Board met Tuesday over Zoom.

Chilmark Declines to Allow Pride Flag to Fly

The Chilmark select board voted this week not to widen its narrow flag policy to accommodate a request to fly an LGBTQ flag on town property. The policy is to allow only the American, state and town flags on town property.

The Chilmark select board voted this week not to widen its narrow flag policy to accommodate a request to fly an LGBTQ flag on town property.

The town’s policy is to allow only the American flag, state flag and town flags on town property.

The decision comes on the heels of an April request by the Martha’s Vineyard chapter of the NAACP to fly the LGBTQ flag in front of the town hall as well as police and fire stations during June to show support for LGBTQ pride month. The request coincided with a U.S. Supreme Court decision which found that the city of Boston violated the first amendment rights of a religious group when it declined to fly its flag in front of city hall but allowed flags from other groups. If Boston allowed one group to fly a flag, then it must allow any group which wished to do so, the court said.

After seeking advice from town counsel Ron Rappaport, the select board decided at its meeting Tuesday to keep to stick to the current policy in order to avoid wading into the murky waters of regulating free speech on town property, selectman James Malkin said.

“I could see a situation where one of us or members of our community feel one way about a flag that’s flown and others are violently opposed to that,” Mr. Malkin said. “There is enough divisiveness in our country at the moment and I don’t think that our town needs that kind of a situation.”

In other business Tuesday, the board decided to dip into its unclassified fund to offset budget overruns from the fire and harbor departments as well as the zoning board of appeals. The overruns total roughly $18,000 and are in part due to expenses related to equipment repairs to a corner of the commercial fishing dock at Menemsha.

The board also expanded the number of alternates on the zoning board of appeals from two to three so resident Fred Khedouri could join the board. The town will also advertise for another two alternates, which ZBA chairman Russell Maloney said is needed as the board sometimes struggles to reach a quorum.

“We only meet once a month, and there are situations where we don’t have a quorum and so the applicant goes away frustrated because they can’t get a decision,” Mr. Maloney said. “And they have to come back to another meeting with another engineer a month later and that costs them money.”

The board also appointed Island carpenter Billy Dillon to serve as clerk of the works, a project manager tasked with overseeing construction, for the ongoing project to build a new firehouse and Tri-town EMS building.

Chilmark board of health member Jan Buhrman discussed the board’s recent indoor mask recommendation.

“We are suggesting that right now, on Martha’s Vineyard, people do mask up when they’re indoors,” Ms. Buhrman said. “If people want to follow the [Center for Disease Control] recommendation, they should continue to get booster [shots].”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/25/2022 - 18:51

Permalink

Hank Alford Up-Island

Chilmark has always been a very conservative town, in almost every sense of that word, I guess it’s on the other towns to continue to make progress and be inclusive and maybe someday Chilmark will join in that.

Tom Edgartown

Well, that maybe true. But I think there is a tremendous amount of liberal residents…
This is a classic don’t do what I go do what I say… that has always been Chilmark
From affordable housing to private beaches…

Jose Oak Bluffs

I always found Chilmark to be inclusive, along with every other town on the Island. The issue is that affinity flags belong on private property, not on government properties. If you allow one affinity flag on government lands, you are pretty much opening up the door to flying all and any affinity flags, some of which you may disagree with. This is a recipe for discord. There is plenty of discord around these days and not enough unity. The American flag, state flag and town flags signify unity (we are all Americans) and a system which stand for the constitutional freedoms that we enjoy. We should all be able to unify around these flags. Without the freedoms that these flags promote, many affinity flags would not be tolerated even on private lands. For example, try flying a Uighar flag in China.

M kelfer Chilmark

Seems to me an unfair assessment. And a misunderstanding of the implications .Painting the town with such a broad brushstroke is unfair to the wonderfully open-minded, kind-hearted and “inclusive” residents I’ve enjoyed meeting and living amongst these past 5 years. As an aside… 87% of Chilmark voters chose Biden/Harris in 2020. For whatever that’s worth….
Peace

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 06:31

Permalink

Mark Chilmark

American flag, State, and town flags only. We do not need to fly a flag of sexual preference. End of discussion, there's no need for a heterosexual flag, so there's no need for a LGBT Flag. The 1/2 of 1% should not be the loudest voice.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 08:12

Permalink

Rachel D. Chilmark

Chilmark prides itself in being an inclusive community, these actions do not speak for our community members, only the selectmen.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 13:04

Permalink

Alexandra Middle Road

I'm surprised and saddened that Chilmark is willing to oppose flying a flag in support of our LGBTQ+ community members simply because some residents might be "violently opposed." Sure, the issue of regulating free speech on town property can be "murky." But why should that act as a deterrent to doing what's right? We can do hard things. And when it comes to supporting members of our LGBTQ+ community -- and any other underrepresented group, for that matter -- we should be willing to wade into those waters, no matter how clouded, because that is who we are as an island community. We stand up for what is right and what is just.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 15:58

Permalink

Carol formerly Chilmark

The town's policy is correct. Affinity flags of all kinds - all - do not belong on town (i.e., on government) property. That is not homophobic, it is just an appropriate policy.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 16:06

Permalink

Jordan chilmark

What a disappointment. Chilmark select board is not exactly a profile in courage. An embarrassing result for a town that has so many progressive residents. Kick the can down the road and let others make the hard decisions. And blame the lawyers along the way.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/26/2022 - 17:16

Permalink

Lorraine Edgartown

Inclusiveness is up to the individual. It has no place in flags flown on taxpayer property. Each individual decides what is inclusive to himself. Spare me the pronoun discussion, please.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/28/2022 - 15:02

Permalink

Timothy Rich Chilmark

On May 02, 2022, while the above referenced flag request was pending with the Chilmark BOS, the US Supreme Court in Shurtleff v. Boston unanimously overturned a lower court's decision where the City of Boston arbitrarily decided which private flags could fly on public flag poles. The Board correctly sought legal advice from town counsel and followed it. Its constitutionality quite simple, if you allow one flag, you have to allow all flags, with narrow exceptions.
The readers might be surprised, or not, the vile and offensive flags that would be allowed to fly on public flag poles under the same protection upheld in Shurtleff v. Boston. The lower court got it wrong and the Chilmark BOS got it right..

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/30/2022 - 14:35

Permalink

Lydia Fischer West Tisbury

I am proud and queer - also born and raised here. I am personally appalled, embarrassed and saddened by this news. For shame.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.