The house dates to 1877 and is considered historically significant.
Martha's Vineyard Commission

MVC Weighs Demolition of Historic House in East Chop

Plans to tear down a historic East Chop home forced neighbors and historic planners to weigh concerns about increasing home demolitions.

Plans to tear down a historic East Chop home forced neighbors, Martha’s Vineyard Commissioners and historic planners to weigh concerns about increasing home demolitions in the town against their support for the proposed rebuild project during a public hearing Thursday.

Located in the heart of the Vineyard Highlands at 9 Beecher Park, the 2,000-square-foot home dates to 1877 and was built in the expansive Camp Ground style, according to a commission staff report.

The home’s age, as well as its listing on MACRIS, the state historic building database, as a historically significant structure, triggered mandatory review by the commission.

Applicants are Bill and Melissa Callahan, who purchased the property in September 2020 for $1.3 million. Their designer is Oak Bluffs architect Chuck Sullivan.

Although the home lies outside a defined historic district, testimony provided to the commission by the town historic district committee suggested the front facade was the most historic and significant part of the building, which has had numerous additions over the past century.

A structural report provided by the applicants stated that while the house did not exhibit any major structural stability issues, it would need “significant structural upgrades” in each of the load bearing components if the applicants undertook any major renovation project.

At Thursday’s meeting, Mr. Sullivan and commission staff said the applicants want to replace the historic home with a 3,500-square-foot, year-round residence. The new building would be similar in style to the historic home, except larger, Mr. Sullivan said, with a covered porch, white trim, cedar shingles and wood moldings and gables that resembled the old building.

“The new building is intended to match the historic building in several respects,” commission DRI coordinator Alex Elvin said.

Mr. Sullivan advocated for the tear down during the public hearing, saying it would be more cost-effective than a renovation — and actually lead to greater preservation of the historic parts of the home because a renovation would require significant structural support.

“This building could be saved . . . but for an Island family . . . it’s a significant cost to renovate this building,” Mr. Sullivan said. “By the time you do all of that, you don’t see anything of the inside structure.”

Barbara Baskin, a member of the town historic district commission, said if the house was in the Cottage City or Copeland historic districts, it would likely not be a candidate for demolition. But she praised Mr. Sullivan’s design, and urged that the demolition preserve the house’s historic outer facade.

“I have seen a lot of Chuck’s work. He knows how to fix these houses,” Ms. Baskin said. “These houses are old. They are tired. They are weak. But there are ways to make them strong again,” she added, referencing a responsible tear down.

Neighbors Cecilia Brennan and Perry Paterson also complimented the design, but voiced concerns of their own, including the height of the proposed two-car garage and sentimental value of the historic house.

“I’m very conflicted. How do you determine what to save, and what not to save?” Mr. Paterson asked.

Craig Dripps, head of the East Chop Association, said he looked forward to having the Callahans as neighbors but also expressed reservations, adding that he hoped the east side of the house could be preserved.

“As a community, we frown against the idea of buying places and then tearing them down. It seems to be the way things are done these days,” Mr. Dripps said. “I have mixed feelings . . . we have to think about the history and the heritage of that particular residence.”

The public hearing was closed, with the written record left open for one week.

In other business, the commission continued to labor over the written decision for the Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School’s athletic complex, which will include a synthetic turf field. Commissioners voted 10-4 to remove added wording from the written decision.

Commissioners who voted against the controversial project said they intended to write a minority opinion.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 08/14/2021 - 08:13

Permalink

David Wilson Oak Bluffs

Why do people buy houses they don’t like? Tons of Islanders would be ecstatic to live in this beautiful home. I hope the MVC denies this request for a complete demo. The owner can modify their plans, or sell in a great market and buy the brand spanking new place they really want.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 08/14/2021 - 11:24

Permalink

trip barnes vineyard haven

The inside walls are the outside walls no insulation all windows need replacing framing is hacked together with several old additions and NOTHING MEETS CODE today A lot will be reused no foundation just pilings The family likes the neighborhood THEY ARE YEAR ROUND WORKING PEOPLE WHO WANT A SAFE HOME TO RAISE THEIR FAMILY.The only historical fact is it had no inside toilet for decades thats why the grass is so green behind the house ENOUGH SAID

Chris Ewing Oak Bluffs

Tripp, I beg your pardon! The cottage was built 144 years ago in the Victorian style of the time. Of course it doesn’t have insulation or a foundation! Your comment about the toilet and the grass is preposterous! We bought that house in 1979 and of course it had inside toilets! The reason why the grass is so green is because my father painstakingly nourished it year after year from May 15th to October 15th. My father would be pained if he knew that our beloved cottage was going to be torn down, but he was a practical man and he knew that our time in that special place was over. No one will ever be able to experience the magic that we did at 9 Beecher Park.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 08/14/2021 - 17:11

