Green Villa would be one of the largest apartment complexes on the Island.

100-Apartment Green Villa Plan Aired at MVC Hearing

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission met Thursday to continue its public hearing on the controversial Green Villa condominium complex, which would create 100 income-restricted ownership apartments and four retail units on Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road in Oak Bluffs.

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission met Thursday to continue its public hearing on the controversial Green Villa condominium complex, which would create 100 income-restricted ownership apartments and four retail units on Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road in Oak Bluffs.

The hearing, which began last month, lasted nearly two and a half hours before hearing officer Doug Sederholm continued it again to next month.

The nearly eight-acre Green Villa property is bounded by Gamba Road to the east, a residential lot to the north and the future Southern Tier apartment complex to the west.

Applicants William Cumming and Chris Miller are seeking a comprehensive permit from Oak Bluffs under the terms of Chapter 40B, a state law that eases some zoning restrictions for developments that include affordable housing.

The town referred the project to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission last year and has been fighting the developers on other fronts, including a lawsuit in Dukes County Superior Court and an appeal to the state’s Housing Appeal Committee over the application of Chapter 40B.

As proposed, Green Villa would deed-restrict the sales of 25 apartments — 21 with one bedroom and four with three bedrooms — to year-round owners earning no more than 80 per cent of the area median income.

The other 75 apartments also would be permanently restricted for year-round occupancy by Island residents, with at least half of them set aside for buyers earning up to 150 per cent of the median income. 

While this income cap does not meet the state’s definition for affordable housing, Mr. Cumming said it provides ownership opportunities for mid-income Islanders who are shut out of the market for existing homes by seasonal residents with deeper pockets.

“The median income to median house price … is distorted on this Island,” he said. “It’s about 13 times house price to median.”

Mr. Cumming and Mr. Miller aim to sell the rest of the Green Villa units — up to 31 one-bedroom apartments and up to six with three bedrooms — to Island businesses for employee housing.

Parking is planned at 210 spaces: 144 for the housing complex and 66 for the commercial buildings fronting Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road.

Short-term rentals of the apartments would be prohibited and a state-certified agent would monitor compliance with the deed restrictions, which would make violators subject to the forced sale of their units.

Green Villa does not qualify for public subsidies, Mr. Cumming said, but it still must meet state requirements under Chapter 40B, such as building some three-bedroom apartments along with the smaller units.

While much of Thursday’s MVC meeting focused on the nuts-and-bolts aspects of the plan, such as building and landscape design, lighting and traffic, it also included a passionate rebuttal of the developers’ proposal by former commissioner Joan Malkin.

“It’s just way, way too big for this Island,” Ms. Malkin said, noting that the next-largest development, nearby Woodside Village with 95 units on seven acres, is tucked back into the woods and not visible from Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road.

Ms. Malkin also disagreed with the developers’ assertion that the housing is for Island residents, saying it would only attract more people to move here from the mainland.

“I’m not saying we should pull up the drawbridge. But it’s more of a question of how much more attractive do you make living here when we don’t have enough space as it is. We don’t have enough resources as it is,” she said.

“We’re going to be widening roads. We’re going to be building their schools. We’re going to be adding rooms onto the hospital … and it’s a problem,” Ms. Malkin said.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 13:46

Permalink

Gina Menemsha/nyc

Oh my build it & they will come is a very bad approach .. Ms Malkin has a valid point. the MV infrastructure can not support a development of this huge build out .. & Reality is that section of Edgartown/VH rd is already over used .. Remember the YMCA is also expanding ..
Yes I know the overall MV population keeps increasing to a year round level. but IMO if Martha keeps building it will tilt the "summer destination" to an unattractive level effecting the Tourism industry. so who will need/live in this over the top development .????

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 16:34

Permalink

Jim H. VH

Please stop over developing MV. The beauty of the island is that it doesn’t look like a monotonous suburb with apartments and condos on every corner.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 18:36

Permalink

Alissa

I am no expert but it looks like a much better location and better value to the island than the proposal for the triangle. It is an enormous amount of affordable housing and the barring of short-term rentals is a great way to ensure that the units are available for working people. The addition of retail units makes this a very desirable place to live if it includes a small grocery mart. Nicely thought out and planned! I would downsize to there when the time comes!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 20:27

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

Does the MVC look at the added traffic from the other projects being built all ready and proposed? It seems to me this road is almost a failed road now and if all of these projects get approved then what. As it is now I have trouble getting a boat reservation in the winter which never was an issue. No question this developer with his other projects will make the island traffic worse if the MVC lets him. And he uses the 40B rule to help him make money to the detriment of the island.

