Funi Burdick took over as executive director in 2017. Her resignation this week followed the revelation that errors were made in applications for public funding for restoration work on the Old Whaling Church.
Alison L. Mead/Gazette file photo

Vineyard Trust Executive Director Resigns

Vineyard Trust executive director Funi Burdick has resigned effective immediately, after irregularities were discovered in public funding requests for restoration work at two of its flagship properties.

Vineyard Trust executive director Funi Burdick has resigned effective immediately, after irregularities were discovered in public funding requests for restoration work at two of its flagship properties.

Ms. Burdick’s resignation was announced in an emailed statement from Vineyard Trust chairman Patrick Ahearn early Wednesday afternoon. Sally Rorer, a board member and prior chairman, will take over as interim president, the statement said.

In the statement, Mr. Ahearn said the Trust conducted an internal investigation after it learned there had been irregularities in submissions to Edgartown and Oak Bluffs for Community Preservation Act funding for work on the Old Whaling Church and Flying Horses Carousel.

Ms. Burdick presided over the overhaul of the Carnegie building in Edgartown, which is now an interactive heritage museum.
Mark Alan Lovewell
Ms. Burdick presided over the overhaul of the Carnegie building in Edgartown, which is now an interactive heritage museum.
Mark Alan Lovewell

Following the investigation, it was determined that Vineyard Trust staff were responsible for the mistakes.

“Based on the conclusion of our review, I have accepted the resignation of Vineyard Trust’s President, Funi Burdick, effective today,” Mr. Ahearn wrote in the statement. “She has accepted full responsibility and accountability for these regrettable mistakes.”

Edgartown officials recently put on hold more than $170,000 in public funding for repainting and restoration work at the Old Whaling Church after town administrator James Hagerty learned just before the annual town meeting that a work estimate had been altered without knowledge of the contractor, John Anderson.

Mr. Hagerty confirmed that the changes to the work estimate, which included an additional $60,000 in funding and changes describing the type of work, were made by Ms. Burdick.

In the statement Wednesday, Mr. Ahearn said irregularities were also discovered in Vineyard Trust funding applications for restoration work at the Flying Horses Carousel.

Oak Bluffs voters approved a $72,300 request at their annual town meeting this spring to restore the historic carousel platform, organ and drive train, as well as the replacement of exterior doors on the building.

Speaking to the Gazette by phone Wednesday, Mr. Ahearn said the irregularities in the Oak Bluffs application were not the same as at the Whaling Church, but he declined further comment.

In the statement Mr. Ahearn apologized to the two towns. “We sincerely apologize to the communities of Edgartown and Oak Bluffs for these submission errors,” he wrote.

Ms. Burdick could not be reached for comment.

On Wednesday, Ms. Burdick sent a letter to the town of Edgartown, apologizing for the errors and announcing her resignation. In her letter, she said that restorations to nationally registered historic buildings like the Whaling Church had to follow extensive guidelines.

“When Mr. Anderson submitted his quote, it included painting, but not all of the work necessary to complete the project according to these Department of Interior guidelines,” Ms. Burdick wrote. “I acknowledge that I should have picked up the phone to clarify directly with Mr. Anderson whether he was taking into account the full scope of the work at hand and asked him to refine his estimate if necessary. Again, I sincerely apologize for that error.”

Oak Bluffs town administrator Wendy Brough confirmed on Thursday that Ms. Burdick did not send a letter to the town of Oak Bluffs.

Formerly the head of the Canterbury Shaker Village in New Hampshire with a background in museums and architecture, she became executive director in 2017, taking over for longtime executive director Christopher Scott who was retiring.

The nonprofit Trust owns 20 historic buildings on the Island, including the Whaling Church, the Grange Hall in West Tisbury, Union Chapel in Oak Bluffs and the Vineyard Gazette building in Edgartown.

During her tenure, Ms. Burdick has presided over a period of change at the Trust, including a full rebranding and the change of its name from the Martha’s Vineyard Preservation Trust to the Vineyard Trust.

She also oversaw a comprehensive architectural overhaul of the Carnegie building, the former Edgartown library on North Water street which now houses an Island heritage museum, and recently signed a lease agreement with the owners of LeRoux at Home to take over Alley’s General Store in West Tisbury.

The new Alley’s has not reopened yet.

“Funi has done many positive things for the Vineyard Trust since joining us four years ago,” Mr. Ahearn said in the statement. “She has been a good steward of our properties and has strengthened our organization in many ways, and we thank her for her service.”

He said the Trust would launch a search for Ms. Burdick’s replacement, and said he had asked the governance committee to take steps to ensure similar errors are not repeated in the future.

