Proposed 15,000 square foot expansion will come before officials in the coming year.
Tim Johnson

Airport Readies Renovation Plan for Busy Terminal

Last week, the airport unveiled some of the first conceptual designs for a major airport terminal renovation, which would bring a permanent structure for departures.

On a chilly December night last week, Martha’s Vineyard Airport director Geoff Freeman marched through the security screening line to get to the airport’s departure area for passengers awaiting flights. In the summer, dozens and dozens of people will huddle under a tent positioned next to the tarmac, but in the winter the tent is gone as the number of flights dwindle down to a handful a day.

If Mr. Freeman has his way, the tent will soon be gone for good.

Last week, the airport unveiled some of the first conceptual designs for a major airport terminal renovation, which would bring a permanent structure for departures, while also giving the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) more room to screen passengers.

The proposed 15,000 square foot expansion work would be some of the biggest changes at the airport in 25 years, and is expected to come before federal, state and Island governing bodies in the coming year.

“We’re going to be going deeper into a design over the coming weeks, and that is where we’ll really define what can work,” Mr. Freeman said during an open house at the airport last week.

Schematic of proposed new design.
Schematic of proposed new design.

The 9,800-square foot terminal straddles the West Tisbury and Edgartown town lines and was built in 1998, prior to when the U.S. security protocols were overhauled in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Most of the flights out of the airport in the summer require security screenings by TSA, and the agency is running out of room as its equipment grows ever larger. On a busy day, when as many as 14 commercial flights are going through the terminal, the ticket counter lines and the security lines can back up through the entire terminal, creating confusion.

“TSA now has a lot of equipment and space and needs,” said Mr. Freeman. “This area just does not accommodate a dual lane, multiple pieces of equipment.”

The layout of the terminal also can lead to people going through security multiple times, creating even more headaches for TSA. If passenger flights are delayed, or there is inclement weather, passengers often leave the current outdoor departure area for refuge in the terminal. That forces them to go back through security a second time, resulting in longer wait times. Under the new plan, the security queue would move toward where the baggage claim area is set up now, creating more space for screeners. After going through security, the passengers would enter the new departure holding area.

Though ridership has risen in recent years, Mr. Freeman emphasized that the terminal expansion is to better accommodate the current traffic of about 60,000 passengers annually, not to lure in more airlines.

“We don’t attract business here,” he said. “Some airports, large airports, small airports, go to these conventions where they solicit business...We don’t go out and advertise for business.”

Matthew O’Brien, the airport’s project manager with the firm McFarland Johnson, said the ongoing pilot shortage nationwide has prompted airlines to try to move the same number of passengers without increasing the number of flights.

From the airport’s perspective, that would result in an approximately equal number of passengers coming and going on an annual basis, but there would be higher peaks. When the terminal was built, the average aircraft carried about 46 people, Mr. O’Brien said. That has now climbed up to about 140 people.

The airport has been eyeing an overhaul for several years, and the process was jump-started this year after the airport landed a $15 million federal grant in October.

Mr. O’Brien estimated that the total renovation cost would be about $40 million, and take about two years for the construction, which would occur in phases so the airport could continue to operate. Though the airport is public, Island residents would not be tapped to help pay for the renovation, and the airport would cover the costs out of its own coffers, according to Mr. Freeman.

The planned terminal construction comes as the Federal Aviation Administration thinks about building a new and relocated air traffic control tower, and the airport continues to explore a change to the entrance road. The two-lane road, which also leads to several businesses, including a liquor store, seafood shop, gym, veterinary clinic and laundromat, can become clogged in the summer if one car is looking to make a left hand turn onto Edgartown-West Tisbury Road.

The airport is interested in adding a right hand turning lane at the exit and is working with the state, which holds an environmental easement through the airport property at the entrance road. There is no finish line in sight, but Mr. Freeman hopes that a new layout can be employed at some point to ease congestion.

“It’s a very long, tedious process to have an easement change,” Mr. Freeman said.

As the airport refines its plans for the terminal, it will have to go to a host of local, state and federal agencies for the change. Here on the Island, both the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and the town of West Tisbury, at the least, would be part of the review process.

Only a handful of members of the public attended the open house last week. One was Adam Turner, the director of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, getting a glimpse of what will be coming across his desk some time soon.

“We’ve had a great relationship, a cooperative relationship with the airport at the MVC over the years,” Mr. Turner said. “All I can say is we look forward to working with them to improve service.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/26/2024 - 10:05

Permalink

Thomas S Hodgson West Tisbury

The best use of 15 million dollars out there would be to get rid of the airport and restore the land to the State Forest. Set aside the rest of the SE corner for businesses.

Thomas S Hodgson West Tisbury

Not everything has to be about the money. The airport also brings a lot of air and noise pollution, and has a history of other pollution as well.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 04:48

Permalink

Tom Edgartown

How about an exit thru the business park? It makes sense to have to two IMO?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 06:42

Permalink

Alan Bell Oak Bluffs

Traffic in August out to the Edgartown-West Tisbury road is dangerous. Why not introduce a traffic circle? They work well elsewhere to slow down and safely move traffic through pinch points.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 07:54

Permalink

Peter J Edgartown

Please, please, please pay attention to the design of the outdoor lighting. Over the years the MV airport has contributed greatly to light pollution on the island. The glory of the stars used to be easy to see... now not so much. For example, the airport created rules that businesses at the airport had to have security lighting, but the cheapest way of doing that is to simply bolt a bright LED light to the side of the building facing outwards. That lights up everything except the building itself. Light that goes up in the sky is wasted light, and electricity. Being able to see the glory of the night sky is a gift from creation to us and our children,, and we are slowly losing that

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 07:57

Permalink

Hannah West Tisbury

Great, looking forward to more planes, more noise and the traffic…….
Remember the great hippie movement, “No more Jets”. How much can this island take.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 08:25

Permalink

Nicole Brisson Edgartown

Instead of a right-hand turning lane, how about adding a roundabout which would help traffic coming from all three ways?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 09:16

Permalink

Ric Smith Edgartown / Dallas

Much needed and very overdue having people stand under a tent with a porta pot, waiting for flights that all seem to takeoff at the same time is not a great experience for visitors or residents.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 12:15

Permalink

Lynne West Tisbury

I, and islanders I know, don't mind a tent, or a little bundling up in the winter. Part of the charm, and we're not Nantucket

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/27/2024 - 12:52

Permalink

D Tisbury

IMO - the airport has exceeded its maximum flight/passenger traffic during peak season.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 12/28/2024 - 22:30

Permalink

Tis Adult Tisbury

I am looking forward to seeing how the airport and State Highway have been working together to further the traffic plans for the auto traffic they have already created. Naturally, they would do this first to gain support for any possible airport expansion—am I right?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/03/2025 - 10:44

Permalink

Larry Pollard Dennis

I worked at the old MVY Airport in the early 70’s for Northeast and Delta.. That was a great experience for me, and I wish it was still there, but like everything, I guess it had to modernize.. Too bad..

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.