In the first night of a double-barreled Tisbury town meeting Tuesday, voters passed an amended leaf blower bylaw, scaled back plans for new moorings, and shot down a $450,000 warrant article for renovations to the house at Tashmoo Spring.
In the first night of a double-barreled Tisbury town meeting Tuesday, voters passed an amended leaf blower bylaw, scaled back plans for new moorings in town waterways and shot down a $450,000 warrant article for renovations to the house at Tashmoo Spring.
The annual town meeting continues Wednesday at 7 p.m. in the Tisbury School gymnasium.
After a motion to table the leaf blower article failed to muster the required two-thirds majority in a standing vote, Tisbury became the fifth Island town to approve a ban on gas leaf blowers, which will go into effect in 2028.
Until then, voters accepted an amendment to the article, banning the use of gas-powered leaf blowers on Sundays and federal holidays. Activity will also be restricted from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday. Use will also be limited to March 15 to May 31, and Oct. 15 through Jan. 15.
Electric leaf blowers are unaffected by the new bylaw, which was opposed by Tisbury residents including Kirk Metell, head of the town’s public works department.
The bylaw won’t make Tisbury any quieter, Mr. Metell said, because the volume of sound produced by electric-powered leaf blowers is indiscernibly less than that of gas-powered blowers.
“We’re saying that you are able to use battery power whenever you want, but yet you want it to be quiet. That’s not going to happen in this town, I’m sorry,” he said.
The bylaw will be costly as well, with batteries for electric blowers costing as much as an entire gas blower, he said.
“Each battery is about $200, and [they] only last about a half hour,” he said, raising the prospect of bringing a gas-powered generator to the cemetery to charge electric blowers on site.
“This does not work for my department — and it does not work for me, as a person who only has the Sundays to work around my house,” Mr. Metell said.
Margot Sharff, who organized a petition to bring the leaf blower bylaw to voters, said other people who only have time off on Sundays and federal holidays would like to enjoy their homes in peaceful quiet.
Dan Doyle stood up to back the amendment.
“I support the Sunday no-blow zone,” he said.
“If it passes, I bet we’re going to enjoy quiet headspace even more than we think [and] nobody’s saying ‘Don’t rake your leaves.’ Just don’t make a racket,” Mr. Doyle said.
Turning to the harbor, voters weighed an amendment to an article proposing to install 35 new moorings, changing the number to 10. The decision required a standing count tallied at 59 to 56 in favor of the amendment.
Lynn Fraker, who proposed the amendment, said the town does not yet have the ability to manage the larger quantity of additional moorings.
“To install this number of moorings without solid planning is reckless,” she said, noting that a new harbor master, Michael Gately, is starting next week.
Former Tisbury harbor master Gary Kovack, who submitted the warrant article before leaving to become harbor master in Edgartown, said the money ($100,000) would be well spent on 35 moorings that could bring in rental fees for years to come.
“They’re going to create revenue sooner than later than they’re going to pay for themselves. And then after that, they’re going to keep creating revenue for the town,” Mr. Kovack said.
Tisbury voters also were divided on the select board’s $450,000 proposal to upgrade the Tashmoo Spring residence for occupancy by recently-hired town administrator Joseph LaCivita and his wife. Mr. LaCivita’s compensation from the town currently includes a $36,000 housing allowance, which would end if he moves into a Tisbury-owned residence, select board chair John Cahill said.
After Mr. LaCivita’s tenure, the house could continue to be used for employee housing, Mr. Cahill said.
“We made the decision that we wanted to move into the area of municipal housing. This is our first venture, and I think it’s not going to be our last,” he said.
The $450,000 request includes funds to replace and upgrade the septic system, which would benefit the entire Tashmoo Spring site, Mr. Cahill said.
The renovation also would be a good investment for the town, said Alex Meleney, a member of the finance and advisory committee, which recommended the article.
“We [would] have a usable asset rather than a run-down building,” Mr. Meleney said.
Ruth Konigsberg, the sole fincom member who opposed the article, said she didn’t see the upside.
“In order to make back the $450,000 that we wouldn’t be spending to renovate this place, [Mr. LaCivita] would have to stay here for 10-plus years,” Ms. Konigsberg said.
A standing vote count found 68 against the article and 51 in favor.
Most other articles on the Tisbury special and annual town meeting warrants passed Tuesday with little discussion and no controversy, but a mass departure of voters following the Tashmoo Spring article led Ms. Medders to call for a head count to see if the town’s quorum of 100 was still present.
Finding only 97 voters still in the gym, she adjourned the town meeting to Wednesday, when it will resume with warrant article 18.

Comments
I believe Tisbury residents
Kate Shands TisburyI believe Tisbury residents made a poor decision at Town Meeting last night in voting agaist the $450,000 renovation to the Tashmoo Spring Building house, which could have housed our new Town Administrator. Here are my reasons:
1. As we all know, we have a housing crisis on this island. As Select Board members John Cahill and Cristina Colarusso pointed out, developing municipal housing in Tisbury is a good idea and would be a step toward addressing that crisis.
2. Our new Town Administrator, Joe LaCivita, demonstrated the kind of creative thinking that we need in Tisbury in proposing that the Town renovate the house as a home for him in the short run and for future Town employees in the long run. If he were to live there for 10 years, the Town would save 10 years of his $36,000 annual housing allowance, totaling $360,000, and yielding a net cost for the renovation of $90,000. His proposal demonstrated a propensity for thinking outside the box and putting the Town’s interests first, something I think our citizens failed to appreciate.
3. Not renovating that house now, as John Cahill pointed out, will continue the Town’s deplorable record of failing to maintain Town buildings and incurring greater costs in the future, as we have unfortunately seen with the school and the library.
4. Finally, in contrast to the arguments made by Tristan Israel and Henry Stephenson, and having been involved in setting up a library findraising event at the Tashmoo Spring Building, I don’t believe that occupancy of that house would have a significant impact on events at the Tashmoo Springs Building or the public park surrounding it.
This is spot on. Well said.
BenThis is spot on. Well said. The carrying costs now of that building are locked in and it will also lose further value over time.
Who gets a housing allowance
Peter VHWho gets a housing allowance in the private sector?? No one. This is ridiculous. Why should wee be paying for that? I can see maybe travel expenses, ferry etc… but housing allowance?
Private sector jobs pay more
David EDGPrivate sector jobs pay more than public sector jobs, so you’re comparing apples to oranges. It’s impossible enough for municipalities to attract talent, and then you factor in a housing crisis is an area where affordable homes are nonexistent.
That is not true anymore,
Jason EdgartownThat is not true anymore, Maybe 20-30 years ago. You add in all the perks, pensions etc… you make much much more in the public sector.
That is a fact.
David, you are not correct.
Grace MVDavid, you are not correct. The public sector you have pension, most cases a job for life, plenty of perks days off vacation etc…you add all that up the public sector is the best deal. There are plenty of people wanting the public sector jobs. We don’t need to be paying their housing as well.
Why do you thi
Should the town be
Born & Raised Vineyard HavenShould the town be responsible for accommodating every new employee they bring over from the mainland?
No! We should not be paying
Ben VhNo! We should not be paying housing expenses!
If Tisbury is willing to give
Joe TisburyIf Tisbury is willing to give an 18% housing allowance to the town administrator then they should be willing to do this for all town employees.
The taxpayers shouldn’t be
Mark EdgartownThe taxpayers shouldn’t be paying for housing for any town employees, how about lowering the tax burden instead.
If the Town manager is
Bob VHIf the Town manager is getting housing allowance, the guy/gal driving the dump truck should as well.
Add new comment