The complete statement from Mr. Ahearn follows:

After it was brought to my attention there may have been irregularities with Vineyard Trust’s submissions to the Towns of Edgartown and Oak Bluffs for CPC funding to restore the Old Whaling Church and Flying Horses, respectively, as board chairman I immediately launched a thorough review and analysis of these submissions.

The Vineyard Trust executive committee and I, along with three of our past board chairs, have regrettably concluded errors were made in the grant applications prepared by staff and submitted to each town, and there simply is no excuse for that. The restoration of historic nationally registered structures must comply with the U.S. Department of Interior guidelines, as well as those of each town when applying for funding for restoration. While mistakes were made by the Vineyard Trust’s staff, we believe they were honest mistakes made without malice or fraudulent intent. Nonetheless, these errors are totally unacceptable, and we apologize for them.

Based on the conclusion of our review, I have accepted the resignation of Vineyard Trust’s president, Funi Burdick, effective today. She has accepted full responsibility and accountability for these regrettable mistakes. Funi has done many positive things for the Vineyard Trust since joining us four years ago. She has been a good steward of our properties and has strengthened our organization in many ways, and we thank her for her service. We will launch a search for her replacement, and in the meantime, Sally Rorer, past chairman, has agreed to serve as interim president of the organization. I thank Sally for her leadership during this time until we find Funi’s replacement.

Importantly, I have asked our governance committee, chaired by Robin Graham, to establish a strict protocol to ensure errors of this nature are not repeated. We take very seriously our stewardship of the twenty historic properties under our care and ownership, and we want to maintain transparency in all that we do. We pledge to ensure the resources entrusted to us by the towns and our donors are handled professionally and diligently as we preserve much of the Island’s heritage through these twenty properties. We sincerely apologize to the communities of Edgartown and Oak Bluffs for these submission errors and we will make every effort to ensure they are not repeated in the future.

Thank you for your understanding and continued support.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/09/2021 - 15:20

Permalink

Transparency West Tisbury

All contracts signed under the past Executive Director should be examined. How does one get to bid on a trust property, say like Alley's? I've heard back room deals , not benefitting the Trust, have been struck and I think it's time these come to light.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/09/2021 - 15:58

Permalink

Marie Edgartown

That’s a start. Now let’s keep going. If it wasn’t for our wonderful town manager it would have gone unanswered. Where was the rest of the overseers? Who voted for the new managers of Alleys? No understanding here. Let our towns appoint all new board members. Nice to throw your director under the bus and then ask for understanding. Ouch.

Marie Edgartown

Should have read.....Where were the rest of the overseers? Comments should be flood and all documents should be examined. Islanders need to show their support for a new board and investigation.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/09/2021 - 16:53

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

Sorry but none of this passes the smell test. The sour air from this organization does not seem to be coming from one person. I have contributed for many years and been a loyal supporter of the trust but honestly ever since they change the name this whole organization has gone downhill. It may seem insignificant but to me Marthas Vineyard preservation trust was a much better brand. Under the leader ship of this Director and the new name Vineyard trust this has been more of a closed door group benefiting themselves. All under the disguise of a nonprofit. One member gets to open up their business in downtown Edgartown on the harbor, another member gets to open up a general store in West Tisbury, another member gets to put their friend in a much needed apartment the Director kicks out a paying tenant so she can live there this is the tip of an iceberg that needs to be melted.

Katherine Scott Tisbury

" It may seem insignificant but to me Martha's Vineyard preservation trust was a much better brand."@@

I agree, except that I would just say "It's a better *name*." Do people recall the etymology of the word "brand"?
Look it up. IMO a lot of mischief is done under the "rebranding" rubric. @@

Actually, the "rebranders" end up wrecking good old "brands>" Which used to be known as an organizations reputation and it also generally described in a nutshell what the organization did and what its legal form was. @@

I am very distrustful of "rebranding" that emanates from new staff and board members, without consultation with and input from the existing membership. New logos are often totally banal and "of the minute," destroying positive communication values with longtime supporters. @@

Most "rebranding" IMO is a big ego trip on the part of newcomer know-it-alls who actually are most interested in their own personal "brands." The "rebranding" project lands squarely on their resumes. ##

Often it is not even professionally or effective carried out. @@

These efforts often alienate longtime supporters. I agree that Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust is a much better name.@@

I strongly suggest that the Trust reverse the branding and return to their original identity. This may well help restore trust in the Trust.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/09/2021 - 17:02

