The Zoia property sparked Chilmark's big house bylaw more than a decade ago.
Andrew Azoulay/ Wallace & Co. Sotheby’s International Realty

Million Dollar a Month Rental Rekindles Big House Debate

The Chilmark home that sparked the town's "big house bylaw" has hit the rental market for $1 million per month.

Eleven bedrooms, 13 bathrooms, two guest houses, a private theater, an indoor heated pool, a 50-foot Italian yacht and a pickleball court on five acres with a view of Nashaquitsa Pond could all be yours to rent this summer, at the cost of $1 million for a four-week stay. 

An imposing series of curved structures in gray wood and glass perched pondside in Chilmark, the newly-listed rental is the most expensive ever to be offered on the Vineyard, according to Sotheby’s International Realty

The record-breaking price tag adds another chapter to a property which has already drawn major controversy since New York businessman Adam Zoia expanded it in 2012. Backlash on the project in Chilmark inspired a documentary film and the “big house bylaw,” a regulation limiting home size that passed at the 2013 annual town meeting. 

The house is going on the vacation rental market for the first time.
Andrew Azoulay/ Wallace & Co. Sotheby’s International Realty
The house is going on the vacation rental market for the first time.
Andrew Azoulay/ Wallace & Co. Sotheby’s International Realty

Since its passage, the bylaw has been lauded by town residents and officials as a major step toward maintaining the town character of Chilmark. West Tisbury even passed its own big house bylaw modeled on Chilmark’s in 2022.

But for some Chilmark officials, the recent high-value listing of the Zoia property again highlights just how much the town has changed — and how much more work is yet to be done. 

“I have said in many meetings that our Island is sinking under the weight of money,” said select board member Jim Malkin, in a statement to the Gazette. “A rental at this astounding figure is clear evidence of the ever-increasing income inequality that is eroding the culture and community of our town and Island.”

“This inequality,” he continued, “is making it increasingly difficult for our year-round population to continue to live and work in our community.”

Though extravagant mansion estates are far from new on the Vineyard, this property, located on 18 Point Inner Way, represents a new high for the Island rental market.  

“It’s certainly the first of its kind, in my opinion, for this kind of rental,” said Sotheby’s listing broker Thomas Wallace. “Usually when someone has a house of this caliber, they simply don’t make it available for rental.”

Mr. Wallace said only the owner and his family had previously used the property, and their schedule this summer has them arriving in August. The property is available to rent for any four consecutive weeks May through July and September through October.

In addition to more than 10,000 square feet of floor space, a deep-water harbor and considerable pond front acreage, the house also includes a laundry list of luxury amenities. 

“You can go on, and on and on,” Mr. Wallace said. “Whether it’s tennis or pickleball or a swimming pool or basketball, you know, all kinds of fun things.”

Included with the price of the rental, he said, is access the to the three boats moored on the property: a Mastercraft X26 motorboat, a Zodiac Open 7.0 speed boat, and a custom, 50-foot Novamarine yacht, equipped with five motors.

Renters will need to bring their own captain, Mr. Wallace said. 

For town zoning board and former planning board member Chris Murphy, who was involved in the development of the big house bylaw, the house is a far cry from old-school Chilmark.

“What happened to the days when people wanted a little camp on the beach with sand on the floor and quahaugs for dinner they got themselves?” he lamented, in an interview with the Gazette. The change in rental tastes reflects a change in the town’s summer population, Mr. Murphy said.

“When I was a kid, the summer people that came, by and large, wanted to be part of the local community. They played baseball with the locals, they went to the beach where the locals went, and their dinner guests were local people,” he said. “At some point, the only people they really wanted to talk to were the other people from wherever the borough in New York is that they came from.”

According to Mr. Wallace, renters on the highest rungs of the market often enjoy the seclusion of a self-contained estate. 

“Chilmark is a great place to retreat, and the privacy is a significant component to it,” he said. 

In 2012, when Mr. Zoia expanded his compound with the addition of a building that now houses the pool, spa and gym, its highly-visible grandiosity was cause for alarm from Chilmark residents and neighbors, the latter of whom challenged whether such a structure was allowable.

“It stood out from its size and visibility,” said planning board member Janet Weidner, also heavily involved in the bylaw’s development. “If it wasn’t in such a visible spot, right on the pond, I don’t think it would have been noticed. So that kind of got the conversation started.”

Once the conversation got started, however, the planning board shifted to developing a bylaw to regulate future mansion-building. Though a similar bylaw in Chilmark failed in 1991, Ms. Weidner said they got considerable public support. 

“Pollyanna-ish as it sounds, at the time we were doing this a few people stood up and said, ‘I’m proud to live in a town where people are concerned about the character of the town,’” she said. 

The effort to create a bylaw also became the subject of a documentary from Martha’s Vineyard Film Festival founder Thomas Bena.

After an extensive public hearing process, the board settled on a final bylaw, which required a special permit from the zoning board of appeals for new houses over 3,500 square feet per three acres. The bylaw limits total living area to 6,000 square feet, with another 250 square feet allowed per additional acre. 

