At Norton Point beach shorebirds share space with over-sand vehicles, creating a need for careful management.
Lanny McDowell

Some Fee Hikes Approved for OSVs at Norton Point Beach

<p>Fees are going up for over-sand vehicle permits, as the Trustees of Reservations work to enhance stewardship and generate more revenue for the fragile barrier beach. The county commission approved hikes to annual permits, but held off on approval for daily pass increases.</p>

Fees are going up for over-sand vehicle permits at Norton Point beach, as the Trustees of Reservations work to enhance stewardship and generate more revenue for managing the constantly-changing barrier beach.

After discussion with Trustees superintendent Christopher Kennedy this week, the county commission approved hike to annual permits this week, but held off on approval for daily pass increases.

The county owns the beach at the eastern end of Katama in Edgartown and contracts with the Trustees to manage it. In spring, summer and fall plovers, terns and other nesting shorebirds share the beach with fishermen, birdwatchers and picnickers, most of them driving and over-sand vehicles.

Mr. Kennedy’s original proposal, which includes hikes to both daily and annual permits, would generate $31,000 in additional revenues for the Trustees, he said.

Trustees superintendent Chris Kennedy said more shorebirds are expected this year on the beach, which has increased in size.
Lanny McDowell
Trustees superintendent Chris Kennedy said more shorebirds are expected this year on the beach, which has increased in size.
Lanny McDowell

With the vote, the annual resident pass for Norton Point will go up from $70 to $90. The nonresident pass will go from $120 to $140. A permit for both Norton Point and Chappaquiddick will go from $235 to $250, while the nonresident version goes from $285 to $300.

The permit fees have been the same for four years, Mr. Kennedy said, while costs have increased. The beach, which has been disconnected from Chappaquiddick since the breach occurred in a storm six years ago, has grown by three-quarters of a mile, and more shorebirds are expected to occupy the beach. Mr. Kennedy said he plans to hire additional personnel this summer.

His initial proposal would also double the fees for daily passes for residents and nonresidents, closing the gap between the daily and yearly passes. A resident day pass would go from $24 to $50, and the nonresident pass would increase from $35 to $60 per day.

“The goal here in having a sizable increase in the pass is to try and urge people to become annual pass holders,” Mr. Kennedy explained. He said the pass was never intended to be a bargain day at the beach. “The hope has always been trying to get people to become true stewards of the property, so this is really an attempt to try and get that to happen,” he said.

He said daily pass holders are typically people who cause the most issues for the Trustees.

“We are finding that increasingly the complaints we get, involving lewd and lascivious behavior, potential drug use, parties involving alcohol, inevitably involve the day pass people,” he said.

But county commissioner and board chairman Leonard Jason Jr. voted against the increases. “I think the local residents are taking it on the chin,” he said. “I think we are making a terrible mistake.”

The commission will discuss the day pass hikes at a meeting on May 14.

In other business at their meeting Wednesday, the commission voted to recognize the county manager’s ex-officio membership on the airport commission, which is spelled out in the county’s administrative code.

Mr. Jason said he had learned last week that county manager Martina Thornton had been denied access to at least one executive session at the airport. The vote was an attempt to underscore her place at the table as a nonvoting commission member.

“She shouldn’t be banned from attending a meeting,” Mr. Jason said. “She should be sitting at a meeting like it always was.”

Commissioner Tristan Israel agreed but said he wasn’t sure a vote was necessary since Ms. Thornton’s position on the commission was already official. He said he had no interest in micro-managing the airport.

“Obviously we have had some issues in the past couple of weeks and I have expressed my opinions about past events on the airport commission but I have no interest in us being involved in how that commission conducts their airport business,” Mr. Israel said. He said Ms. Thornton already attends the meetings. “I think it stirs up things that are not necessary at this point. I don’t think we should inject ourselves into the running of the airport. I am comfortable with the arrangement as it is.”

Two weeks ago the county commission ousted two members of the airport commission and replaced them with new appointees.

Commissioner Thomas Hallahan said Ms. Thornton had been admonished at an airport commission meeting for attempting to speak quietly to another person. “It was not necessary and I think it rather embarrassed her position so the position isn’t always respected,” he said.

Ms. Thornton was not present at the meeting. Later, county treasurer Noreen Mavro-Flanders said by phone that Ms. Thornton had been denied entry to more than one executive session and had not been granted copies of airport meeting materials in advance of the meetings.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/28/2014 - 06:18

Permalink

concerned tisbury

I think that the tourists should pay most of the rate hike. I watched this meeting and don't see what the big deal is with 'Ms. Thornton sitting as an ex officio on their board. She cannot vote. As Norm Perry stated in the County Commissioners meeting, "it was always that way when Winn Davis was county manager". It only changed when Russ Smith decided he didn't want to go. What is the airport hiding? How would the airport commission feel if Sean Flynn went to a county commission meeting and was embarrassed and treated like a child for no reason? Time for that group with all their secrets to come out. Good for the County Commissioners to try to protect county assets cuz if the airport ever did start losing money like they did years ago, the County, I.e. tax payers would have to pay their HUGE salaries. Also like another reader said,where does the FFA and the MDOR get their money, TAX PAYERS! So for Sean Flynn to say they don't need tax payers money to survive is another stretch of the truth.

