Renewed tug of war is on between the mainland and the two Islands over who controls the SSA.
Tim Johnson

State Senator Files Bill to Dilute Island Control of SSA

A Cape Cod state senator has filed legislation seeking to alter the weighted vote structure on the five-member Steamship Authority board that gives the two Islands control over the boat line.

A Cape Cod state senator has filed legislation seeking to alter the weighted vote structure on the five-member Steamship Authority board that gives Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket control over the boat line that is their lifeline.

The bill was quickly condemned this week by the Cape and Islands state legislative delegation.

Filed by Sen. Susan Moran as senate bill No. 2361 as “an act relative to municipal equity on Steamship Authority operations,” the bill bubbled up at a marathon, three-hour SSA board meeting Tuesday morning amid broader discussion about long-term planning initiatives, indicating a renewed tug of war between the mainland and Island port communities as demand for travel to the two Islands continues to grow.

At the meeting Tuesday SSA special counsel Steven Sayers explained the bill. “Senator Moran has proposed legislation that would provide on this board the mainland communities an effective veto over any actions taken by the authority . . . the Islands would no longer have majority control of the vote,” he said.

When the 1960 SSA enabling legislation was last amended in 2002, expanding the board of governors from three to five voting members, it was intentionally structured to give the Vineyard and Nantucket each a 35 per cent weighted vote. The three other port towns — Barnstable, Falmouth and New Bedford — each have a 10 per cent vote.

The core mission of the SSA is to provide dependable year-round ferry service to the two Islands. The ferry line operates with no state or federal subsidy and depends on summer fares to stay financially afloat in the winter months.

A Falmouth resident and former Falmouth selectman, Senator Moran’s district includes the towns of Kingston, Pembroke, Plymouth, Bourne, Falmouth and Sandwich. The bill was filed in the senate and referred to the Joint Committee on Transportation on March 29. The language change would require a mainland town to join the Vineyard and Nantucket to form a voting majority.

Speaking to the Gazette Wednesday, Senator Moran defended the bill and said it grew out of long-term planning initiatives around regional transportation on the mainland, including plans to replace the Bourne and Sagamore bridges. She said the bridge replacements would require mainland towns, including Falmouth, to examine transportation broadly.

“We’re more aware now than ever that one side having all the power just is not sustainable. And this legislation is really looks at having no town feel disenfranchised,” the state senator said.

She cited the heavy traffic that comes through Falmouth from automobiles and trucks bound for the Vineyard.

“We’re essentially bursting at the seams here,” Ms. Moran said. “Constituents have felt placated by the [SSA] board . . . and there’s really no opportunity for real, give-and-take conversation. Right now the Islands already have veto power over the mainland communities. It’s just that the status quo is not working for the towns with the smaller voting power. And so, rather than alienate those constituents, my bill creates the mechanism to ensure compromise so that there can be real conversation.”

In a statement Wednesday, state Sen Julian Cyr and Rep. Dylan Fernandes vowed swift action to quash the bill.

“This bill would allow one Steamship Authority member to control the fate of the lifeline to Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket, while placing Island communities in the precarious position to be responsible for future operating deficits,”  the joint statement said.

“Islanders should chart the course when it comes to their lifeline to the mainland. We are open to a thoughtful and collaborative conversation about the Steamship Authority, but after hearing from our constituents, we have deeply held concerns about this approach and cannot support it. Fortunately, there is a long tradition of deferring to the lawmakers who represent the Islands on such matters. Legislation affecting Islanders cannot advance without our support, and thus this bill will not pass.”
    
Broader discussion at Tuesday’s boat line meeting included a rehash of various subcommittee meetings from port towns and renewed discussion about establishing a port in New Bedford for freight and expanded passenger service to the Vineyard.

Falmouth residents have consistently sounded off on early morning freight ferries to the Vineyard, and railed against the SSA’s plans for an expanded shoreside ticket office complex at the Woods Hole terminal.