The bylaw, which voters overwhelmingly approved, also required biennial reviews to examine the efficacy of the regulation, which Ms. Weidner said has been largely positive. The 2015 review, for instance, found a 40 per cent reduction in the average size of new residences in Chilmark after the bylaw, finding the average new residence had reduced from 4,360 square feet to 2,570.

“In brief,” wrote the most recent, 2021 report, “the ZBA and the Planning Board agree that the Residential Building Size Regulation bylaw appears to be working.”

But while the bylaw may have curbed the worst excesses of opulent mansion-building, the damage that extremely-high value rentals can have on the community continues to be a burden, Mr. Murphy said. 

“There’s these incredible buildings with all sorts of services, that requires numerous staff…so what did the people building that house do for affordable housing?” he said. “If they are creating, essentially, three full-time, year-round jobs, then they ought to be supplying homes for three full-time, year-round families.”

Chilmark currently has their short-term rental tax, which applies to stays of less than 30 days, set at 4 per cent. Each four-week rental period of the Zoia property would net the town $40,000 dollars in revenue. 

At town meeting this year, Chilmark voters will determine whether to increase the town’s short term rental tax to 6 per cent, the maximum allowed by the state. The state levies an additional 5.7 percent.

For Mr. Murphy, the effort to keep the Vineyard livable for more than the ultra-rich is a guiding light. 

“I’m 77 years old, I’ve got children that live here…and I’ve got grandchildren that are here,” he said. “If they want to live here in their lifetimes, it would be nice to think we’d left them someplace it was worth living. So that’s what keeps me involved.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 02/29/2024 - 15:48

Permalink

Frank WT

We need to protect our classic small Vineyard cottages. That’s the character of our island. Let the Hamptons be the Hamptons and let us be the Vineyard.

Susan Pennsylvania

I agree with you, Frank, about protecting the cottages. And I would add the need to protect the reasonably sized family houses, with the characteristics of a Vineyard home. I still don't understand how the huge (vulgar) mansion estates were permitted.

Lisa Brown Langley Edgartlown

Yes I totally agree, the sweetness is being frittered away. I was chatting with a person from another place where the sweetness is all but gone; it s heartbreaking, to see the Hamptification of our island.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 02/29/2024 - 22:02

Permalink

Islander MV

It would be great if someone actually pressed Mr. Zoia, who probably will not see this article personally, to make a reasonable donation to Island Housing Trust. Such a donation could show that Martha’s Vineyard is about more than only family, that Martha’s Vineyard is about community, too.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 02:32

Permalink

Enough Already Oak Bluffs

This house was built according to Chilmark zoning regulations that the townspeople agreed to at town meetings in the past. the owner had every right to build what he did.

Roddy Seasonal Visitor

Right on “Enough Already “. Also, how obtuse and absurd for someone to say if you create 3 jobs anywhere you should be simultaneously required to provide housing for those same three employees. So by this audacious and convoluted logic every employer in the U.S. should be doing the same? Get real. This is all just jealousy talking.

Sam Up Island

Totally agree. It seems the homeowner followed all the rules at the time and was within his rights. Change is constant, embrace it and adapt. From the look of the solar panels in the picture it also seems that the house is generating its own power and was likely built more environmentally sensitive than the falling down old up island houses with oil furnaces and chimneys bellowing smoke. Please.....

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 07:15

Permalink

Joanne Chilmark

I don’t see private Atlantic Ocean beach access on the list of amenities. I guess the renters will have to wait in line for parking at LVB like the rest of us. Remember “carry in carry out.”

Slater MV

Far from poor? Everything that was once beautiful about this island and community is festering and rotting away from inside, but yeah the rich love it here so it must be wonderful. In my 65 years here I’ve watched it slowly chopped up and destroyed, all being sold to the highest bidder. Yes Martha is poor.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 08:20

Permalink

Danny East Chop

How lucky are we all? Having spent significant time and made memories with such a sought after place to be. MV isn’t for everyone, and if it wasn’t hard to plan into your life it also wouldn’t taste so sweet. I say live and let live. If the ultra rich want to be here too, take it as a compliment. Or, if comparison has stolen all your joy could always sell high now and find another sand dune to spread your towel on.

Islander MV

I would have to add that no real islander considers this to have anything to do with "comparison." We all live here, there's nothing we have to compare to anywhere in the world. It's about the values of those who do live here and the contribution we make to our communities. There's no law saying anyone has to do anything for the island nr anyone on it and we all know it. But islanders value those who value the island. Sounds like you've made a lot of memories here, we hope you have acknowledged beyond words the joy you've found here outside of dinners at fancy restaurants that employ visiting workers and are now owned by corporations, or shopping at Cronig's. It's about valuing where you've made those memories, isn't it?