Permalink

chris keniston formerly west tisbury

if you're so concerned about saving it the buy it otherwise mind your own business. they have a design that fits. some of these buildings are either fire hazards or ready to collapse and no one knows it. houses have a certain life span. economics as far as air and heat matter. let it go

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 08/14/2021 - 20:12

Permalink

Mary CT seasonal islander for over 50 years

It is a shame that people do not wish to preserve history. Money is trumping everything these days and those who have it think they can do anything… let’s preserve island history. This seems to be a common thread these days on the island. Let’s save and preserve our beautiful little island!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 08/14/2021 - 23:02

Permalink

Islander Vineyard Haven

What’s the point of tearing down historic houses to replace them with bigger “ more efficient “ structures that can be put up anywhere in America by installers that look like “ anywhere in America “ so a working island family who can afford a $2 million dollar house can have central air and a sprinkler system to keep that grass green.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 08/15/2021 - 21:00

Permalink

trip barnes vh

chris sorry to tell you it was built as a summer house.Plenty of houses built 144 years ago had foundations you can put nailpolish on a hangnail but you still have a hangnail Ihave moved many houses and restored the 4th oldest house in Edgartown FYI THERE WAS NO INDOOR PLUMBING in the house until the 1920s hand pump in the kitchen.no septic no cesspool no electricity no zoning no building code sadly you could not legally build that house today

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 08/16/2021 - 08:22

Permalink

Marie Edgartown

It’s not the owners fault. It’s who we are now. We are no longer a summer community. We are a year round community with year round needs. We are all trying hard not to become a suburb,, but face it if it wasn’t for our beautiful ocean and ponds, which if we don’t act fast to preserve will be history, we are a suburb of the main land. Let’s try to focus on our infrastructure and be realistic when we think of who we are today. Historic, I am afraid is history, look at what is going on in the world.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/17/2021 - 08:05

Permalink

Burgo off Nantucket

… the lack of local will, let alone political will, to conserve what remains of the Island’s character is startling. Witness the scandal of the miles of trails and bike ways permitted to be cut through your very limited wild and even special value old growth areas. And the quickening pace if permitted demolition. The appeal of the Island depends on key characteristics - change is possible of course but a greater sensibility and a higher leadership IQ appears to be needed as the Island moves inexorably towards vanilla-anywhere.

Island born Oak Bluffs

"Very limited?" A full third of Martha's Vineyard is conservation land, which can't be built on. The "miles of trails" are carefully put in to PRESERVE the "Special value old growth areas." Do at least a TINY bit of research before commenting on our Island. I do agree about the constant demo/rebuild ethic here, I wish more people valued history.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/17/2021 - 08:12

Permalink

Alan off Island Naples Fl

I bought an old stone home. One board thick. We kept that look and insulated in side. They say it looks beautiful. I think so. It can be done and u don’t need to go over budget. But u won’t have a 3500 sq. Yet it’ll be bigger than 2,000 which still is not small.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/17/2021 - 16:18

Permalink

TJ Minn Oak Bluffs

We're over-run with wealthy seasonals. Just rename the island North Hamptons and get the invasion over with.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/17/2021 - 17:29

Permalink

gina Menemsha/NYC

There has always been seasonal $$ on Mv. that's what made the journey for the attractive peace & a rustic charm.. So fast forward. 2021. huge population surge of yr round residents that are happy to commute on line or physical.. ie more boat/plane traffic etc.. Yep MV is now a growing suburb.. so the housing stock is reflecting..that changing demographic & their expectations. Progress ?? not really. .. . .

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/17/2021 - 21:16

Permalink

JPK oak bluffs

Everyone wants bigger and bigger. Maybe scale down to a reasonable size for the neighborhood and according to what exists.
Any an apartment above the garage, isn't the house big enough? Consider the surrounding neighborhood and what exists around there.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 08/20/2021 - 09:13

Permalink

Trailwinds OB Oak Bluffs

Stay out of their business and allow them to invest in the island. Growth is good for Oak bluffs and good for the island. Just because something is old does not make it historic and in need of preservation. Welcome, Bill and Melissa.

Island born Oak Bluffs

Obviously another washashore who didn't read the whole article. The house is on the HISTORIC REGISTER. It is, therefore, HISTORIC. And "Welcome?" They're Islanders. Read before commenting.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.