First industrial-scale wind farm in the country will be built 12 miles south of the Vineyard.
Courtesy Vineyard Wind.

Vineyard Wind Clears Final Approval from U.S. Government

With fanfare, the Biden administration announced its final approval for Vineyard Wind, marking a major milestone for the project that grew its roots partly on Martha’s Vineyard.

With fanfare, the Biden administration announced its final approval Tuesday for Vineyard Wind, marking a major milestone for the first industrial-scale offshore wind project in the country that grew its roots partly on Martha’s Vineyard.

In a press release, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland and Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo announced just after lunchtime Tuesday that the 800-megawatt wind farm had been granted a Record of Decision by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, signaling final approval for the project.

“A clean energy future is within our grasp in the United States,” Secretary Haaland said in a press release.

“We can fight the climate crisis, while creating high-paying jobs and strengthening our competitiveness at home and abroad,” Secretary Raimondo said.

On the drawing board for four years, the Vineyard Wind I project will build 84 turbines about 12 miles south of the Vineyard, aiming to generate electricity for more than 400,000 homes and businesses in the commonwealth, also creating jobs and reducing carbon emissions.

Vineyard Wind is a joint venture between Avangrid Renewables, a subsidiary of AVANGRID Inc., and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners.

The project is on track to be completed in 2023.

Since 2017 it has gone through an exhaustive public review process at the federal, state and local levels.

A massive final environmental impact statement for the project was approved last month. Mitigations along the way have included protection measures for endangered right whales, funding to compensate fishermen for potential loss of revenue and gear, and protection of cultural and historical areas of interest.

“Today’s Record of Decision is not about the start of a single project, but the launch of a new industry,” said Vineyard Wind CEO Lars T. Pedersen in a press release Tuesday. “Receiving this final major federal approval means the jobs, economic benefits and clean energy revolution associated with the Vineyard Wind 1 project can finally come to fruition. It’s been a long road to get to this point, but ultimately, we are reaching the end of this process with the strongest possible project.”

Headquartered in New Bedford, Vineyard Wind has long had a partnership with Vineyard Power, the nonprofit Island energy cooperative. A community benefits component of Vineyard Wind’s early bidding application for offshore federal lease areas helped thrust the project to the head of the pack in the highly competitive, multi-billion-dollar race to build offshore wind farms in the U.S.

The project was nearly threatened to be derailed a year and a half ago by the Trump administration, but got back onto a fast track after the November 2020 election.

A broad coalition that represents the fishing industry quickly released a statement Tuesday condemning the decision.

“BOEM continues to abdicate its responsibility to the public and leave all decision making to large, multinational corporations,” said the statement from the Responsible Offshore Development Alliance said. “This decision . . . . includes effectively no mitigation measures to offset impacts to critical ocean ecosystems and commercial fisheries.”

But in statements issued Tuesday, an array elected leaders had only laudatory remarks.

“The era of American offshore wind is no longer on the horizon — it’s here, now, off the coast of Massachusetts, and the answer to America’s energy future is blowing in the offshore wind,” said U.S. Sen. Edward Markey.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren called the decision “a bold step forward towards fighting the climate crisis.”

Congressman Bill Keating said: “What a difference today is from the last four years.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/11/2021 - 15:22

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

Terrible news, what a horrible eyesore these will be off the coast of MV. How about we put these monstrosities off the coast of Biden's residence.

WD Vineyard Haven

They will be all along our coasts, eventually. I think it's rather myopic to stress the views, when we need alternative energy sources. Some in Europe love the views, knowing that the mills are responsible for cleaner living. Besides - few if any will every notice the tops of teh windmills, or after a getting used to they will forget they are there.

So much for the view edg

I never got used to looking at the windmill on the Edg W.T road. Its a blight on the view. Worse than a cell tower without the fake branches.

Jared Edgartown

What about the bird strikes? These windmills will kill thousands of birds, and what about the migratory paths of the birds, as well as fish in the ocean? The construction costs, maintenance, and ultimately, the removal of the turbines, far exceed the output/production of power.

