The approximately $50 million overhaul of the Martha’s Vineyard Airport terminal, which is being sought to enclose the departures area and give more space to federal security screeners, is scheduled to start on Oct. 20.
The approximately $50 million overhaul of the Martha’s Vineyard Airport terminal is set to start later this month, a milestone in a project that has been kicked around for about a decade.
The construction, which is being sought to enclose the departures area and give more space to federal security screeners, is scheduled to start on Oct. 20. The airport is planning to renovate about 5,000 square feet of the existing terminal and add about 15,000 square feet — nearly doubling the size of the current building.
The project got a major boost last year when the airport received a $15 million grant from the Federal Aviation Administration, and officials are excited it is finally coming to fruition.
“We’re really looking forward to it,” said Bob Rosenbaum, the chair of the airport commission. “It will be a really nice addition. It will make everything more comfortable and efficient.”
The current terminal was built in 1998, straddling the West Tisbury and Edgartown town line. Within just a few years though, it was obsolete due to the changes in airport security that came from the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.
“We’ve been struggling really since then,” said Geoff Freeman, the director of the airport.
Agents with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) have been crammed in a small area, and using equipment that wasn’t designed for the terminal. That has often led to long lines at the terminal, which can see tens of thousands of commercial flight passengers go through it in any given summer month.
Under the new plan, the TSA screening area will be moved to the other side of the terminal, near where the rental car agencies and baggage claim currently sit. TSA will now have room for two screening lines, which the airport hopes can cut back on lines in the summer months.
“It’s not a very good space and it’s really crowded,” Mr. Freeman said.
The construction comes as the airport has experienced a record number of passengers in recent years. In 2024, nearly 82,000 people flew on commercial flights in and out of the airport, setting a new high.
Those passengers are also increasingly coming on larger aircraft, adding to the logjams. When the terminal was built, the average aircraft carried about 46 people. That’s now climbed to 140 people.
A significant portion of the addition will also be to enclose the departure area, which currently consists of a tent and porta-potties next to the tarmac. Because the departure area is outside, people often will come back into the terminal if there is inclement weather, meaning they have to go through the TSA check point again.
This again contributes to headaches at the screening portion, according to Mr. Rosenbaum. Some people will also not get into line if the weather’s hot until the last minute, and they can end up missing flights.
“It’s just really been not good and people not wanting to go sit out in the tent on a hot day,” Mr. Rosenbaum said. “Post-screen hold room will now actually be pleasant.”
Construction is expected to be completed in May 2028, according to Mr. Freeman, and it will run in several phases to work around the busy summer season. Work will start with underground infrastructure, such as piping and conduits while the weather is still good.
Among the other changes will be a new stormwater filtration system, and changing the current heating from oil to propane.
Parking lot A, a long-term lot at the terminal, will be closed for about two years during construction and will act as a staging area. Parking will be shifted to parking lots B and C, both of which are under utilized, according to Mr. Freeman.
Mr. Freeman emphasized that the project is not designed to attract more air traffic. Instead, it’s aimed at improving the experience for the existing passengers.
“The runway is not being lengthened...It is really to help with the passenger experience and flow of the terminal,” he said.
The project will also not cost Island residents more in local taxes, as it is being paid through federal and state grants, as well as the airport’s own budget.
“We don’t take local tax assessments from the county,” Mr. Freeman said.
Though officials are ready for construction to start, another long-term plan to build a new air traffic control tower has been shelved by federal officials. Mr. Freeman said the project was indefinitely tabled due to a lack of funding and the cost of design.
This will not change the design of the airport addition, though the airport would have gained some extra space if the tower had been moved.
“We are building as we would regardless of if it happened or not,” Mr. Freeman said.

Comments
Can we please, please, please
Mr. B ChilmarkCan we please, please, please do what is necessary to get a right-turn lane added to the airport's exit?
I second that concept. VH
Paul Adler ChilmarkI second that concept. VH also needs two circles or traffic lights.
Do you see the green plastic
Tim Johnson TisburyDo you see the green plastic box in the grass to the right as you exit the airport? Thet is a large telephone wire junction box I am told. It was nocked off for some time and it has many telephone lines inside it. likely, it would be less expensive if they went around it and avoided the cost of moving it.