But Barnstable governor Robert Jones said altering the board’s voting structure was the wrong way to address Falmouth’s concerns, and would lead to further division between the port communities.

“Legislation like that only serves to tear us apart,” Mr. Jones said. “I’m frustrated with this . . . to change the vote, that’s just not going to serve any good purpose, except perhaps to alienate neighbors.”

He added that pleasing Woods Hole residents has proven a challenge, and that New Bedford presented a “huge question.”

Falmouth governor Kathryn Wilson said it was important to discuss the transportation issues facing Woods Hole, especially as demand for Vineyard service continues to accelerate, and the two bridges to Cape Cod both face needed, long-haul repairs. She pressed the question of exploring New Bedford as an alternate port.

“I think the time is right to try and get out in front of this,” Ms. Wilson said. “Our regional transportation snarl is right smack on the horizon. And then, if I was on the Vineyard, I’d want some redundancy, I’d want some backup.”

Ms. Wilson said she did not know enough about Senator Moran’s amendment to give an opinion.

New Bedford governor Moira Tierney said that while the Whaling City is interested in principle in an SSA port — and that she believed it would become necessary at some point in the future — significant infrastructure and economic obstacles remain.

Vineyard governor James Malkin and Nantucket governor Rob Ranney pushed back on all fronts.

Mr. Ranney said diverting SSA ferries to New Bedford would have a litany of consequences for the Vineyard, including longer trips and more expensive fares. And Mr. Malkin said the effort to alleviate traffic concerns in Woods Hole should be driven by the board or an independent third party, rather than a Falmouth-based task force.

“It seems to me that most of this activity is being driven by the concerns of our friends in Woods Hole, dealing with traffic,” Mr. Malkin said. “If you form a group to deal with that squeaky wheel . . . you’re forming a group to deal with concerns you’ve already prejudiced.”

But Ms. Wilson, who has fought without success to eliminate the 5:30 a.m. freight ferry from Woods Hole to the Vineyard, said the current situation is untenable.

“I think the status quo is not the way to continue on,” she said. “It is not satisfactory.”

Updated to include statement from Senator Cyr and Representative Fernandes, and comments from Senator Moran.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/20/2021 - 22:18

Permalink

Nat Trumbull

“The increment of cost to the retail price of goods sold on the islands of diverting one-third of all freight to New Bedford would be under 0.35 percent in all tested cases.”

“While the increment of cost to shippers of New Bedford-based service would range from 12 to 40 percent (worst case), the cost of ferry transportation represents only 0.8 percent of the retail price of goods sold on the islands. Thus, while marginal change in the cost of this last leg of the trip is significant to the shipper, it results in very small change in the ultimate retail price of products sold on the islands.”

“It is estimated that the cost of goods wholesaled in the New Bedford area averages 2.9 percent less than comparable goods sold in Massachusetts as a whole. If 10 percent of the shippers changed suppliers as a result of a shift in operations to New Bedford, it would result in a reduction of the wholesale costs of goods sufficient to eliminate the increase in transportation costs.”

(New Bedford Freight Ferry Project, Technical Memorandum, FXM Associates and KJS Associates, Inc.)

here we go again edg

I'd be hesitant to rely upon studies or memorandums, as there are always disagreement in opinions. Not unlike probability and statistics. All one has to do is watch a courtroom on TV and each side will have credible 'experts' who contradict each other's opinion. Anyone who lives here on the Island, or the Cape has seen their homeowner's insurance premiums skyrocket, while private insurers bail out of the market forcing property owners into the 'fair plan', with rising premiums. Why? Because almost without exception, the 'experts' and 'scientists' predict an 'active hurricane season' and insurance companies take advantage of those predictions to raise premiums (despite most hurricane damage being from floods...which are NOT covered under the standard homeowners insurance policies!!!) Our last significant hurricane was 1991 and at some point we will get another one.. but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