Permalink

Jane Chittick, founding executive director, 1980-93 Edga

What a ridiculous statement from Patrick Ahearn, the Trust's Chairman. And, by going along with him, the rest of the Trustees are not inspiring ANY trust whatsoever by allowing the Chairman to try to sweep this ‘innocent mistake’ under their rug. This isn’t how you handle a lack of confidence in the organization. So the others all stay on? So discouraging.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/09/2021 - 18:38

Permalink

Kenny Edgartown

Name change time. Trust is earned. Vineyard Insiders might be more appropriate.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 04:39

Permalink

Elizabeth Edgartown

Patrick also should step down. Too much insider industry stuff under his watch that is not being reported. He needs to go. And that rebranding was an embarrassment- waste of money. Board should have killed that idea. And they should ask the inner circle who are in the local real estate/construction business to step aside. Smells fishy. Is fishy.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 06:54

Permalink

Jim S.

How does a board president just throw their ED under the bus like that without assuming any responsibility? And how is their board president also an architect who has been defiling the Vineyard’s sense of place and history for decades the top position of this organization? His impact on this island is directly opposed to the mission of the organization.

Sally Vineyard Haven

Hear, hear! Red flags also should have been raised when the word "Preservation" was removed from the name. The organization's entire purpose, to preserve, was deemed extraneous or cumbersome to its revamped image. That's not just a stylistic choice. It speaks to the organization's values.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 07:12

Permalink

jonathan edgartown

As a long-time Trustee of Vineyard Trust, I can say this is a sad day for those of us who volunteer our time and resources to preserve the island's history and heritage by supporting Vineyard Trust. I can assure all of you who wrote letters that the Trustees were unaware of these mistakes, and we could not have known. While we were aware grants were being applied for, as volunteer board members we rely on paid staff to accurately complete the grants, which is their expertise. We are all volunteering to support the community, and it is disheartening to read your comments. As soon as we learned what happened, we took immediate action (our Chairman launched an investigation and brought in former leaders of the organization on that review committee to be certain no stone was left unturned. When the analysis was complete, the Chairman accepted the resignation of the President. He also has assigned our governance committee to be sure this never happens again.) This was swift action to correct the mistake. He also has apologized to the community, pledged transparency, and asked for the community's support because we need it now more than ever. I don't think you could ask anything more from a volunteer non-profit board and I'd ask you to please support our efforts going forward as we all want to do good in the community and make it as enjoyable as possible for all of us who live here, or visit. Thank you.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 07:18

Permalink

Curious Edgartown

If these irregularities were an honest mistake why'd she have to resign immediately? Hmmm.....

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 08:47

Permalink

Brian Packish Oak Bluffs

This matter was brought to my attention shortly after our Town Meeting by our counsel. Our counsel was alerted by a concerned member of the Trust staff. As Chair of the Oak Bluffs Selectboard I immediately began to work with CPC Chair Joan Hughes, Ron Rappaport and the Trust to investigate these issues. The Trust was transparent and forthcoming with any requests. After thorough investigation they took immediate and meaningful action. It’s disheartening at best to see such an important organization in our community face this type of challenge. I believe they have taken the appropriate actions. I am grateful for the value and opportunity this organization brings to our community. We have all stumbled and for me the true character of any entity is proven in how they choose to get back up and continue on.

Greg Edg.

Mr Packish,
The true definition of character, is what your actions are when no body is watching,
Not what you do after being caught,

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/11/2021 - 08:55

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

Gabrielle West Tisbury

yes, this should be emphasized. Unfortunately it seems their is an entitled approach these day...do what you want and ask for forgiveness later

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/12/2021 - 09:42

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

Katherine Scott

Gabrielle: "yes, this should be emphasized. Unfortunately it seems their is an entitled approach these day...do what you want and ask for forgiveness later"

Yep. And this is how it is going to go with the "plastic-turf sports plex" at the high school. Just get the approval by hook or by crook---what happens ten years down the line is someone else's problem.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 08:53

Permalink

JESSE Vineyard Haven

losing all hope in the older generations, just kidding already lost all hope.
The millennials will hold you accountable for you're actions.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 09:05

