Mark Alan Lovewell

Rights and Wrongs

With the federal appeals court decision last week requiring the Wampanoag tribe to obtain local permits before starting construction of a bingo hall in Aquinnah, tribal leaders have two choices.

With the federal appeals court decision last week requiring the Wampanoag tribe to obtain local permits before starting construction of a bingo hall in Aquinnah, tribal leaders have two choices: play ball with the town or drop the plan altogether.

They can certainly seek to get the two-judge decision reviewed by the entire appeals court or try to take it up to the U.S. Supreme Court, but both avenues are long shots at best.

If there was any good news for the tribe, it was that the ruling did not set a legal precedent regarding their sovereign rights. The tribe was simply out-lawyered. Writing for the court, the Hon. O. Rogeriee Thompson found that tribe had failed to raise the issue of permits when it appealed a lower court decision on different grounds, a procedural omission that prevented it from bringing the issue up later.

The vigorous pursuit of what seems on its face like a bad business idea – a modest gaming facility at the furthest reaches of the Island – has always been more about principle than practice. The sad irony is that while many Islanders, including tribal members, are sympathetic to the notion of tribal sovereignty, most dislike the idea of a casino in Aquinnah.

It is noteworthy that the tribe is represented by Arizona attorney Scott Crowell, whose clients include indigenous tribes nationwide and whose entire practice is “committed to tribal advocacy and to the preservation and furtherance of tribal sovereignty,” according to his website. If more evidence were needed that this was not just an Island dispute, consider that both the National Congress of Indians and the Native American Rights Fund supported the tribe’s position in this case with a friend of the court brief.

The appeals court decision cautioned the town not to try to use its permitting authority to harass the tribe or thwart the casino. Now the Aquinnah selectmen have reached out, inviting tribal leaders to begin a discussion of how construction of a gaming facility might proceed. If there was ever a time to talk, it would be before the announced retirement of selectman Jim Newman, a thoughtful leader and a good friend to the tribe.

Until now, tribal leaders have rebuffed efforts by the town and the Martha’s Vineyard Commission to engage on the topic. In a statement last week, tribal chairman Cheryl Andrews-Maltais correctly stated that the court had already acknowledged the tribe’s right to conduct gaming on tribal lands, even if it still must comply with town and Islandwide building regulations. She pledged to continue to assert the tribe’s rights to gaming on tribal lands, though it was unclear what that might mean in practical terms.

Best case for the Island? The tribe abandons the ill-conceived bingo hall. As the pundits say, it’s time to declare victory and move on.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/05/2021 - 05:52

Permalink

West Tis resident West Tis

I am offended by the tone of this editorial. The author would do well to speak to members of the tribe who support the casino and learn why. Very poor taste for the Gazette. The issue deserves an in-depth history of the tribe’s attempts to bring in revenue for their people.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/16/2021 - 12:41

Permalink

Ana de Sousa Oak Bluffs

In the age of "Black Lives Matter," a broader view than that of the Gazette must be considered. A decision of our modern day "Supreme Judicial Court" ruled with racist overtones that the lots created by the act of the Legislature that created the Town of Gay Head (now Aquinnah) were intentionally divided to provide no access to those to whom the lots were granted whatsoever. Our Legislature in the mid 1800's recognized that while it had abolished "slavery," it continued to subjugate our Native brothers and sisters, an embarrassment in light of the lives being sacrificed in the Civil War. With There was a great degree of fervor to study and create pathways to recognize our Native peoples as full citizens and grant to each a parcel of ground (held by the Commonwealth for the benefit of the Tribes) from which each might derive shelter, sustenance or other revenue. The SJC ruled within the past decade, that the Legislature had instead intended ONLY that the grantees of the lots had NO ACCESS and thus only received a tax bill, being left unable to thus use those lots. The decision showed an extreme short-sightedness with significant racist overtones and overrode the Legislative will to the benefit of elitist environmental groups, and ironically the Town itself to keep these families and their successors from using the ground so granted for any purpose, having no access. The Gazette lauded that SJC decision, confirming the racist bent of that organization, it's leadership and its editorial staff. So, keeping in mind that highly elitist and racist sense of the Gazette, it is no surprise to hear the Gazette cheering "All lives matter!"

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.