Vineyard Wind Withdraws From Federal Permitting Process

Vineyard Wind has withdrawn its construction and operation plans from the federal permitting process, suddenly throwing the future into limbo for the consortium.

Vineyard Wind has withdrawn its construction and operation plans from the federal permitting process, suddenly throwing the future into limbo for the international consortium that has been at the front of the pack in the race to build offshore wind farms off the American eastern seaboard.

The first announcement that Vineyard Wind would withdraw from federal review was buried in a public statement that went out Dec. 1 about the company’s selection of General Electric’s Haliade-X as its preferred wind turbine generator model.

In followup statements Monday, both Vineyard Wind and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the federal agency responsible for reviewing the project, confirmed the withdrawal.

Vineyard Wind is a joint wind energy venture between Copenhagen Infrastructure Projects and Avangrid Renewables. The $2.8 billion plan to build a 108-turbine, 800-megawatt wind farm in federal waters about 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard has been working its way through the dense federal permitting process for the past three years.

The process had seen repeated delays and slowdowns, but had nearly reached the finish line late last month, with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) expected to release a final environmental impact statement by Dec. 11 and a decision by Jan. 15, five days before President Trump leaves office.

Now Vineyard Wind appears to be betting on the Biden administration for a fresh start.

“While the decision to pause the ongoing process was difficult, taking this step now avoids potentially more federal delays and we are convinced it will provide the shortest overall timeline for delivering the project as planned,” said Vineyard Wind CEO Lars Pedersen in a followup statement Monday. “We intend to restart the BOEM process from where we left off as soon as we complete the final review.”

On Monday, a spokesman for BOEM confirmed in an email to the Gazette that the agency had received a letter from Vineyard Wind withdrawing its proposal, effectively halting the project’s years-long review process and leaving the overall status of the development unclear.

“BOEM is not actively reviewing Vineyard Wind’s application right now,” the statement said.

The spokesman did not clarify whether the agency intended to entirely restart the project’s permitting if or when Vineyard Wind submits a new project plan — which could lead to years-long delays.

But two days later, on Dec. 16, BOEM issued a decision published in the federal register formally terminating review of the project. Vineyard Wind’s review had included nearly three years of environmental analysis from BOEM, as well as a supplemental review of the cumulative impacts of all offshore wind development on the East Coast. The decision from BOEM indicates that further federal review of the project would likely have to restart on the ground floor — and the seafloor.

“In light of Vineyard Wind’s letter dated Dec. 1, 2020, this notice advises the public that the preparation and completion of an EIS is no longer necessary, and the process is hereby terminated,” the decision in the federal registry states.

Commercial fishing interests, which have long voiced concerns about offshore wind development, hailed the decision from BOEM and said the move to pull the project would likely amount to more than a short delay.

“That federal register notice is crystal clear,” said Annie Hawkins, director of the Responsible Offshore Development Alliance, which advocates for commercial fishing. “The review of your plan has been terminated. You can resubmit from day one.”

Ms. Hawkins said the decision from BOEM was just one of three major developments for fishing interests this week. A Senate bill was passed requiring companies to use American ships and labor for offshore wind construction, just as an internal BOEM memo to Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt argued that offshore wind development could not unreasonably interfere with fishing operations, rather than simply the “legal right to fish.”

A copy of the memo was provided to the Gazette.

“From the fishing industry perspective, this is like hitting the trifecta,” Ms. Hawkins said. “It seems to be that this is a game-changing week for offshore wind.”

The Vineyard Wind project has faced myriad federal and local permitting hurdles since its inception. Although a denial from the Edgartown conservation commission for the undersea connector cables after dozens of Island fishermen spoke against the proposal at meetings last summer was later reversed, federal permitting has proven more challenging, with many stopping points in an environmental impact review that was expected to be completed by last summer. One of several setbacks came when BOEM said it wanted to examine more closely the entire scheme for wind farms off the coast of the U.S.

Deepwater ocean blocks have been going up for auction at a steady clip in the past three years. To date Vineyard Wind has secured two lease blocks, while Mayflower Wind has secured a lease site adjacent to the Vineyard Wind project.

