Vineyard Wind turbines seen over the horizon from South Beach.
Ray Ewing

Court Denies Nantucket Group's Appeal of Vineyard Wind

In a 36-page opinion Wednesday, a panel of judges with the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals denied the ACK for Whales group claim, which sought to halt the project currently being constructed about 14 miles to the Vineyard’s south.

A federal court has rejected a Nantucket group’s claim that regulators didn’t follow the Endangered Species Act and other environmental law when reviewing the Vineyard Wind offshore wind energy farm.  

In a 36-page opinion Wednesday, a panel of judges with the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals denied the ACK for Whales group claim, which sought to halt the project currently being constructed about 14 miles to the Vineyard’s south. It is just the latest in a slew of lawsuits that have not gained traction against the wind farm, one of the first commercial-scale projects to be built in the country. 

The Nantucket group, formerly known as Nantucket Residents Against Turbines, asserted that the project was endangering the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale and the National Marine Fisheries Service was relying on defective data to make decisions. 

The U.S. District Court in Boston rejected the claims in May 2023, prompting the group to turn to the federal appeals court. 

But the higher court wasn’t swayed. 

“[National Marine Fisheries Service and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management] followed the law in analyzing the right whale’s current status and environmental baseline, the likely effects of the Vineyard Wind project on the right whale, and the efficacy of measures to mitigate those effects,” the appeals court panel wrote in its decision. “Moreover, the agencies’ analyses rationally support their conclusion that Vineyard Wind will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of the right whale.” 

Vineyard Wind is in the process of building 62 turbines, as well as an operations headquarters in Vineyard Haven. The turbines have drawn some critics over their presence along the horizon or their potential harm to marine life.

On Nantucket, ACK for Whales will continue to push against the project via two articles on the May town meeting warrant. The articles call for the town to pull out of its standing “Good Neighbor Agreement” with Vineyard Wind and require all offshore wind decisions at the town level be authorized by town meeting.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the agency charged with protecting the whales, has spoken out about the offshore construction and recent whale deaths, including one on the Vineyard earlier this year. 

“At this point, there is no scientific evidence that noise resulting from offshore wind site characterization surveys could potentially cause whale deaths,” the agency said. “There are no known links between large whale deaths and ongoing offshore wind activities.” 

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/28/2024 - 18:46

Permalink

Tom Engley West Tisbury.

The irony doesn’t escape me that Nantucket now wants to protect the whales considering there is still whaling money on the island.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/29/2024 - 15:59

Permalink

Chris Edgartown

And they will likely not stop eating lobster, an industry that is directly implicated in whale harm. Recent beached, dead whale had clear signs of rope injuries if I remember correctly.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/29/2024 - 19:20

Permalink

Carol formerly Chilmark

Anyone who actually does care about the right whales should listen to this NPR Science Friday report on the science (i.e., facts) of what is killing right whales:

https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/offshore-wind-misinformation-rig…

Allow me to boil it down: 70% of right whale deaths are due to entanglement with fishing gear (specifically ropes from lobster pots, snow crab pots and jonah crab pots); 30% are due to ship strikes. We don't see all dead whale bodies, of course, but of the ones we've been able to study - that's how it breaks down.

ACK for Whales figured prominently in the Brown University study of layers of dark money groups with roots in fossil fuel companies that are trying to appear naturally grass-roots in their opposition to offshore wind. Very glad the court did not buy their BS.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/29/2024 - 20:04

Permalink

Carol formerly Chilmark

Thank you to the Gazette for reporting on this, and especially for including a PDF of the decision.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.