Buoyed by the outcome Tuesday night, on Wednesday the coalition to create a housing bank for the Vineyard was looking to the next steps.
Buoyed by the outcome Tuesday night when four Island towns voted their overwhelming support for a housing bank for Martha’s Vineyard, on Wednesday the coalition that has led the campaign to create the housing bank was already looking to the next steps.
“We’re feeling really grateful to the community and really pleased with the voter turnout and with the engagement and all the support,” coalition coordinator Laura Silber told the Gazette by phone.
The town meeting votes still hinge on approval in the ballot box.
Edgartown, Oak Bluffs and West Tisbury hold their elections tomorrow. The Tisbury election is May 24.
“I would say [I’m] pleased, but absolutely not complacent,” Ms. Silber said. “It doesn’t go through until the ballot votes happen, but I was really delighted with the support last night.”
If the initiative wins approval in at least four of the six Vineyard towns, it can go to the state legislature as a home rule petition.
“This is a fantastic first step. It’s a huge first step,” Ms. Silber said. “The fact that the votes were so overwhelming in all of the towns was really extraordinary. Honestly I can’t remember the last time something like that happened.”
The overwhelming support speaks to all the outreach the coalition did, she said.
“We’ve done dozens and dozens of meetings with the towns that have all been open public meetings that are all on public record so that the community can access any part of this process and we’ll continue to do that going forward,” she said.
She also said the wide voting margins are important because state lawmakers take community support into account when considering legislation.
“The fact that these votes were so overwhelming is going to make a big difference at the legislature as they’re considering the Vineyard support for a transfer fee,” Ms. Silber said. “I think that the votes last night sent a really, really strong message to the legislature and I hope that the ballot votes will confirm that and send the same kind of message.”
Chilmark and Aquinnah hold their town meetings and elections later this month and in early May.
•
The housing bank would establish a new regional government entity funded by a two per cent transfer fee on most real estate transactions over $1 million. The money would be used to expand and develop more affordable housing on the Vineyard through grants and loans from the housing bank.
On Tuesday night, the debate was passionate on all sides, beginning in West Tisbury, where an overflow crowd of voters turned out.
“All we are doing tonight is starting the process, it gives us a seat at the table,” said John Abrams, a coalition steering committee member who has led the charge this year.
“If we do not support it we will have nothing. Think about this: all six select boards agreed to put this in front of the voters. We are hoping you will not just support it, but overwhelmingly support it," Mr. Abrams said.
And voters did, over the objections of a handful who spoke against the initiative. The standing vote was 324-27.
Edgartown followed suit soon after the West Tisbury vote, approving the housing bank question in a voice vote on the town meeting floor at the Old Whaling Church.
Remarks were equally passionate from townspeople.
“I do know people who have lived in the state forest and you probably do too, although you might not know it,” said Kate Putnam, who is also a member of the coalition.
“Let’s not miss this opportunity to be part of the discussion. I’m afraid that if we don’t act, there won’t be anyone who can help me age in place,” she said.
Ben Hall Jr. echoed the theme.
“I am heartily behind this legislative proposal,” he said. “I cannot tell you how many of my friends, people I grew up with in Edgartown are not here anymore. The heart of our community is now leaving the Island . . . Let’s not have perfect get in the way of good.”
Oak Bluffs took up the article later in its meeting at the Performing Arts Center and the outcome was the same: a nearly unanimous vote in favor of the housing bank.
“It’s a step forward, not an adoption vote . . . we’ll send a powerful message to the legislature,” said Kira Sullivan, drawing applause.
Gretchen Coleman Thomas urged voters to get behind it.
“I will be 79 years old in December and I don’t have housing,” she said. “I’ve been looking off Island and it’s as hard as it is here,” she added.
Luanne Johnson agreed.
“I have a P.O. box in West Tisbury because I’ve moved around the Island like a lot of people have,” she said.
Late in the evening Tisbury made it unaninmous, voting 205-23 to back the bank.
“Let’s not miss this opportunity,” said coalition member Julie Fay. “This housing crisis threatens our community, our economy and our way of life.”
There were critics. “This legislation will do absolutely nothing for the fundamental problem of housing equity,” said Tony Peak. “Passing it codifies a two-tiered housing system,” he added.
But by far the majority came down in favor of the housing bank, calling it an important first step.
“We have a chance to make a difference and we have to start somewhere,” said Judy Federowicz.
•
All four towns saw strong turnouts, as expected this year, with the housing bank question topping the docket.
It also was an evening to celebrate a return to some sense of normalcy in the annual town meeting schedule. Many voters marveled at being able to gather again, some maskless while others wore face coverings.
“It’s amazing to see everyone in person,” Edgartown IT director Adam Darack said during his report to the town.
In West Tisbury moderator Dan Waters gaveled the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., with every seat in the school gym filled. In Edgartown at 7 p.m. it was a similar scene, with a long line of voters stretching outside the Old Whaling Church. Late-day light filtered through tall windows, casting shadows across the pews.
“Is this just an Island thing where no one ever starts on time?” one voter asked another who was seated next to her.