In the statement Monday, Mr. Pedersen described the federal review process as “extremely rigorous” and said Vineyard Wind plans to complete its financial investments in the second half of 2021. The company still hopes to have the project online by 2023, he said.

“A short delay now still allows us to deliver the project on the appropriate timeline, with the final investment decision in mid-2021 and power coming onto the grid in 2023,” the statement said. “We continue to progress on our due diligence efforts and we intend to notify the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in several weeks when it can resume and complete its review of the COP.”

But the status of that review — and the country’s first industrial-scale offshore wind development — remains unclear, according to the statement from BOEM.

“Because the construction and operations plan has been withdrawn from review, there is no longer a proposal for a major federal action awaiting technical and environmental review, nor is there a decision pending before BOEM,” the agency said. “Vineyard Wind is welcome to submit a new construction and operations plan, at which time BOEM will begin an appropriate environmental and technical review.”

Updated to include additional comments from federal officials.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/14/2020 - 18:52

Permalink

Up island investor Chilmark

Sounds like your quitting? Get to work, many of us invested in you years ago. Learn how to fight and win.

Robert Skydell Granada, Nicaragua

I sincerely doubt that the fish or the birds are feeling particularly thankful with this news, but considering that offshore wind installations are generally beneficial to fish habitat should matter. There are several erroneous statements presented in this and other posts worth addressing. An eyesore located 15 miles out to sea is not an issue since it won't be visible from land. Bird mortality rates for modern large format wind turbines is also negligible. The issue of "unproven technology" would be reasonable but only if you were in the business of selling buggy whips! Wind installations whether onshore or off have been in operation for many decades and can be found all over the world. Several countries derive a large percentage of their electricity from wind and have for years. And contrary to what a certain elected official has repeatedly asserted, they don't cause cancer and have nothing to do with your ability to watch television when the wind isn't blowing! After 32 years as a Vineyard resident, I live in Nicaragua now about an hour's drive from a large land-based wind installation located on the shore of Lake Nicaragua. It is an absolutely incredible sight to behold; quiet, non-polluting and integrated into the pristine landscape with cattle grazing nearby. Unlike the United States and specifically Martha's Vineyard, no coal is being burned at a nearby power plant (i.e. Brayton Point) the air is clean and no acid rain or heavy metals is affecting fish or wildlife.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/14/2020 - 20:10

Permalink

BCS OAK BLUFFS

This has been a red herring from the beginning. Astonishing that islanders haven't supported fishing over big energy but here we are.

Carol formerly Chilmark

Utter nonsense. Wind energy provides safe, zero-pollution energy to 40 million Californians - almost 14 gigawatt-hours last year, or 7% of the electricity for 40 million people.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 05:53

Permalink

John Aldeborgh Edgartown, MA

Politics, which is a big red flag, in a bad way. The economics still make no sense so we’ll all pay higher prices for electricity. Really helps those who can least afford it. BTW, it’s a Joint Venture with a European company so it’s not even an all American project.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 07:10

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

Fantastic news, let’s continue to focus on preservation efforts on-island and real energy efficiency projects that aren’t such eyesores.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 07:29

Permalink

Jim bishop Oak bluffs

If you look at the financial impact on kilowatts it will be staggering to our economy. Hopefully the big money investors are starting to see its unsupported

John Cape Cod

Wind and Solar energy will never be the future source of electricity as they are and will remain a supplemental expensive source of power due to the basics. It should be quite obvious that Wind turbines generate no electricity when wind is not present and solar panel's which are incredibly inefficient also produce no power when there is no sunshine, especially when you take into account the amount of hours per day sunshine is available. In todays world people expect to have electricity available at all times for what ever purpose it is needed for. That expectation can only be achieved by means of a controlled power generation source such as by fossil fuels / nuclear / Hydro / waste to energy to provide the electrical grid with the proper amount of electricity at any given moment based on the demand for it. Until a new controlled power source can be brought about to replace current day generation sources they are here to stay as solar panel / wind turbines are not what will power the planet in the future.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 08:17

Permalink

Sharon Strimling Oak Bluffs

I’m always surprised by harsh comments. This project has been worked on tirelessly for years, through rigorous challenges, for the benefit of the environment. Kudos, Vineyard Wind, for all you have done. I trust that your decisions have been made with care and best strategy — and know they are not easy.

