Construction from earlier this year at the Stone Bank property in Vineyard Haven.
Ray Ewing

Stone Bank Changes Prompt Further MVC Review

The Vineyard Haven project will need to go to the Martha's Vineyard Commission for a fifth modification after the developer built a fence and wall that weren't previously approved by the commission.

Developer Reid (Sam) Dunn has built a fence and wall on his Stone Bank condominium property that were not included in the project originally approved by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, MVC staff said this week.

These changes, as well as a proposed fence dividing the development’s courtyard, call for a modification review before the full commission, the commision's land use planning committee determined at its meeting Monday night.

It will be the fifth modification of the prominent Vineyard Haven project since it received its original MVC approval in the spring of 2021.

“You didn’t build what you said you would build,” MVC executive director Adam Turner told Mr. Dunn Monday.

“Everything that comes in to us is not quite what we approved,” Mr. Turner added. “The building inspector has the same problem.”

The six-foot-high fence and wall are both built flush to the ground, adjacent to the foundation of the condominium building that is closest to the Tisbury municipal parking lot and Vineyard Transit Authority bus shelters.

“There’s been a terrible problem in that area for vagrancy, drugs and homeless people," Mr. Dunn said. “It’s been used as a dumping ground. People have been sleeping on the property and it needs to be secured."

But the barriers potentially could block the flow of stormwater in the area, said Rich Saltzberg, the commission’s coordinator for developments of regional impact (DRIs).

Chairing Monday’s committee discussion, commissioner Fred Hancock favored an independent stormwater study before the modification review, a measure staff also recommended.

Committee members brushed aside Mr. Dunn’s assertion that he followed the proper building codes when putting up the fence and wall.

“This is strictly about whether it was constructed as presented to us, and the fact that it wasn’t means that we need to approve the modification, and in order to do that we would like to find out what all the ramifications are of the project being built in this way,” Mr. Hancock said.

The committee agreed to commission the stormwater study and ask the full commission to open a modification hearing at its June 22 meeting.

There are other ways in which Mr. Dunn is out of compliance with his MVC approval, Mr. Saltzberg said, but the committee ran out of time Monday to review them.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/13/2023 - 18:59

Permalink

GFK Ob

What a shock,Sam Dunn changing plans as he wishes. Take a look at his history.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/13/2023 - 19:09

Permalink

Susan Bucks County, Pennsylvania

More photos would help.
But proceeding without review and approval paints a fair picture of the situation.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/13/2023 - 19:56

Permalink

Jen VH

There’s been a terrible problem in that area for vagrancy, drugs and homeless people… I am surprised to hear this? I have never experienced this?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 06:10

Permalink

Jim OB

This feels like the MVC wants to flex its muscles because it can. What a silly game the MVC's become. I'm with Sam Dunn on this one.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 06:10

Permalink

Danielle Tisbury

It's amazing how vineyard wind can come in with a huge set of plans, it all goes through without a hitch....it's all about the$$$$$!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 07:01

Permalink

Mark Acker VH

The entire place looks like Disneyland, with multi colored buildings? The Vineyard standard has always been wood shingle natural grey siding, how did this Disneyland look get approved? This is also in a critical shoreline district. All I see is an absolute maximum density of buildings? The MVC is so inconsistent, overly strict on some projects and blinded green lights on others.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 07:21

Permalink

Tyler Davidson Tisbury

Shame on the MVC. This is a great project and Mr. Dunn is building a beautiful property to benefit the town. “Stormwater study” is a lame excuse to further delay this project. The wall is needed and he is well within his rights to put up a wall there. This will lead to further litigation against the sham organization MVC. Shame on Tisbury for letting the town deteriorate as it is and being anti-business. Shame on the MVC for not staying within its original charter. It’s time for the MVC to dissolve.

R Scott Patterson Edgartown

Mr Dunn is the only one responsible for the delay, HE CHOSE to ignore the plan that had been approved and did what he wanted. He gambled that no one would notice, he lost. Quit whining and accept the consequences of your actions! Use it as a learning experience so you don't delay your next project.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 09:31

Permalink

Tom Underwood Marblehead, Mass.

First the removal of the historic shingles and replacement with historical inappropriate shingles -- and now this further violation. Sad.

David OB

You do know the shingles replacement was done by the previous owner, not this developer, right? Limping them into one disparaging sentence is what's sad.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 12:14

Permalink

gina Menemsha/NYC

Hard to believe that Mr. Dunn just realized that the area is an attraction for the all the reasons he mentioned .. He's been building there for @ least 2 yrs.. I think the fence was always "planned " He will most likely pay MVC & town fines & the fence stays ..He'll say it a safety issue..

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/14/2023 - 22:30

Permalink

Tom Engley West Tisbury

This is not a surprised. Mr Dunn will give lip service then do what suits him. I’ve said this before. Make him pay or just let him get his way. Amazing everything is legal at that site.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/15/2023 - 08:30

Permalink

Bert Oak Bluffs

The horse is already out of the barn . This project has forever changed the landscape and skyline of our port of entry . The size and color of the buildings are far from the character and charm that Vineyard Haven once had . When the bank replaced the tile roof with asphalt shingles ( with the towns permission ) the neighbours and historians demanded that Santander , at its own expense , revert back to the red tile roof. Where was that same level of interest when it came to allowing this project to move forward ?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/15/2023 - 13:02

Permalink

LC VH

This development continues to boggle my mind.
The slur attributed to Mr Dunn concerning persons with housing insecurity, substance use disorder and, for that matter, the lack of a car such that waiting for a bus might make you an “undesirable” should give pause when future building projects are brought to the powers that be for consideration.
Same as it ever was.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/15/2023 - 18:20

Permalink

Amy Edgartown

Uphold your mission MVC! We support you! This project is clearly way out of line with what was applied for and approved. Please don’t allow the same to take place with the educomp building

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/16/2023 - 13:11

Permalink

Dagmar Von Trotten Vineyard Haven

I hope Mr. Dunn will be paying for the
Storm water study, being that his unapproved wall is the issue.
Tisbury has enough expenses.
If he didn’t want possible “undesirable people “ near his colorful condos, building near the SSA was probably a bad location choice.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/17/2023 - 07:17

Permalink

Doreen Kinsman Vineyard Haven

To allow such a cluster of condos, stores and taqueria in such a critically important transportation hub of our town seems the height of folly. While I appreciate Mr.Dunn's purchase of our revered former stone bank property, such a concentration of living space for no doubt well-heeled individuals does nothing to alleviate our housing problem. The colorful mix and match exteriors of these structures is definitely not in keeping with the historically significant traditional gray shingled or white painted homes in our historical district and Main street all the way to and including West Chop., heretofore so in keeping and characteristically renowned in our town. Shockingly disappointing indeed!.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.