William Ex PBA CHILMARK and HK

More costs to islanders on many levels, not to mention the ignored human costs, just to placate a few. More cancelled ferries because of longer more exposed journeys from a further port.
More ferries to purchase because of the longer journey times (major investment) to keep the same service levels. More fuel use by ferries for the longer journeys not helping our climate battle.
Airports, hospitals, schools, power lines, fire stations, roads, ferries….etc. serve us all. Always the same argument by the few NIMBY. That’s such biased talk. I do appreciate the sugar coated report to sweeten it so.
This is all theatrics and a non-starter. The total cost would be less to just take those road-side homes by eminent domain and widen the road for all.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/21/2021 - 08:49

Permalink

Ken Edg.

I thought she was going to file a bill to get the state to help fund the steamship authority. She seems to have her priorities all wrong.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/21/2021 - 09:29

Permalink

fact checker edg

Since the enabling legislation makes the SSA an 'extension of the state highway' make sure the fares reflect the mileage travelled. So the fare should match the same 7 miles travelled on the Mass pike. And the community at 'the end of the road' shouldn't be responsible for any deficit incurred during operations. That fare would be fair, Senator.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/21/2021 - 11:33

Permalink

Chuck Hodgkinson West Tisbury

The essence of the current Steamship operating model has been in place since the 1960’s. The boats and fleet composition seem to be designed for summer traffic more than year-round, life line transportation needs. Perhaps a bit radical but, to make a point...why not have a professional consultant or team of consultants prepare a 10 to 15-year plan to phase out and sell the fleet and replace it with a different service model and fleet configuration that might include fast ferry passenger service? Rather than have an idle fleet for 7-8 hours each night as is the current practice, can the fleet be configured for nighttime freight service between New Bedford and MV—seasonally in the summer at a minimum or perhaps year round? This would ease truck traffic and significantly reduce truck space use through Woods Hole, open daytime space for cars out of Woods Hole and thus avoid the thought of "we're going to need a bigger boat" to handle the growth in summer demand. Growth shouldn’t be an operating goal it should merely be managed within the service model. Should a pro-forma business plan be developed on paper for a wholly-owned subsidiary freight company that has a different operating service, cost structure and staffing model? The boats used by this freight company can be leased to this subsidiary by the parent MV Steamship Authority. The Nantucket operating model may or may not need adjustments. This is a 20 minute brain dump that is intended to help develop a more reliable plan for the future. Some of these suggestions may prove to not be feasible. That is the purpose of a pro-forma business plan which is different than the staff report for New Bedford freight service developed a few years ago. This report was developed within the confines of the current operating model and thinking.

Adjustment needed Vineyard Haven

Chuck you bring up an interesting point but you need to look at Moran's end game.
First they come for freight traffic, then they come for cars and summer people's cars, then they come for year round life line people. The few Woods Hole people will never be satisfied. Vineyarders still shall boycott spending money in Woods Hole and Falmouth. We have purchase power, use it.

Francis Partel Edgartown

I have often wondered how applicable the Boeing 747 experience might be to the SSA This was at the time a very large and very efficient aircraft but because of its capacity the plane flew with a inadequate load factor, i.e. the plane often made trips below the break even cost, which made it not economically viable. Other airlines took note of this and purchased smaller aircraft that operated with higher load factors, e.g. Southwest, Ryan Air. What I'm suggesting is the "bigger boat" theory may be fallacious, and smaller boats, operating with high load factors, or some optimal mix of boats, and perhaps with more frequent service may make for sounder SSA economics.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/21/2021 - 12:13

Permalink

Jane Chittick Edgartown

"The ferry line operates with no state or federal subsidy and depends on summer fares to stay financially afloat in the winter months." WHY do residents pay ANY fare? We all pay state and federal highway taxes, but unlike mainland residents who can get from Point A to Points X,Y, Z without traveling on any turnpike, they don't pay to get on the road. We are not treated as any other residents (except on islands) in the United States. If visitors and non-residents want to visit here, then that is their prerogative and should pay the fare... it's for fun or business, but it's not to get home. If I want to travel to Boston for medical app1ointments, and my neighbors in New Bedford also are seen by doctors in Boston, they don't have to pay anything extra. to go and get home, I have to pay. Right now, it's $106 out of my pocket. Nantucket and Vineyard SSA Governors: get busy!