This world needs innovators. Innovators by nature have their necks extended. As a human being I want to treat those with care, and if i do disagree, I want to do that with respect.

I invested too, and fully understand that every investment is a risk. That’s on me. It’s also on me to trust the people I invest in that they fight right and well. If I get that wrong, that’s on me too. I don’t believe I did. I’ve seen their tireless hard work, and I also know their intelligence and intentions.

And btw, collaboration is often at the root of progress. I don’t care what countries help out.

Best of luck in this next year, and thank you for all your doing.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 10:00

Permalink

Jean K WT

Sorry happy to hear this project (financed primarily by a foreign company) has been tabled hopefully for ever. The negative impact it would have had on wildlife and fishing was not worth the potential benefit. They should build it on Nomans Island where they aren’t ruining vistas and livelihoods. Hoping Obama will insure Biden’s administration rejects the project now that he owns a home here. Only good news I’ve heard in months.

Jane Norton Chilmark

Building windmills on Noman's Island - a federal bird sanctuary - would not keep the wind farm from "ruining vistas" because Noman's is 10 miles closer to the Vineyard than the proposed off-shore site. Wind turbines on Noman's would be more visible from the Vineyard, not less.

Wildlife and livelihoods are important concerns, as is the cost of maintaining offshore turbines and loss of local control to foreign investors, but wildlife and livelihoods on the Vineyard are going to be devastated by climate change if we don't stop adding greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 10:24

Permalink

gina Menemsha/NYC

Not being for or against this project , I get the impression from the PR is that Developers are re working build out plans while a New Administration takes the Federal required permitting.department . This project has had so many stops & starts I doubt it's dead just postponed..

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 10:52

Permalink

Essential Worker Edgartown

I am glad to know I don't have to view those ugly turbines. At least for now..., because as soon as there is another political/financial angle it will begin again. They destroy the picturesque nature of the island and are very deadly to the birds and other wildlife.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 12:16

Permalink

Adam Wilson Oak Bluffs

I believe the reason for withdrawal is a major revision in the construction operation plan (COP), for higher megawatt turbines (9.5 --> 12-14). Such a change to the project slated to be built 12 miles south of Nomans was too great for the Bureau of Offshore Energy Management (BOEM) to consider as a "revision" to the various infrastructure and environmental reviews. Hence the withdrawal. But make no mistake, off shore wind is coming to the US up and down the eastern seaboard in a big way. 5 wind towers are off Block Island and 2 are up and running off the coast of Virginia testing the effectiveness of generating clean renewable energy at utility scale. BOEM has lease agreements with numerous energy producers (Including Shell), to build wind farms off MA, RI, NY, NJ, MD, DE, VA and NC. Millions have been paid for rights to build offshore wind farms and permitting is under way for projects in the lease areas of RI and NJ. President Elect Joe Biden has promoted these utility scale projects for the jobs they will create and the clean energy they will provide. in the next 10-15 years we will be looking at these farms from vantage points along the east coast. to some they appear unsightly. But to many who will receive the energy they provide from a clean resource and not from fossil fuel, they are one of the solutions to combating climate change and making the world a cleaner place for generations to come.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/15/2020 - 18:03

Permalink

TM Edgartown

I hope people will consider the following before forming (and spreading) opinions on this or any offshore wind farm:

1. It will be impossible to see this farm from even the highest point on the south shore. Mainly due to the earth being round.

2. Cats killed 4,200x more birds than wind turbines last year, followed closely by buildings and traditional electrical wires.

3. Climate change is real, consider investing in a sustainable future now rather than dealing with the sure to be higher mitigation costs down the road.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/16/2020 - 04:22

Permalink

All island Tisbury

Birds and fish? You know what really kills birds and fish, air and water pollution from fossil fuels, not wind turbines! Clean energy saves birds and fish.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/17/2020 - 14:09

Permalink

Kelce OB

I miss my cat dearly. But she killed far more birds while on this earth than any windmill ever would. Give wind a chance.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.