Select board pushed back on farm proposal to revise bylaws to host events.
Larry Glick

Chilmark Farmers Push to Revise Zoning Bylaws

A coalition of Chilmark farmers is urging town officials to revise town zoning bylaws to allow farms to host on-location events.

A coalition of Chilmark farmers is urging town officials to revise town zoning bylaws to allow farms to host on-location events. At a meeting on Dec. 14, the town planning board pushed forward the proposal, however the select board decided not to initiate official public hearings on it.

“It’s my belief that this proposal, as it stands, threatens what makes Chilmark unique,” said select board member Jim Malkin, in a prepared statement at last week’s meeting, highlighting concerns about traffic, noise, commercial activity and lack of housing for additional farm employees.

“The proposed language...gives virtually unlimited freedom to do anything,” he said.

But the group of Chilmark farmers, including representatives from Beetlebung, North Tabor and Grey Barn farms, say agricultural events have become a critical piece of making small farms profitable.

“One of the biggest challenges we face is the notion that farming is simply about buying and selling vegetables or meat,” the group wrote in a joint letter sent to the planning board in July. “The limits of the current bylaws handcuff town officials.”

The farm group first presented plans for a bylaw to the planning board this summer in hopes of drafting a warrant article for town meeting this April, but progress has moved slowly since then. Richard Osnoss, chair of the planning board, said the idea for a broad bylaw for public hearings was presented the select board to elicit more public engagement for the process.

“People don’t come to our meetings, that’s the nature of the beast,” he said.

Mr. Osnoss also expressed some urgency to resolve the issue.

“Part of our motivation to, kind of, bring it to a head was because we know that events are occurring, and they have occurred,” he said.

Amy Weinburg, owner of Beetlebung Farm, spoke in favor of farm events, saying that current zoning bylaw language allowing the “use of premises or structures for...agriculture; or work related directly thereto,” could already be interpreted to allow events.

“The work of a farm should not simply be measured by its carrot yields alone,” she said. “If inclined and permitted, our work can and will foster community, build a greater respect for the land and create an appreciation of a resilient local food system.”

Select board members, meanwhile, urged a slow and deliberate process.

“It’s a big deal item, and it should be thought out carefully,” said select board chair Bill Rossi, adding that the town building inspector was also searching for clarity on the issue.

Planning board members on Thursday resolved to hold a series of informal public forums on the topic, yet to be scheduled. The planning board will meet again to discuss the topic on Dec. 18.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/18/2023 - 16:19

Permalink

Alec Walsh Chilmark

These three farms are wonderful assets to our community, providing bucolic greenspaces, and organically grown produce and protein that we can access locally. The Dix, Glasgow and Weinberg families understand the rural, pastoral nature of Chilmark and do not seek to do anything that will change it. The economics of farming produce or raising animals alone will not allow these farms to be commercially viable. Allowing farm-to-table dinners and other small gatherings will both build community and help these farms to be able to succeed financially, I would urge the planning board to find a way to accommodate them.

Larry Glick Chilmark

Well said Alec, I agree with you 100% and would also strongly urge the planning board to find a reasonable solution. These 3 farms add so much to our community!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/18/2023 - 19:30

Permalink

Enough Already Oak Bluffs

I used to live in Vermont and I had to chuckle when recently visiting the Grey Barn farm as the landscapers they hire were leaving after spending the morning perfecting the farms' perfectly manicured lawn around the outbuildings. Real farms can't afford nor would even think of this. These are Disney inspired farms looking to grow their social media influence.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/18/2023 - 20:06

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

I have all the respect in the world for farmers,but they don't pay very much in taxes like the rest of us

Dave Weston/ Edgartown

I see you own 2 homes, too, Charlie. Maybe cut the farmers some slack. The tax code was written to protect farms, not force them to sell to developers.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/18/2023 - 21:58

Permalink

Albert Gosnold

Chilmark gentleman farmers.
The most expensive farmland in the world.
Not hard scrabble forty acres and mule farmers.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 08:34

Permalink

C Potts Tisbury

It may help to better understand the concerns of Chilmark officials. Other bylaws, new or amended, can tackle those concerns, for example, noise, operating hours, permitting process for individual events, etc. I've attended many farm-to-table gatherings off-island, and they are wonderful! I've never understood why Vineyard officials seem to be so against them and other farm events when they truly help to sustain the wonderful island farms and help to create community. Given everything going on in the world, we need ways for people to come together. There are plenty of guardrails that can be established to prevent fears from becoming reality.

William Falmouth

As the town of Oak Bluffs learned the hard way, the Dover Law protects both schools and farms from most local zoning regulations. Any farm over 5 acres already can have functions such as farm to table dinners, provided 25% of the revenue is from items grown on the farm or, 50% of the products are grown in MA.

