Six boards of health met over Zoom Wednesday.

Boards of Health Suspend Indoor Mask Mandate Islandwide

Marking another turning point in the pandemic, Islanders can now shop, dine out and enter most public buildings without masks.

Marking another turning point in the pandemic, Islanders can now shop, dine out and enter most public buildings without masks, following a unanimous vote by the six town boards of health Wednesday.

The six-town decision to suspend the mask mandate went into effect as soon as the health boards’ joint meeting adjourned shortly before 1:30 p.m. Wednesday, after nearly an hour and a half of discussion and public comment.

“It’s time to suspend,” Chilmark health board member Jan Buhrman said. “The community has trusted us . . . We should do what the CDC is recommending.”

More than 155 people attended the meeting held over Zoom.

The lifting of the mandate is not universal; under federal law, face coverings are still required on public transportation through at least March 18. This includes the Vineyard Transit Authority and the Steamship Authority, spokesmen for both lines confirmed Thursday.

“You’re still required to have a mask on for all public transit,” VTA administrator Angela Grant told the Gazette by phone.

The policy also applies to VTA headquarters, she said.

“There’s some federal money in this building, [so] we also have to have them on in the building,” Ms. Grant said.

“[I’m] hoping that some of that gets lightened up once they reevaluate in the middle of the month,” she continued. “But for us, it’s business as it’s been

since it started.” Masks are available aboard VTA buses for those who do not have their own.

The SSA operates under Coast Guard (federal) rules, spokesman Sean Driscoll said.

Masks are also still required at the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital, which takes its direction from the Massachusetts Department of Health and the Mass General Brigham system, hospital spokeswoman Marissa Lefebvre said.

“Even last summer when the mandate was lifted, hospitals were still required to have masks. All visitors and patients and employees,” she said.

She did not know when the hospital expects to hear from the state, but Ms. Lefebvre indicated the mask mandate in the hospital is here to stay.

“It’s unlikely for quite some time, but again, nothing is changing at least for right now,” she said.

Island libraries also will retain their masking policies for the next few weeks, with the potential exception of Oak Bluffs.

Face covering requirements have followed the ebb and flow of the pandemic on the Vineyard for the past two years.

At one point masks were required indoors and out. Later the indoor requirement was retained, but the outdoor requirement lifted.

Early last summer when Covid-19 case counts were well down, the boards of health suspended the indoor mandate.

But in mid-August, with the Delta variant raging, the requirement was reinstated.

It stayed in place until this week.

One day after the vote by the health boards, many businesses around the Island took down the signs that had been taped to the doors for months, warning patrons that face coverings were mandatory.

In a message posted on its Facebook page, Cronig’s Markets took note of the change.

“All Cronig’s locations have decided to no longer require masks following the recent Islandwide decision top lift the mask mandate,” the post said. “We still encourage everyone to wear one if they’d like to. Thank you to all of our customers.”

At the Wednesday meeting library directors registered their concerns.

“We have a lot of elderly visitors who are in the high risk category. They’re still reluctant,” said Vineyard Haven library director Amy Ryan during the public comment session preceding the vote.

“We want to balance people’s safety and their comfort,” Ms. Ryan said.

Five of the Island’s six public libraries are run by elected boards that have jurisdiction over activities in their buildings, including masking, Chilmark library director Ebba Hierta said. The Oak Bluffs library, which has an appointed board, is unable to set its own policy, library director Allyson Malik said as she requested the ability to keep requiring masks.

“The kids generally coming to story time . . . are under five [and] none of them have been vaccinated,” Ms. Malik said.

The Oak Bluffs health board agreed to allow Ms. Malik to continue the library’s current masking policy until she can bring her request to the town select board at its next meeting.

Wednesday’s all-Island vote to suspend the mandate also stipulates that it will go back into effect automatically if infections and hospitalizations on the Vineyard rise to levels specified by the federal Centers for Disease Control.

And face coverings are still required as part of the state Department of Public Health guidance for isolation and quarantine for people who contract Covid-19.

Health board members discussed, then abandoned an amendment that would have expressly stated the rights of individual proprietors to set masking rules at their establishments.

“The businesses can make their own decisions about masking,” said Tisbury health agent Maura Valley.

Moderated by Tisbury building inspector Ross Seavey, the virtual meeting saw ample public comment, much of it critical of the measures that have been used to control infection and community spread of the virus, and are widely considered sound by most public health experts.

“Masks are ridiculous. They don’t work,” Lara Maciel said.

Edgartown school committee member Louis Paciello said he was happy that children won’t have to mask up in school, but displeased with the health boards’ reliance on CDC recommendations.

“I’d like for you to not follow the CDC so much,” Mr. Paciello said.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2022 - 21:19

Permalink

island girl West Tisbury

Thanks one and all for -- despite considerable personal sacrifice and exhausting hours -- working to keep us all safe. Some may vilify you, but the sensible and thoughtful members of the island community who are safe cannot thank you enough. For all of us (plus family and friends who have been kept safe from COVID we appreciate your efforts. For all those who have complained and whined -- get over it. Instead of excoriating these good people, be glad that with almost a million Americans tragically dead, and others suffering from lingering effects,that we have had only one death.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2022 - 21:30

Permalink

Jesse Chase Martha's Vineyard

Is it accurate that one in five Martha's Vineyard year round residents are 65 years old or older -- the most vulnerable human beings to the potentially severe (and possibly lethal or longterm) effects of quite contagious Covid19?