Mel Shatcher West Palm Beach

Tourists? Without our money, your Island would be a ghost town.
The fish are gone. The beaches are disapearing. Big money for gas. Don't lose the "tourists"

BG Edg

You are wrong. Sean is correct. MA aeronautics gets fees from aircraft owners via registration of their aircraft. The FAA funding is from USERS of the airports in the USA. The funds come from taxes on jet fuel, avgas,and Federal excise tax on airline tickets or air-taxi charters in aircraft above 6000 lbs. All of the money and profit generated at the airport MUST remain at the airport. Its part of the FAA 'grant assurances' that must be adhered to when accepting FAA funds and when the title to the land was transferred. Even if you do not fly your own plane or get on an airline, you benefit from this via the airport business park. No money generated at the airport can be used for any other county business other than the airport itself.

concerned tisbury

If all is true about the FAA why do they have problems when the federal government shuts down. If they are totally self sufficient, why would a shut down affect them Sean? Just wondering.

Mike H Mass

“Tourists” should pay the bulk? We typically are there for a week or two yet still pay close to $300 for the same stickers that the Island folks use for months of use ( and they pay less which is fine). If you raise the rates for off islanders even further you eventually will see fewer and fewer people buying as the economics simply don’t work for people visiting for a short time. ( sure you can argue that's not a bad thing either ). How about a pay as you go - a sticker cost of $100 with a fee daily for beach entry? That puts the costs where they should belong – people using the permits the most. Call it pay as you go. Many towns in Mass do this for their transfer station use with great success. I'll gladly pay the increase as we greatly enjoy the beauty of Chappy but don't hit me harder for the short time I am there.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/28/2014 - 10:28

Permalink

Fred Davis Edgartown

The fees should have an annual increase tied to the cost of living.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/28/2014 - 11:10

Permalink

Reviewer

About time for the next County review commission I believe. Commissioners are once again pulling shady moves again now that some good commissioners have left and are leaving the new and newer ones left over are inexperienced, looking to pad their narcissistic resumes especially Christine Todd who at the last County commissioners meeting excitedly and laughed while raising her hand when the chairman asked who wants to go after the airport commissioners?
Also no mention of dogs being brought on Norton Point and I agree stop killing the islanders. When I was a kid it was all free and the beach was available 24/7 365 days a year! I am totally sickened what has happened to our island, oops this island - not our island any more!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/28/2014 - 12:41

Permalink

Priced out of a vacation CT

I liked it better before the Trustees got thier hands on it. Why do I have to pay more to prove my "stewardship"? So they can get new trucks to sit in? First they overpriced Wasque now they are doing it to South Beach. Think I'll start looking at RI or the Cape. Between the ferry and the beach pass I'll have an extra 300 in my pocket to sink into the local economy.

Kate West Tisbury

Then that'll be one less of the entitled who doesn't give a crap about the Vineyard. Bad-mouthing a non-profit that struggles to pay a staff on one of the most threatened and rapidly eroding parts of the New England coast because you don't think they're doing enough to make it more Rhode Island-like? Sounds like the Jersey shore might be more your cup of tea.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/29/2014 - 10:13

Permalink

James P Edg/New Haven

Eliminate day passes altogether. Where in the world does all the money they collect go??

Stacey V.

Think about how much it must cost to have staff on the beach with winch trucks available to pull out all the people who get stuck. If it weren't for the trustees you would be paying upwards of $250 to have a tow truck drive out to get you. Not to mention the other trustees properties on the vineyard, like Mytoi and Menemsha Hills, that are 100% free to go to and probably have huge maintenance costs that are supported by beach sticker sales. They also work with all the island schools doing free educational programs, so we should all appreciate at least some of the work they're doing on the island.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/30/2014 - 06:52

Permalink

Priced out of a vacation, CT CT

Sorry about bad mouthing the Trustees, I know they do some very good work. My-Toi is one of the most beautiful places on the island. Its just frustrating that everything keeps going up except my paycheck. If I didn't care about the Vineyard I wouldn't even take the time to comment. I have to scrape and save all year just to get a week or less on island. $60 a day!!?? Come on! How about $100 a week(7 Days-in line with most vacations) for off islanders and no daily passes. That way you limit traffic and the pricing becomes more in line with any of the major New England beaches daily weekend price. Also those that are willing to fork it over are more likely to be either avid sportsmen or conservationists that appreciate the access to such a wonderful resource and won't trash it for fear of losing it.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.