We write to publicly acknowledge the difficult choice to impose a moratorium on anchoring in Lake Tashmoo.
Editors, Vineyard Gazette;
We write to publicly acknowledge the difficult choice to impose a moratorium on anchoring in Lake Tashmoo recently voted by the Tisbury select board and to thank them for doing so. It is the responsibility of our town leaders, ultimately, to steward the town’s resources, both natural and financial for the benefit of all, not just for the present, but into the future.
It does appear that everyone present for the discussion acknowledges the stress imposed on our natural resources from over use. This is, after all, a challenge throughout the Island and other beautiful places people are attracted to.
What is also apparent is that we haven’t yet found a fair and manageable way to limit the use enough to preserve the health and longevity of the resource.
The select board unanimously stated their intent in voting for this moratorium was not to be the permanent solution. To the contrary, the imposition of an anchoring ban is a huge incentive for all stakeholders to come together to find those solutions. As stated, this is to be part of a plan for the overall management of Lake Tashmoo with the goal of preserving water quality, which is the basis for Tisbury Waterways Inc. advocacy.
The discussion revealed many good ideas that should be seen as encouraging. These ideas include alternatives to anchoring that still allow a limited number of guests to moor in the lake. Let’s try to hear all the ideas, keeping in mind the goal of preserving the pond, and help our town leaders chart a course.
Melinda Loberg
Vineyard Haven
The writer is president of the board of The Tisbury Waterways, Inc.

Comments
Please consider this modest
Carl Oak BluffsPlease consider this modest proposal: after one season of the anchoring moratorium, we check the nitrogen levels of the lake. If they haven't improved markedly, we also close all of the beaches on the lakefront for a season (maybe it was the swimmers and not the boaters that were relieving themselves in the water). Check the levels again, and if not improved - we stop all houses in the lake's watershed from using lawn fertilizers and septic systems, and then we measure nitrogen in the lake.
Which option do you think will have a real impact on the lake's water quality?
Which option will the neighbors, who love the pristine lake, reject outright?
Maybe once we identify the real source of excess nitrogen and pollution, we can stop scapegoating the off-islanders.
Will the TWI agree that if,
Tom TisburyWill the TWI agree that if, after a year with the moratorium, there is no improvement in eelgrass coverage and nitrogen levels, they will commit to looking for changes in fertilizer usage and septic systems in the Lake Tashmoo watershed?
If the boaters aren't the cause (which the numbers would show) then you should look to the sources of nitrogen identified by several studies for more effective solutions.
Add new comment