John Brookline

And 12 miles out, will they even be easily visible from shore? I don't think windmills are ugly anyway, and the clean energy generated more than makes up for any marring of views.

EKQ Oak Bluffs

I agree, WD. I've seen windmills cropping up all over farmland and other places off island. You get used to it really easily and we need alternative energy sources. In a way they're rather beautiful!

Bob Edgartown

It is a very debatable discussion on weather wind energy is better for the environment. When you look at the details of all the production and work involved in making these happen and then how to dispose of the used equipment. Not to forget that all of this is happening because of the money grab of tax payer dollars in either out right grants (free money) or tax breaks to these billion dollar companies. Another feel good project for the moment.

Baraka

Wind farms do not generate enough power to justify their disparate impact on the environment around them. Our energy demands will rise significantly as the push for electric vehicles rise. The only legitimate answer is modern nuclear energy.

Heidi OB

How does this affect an already negatively affected South Beach and south shoreline? 12-15 miles is not far enough away and will create some environmental change - what is it ans are they being fully transparent?

Robert Skydell Granada, Nicaragua

I was wondering how many people have to look at the Brayton Point coal and high sulphur burning powerplant that sits prominently along the Cape Cod Canal? The smokestacks from that plant are clearly visible from Martha's Vineyard but few if any seem to notice or care.
Turbines 12 miles out to sea will be negligable in comparison for sure while representing significant gains in terms of the environment and reducing dependence on fossil fuels.

Wallace Plymouth

Robert- you may not have noticed that Brayton Point Power plant no longer exists. Canal Electric at the east end of the CC Canal has been shut down for years.

Emily Tisbury

Mark, your comment about the wind turbines being "terrible" because they will be an "eyesore" to you is remarkably selfish. Our children and grandchildren will need clean, renewable energy to continue to live healthy lives on this planet, already in a climate crisis. To even have the privilege of complaining about your view is something you should pause and think about. There are much less fortunate folks out there who don't have clean water to drink or a safe place to live - and here you are worried about aesthetics miles offshore. Have some perspective, please.

Mark Edgartown

Don't lecture me on "privilege", I've worked incredibly hard for everything I've achieved in my life. Manmade monoliths sitting off our pristine shore are ugly by any definition.

Mike Somewhere

A huge step in the right direction. The horizon is 10 miles away. We may be able to see the tops of the turbine blades if viewed with binoculars at 12 miles from land. We need to give that criticism a break. Hardly an eye sore. Now - the towns have to relax some of the noncompilable set back regulations in place so we can all do our share in reducing our dependency on fossil fuels. I have been trying to get a small residential (8" diameter) wind turbine considered for over 10 years. No dice. I feel strongly that its our Patriotic duty to create a renewable/sustainable energy model for future generations. Depletable resource consumption is not it.

AJS Montauk, NY

Totally agree. A lot of capital involved with the wind turbines and very expensive to maintain. Wait till the electric bills start showing up.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/11/2021 - 15:36

Permalink

Suann Childers Lexington

"There Are Just Too Many People On This Planet, Dear." - TRUDY TAYLOR R.I.P.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/11/2021 - 19:10

Permalink

R Scott Patterson Edgartown .

Good!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/11/2021 - 19:31

Permalink

Zephyr

Fantastic news! We need all the alternative power generation we can get, and sooner rather than later. Climate change is well on the way to putting much of Vineyard Haven, Oak Bluffs, Menemsha, and Edgartown underwater, along with the increasing chance of bigger and more damaging hurricanes. This is one small step in avoiding catastrophe that many of our children will have to deal with. Those opposed to this apparently don't care about the health of the planet.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/11/2021 - 23:04