Islander MV

Super lucky! To have so much development and so much land built upon, with nonstop construction and the ever-increasing income inequality! Wow, we are blessed when our superintendentts, surgeons, fire and police, teachers, laborers, contractors, etc. have nowhere to live. I couldn't tell you how fortunate everyone is to live in those conditions...a rotating cast of servants #blessed

Danny East Chop

My fondest memories are bodysurfing off the vineyard. Make a pb&j for myself when I go to the beach. Living by the sea has always come with risk. I can accept the conditions of an MV without nightly table service and daily leaf-blowing. Will still be able to use my rake and operate by bread knife for a little bit longer if I remain lucky.

Liam B.

Ah yes, where will the people who are directly employed by this property (i.e., laborers, contractors) and those indirectly employed by it (i.e., fire, police, teachers) live!? The owner purchased it for $7.5 million in 2010 - I cannot imagine how many locals and commuting workers were submitting offers to purchase only to be disappointed. I miss the good times when land was cheap and available on poor Martha because no one wanted to buy it and we salvaged shipwrecks for goods and materials. I wonder how the demand started in the first place.....ಥ_ಥ You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 08:21

Permalink

So crazy TISBURY

Looks to me like a a fancy resort. They should get a manager and run it like that.

Peter Bruce Chilmark

This is the key point. Having a big fancy house in the neighborhood is one thing. Having a high end commercial resort for ultra rich renters is another.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 09:09

Permalink

Tom Chilmark

I don’t see the problem. People should embrace it! It’s happening everywhere not just MV.

Islander MV

"It's happening everywhere" is the best reason for it to be taken seriously as an offense to the environment, to development, and to neighborliness anywhere.

John Colorado and Chilmark

I suggest you check out the resort of Aspen to see what happens when the billionaires buy up most everything at ridiculous prices and then arrive on their private or corporate jets. Most don’t care to associate with locals and restaurants soon catch on…by raising their prices out of reach for all but the super wealthy. It seems greed is coming to our beloved Vineyard. “Happening everywhere” is no justification for changing the friendly and warm character of Martha’s Vineyard.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 09:48

Permalink

Ginny WT

Having followed the controversy surrounding this property for many years, from the initial meetings and applications, I can only say to Mr. Zoia: "I spit in the milk of your mother!"

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 09:56

Permalink

Donna Russell

The only people who truly honored the preciousness of this island were the Wampanoag, the People of the First Light. The wisdom and practices of indigenous people around the world may be what saves this planet.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 09:59

Permalink

Carolyn O'Daly Edgartown

The only argument I can come up with is that the taxes generated for the schools and towns are welcome and these are the people (and their guests) that spend lots of dough at all the pricey summer fundraisers. Oh well.

maleeka ob and baltimore

Good point. While it may interpreted as 'out of character' for the island, its replication and copycats have been addressed by zoning in the time since. I'd have to guess that the construction of this 'thing' made lots of money for island tradesmen and businesses. Like it or not, construction of homes by wealthy seasonal residents is the economic engine that drives the economy here. They don't ask 'how much'.. they ask 'when can i have it completed'. And this influx of money HAS 'lifted' all boats here. I remember visiting my grandparents in the late 60s and early 70s and this place was the poorest county in the state, and other than caretaking, painting, housekeeping and scalloping 'off the books in the winter while collecting' there was no other source of income for the year round residents.

Islander MV

No, this idea of "lifting all boats" is not correct – it has lifted some boats while leaving most other boats to sink. You mention island tradesman and businesses. Tradesman have more work than they can get to 5x over and have raised their prices accordingly–this is not helpful. "Island businesses" -- you mean the corporations and off-island businesspeople who have bought up many previous island companies, probably many you know, and who are usually only open in the summer, when the employees are here for the summer, in housing that none of these businesses provide at substandard wages?

Chris Wt

I really don’t see the problem. Ok it’s big so what? Would it have been better to have 4-5 houses on the site? Or a big affordable housing development?

Carol WEST CHOP

Chris, I agree. As long things are done to zoning so be it….people drive big SUV’s that can fit 12 people in it and drive around with one person in it… then complain we should be green

One Week a Year at Oak Bluffs Marina MA

I honestly don't know where I fall on this issue but, Chris, I had to laugh at your comment. People definitely don't want a large house accessible only to the super rich, but they certainly wouldn't support an affordable housing complex in the same spot to serve the people they claim to be worried about. The "best" thing to do is keep the island in the way it was when they got here. This is a moving target and could be 5, 20, or 40 years ago which makes the commentary entertaining to observe.

My two cents: Develop building codes and other regulations that they community wants and don't cry when something is done that fits those guidelines.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/01/2024 - 21:42

Permalink

Thomas Edgartown

They did everything within the rules. There are bigger and far more opulent homes on MV.
That being said $1 million for June ,July or September? Nope. Not available the best month of the year.
Diane Sawyers old house for 100k a week blows the doors off of this property

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/05/2024 - 15:00

Permalink

Amy Edgartown

Certainly seems like blatant commercial use of a residential property. Yes, MV has “always” had wealthy seasonal residents, however those “summer people” came for the entire summer, year after year, generation after generation, still contributing to the community. Now it’s is turning into the Hampton’s. The clientele that expects such high end offerings such as this, is NOT authentic vineyard style. So sad.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.