One of the cases that confirms such was a dairy that wanted to open an ice cream store on-site using its milk. The farm prevailed against the town.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 09:54

Permalink

Jonathan West Tisbury

If you want to run a business with “farming” as part of your income stream, just say so. Please don’t try to equate ‘events’ or ‘agri-tourism’ with the very difficult act of raising food. Its not your intentions I object to, it is the bs.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 10:18

Permalink

Mary UpIsland

The farmers arguments are absolutely legitimate. On the other hand what is being proposed would turn actual farms into wedding venues, high-end storefronts, farm-to table dinning operations etc. What is unfortunate is that not only it would change the rural character of the town but it will make buying food from these farms even more unattainable for the locals. Sure there with be more revenue from summer business and city folk that look for a more elevated "farm" shopping experience. These models are not new, i'd hate to see food producing farms turn into event venues that only a few can enjoy.

Gabrielle West tisbury

Completely true. Every farm would get 20k an event, it would definitely result in more photos and less production, traffic and noise.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 12:28

Permalink

Ned Block Chilmark

I've had the pleasure of attending numerous enchanting farm-to-table dinners at one of the local farms – its identity a secret, as whispers of their legality linger. These gatherings were not just meals, but jubilant celebrations of community spirit, primarily graced by the warm presence of Chilmark neighbors. It's difficult to comprehend why such events, which highlight the extraordinary culinary prowess of our talented farmers and offer a fertile ground for neighbors to weave closer bonds, could ever be considered illegal. These dinners were not mere eating experiences; they were vibrant festivals of togetherness and a showcase of the land's bountiful gifts.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 14:41

Permalink

Michael Caruso Chilmark

Can anyone dispute that these and other small farms make the Vineyard more wonderful? And we all know how our local businesses can struggle to make ends meet. This is especially true of these small farms with very high production costs. As C Potts wrote, the town can establish appropriate guardrails to limit the issues Mr. Malkin noted. Let's work together to help our local businesses prosper.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 17:55

Permalink

Francie Shaw Chilmark/Berkeley CA

I love the Island farms run by younger Islanders who are trying make living and feed people healthy food. But I will offend many by saying the Grey Barn is exactly what I think we DON'T want. It should be possible to make a law that distinguishes rural farmers from the rich Martha Stewart farming.Please someone, figure it out.

Robert Skydell Antigua, Guatemala

The hard working and committed folks at Grey Barn are producing award-winning cheeses and organic, locally grown meat and more. The are personally involved in all aspects of the hard work that is required, and the fact that they can afford to maintain the property in such a pristine condition matters not one iota. Quite the opposite in my opinion. Agriculture typically operates on a razor-thin margin economically and the ceaseless dedication of all Vineyard farmers deserves consideration regardless of their financial wherewithal. Would you be more satisfied if the property was unkempt, the buildings in disrepair, derelict vehicles, debris and piles of manure scattered about in view from the road?
I believe in supporting affordable housing on MV but in an appropriate and sustainable manner. Ask yourselves if the Island would be better off if the iconic view overlooking the Keith Farm or Flat Point would be better served if developed into large-scale affordable housing units?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/20/2023 - 08:26

Permalink

Dan Colmark

Is this why Beetlebung is building this huge structure on their farm land? I bet they got farming zoning bylaw easements as a farm to build such a structure in the middle of town. This is very clever indeed but i cant help but feel fooled by their true intentions. Now it all makes sense. Exploit the regulations then come around and change them so now you can operate your "venue" If this goes through we should start taxing them like we do any other restaurant and retail shop.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/21/2023 - 08:07

Permalink

the meaning of 'is' 'is' mv

Supporting real farmers is essential to all. 'Farm stands' have been known to morph into mini-supermarkets, delis, bakeries, etc. Local farmers who actually grow their own food is logical definition of a 'farmer'. A 'store' that sells items delivered by truck from new bedford suppliers is not a farm.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/21/2023 - 12:16

Permalink

JUST SAYING ISLAND OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD

WHEN WE GIVE TO ONE, WHAT WE ARE TAKING FROM ANOTHER IN DOING SO?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/21/2023 - 18:58

Permalink

SteveF Chilmark/Cambridge

I love all the local farms, from Beetlebung to Morning Glory. Their food - grown and prepared - is delicious and provides jobs. It is certainly true that some off-island merchandise is too expensive for many islanders (looking at you Grey Barn). If there are farm-to-table events, we never hear about them, perhaps we're not A-listers. But small (and affordable and year-round!) events should be allowed with certain guidelines. If the Allen Farm can hold weddings, surely the other farms should get a chance to do their thing.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.