The lowest bid to do the work is about $20 million for each boat, general manager Robert Davis said Tuesday.
The Steamship Authority’s original budget to convert its three newest vessels into freight boats has been blown out of the water by sharply rising shipyard costs, boat line officials said this week.
The lowest bid to do the work is about $20 million for each boat, general manager Robert Davis told the port council Tuesday morning.
“We’d been looking at something in the $9 million range,” Mr. Davis said.
Supply chain costs and material prices, particularly for steel, have been going up significantly, director of marine operations Mark Amundsen said.
About 30 shipyards, from Rhode Island to as far away as Florida, Louisiana and Texas, requested the bid package, Mr. Davis told the council.
But only two companies actually bid on the job, he said.
“The yards that had previously taken out [bid] packages had indicated that they were fairly busy,” Mr. Davis said.
To reduce costs for the work, Mr. Davis suggested the authority extend its schedule for converting and recommissioning the three former oil-rig service vessels, at least two of which had been intended to go into service this fall.
“[This] is a very aggressive timeline, in terms of getting the work done, and so it appears the [bidding] yards built in a considerable amount of overtime in order to accomplish that,” Mr. Davis said.
He felt there was no reason the authority couldn’t extend the delivery time for the vessels, cutting on overtime costs.
“As long as we have them by the spring of 2024, we should be in good shape, so I think that will make a big difference in terms of some of the cost structure,” Mr. Davis said.
Nat Lowell, who represents Nantucket on the port council, endorsed Mr. Davis’s recommendation, saying the three identical ferries are crucial for both islands and will be worth the wait.
“The opportunity is so good to do this that I don’t care if it takes two more years,” he said.
Mr. Davis said the boat line will work with the low bidder to bring down the current estimate, and re-bid the project if necessary.
The Steamship Authority bought the first two vessels, renamed M/V Aquinnah and M/V Monomoy, last fall, paying about $10 million for both, and the third, M/V Barnstable, in December for $5.7 million.
All three saw brief service in the Gulf of Mexico before being mothballed more than a decade ago. They’ve since passed extensive inspections before changing hands.
An option to buy a fourth sister ship from the same seller, Hornbeck Offshore Services, was due to expire this month.

Comments
I’m sure SSA will tell
R Scott Patterson EdgartownI’m sure SSA will tell everyone it was completely unforeseen and couldn’t possibly be their fault in any way but not to worry, it can all be fixed by increasing fares.
Absolutely. We've heard this
Laura EdgartownAbsolutely. We've heard this song from SSA before. If they are truly this shortsighted this often, it is, indeed, time for new leadership, as the ignored study pointed out.
I'll reprise what I commented
Frustrated MVI'll reprise what I commented in August: "At least they are buying a matched pair which should help with operations and maintenance. Still, I don't know much about boats, but isn't cutting out the mid-section of the hull and superstructure kind of a huge deal? Were there no other options? Were new boats off the table? Sadly, I have little faith this will improve the SSA or its service."
So, this will cost extra time and/or extra $11 million per boat. It was hardly unknown that there were supply chain issues when the estimates were made. The situation is better now than it was then. Seems like this was a large underestimate. I remain hopeful that I am wrong while acknowledging that hope is not a plan.
I am sure they will cut all
Rob Webb Oak BluffsI am sure they will cut all kinds of necessary upgrades the ten+ year old mothballed freight vessels need just to get the prices down to where they need them to be. At this point couldn’t they have just built two new boats for the price of retrofitting these vessels to fit SSA needs? But no instead we are stuck backing vehicles and trucks on for another 25+ years.
Send the boats to Morgan city
Paul ChappySend the boats to Morgan city Louisiana, and the work could probably be done in half the time, for half the cost. The boats purchased, worked out in the gulf of Mexico for years, and the companies who specialize in them are on the gulf coast, send the boats there.
I commented many times. I
Jim EdgartownI commented many times. I said we should be buying new boats, the costs to retrofit will double triple in price.
Retired Ship builder welder
Holy crap. Buy a boat for $5
Bob Morris Woods HoleHoly crap. Buy a boat for $5 mil that’s been imothballed for 10 years and put 20 mil into a conversion. I wonder who performed the ‘intensive inspection’ —the same people who estimated 10 mil conversions? Much rather buy a vessel that’s been in operation and maintained. Wonder who the broker on the deal was?
Where is the Chief Operating Officer WITH INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE.
Please buy commuter passenger
James Oak BluffsPlease buy commuter passenger fast ferries. I will pay extra! You can use that money to retrofit your car carriers!
Every major decision
AnonymousEvery major decision announced by the SSA, whether the vessel purchases, RFP for New Bedford, technology upgrades or the Woods Hole terminal has ended up being significantly overbudget or problematic due to a lack of bidders. Yet, the Board of Governors approves the management's decisions. Time for a review of SSA Governance.
It is frustrating to know
Mr K Oak BluffsIt is frustrating to know that the experts in vessel maintenance hadn't put this in their specs, knowing that construction costs across the country have nearly doubled. In my humble opinion, the SSA should have bought 2 new "Woods Hole' type vessels. Then three could serve both islands, be interchangeable and something that the SSA has lost since the Islander left....reliability, could be reinstated with the fleet. It seems that since Senesco started servicing vessels, the real trouble has started. We can't blame the SSA Board of Governors for information that was not told to them, but we can ask them to hold accountable the paid leadership of the SSA. Again, my humble opinion.
-RobbyK, Oak Bluffs.
The "Woods Hole", because of
Thomas Hodgson WTThe "Woods Hole", because of its asymmetric, unbalanced, bow-heavy design, doesn't float right and never has. Check out the photos from when they first got that boat. It requires a huge amount of ballast and careful loading to float anywhere near level. Any re-use of this design that does not account for and correct this imbalance would not be wise.
First, the SSA rebuilds the
Thomas Hodgson wtFirst, the SSA rebuilds the Woods Hole docks to be seventy-five or so feet further out from the shore. Then the SSA buys boats that are so long have to have their length reduced by twenty feet in order to be able to use them. Can someone explain this?
Add new comment