Mark Edgartown

Nobody is forcing you to live on MV. It's absurd to think residents should not have to pay any fare given the cap ex and operating budgets necessary to operate a fleet of boats that supply the island with everything. Also, how do those supplies get to the ferry...the highway system.

Chris Ob

Exactly, living on MV is a choice. But I do think some discount should be given to full time residents and lesser one to seasonal and no discount for visitors. Tiered system makes sense, but everyone should pay.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/21/2021 - 13:47

Permalink

John Cape Cod

Meanwhile as well, Try to get on / off Cape during the seasonal tourist rush with miles of backed up traffic to both Bridges, which I get stuck in commuting daily to work. And where might some of these cars be headed ? To MV and Nantucket ! If you find living on the Island such an expense and inconvenience, then why live there ?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/21/2021 - 17:38

Permalink

here we go again edg

Those proponents of a New Bedford Route seem to lose the 'its all about going green'posture. The boats will be having a much larger carbon footprint burning lots more diesel. Since they will be running many more hours, they will wear out sooner and require earlier replacement. Its a losing proposition. Unless of course the State wants to pay. How about we pay the same fare as those using the under-harbor tunnels in Boston. BILLIONS were spent on the big dig among other tunnel projects.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/22/2021 - 07:30

Permalink

Bob Morris Cape Cod

Reading all of this- Islanders are unhappy. Mainlanders are not happy. Time to rewrite Enabling Act under 21st century conditions.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/22/2021 - 08:26

Permalink

John Edgartown

Everyone seems to think that there is a magical path that returns us to Mayberry. Sheriff Andy? Aunt Bee?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/22/2021 - 13:41

Permalink

Kelce OB

Mayberry was a fictional, landlocked town in North Carolina. Plus Andy and Bee are dead. so, not the solution. Sometimes you just can't everyone happy and there is no magical path. The SSA was enabled as a lifeline to the islands, not a convenience for Woods Hole. prediction - The senator's bill will die in committee. All's she's done is whack the hornet's nest and gathered herself some attention.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/23/2021 - 06:09

Permalink

Native born R.Y. Res. Edg.

Build a bridge to the Vineyard.We are trapped between 8 PM and 6 AM if we need medical access to the mainland hospitals,be it human or animal.Have a toll,St.Police presents and checks as they do for the ferries.Truckers,and cars would not all be herded down to WH at the same time,forced to sit in long standby lines when ferries break down.and reservations would not be needed.

John former island resident Florida

The state had no problem spending 20 billion building under ground bridges in boston, so why not a bridge. It is possible look at key west.

Mark Edgartown

The big dig was a massive effort to improve the infrastructure of a major city in the northeast, it is not a corollary. Being realistic about improving ferry service and efficiency is a better use of time than a fanciful bridge to nowhere.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/23/2021 - 08:04

Permalink

John Aldeborgh Edgartown

Why don’t the boats run 24X7 during peak season? The airlines have been profitably using’Red-Eye’ flights for decades to both add capacity and improved asset utilization. Adjust fare structures to incentivize freight during the off hours. Has the potential to create jobs, improve the productivity of the SSA and help with the traffic flow.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/24/2021 - 21:35

Permalink

Cynthia Edgatown

agree, build a bridge. If Bidens proposed $2 trillion infrastructure package passes, there should be plenty of money for the bridge if all that money was really going to be used for roads, bridges and rail!!

Mark Edgartown

$115 billion is being allocated for bridges, highways and roads and is likely already earmarked for fixing critical projects in need of repair. Focus on realistic solutions for the SSA instead of flights of fantasy.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.