The housing project would have three duplexes on Lobster Alley.
Courtesy of Tisbury

Neighbors Speak Out Against Cat Hollow Housing Plan

A proposed mixed-income housing development near Veterans Memorial Park in Vineyard Haven is under fire from neighbors, who are asking Tisbury officials not to issue a permit for the project.

A proposed mixed-income housing development near Veterans Memorial Park in Vineyard Haven is under fire from neighbors, who are asking Tisbury officials not to issue a permit for the project.

“The neighborhood is working very hard to push against this,” Susan Lemoie-Zarba told the town planning board Wednesday night, during a discussion on the Cat Hollow apartment complex proposed by the Island Housing Trust.

The trust has proposed building three duplexes on 2.7 acres at 25 Lobster Alley off of Causeway Road. The nonprofit, which purchased the property in 2022, is seeking a general permit from the Tisbury zoning board of appeals under Chapter 40B, a Massachusetts state statute easing some restrictions in local zoning bylaws for construction projects that include affordable housing.

Ms. Lemoie-Zarba and her husband, John Zarba, submitted a neighborhood petition opposing the trust’s application.

“We knocked on a bunch of doors [and] we got 52 signatures in the dead of winter, when half the houses are empty,” Ms. Lemoie-Zarba said. 

“There was only one ‘no,’ and that person sits on a board within the town,” she said.

Their petition lists several points in opposition to the Cat Hollow plan, including impacts on traffic, parking and fire safety, increased noise and light pollution and risks to the health of nearby Lagoon Pond.

Two of the six proposed units at Cat Hollow are reserved for sale to year-round residents earning up to 80 per cent of the area median income and will be counted toward Tisbury’s affordable housing inventory, according to the trust’s application.

Another two apartments will be sold to Islanders earning up to 140 per cent of the area median, and two will be priced for a higher income bracket to be determined by construction costs.

An existing three-bedroom house on the property is leased to the Vineyard Transit Authority, which assisted IHT with the $1.5 million purchase in 2022 and has renovated the residence for transit employee housing.

The town zoning board of appeals voted Jan. 23 to refer the Cat Hollow proposal to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, which is expected to decide this month whether or not to consider it a development of regional impact.

The Tisbury planning board is not directly involved in the permitting process, but can submit its comments to the zoning board of appeals, said Ben Robinson, who chaired Wednesday’s meeting in the absence of Connie Alexander and also sits on the Martha’s Vineyard Commission.

“As we see how this process unfolds at the MVC, we’ll have a better sense of the time frame that the planning board will have,” Mr. Robinson said.

Also Wednesday, the planning board voted to approve Reid (Sam) Dunn’s fine dining restaurant at 75 Main Street, in the former lobby of the historic bank property that Mr. Dunn has developed into a mixed-use condominium complex. 

The proposed restaurant received Martha’s Vineyard Commission approval as a development of regional impact in December, 2024, sending Mr. Dunn back to town authorities to complete the permitting process.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/08/2025 - 06:10

Permalink

Circus VH

I’m sorry but this place is officially a circus show. Time to throw in the towel on housing. For all the effort to be met with all the opposition, how on Earth is this sensible any longer. Shows over folks.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/08/2025 - 07:19

Permalink

Lenny Edgartown

We need to put an immediate moratorium on new housing. We don’t have the infrastructure to support more people, especially more year round people. See the above article on this website about MV losing a major source of primary medical care. We need to recognize that we live on an island and building affordable housing will never solve the problem of access to essential services. The only thing more building does is create more construction jobs (for workers we don’t even have) and further strain our scarce resources.

August Vineyard Haven

We desperately need housing and this is your response? At a time when cops, firefighters, SSA workers, teachers and practically every business has employees in need of housing?

George Vineyard haven

If I recall correctly, a primary issue expressed by the medical staff on island is the lack of housing available for a rate commensurate to their income. Reducing the growth of housing stock worsens that issue and makes the island more of a place for people who’ve inherited property and the wealthy. In other words, less like the island I think we most would like where all can live here.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/08/2025 - 09:12

Permalink

Alice Oak Bluffs

So every proposal to ease the housing crisis for the regular people of Martha's Vineyard will now be fought like this? The state needs to step in with a stronger law than Chapter 40B. Housing is desperately needed here. Also, if plaintiffs lose they should pay all legal costs incurred by the developers and plaintiffs should be penalized for delays and nuisance costs.

Bob Edgartown

I whole hardly agree about tort reform and lawyers cost. There would be a lot less suing and litigation going on if the loser had to pay like they do in other countries.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/08/2025 - 12:03

Permalink

Neighbor

As a neighbor pressured to join the opposition, I fully support this project. This is EXACTLY the type of projects we need. Mold density, thoughtful design, energy compliant and more. I will support changes to short term rentals while short sighted nimbys that own short term rentals fight legitimate proposals.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/10/2025 - 11:08

Permalink

Frustrated MV

Vineyard Gazette comment section is totally useless. Any comment even 1% controversial is censored. Whole idea is to promote free expression of different opinions and views.

Only the most boring and vanilla comments are allowed: "This is a good project. Houses are nice. People live in houses on the island. We need more pretty houses for people to live in on the island. Houses are where people who work on the island live. I hope these houses have grass and trees. These houses should also have flowers. We need flowers for bees and flowers are also pretty and smell nice"

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 02/12/2025 - 14:00

Permalink

Also a neighbor VH

The only thing the petition asked for - as far as I could tell - was that the project be referred to the MVC for proper oversight and review. IHT and the developer were attempting to get this project completely approved by requesting a comprehensive permit from the Tisbury ZBA. None of my neighbors even knew anything about it. It’s simply not playing fair that a developer should try to by pass existing town bylaws because 2 units of “affordable” housing are part of their FOR PROFIT development. Let’s hope the MVC takes a close look at this and every other project that has the potential to make permanent changes to the island, it’s neighborhoods and it’s residents homes - without them even knowing what’s happening.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.