2 lanes would be twice as
Tom Engley West Tisbury2 lanes would be twice as dangerous that’s two times more accidents. Round about is the answer a big one.
YES! So much needless backup
Chris Daly AquinnahYES! So much needless backup for those waiting to turn right.
The Airport has been working
GFreeman AirportThe Airport has been working on the release of an environmental easement in that location that is held by the DCR (state forest). The easement prohibits any changes. As noted in the MVY Environmental Impact Report/Assessment published in 2021, the airport has been working on solutions in that area. There is a State legislative process, Article 97, that we have been working on with several State agencies over the past several years.
We need to improve the
Bob EdgartownWe need to improve the entrance and exit experience to this airport for the passengers and public as well. A right hand turn out of the airport seems like a no-brainer and why it wasn’t done 15 years ago is still a black mark on the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and State planners who overlook traffic on the island. Better yet utilize the existing back road out of the airport onto the business park.
Expanding the airport
Tom B West TisburyExpanding the airport footprint is a massive mistake. Basically the only thing that the airport can control is capacity. It seems like the commission and airport manager think that lengthening the runway is the only thing that would increase capacity — but for some reason not also building a terminal to allow more passenger capacity. If you believe that the airport doesn’t intend to continue to expand and increase air traffic with this “upgrade” then I don’t know what to tell you. Also the claim that this project will not cost the taxpayers any money is predicated on airlines continuing to fly here and pay the passenger facility charge to the airport. If the airlines were to stop flying here for whatever reason, MVY and by extension Dukes County taxpayers would be on the hook for the project.
The terminal capacity is for
facts matter mvyThe terminal capacity is for the convenience of the passengers. Right now, airliners must wait at the end of the taxiway "A" for a gate, while inconveniencing passengers and wasting fuel in the process. The size of the terminal has ZERO bearing upon air traffic. As a professional pilot for 45+ years and thousands of hours, NOT ONCE did a passenger say 'lets fly to xxx airport since they have a nice new terminal and updated bathrooms'. The project is paid for with FEDERAL dollars, collected from USERS of the airspace NATIONWIDE. Airline passengers pay a ticket tax on all flights NATIONWIDE. A passenger facility charge collected is miniscule. Private, corporate and charter aicraft pay a fuel tax. ALL aircraft pay landing fees. The money is collected NATIONWIDE and distributed by the FAA as needed. Your comment that taxpayers would be 'on the hook' is NOT accurate.
This is factually untrue, the
Tom B West TisburyThis is factually untrue, the one thing the airport has control over is the flow of people through the airport. Therefore by increasing the SIZE of the terminal it also increases CAPACITY. You should also probably read the article before responding - it’s not paid for solely by federal dollars the airport had to take out a loan to cover the cost of construction. One that they will be required to pay back and in the current political/economic climate it is not guaranteed that it is paid back with PFC or other federal revenue sources. In regards to where passengers decide to fly, you may think it has nothing to do with the airport amenities, but this is also not true. Airports and airlines manufacture demand and creating a bigger more inviting terminal increases the likelihood that airlines will fly here.
What is our end game here?
Pearl WTWhat is our end game here? When does someone say enough is enough? It is no longer enjoyable to live here. Maybe not even to visit? At least for the people we once attracted. Neighborly, quaint, calm are all words of the past. Oh I know, don't let the door hit me on the way out, right? If you don't think it's ruined, you ruined it.
The best way to decrease the
Robert Brown EdgartownThe best way to decrease the traffic issues would be the SSA to stop bringing so many vehicles over from Woods Hole
Shrink the SSA?
Albert GosnoldShrink the SSA?
Raise the rates?
Whatever it takes to thin the
Robert Brown EdgartownWhatever it takes to thin the heard
This is very exciting FM is a
Chris Huff Vineyard Haven/ RoslindaleThis is very exciting FM is a great FIRM. They do incredible work and have a strong history in airport architecture. I am very glad they were awarded this project. I look forward to watching this progress.
Okay... that's great the
Anonymous Islander EdgartownOkay... that's great the airport will be updated but what about the traffic? No mention of that???
Add new comment