Island Town Councils on Aging, what say you?

Carmen, OB

Even more reason Jesse the older population, elderly and those immunocompromised to remain masked if they chose in vulnerable situations. Those who are fully vaccinated, boosted and healthy do not need to. Just like with any virus, the flu can be just as deadly to some, you don’t mask up an entire island or anywhere for that matter indefinitely to prevent that, that is not realistic. Why not focus on helping and educating those who ARE vulnerable to protect themselves from not only Covid, but other respiratory viruses that can be just as serious? Supply unlimited n95 masks for them, testing, etc. This is not an all or nothing situation. Everyone is entitled to managing their own health care decisions for themselves or a family member. We have the tools, everyone’s immune system is different, so those who need them should use them, it’s their choice.

What about children under 5? Up-island

Everyone happy about this decision to unmask (while the majority of the island is away on school vacation) seems to conveniently leave out of this conversation that vaccines are still not available to children under 5 and children under 2 can not wear masks. So these “tools” you say are available to everyone are, in fact, NOT. Bracing myself and hoping for my baby’s sake there isn’t a surge on island when everyone returns from vacation and walks into schools without masks. I’m disappointed that the BOH didn’t wait until the end of March to lift the mandate to ensure the safety of our littlest

Carmen, OB

Children under 5: totally understand your worries, I have children, however, we have learned children are at a very low risk and so are school settings, that should be reassuring, they do not recommend vaccinations at this time for 5 and under b/c they want to make sure they even need it and if so, I would rather them do the research extensively before rushing to vaccinate the younger population to make sure it’s even safe for them. Not saying no one gets sick from Covid in that age group, but they are just at risk for viruses such as RSV and others, my daughter was very ill with RSV and was hospitalized for a week. My point is, if you look at the science and data, little ones are in the low risk category overall and you cannot put your children in a bubble either. Regards to masking, paper and cloth masks have proven not to be efficient protection when it comes to airborne viruses, that’s why N95 masks became highly recommended especially for the vulnerable and you cannot expect all children to wear n95 masks for an entire day either. Vulnerable children that need extra protection, masking precautions should be up to their parents/ their doctor. Look at omicron for example, everyone was masked and it still spread like wildfire, thankfully it was mild. Long term use of mask wearing also has been proven to cause mental, speech development, educational, social damage in children, not to mention high schoolers and college kids. Even boosters with young adults, that is now being questioned by doctors, they did not even study that age group enough and pushed the boosters on healthy vaccinated young adults. Every parent has the option to continue to mask their children at school if that makes them feel better, totally respect that, but given what we know now, continuing to mask an entire community is unnecessary and will do more damage at this point. Those who decide to continue mask wearing will always have that choice and they should be respected and not judged as well.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2022 - 21:53

Permalink

BJ’D Edgartown

I agree with the comments about the CDC, their credibility has been questioned and challenged throughout the pandemic.

Not a fan of ‘suspend’ either, it should be ‘lifted’.

We are not longer in ‘a state of emergency’ so to keep mandates on the table for ‘just in case’ scenarios is overreach of local powers. It is crucial our own appointed elected officials follow the guidelines and not abuse their powers.

That said, they made the right call, people are done with mandates and restrictions, it’s been proven life can now resume safely now with precautions and people can be responsible for themselves. Mentally, this move towards normalcy will have a positive impact on our community, we (all ages) needed this. Cheers to seeing faces and smiles again!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2022 - 22:00

Permalink

Downislander

“There’s so much other science out there”. From the “alternative facts” contingency. Please tell me that this crackpottery wasn’t a factor in the Boards of Health decision.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2022 - 22:38

Permalink

What about kids under 5? Up-Island

My toddler is unable to be vaccinated yet and now I am so nervous that his older sibling will be walking back into school next week with classmates that have been all over the globe during vacation. I’m really disappointed in our local Boards of Health and wish they could’ve at least wait two weeks after vacation ends to lift the mask mandate.

BCS Oak Bluffs

Look at the data. Your toddler is far, far more likely to be struck by lightning on a sunny day in March as you walk your older child to the bus stop than to be infected adversely by covid.

Resident of MV/ and a mom

With all due respect, we have the DESE, MA Department of Public Health, CDC and others in agreement that we can now move forward without masks in most indoor settings, including schools. This decision was inevitable as we enter the endemic phase. If you disagree with their collective assessment that we can now move on from mask mandates, my suggestion would be to talk to your pediatrician about your concerns.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 03/03/2022 - 06:56

Permalink

Joanne Chilmark

Follow the science to impose mask mandate and follow the science to lift it. Well done Boards of Health!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/04/2022 - 05:38

Permalink

CLC Edgartown

Hallelujah! The boards made the RIGHT DECISION. And for those of you complaining, feel free to continue masking and don’t come down on others who have moved on with their lives. Mask optional is the only path forward. Allow people to choose for themselves. Bravo MVY! Beyond thrilled for the poor children. They should not be brought up in a mask wearing society and be expected to learn and thrive under these tyrannical restrictions.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.