundson said.

“We do not want to see the many livelihoods endangered for the benefit of one business and the convenience of a collection of recreational boaters.”

There was no public discussion of the matter, and selectman Melinda Loberg reminded the group that a full public hearing will eventually be held in front of the MVC.

“The board of selectmen does not review this project,” she said. “As soon as they [the shipyard owners] apply for a permit they are sent to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission,” she continued.

“That is why we are not holding a public hearing, because public hearings will be a matter of course.”

Mrs. Loberg thanked the audience members for coming.

“I encourage you to attend the [Martha’s Vineyard] commission hearing,” she said.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 07:56

Permalink

Katherine Scott Tisbury

"“I wanted . . . just to say a few things for all the fishermen in the room,” Ms. Edmundson said, reading from a letter that echoed concerns expressed by earlier speakers.

“We believe this project is a direct threat to the diversified occupations that make up our working waterfront tradition and our community at large,” Ms. Edmundson said.

“We do not want to see the many livelihoods endangered for the benefit of one business and the convenience of a collection of recreational boaters.”"

Amen to that.
Shame on the selectmen for putting themselve on the record on the wrong side of this.
Or any side at all, at this point.
The Lagoon Pond is one of Tisbury's "gems," in the Visioning parlance.
It is a balm to the eye and to the soul.
Please do not wreck it for motor boaters.
Expand on the Inner Harbor. Or not at all.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 08:08

Permalink

ECS Ft Lauderdale / Edgartown

Would like to see a map diagram of the plan published large enough to clearly understand the location.

Jacqueline l. McGillicuddy 15 wayland Ave, Oak Bluffs, Ma. 02557

I would like to see a map of the location they want. I would not like to see are fishermen hurt financially.48 slips is a lot.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 09:02

Permalink

Rich Weiss Oak Bluffs

Loberg, Rogers and Krystal seem to think it’s ok to say the Tisbury BOS are not a regulatory agency; does not review these types of projects and barely allows any public opposing views but believes it’s perfectly ethical to write a letter of “strong support” for the marina even though, you know, Tisbury BOS really has no dog in this fight. The hypocrisy is criminal.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 09:32

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

There he goes again the president of this association also went after the asphalt plant and getting them to make changes to the plant which cost everybody on the island hundreds of thousands of dollars over a period of time. Now he wants to ruin more of the island economy. These people only want to believe in their science and no one else’s science. This plan when it’s all said and done will be a benefit to the lagoon and the island economy. Those boat slips will fill up in a nanosecond which shows the demand our tourism industry needs. Kill tourism kill the island.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 10:34

Permalink

gina Menemsha/ NYC

It will be interesting to see how the MVC reviews this Marina Project.. IMO it will be allowed but in a scaled down version.. 48 slips is quite a lot for that small shoreline.. It will certainly keep the Drawbridge busy..

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 12:48

Permalink

Vasha Brunelle VH

The Shipyard claims they will protect the waters of the Lagoon.. hmmm. Several years they chopped down a beautiful mature honey locust which graced the front of their property, and had been planted over 40 years ago with all of the others along Beach Rd by the Friends of Tisbury. The excuse was to make more space, and the destroying of the tree was sanctioned by a former short-term head of the Tisbury DPW. Stewards of the environment?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 18:15

Permalink

Ticked off Oak Bluffs

All the upgrades are not beneficial to us as islanders.
The fishing industry will be impacted, as well as the folks who rely on that for income. The scenery will be ruined. Such an impact will reduce those who come here to view our Island's beauty.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/01/2020 - 22:50

Permalink

martha edgartown

The Island doesn't need more tourism. There comes a point where the goose that laid all the golden eggs for everyone is cooked. Save the fishermen forget increasing tourism.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 02/02/2020 - 09:42

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

Hope the MVC shuts this down, I am not convinced that there will be any benefit to the island that will outweigh the environmental damage.

Kathleen Tilton Chilmark

Well said Mark.
There will be no benefit to the island public, this only benefits the Hales. More boats more people = more problems more pollution.
What about the people who value the natural beauty of the lagoon? How does money outweigh that? More money seems to be the mantra now. More money does not benefit me or my children.
Clean water to swim in and drink is what benefits some of us.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.