Outgoing West Tisbury poet laureate Spencer Thurlow read his last town meeting poem, and voters easily approved an annual town operating budget, trimming the legal spending line item from $30,000 to $20,000.
Early in the meeting a bylaw to regulate the size of residential homes saw overwhelming support, passing 352-11.
Many spoke in favor of the so-called big house bylaw, modeled after one already on the books in Chilmark.
“This bylaw provides the necessary guardrails for now and in the future and it’s the right time for it,” said Brendan O’Neill.
“Don’t we come here to be mostly outside as much as possible?” said Whit Griswold, drawing cheers.
Builder Gary Maynard added his view. “Many people here may be surprised to hear that I’m in favor of this . . . I build medium to big houses,” he said. “My wife and I live in a 1,000-square-foot house and we often find it too big"
In Edgartown, voters approved a $40.9 million operating budget and 2.5 per cent cost of living raise for town employees after lengthy debate about whether the amount should be higher. An amendment to raise the amount failed. But voters were happy to open their wallets to bring back the Fourth of July fireworks, increasing a $50,000 appropriation to $75,000.
Oak Bluffs easily approved a $35.5 million operating budget with no discussion. Voters agreed to appropriate up to $6.9 million to shore up the East Chop bluff, which is critically threatened by erosion. The town has secured more than $10 million in FEMA funding, but needs to show that the town is willing to pay its share in order to receive the grant.
“It is not our intention to pay the full $6.9 million,” said town administrator Deb Potter, who said the amount is expected to be offset by other grants.
Voters also gave strong support to a proposal to appropriate up to $26 million to expand the town wastewater treatment facility, which is nearing capacity, and extend sewer where needed. Select board member Gail Barmakian said the town intends to seek oustide funding but needs to show town support for the effort.
“There’s a variety of funding out there. We want to get in line for this,” she said.
Richard Leonard also urged voters to approve the plan.
“The sooner we get moving with this and start the process . . . the better,” he said to loud applause.
In Tisbury voters approved a $150,000 capital appropriation for repairs to the library. Town administrator Jay Grande said the town will be coming back with a much larger capital request for renovation and an addition. “It's been plagued with issues from the day it opened and some of these are related to the procurement processes that were undertaken years and years ago,” he said. “There's been a lot of money spent on the building, but it's been an incremental approach, not comprehensive.”
Zach Harris, Bill Eville, Aidan Pollard and Louisa Hufstader contributed reporting.

Comments
Anyone who was present for
Ginny Jones WTAnyone who was present for the WT ATM tonight will have been [mostly] pleased by the outcomes and by the good humored respect with which the voters and the town leaders approached each and every one of the 51 warrant items. The level of civility between residents with various opposing view points never really slipped. Although we ended up voting about $ 22 M in expenditures, which is a hefty increase from last year (and rather shocking), there was very much a feeling that folks were voting for some very important projects and policies -- all of which will benefit the whole community over the long term. There is a sense of an island wide paradigm switch on many levels and in many programs.-- one that will be very positive. I may be wrong (I often am) but it seems to me that many islanders are beginning to understand, and work on, ways to keep the island vibrant and a family friendly place where islanders can survive, and thrive. And we can keep the island an environmental success story rather than a subset of a Hamptons or some other egregious community.
Thanks voters for providing the Planning Board with some tools which allow us to approach each and every project with a flexible yet critical eye.
Thanks too, to all, for keeping your heads down, for creatively and courageously approaching thorny issues, and for coming to consensus with each other and with the issues.
Maybe now something will be
Charlie Callahan So Boston/EdgartownMaybe now something will be done for affordable housing.And those who can't deal with it can move
And West Tisbury voted to
Kate Warner West TisburyAnd West Tisbury voted to join Brookline, Arlington, Concord, Lexington, Acton and Cambridge in asking the Legislature to give us permission to require that all new construction and major renovations be 100% electric!
When I built my house in 1983
dont fool me again edgWhen I built my house in 1983 we all got snookered into putting in 'cheap efficient' electric heat. We got a special 'space heating rate' whereby the more electricity that we used, the price per KWH was reduced. Back then the only choice was heating oil or electric. (there was no bulk propane delivery-just cooking cylinders) After the thousands of homes were built with electric heat, the utility at the time was allowed to remove that rate and charged us the same as people just using electricity for light bulbs. When I was on vacation for the month of february, I left my heat on 50 degrees, and got an electric bill for over $400.00. So NO THANKS in case you want the REAL story
I know exactly what happened
Kate Warner West TisburyI know exactly what happened to you and it is sad as electric baseboard heating is THE most expensive way to heat your house and sadly, the electric utility company encouraged it and offered lower rates if you did it and then took those lower rates away. Air source heat pumps are the most efficient way to heat and are a whole different technology.
As an electrician, 100%
Donald OBAs an electrician, 100% electric, is NOT the way to go! people need 2 sources of fuel in a home, if the power grid goes down, with 2 fuel sources, people can still cook and run a generator to power up, and heat their home. Opting for one fuel source is asking for trouble!
I feel it is newsworthy to
News PerhapsI feel it is newsworthy to note that one of the few “No” votes in Oak Bluffs came from Brian Packish, chairperson of the selectboard.