Permalink

jonathan edgartown

I appreciate the questions as they are legitimate ones and I appreciate your concerns. As I understand it, the contractor bids were increased to cover what staff believed to be the true cost of the full restoration of historic buildings, which must meet certain specifications for nationally registered buildings. The estimates provided didn't cover the full extent of the restoration. The mistake, and it was a big one, was to do make changes to the estimates without discussing it with the contractors. The Trustees were never made aware of this and could have no way of knowing as we rely on staff to accurately and completely apply for grants and administer funds. That is their expertise and responsibility, and is consistent with how other non-profits handle grant applications to the best of my knowledge. When it was brought to our attention that this was done, without our or anyone's knowledge, our board leadership took immediate and appropriate action. In my view, and I'm just one Trustee who has thoroughly examined the situation because I volunteer my time and donate to VT and was deeply concerned, I believe staff's intentions were in the right place, but they totally screwed up on process and should have worked directly with the contractors to ensure accurate estimates before making the application. I don't think it was done maliciously - they truly wanted to be comprehensive but they shouldn't have made changes without anyone knowing. That was completely inappropriate and unacceptable. The CEO, who is a very good person and and has much experience, realized the seriousness of the mistake, accepted responsibility for these actions and resigned. I know all of us at Vineyard Trust are deeply sorry for this and apologize to the community. We are putting a strict process in place to be sure it will not be able to happen again. I hope that clarifies for you and you will support us. We need the community's support now more than ever in order to preserve these properties. Thank you.

Kelly Brilliant OakBluffs

Non profit ED for 20 years. And I also worked on advocating for MA CPA Funding. Why were actual estimates given in a proposal application? It should have been a more approximate number and I don't see huge mistake here except that you shouldn't get to that stage of actual estimate yet in a proposal of this size. It does not seem particularly unethical to me to apply for funding that is appropriate for an historic structure, but the idea that you would get down to that level of contractor specificity is just a little odd. Seem like other more serious issues that pertain more to board roles are the bigger fish to fry here.

JonathanR West Tisbury

A mistake is when you baking soda instead of baking powder, grab the salt instead of the sugar, lock your keys in the car. This was deliberate, intentional, premeditated. A conscious effort to deceive. Don't know if it rises to criminal behavior, but it is way beyond 'mistake'.

Elizabeth Edgartown

I don’t think you will get the community support until you ask Patrick and other insiders like Gary to step down. It’s not just the paid staff. You have an optics issue that insider board members are professional livelihood benefits bc of their insider status.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 10:14

Permalink

Gabrielle West Tisbury

perhaps there should be some mandatory representation 0f year round residents of all towns on the board, free of duplicicit interests.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 14:14

Permalink

Marie Edgartown

I appreciate your letter and service. Thank you. What is unsaid is if it was an innocent mistake and if you feel she has done many wonderful things why didn’t you defend her and stand by the “honest “ mistake. It still calls to addresss the carousel, the marine store,the apartment and of course Alleys. What I feel the letters are saying is trust has been lost with the public. Now in my mind, you can defend your board decisions or you can walk away and say I donate and volunteer. I personally would have an immediate meeting back my administrator and answer questions from public on issues brought to light. Thank you

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 15:37

Permalink

august west edgartown

There’s very little actual information in Patrick’s statement. Perhaps it’s time to ask more questions and not let this go.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/10/2021 - 20:59

Permalink

Mike and Sally Edgartown

I agree Mr. Ahearn should step down for the good of the preservation.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/11/2021 - 06:49

Permalink

Lorraine Edgartown

Good morning, everyone. It is a bright, beautiful, New England sun shining morning. And, we all know what sunshine is, do we not, Children? Sunshine is the best disinfectant. And, me thinks we surely do need some on this not so stunning affair. Vineyard Preservation Trust has a much better ring, than Vineyard Trust, yes? Perhaps we can earn back that name?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/11/2021 - 07:14

Permalink

John Aldeborgh Edgartown

What’s interesting to me about this article is the comments, I kind thought hmmm after reading the article, but after reading the comments I think the Gazette should dig deeper. If there’s truth to some of the accusations made in the comments then a through house cleaning in needed. The claims that the board are just volunteers isn’t credible as that’s no excuse for poor supervision, if you accept the position you accept the responsibilities that come with the job. I think some more digging and good journalism are needed so the public gets a more complete picture of what might be a bigger scandal.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/11/2021 - 09:57

Permalink

Eddie Edgartown

Third party should investigate lack of board oversight. Troubling.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/11/2021 - 14:03

Permalink

T Bone Oak Bluffs

Until there is a full accounting of Community Preservation Act funds received by the Vineyard Trust during the Burdick era I believe the "Trust" should not be allowed to apply for any additional funding from this source. There is no doubt they have done good work in the past. But these recent practices cast a dark shadow that won't be lifted until a full, independent audit is completed. Was this an isolated doctoring of paperwork or just the tip of the iceberg of other projects funded by the CPA?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/11/2021 - 14:40

Permalink

Betty Ann South Water St Edgartown, Ma

We adore Patrick Ahearn, but I think Patrick should step aside. Such a sad story we are so upset.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.