Jim H. VH

Good point on the ferry situation. During the summer the ferries run at essentially 100% capacity with no ability to add additional ferries. That fact alone should put an end to any additional housing or 40B developments. It's literally impossible to add more capacity.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 21:20

Permalink

Carla Cooper

WE NEED HOUSING says everyone. But not here or not there. Come on people, either we build the housing we need or we stop whining about the lack of housing and staffing. This is not “out of scale” with the island. It’s the perfect solution. And what is wrong with attracting people here who can work and provide the services we need? As long as it can be built in a manner that is faithful to island architecture, complies with wastewater standards, and offers some habitat loss mitigation, this seems like a win-win. Honestly, the arguments against this are absurd.

Jean Edgartown

Do we need more affordable housing? We are driving the hand that feeds us away, the tourist. When that happens it will be the opposite, we will have plenty of affordable housing. Because there will be no good paying jobs.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 03/15/2025 - 08:49

Permalink

James Flynn

It’s becoming more and more clear that these boards do not want the working people of Martha’s Vineyard to live on Martha’s Vineyard. The peace and tranquillity of Martha’s Vineyard that my family has enjoyed for the last few hundred years is now gone, we now need to focus on the reality of the situation and house the people that need to be housed and keep the money on island. If we house everyone on island the community benefits. We might have a little more traffic - but in reality it likely will be unnoticeable in every situation but peak times. LET THEM BUILD! These little developments that these boards do approve do next to nothing and aren’t for ownership because the ruling class of Martha’s Vineyard does not want the people below them to own property. We must vote these people out of these positions their agendas are becoming more and more clear based of the actions they make.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 03/15/2025 - 15:25

Permalink

When will people figure it out…

The same boards that deny housing proposals are also the same boards that do the housing that and are the same boards that want to limit tourism. The goal was never housing it’s limiting commerce

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 03/15/2025 - 21:09

Permalink

James Edgartown

Affordable housing begets calls for more affordable housing, more infrastructure, more services, more schools, and of course more taxes. With multiple major developments in planning stages for Down Island towns, one must ask where it ends. Sadly, the Vineyard looks more and more like a generic suburban town with hodgepodge development. The sprint to pave over large swaths of open space will come back to haunt the island when the tourists look elsewhere to spend their money. No one wants to visit a more rundown version of their own hometown while on vacation, despite the Vineyard’s attempts to keep selling its long gone quaint image. Combine overbuilding with the constant SSA woes and we have a perfect storm brewing for economic decline.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 03/16/2025 - 15:52

Permalink

James Oak Blufgs

Run a better Commuter fast ferry system and be done with affordable housing. Half the people don’t want to live on an island anyways.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 03/16/2025 - 20:43

Permalink

Sue iowa

if there’s no where for people to live there all the business will need to close Who’s going to run the towns business

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/17/2025 - 10:02

Permalink

Who really cares EDG

Let's be real. This complex won't hurt anymore than the 1000+ private jets landing in the summer, or the 75+ commercial jets landing each month, along with the 3,000+ cars (who knows the #) coming and going on SSA, let alone the thousand J1 visa workers cramming into every nook and cranny of what housing is available for 6 months. Cry foul about this complex, sure. That's an easy path, when meanwhile the island has tipped (Please reference March 2020) + 5 years ahead and let's not be kidding ourselves here. Denial is a painful truth when it's blatantly self evident. How about we focus on the schools, the children, the community, the beaches and the forest and the bigger picture for once. So many moments of uproar are going nowhere. Let the wind blow, set the sails and for once, just enjoy the ride here. You might just smile.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/17/2025 - 10:41

Permalink

Lifer12 Off-Island

Years-long water bans, ever-worsening traffic/parking issues, outgrowing of schools. Can we please press pause and figure out how to develop responsibly before taking on these massively disruptive projects that can never be undone?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/18/2025 - 06:14

Permalink

Chris OB

Everyone is missing the most vital issue: medical care. When I first moved here in 1997, when you went to the ER, you were seen by a doctor. Now you only get to see a physician’s assistant. And the quality of care has declined. I know that first-hand. Until there is better medical care on the island, i.e. more good doctors, not just PAs & nurses, adding more people is irresponsible.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/18/2025 - 07:55

Permalink

D Vineyard Haven

Why would a development of this size even be considered? This is much too large and not in line with the aesthetics of our beautiful island. Once tourism decreases and businesses begin to close, this will not be needed.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/18/2025 - 10:29

Permalink

Elizabeth Edgartown and NYC

No one is crying about the HUGE memory care facility, that the hospital SOLD. And the proposed 55+ condos to be built at the Triangle, now this.
And always talk of more housing, more upgrades to schools and services, and jobs - or the lack thereof. What Martha's Vineyard needs to do is figure out what Martha's Vineyard is. We can not be all things to all people on a small island with one water source. Nantucket figured it out for themselves - they are a tourist economy - period. Like it or not, it is working for them.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/19/2025 - 12:35

Permalink

Mark Acker VH

I prefer much smaller developments under ten homes. These mega developments just burden the already strained infrastructure and large developments simply don't fit into the rural character of the Island. Reminds us of a Boston suburban development.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.