Firehouse Problems

What would you do if you were a selectman in Oak Bluffs about the local fire department and its leadership?

What would you do if you were a selectman in Oak Bluffs about the local fire department and its leadership?

Here is run down of some of the infractions that have occurred:

• Sexual harassment by the chief costing the town $97,500 paid by the town’s insurance which will probably raise the premium causing our taxes to increase.

• The supervisor having a relationship with a subordinate. Didn’t we have a president who got into trouble for this?

• FBI inquiry into the over billing of Medicare/Medicaid by the EMT department supervised by the fire chief.

• The fire chief places his locker in the female locker room. Are you kidding me.

• When first questioned the chief lied to the selectmen.

• The above infractions are surely enough to remove the chief but that has not happened. Why did the selectmen give him their support after all of these infractions?

• The present selectmen still stand by him, if you can believe it. They state that there was no wrongdoing by the town or the chief in dealing with the administrator. Then why pay the former administrator the $ 97,500 if there was no wrongdoing?

• Two selectmen came to the defense of the chief saying that what he did was not that serious. What do they consider serious?

• Let me give you a hypothetical situation.

• If a school principal had a relationship with a teacher and continued harassing the teacher and the principal also mishandled student activity funds what would you say?

• Would you defend him and let him continue in his position? I am sure you would not.

• As residents of Oak Bluffs we need to give this situation some very serious thought and not allow it to continue.

Eric Hohenthal

Oak Bluffs

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/31/2020 - 21:56

Permalink

James Santos Close by

Come on Eric, everyone has there moments as he did. He is no Clinton like your no Ken Star. the present selectmen stand by him because they know what an asset he is. Asset out weighs the liability side. Your support and others would make a better chief.... now! that its all under the bridge.
Old people run on old ways, new faces bring ways to fix.
Any good manager knows the answer is not firing, its in fixing a situation your town has some much to gain from.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/01/2020 - 16:08

Permalink

James Santos Florida

Glad to see I'm not the only one with reasonable compassion.
Very few people understand the difference between - Liability and Asset.
Your assuming I'm an insider using a stage name. Wrong!
I'm in Florida for the winter and live on West Island just around the corner from you, a neighbor. My view comes as CEO and businessman and have always invested in people. I have been waiting the outcome hoping... just maybe his outstanding collection of undisputed good services would carry some weight.
Even the trumpeter go a break, lets see what he does with that.

Someone mentioned maybe an outsider could be the answer! I assure you its not, maybe an outside view would help.

An asset 95% of the time VS Liability for a moment.
Weight it! kick it around! I would have invested in to that all day long.
Just saying

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.