Permalink

Chappy Runner Chappy

There's no such thing as a free lunch, despite politicians frequent attempts to bill this project as such. Wind farms result in surface warming by mixing up the atmosphere, which can actually increase the local area's temperature. This warming effect can potentially hold for a century, or until there are enough wind farms globally to reduce GHG emissions enough to offset the farm's warming effect. By which time, these turbines will have had to be decommissioned and or replaced multiple times (operational life of 30 years)... Oh, do we need a reminder how energy intensive it actually is to create these farms? Diesel-burning vessels for the installation, concrete and rare earth metals produced for the turbine blades & magnets in the gear boxes. Once assembled, all of these extremely large components (each rotor alone is c. 550 feet long, the monopiles are 200-300 feet long) then need to be transported across the globe for installation off our south shore. Let's also take-in the avian mortality that will be caused by this project. Each blade of each turbine will kill c.10 birds a year (multiplied by 3 blades for 84 turbines = 2,520 bird deaths per year from this project alone). Good luck to the osprey, I guess? Such a shame...

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/12/2021 - 06:49

Permalink

Mark Lucier Edgartown

Rather than an eyeSORE, one will get SORE eyes trying to see these fifteen miles offshore.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/12/2021 - 06:49

Permalink

Jared EDgartown

The windmills will be visible from the island. The whole project is a money pit, the wind turbines will not produce enough electricity to pay for itself, before the turbines end of use or life expectancy. terrible idea!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/12/2021 - 07:19

Permalink

Lorraine Edgartown

Lots of moolah being made by somebody on these behemoths. Here we go: A single wind turbine can use 335 tons of steel to build, 4.7 tons of copper, 3 tons of aluminum, 700+ lbs of REM (rare earth metals) from where are we importing some of these metals? The annual cost of 1-2 cents per kilowatts per hour produced, about 42K-48K annually, turn around time for payout? estimated 10-15 years each turbine. Not very cost effective. Dismantling them when their usable life is completed, are the companies bonded to do this? Or, will they be relics littering the seas south of our beautiful island? Hydro power, geothermal, solar, much better ways to go. The internal combustion engine has served us well so far and it is lovely to think of all electric cars except when everyone plugs them in to charge them after they get home from work and the grid goes down. Our present day grids cannot handle everyone having an electric vehicle. I drive across the country frequently and there are not charging stations that will help me keep my vehicle running. Let us be prudent and careful and cautious in our planning our energy needs. IMHO....

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/12/2021 - 13:19

Permalink

Susan McHugh

I have great concerns about the effects to our ocean ecosystem, our fisheries and bird migration. I cannot believe our environmental regulators signed off on this. Why is our government relinquishing protecting our ocean.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/13/2021 - 10:08

Permalink

John Vineyard Haven

The human eye at 5 foot 7 can see three miles to the horizon. The wind farm is being built 12 miles off shore. You won’t see it from the beach.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/13/2021 - 22:10

Permalink

Michael OB

Reminds me of the Roundabout fiasco.
Just chill...everything will be fine.
Maybe go for a walk, or read a book.
Geesh.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/14/2021 - 07:13

Permalink

Tisbury West Tisbury

A wind farm the size of MV, if not larger. What could possibly go wrong? Will be interesting to see the effects of the law of unintended consequences unfold. Not pretty, but interesting...

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/14/2021 - 07:20

Permalink

Jim Chappy

The empty platitudes by these govt officials are just so false. These windmills are nothing more than an poorly conceived experiment wrapped up in unproven innuendo. As this Island was “chosen” to be the practice field for bombing runs of live and dead ammunition — we once again submit to this govt to become another experiment that will rapidly be abandoned and people 50-60 years from now will be demanding that the govt. clean it up.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/14/2021 - 13:37

Permalink

Vasha Brunelle Vineyard Haven

What a dangerous deadly area for migratory birds. Are we humans willing to do whatever greenwashing it takes to maintain our comfort levels?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/15/2021 - 15:04

Permalink

Mp Vineyard

Offshore wind is expensive, and 800 megawatts isn’t that much. Look at iso New England for real time energy info. Wind farms don’t operate at full capacity the majority of the time, it averages around 40%. If that money was spent on solar and onshore wind you would get closer to 2500 megawatts, it would be done faster and be cheaper to maintain. We need to make smarter investments than this to move away from fossil fuels.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.