Anyone who grew up here and
Rational Person Oak BluffsAnyone who grew up here and or moved here in the last 30 years or so knows this is an expensive place to live. Housing has been a problem for decades. The housing bank is like someone who goes out and buys a Mercedes and realizes they can't afford to put gas in it. So the solution is tax anyone else buying a Mercedes to pay for the gas! How ridiculous.
West Tis had a great night.
Walker West TisburyWest Tis had a great night. Opposing opinions were given lots of time and greeted with applause on both sides. From reading most of the comments online you’d expect a mess of a town meeting. The reality was far from it. Warm, engaging, and respectful.
Here’s why I will vote twice
Jame Katch ChilmarkHere’s why I will vote twice for the Housing Bank—at town meeting and at the ballot box.
People have questions about whether the Housing Bank will be run by people who do what we want. Well, I’m 74, and so far, no one in my life has done everything I want. BUT the people who are elected to make the Housing Bank decisions will be working incredibly hard to make the best possible decisions for our island and for affordable housing. They live here and know what matters to us.
Without the Housing Bank, those decisions are made by the wealthy folks, mostly people who don’t live here year round and don’t care about affordable housing. They care most about making more money.They have been making those decisions and will continue to, if we let them.
So vote for the Housing Bank, elect the best people we can find, complain about the decisions we don’t agree with, and vote them out if they don’t do their job.
To me, the balance is clear. Support the Housing Bank!
What I loved about Tisbury
Caitlin Burbidge TisburyWhat I loved about Tisbury town meeting: the commemoration to the gym (the last time we'll meet in that space), being able to meet together after covid, new voters in their 20's and 30's attending for the first time, randomly sitting next to Tristan Israel who has years of political wisdom to share, my town passing a wonderful bill for affordable housing that means a lot to me and many other people I love, most of whom are housing insecure. Thank you to Rachel Orr for thoughtful input, which I am interested in talking about more. No matter what side anyone is on, it's clear that we care about our town and that's pretty great isn't it. Go MV.
Edgartowns meeting was
Hannah Burbidge EdgartownEdgartowns meeting was interesting to say the least. Although there was very little opposition to the housing bank, even those who spoke opposed completely agreed that the housing crisis here is at its breaking point. They said they are for affordable housing. And when it comes down to it, the crisis outweighs the small details people find issue with.
MV deserves affordable housing for the working community that lives here. This is a triumph for us! Community staying together is more important than anything else. Glad to be able to be apart of this vote for the Housing Bank!
It all sounds good. I have
Jim EdgartownIt all sounds good. I have not once heard a "plan" for the "crisis" when all the money comes in? Hire planners and professionals to deal with this "crisis"?
This story has been played before just a different issue. How about all that tax reveunue from the seasonal rentals?? Where is that money going?? Land Bank revenue?
If we are not careful every "crisis" that comes along we will be tapping our nest eggs that I and others worked ver hard to get. There is a reason I own a home on the Island, I worked hard,2-3 jobs while in school, now I have 2 jobs. I work 70 hours a week and more in the summer. Can all the folks looking for affordable housing say the same?
Can anyone comment on whether
Ben I EdgartownCan anyone comment on whether or not a housing bank applicant has the ability to purchase and "own" an affordable housing property via the Housing Bank or are they only able to become a "renter" by going through the housing bank? Thanks!
Hi can you confirm if the
Mary Jane Nevin ChilmarkHi can you confirm if the Housing Bank has a residency requirement? Or any requirement for application? If not, then does that mean that anyone in the US that wants to live here can simply apply & get housing ? I thought the Housing Bank was being created as a way to help those who already live & work here get year round affordable housing. If all applicants already have a job or a vested interested in living here then the Housing Bank will have accomplished its goal. Without any requirements Im afraid it will be just a very expensive mistake.
At risk of being a lone other
Mike ChilmarkAt risk of being a lone other-voice here, as much as I support efforts towards the creation of affordable housing, there is still a “tax the rich” uneasiness for me. Say you worked hard to buy a home here 5/10/15/20 years ago…paid the 2% tax on that purchase, and enjoyed the appreciation value in that home. Your RE taxes rose over the years as well. Now you’d like to upgrade to a larger home, and your current home is worth north of $1 million. Not uncommon these days. You’ll now be assessed another 2% on your sale over the million, and pay another 2% on the new home purchase, in addition to the capital gains generated ( if not a primary residence). Seems like a lot of taxing.
Wonder if there’s a creative way to “credit” some/part of your initial 2% purchase tax towards the 2% over a million sales tax . Might be a more palatable compromise?
This should have been a
Islander61 OBThis should have been a choice, land bank or housing bank. Having both is asking a lot for a buyer to pay. Maybe alternate years, even years land bank gets the money and odd years the housing bank. The $1M price tag is too low as well. You can’t buy anything for under $1M now. Increase it to $1.75M. For those looking for options, there’s one. A 4% tax is too much for anyone to pay, it will eventually affect the seller, there’s no way it won’t. I hope the legislature amends this to something more reasonable.
Add new comment