Steamship Authority Seeks Millions in Bonds

Steamship Authority governors voted Thursday to issue up to $26 million in bonds to fund ongoing waterside construction at the Woods Hole terminal and repay $5.66 million in bonds issued in 2009 that will mature over the next few years.

Steamship Authority governors voted Tuesday to issue up to $26 million in bonds to fund ongoing waterside construction at the Woods Hole terminal and repay $5.66 million in bonds issued in 2009 that will mature over the next few years.

Authorized by state law to issue bonds up to $100 million, the boat line currently has $73.45 million in outstanding bond obligations, treasurer/comptroller Mark Rozum told the board.

The SSA retires about $7.5 million in bond debt each year, with $7.52 million set to be retired March 1, Mr. Rozum said. That will reduce the outstanding balance to $65.93 million, leaving more head room for the $26 million in new bonds authorized Tuesday.

New Bedford governor Moira Tierney challenged the plan to come within $10 million of the boat line’s bond limit.

“What would we do if we wanted to build a boat right now?” she asked. “How would we finance it?”

“At this point, we’d be hard pressed to build a new boat,” Mr. Davis answered.

“We would have to go back [to the state legislature] and get an increased bonding limit.”

The last bond increase, from $75 million to $100 million, was approved by the legislature and signed by Gov. Deval Patrick in 2014.

Mr. Davis said the Woods Hole — the SSA’s newest ferry, launched in 2016 — cost about $40 million.

Building the same boat today would cost at least $45 million, Mr. Davis said, because of evolving standards for engines and other vessel systems.

He said the first step toward adding a new ferry is to ascertain the need, which he said would be part of the upcoming capital budget process.

“We do 10-year projections,” Mr. Davis said.

The SSA’s last 10-year projection had set this year for design and engineering work toward its next new ferry, he also said.

“I’d be remiss in my responsibilities not to say that I am concerned,” Ms. Tierney said. “If we wanted to make a boat today, we really don’t have the financial wherewithal to do it.”

The meeting took place on a day of unexpected tumult for the boat line, whose website had crashed in pre-dawn hours on the first day of booking summer reservations for the Vineyard route. Thousands of frustrated customers were unable to access the site until afternoon. In a formal statement, Mr. Davis apologized for the problems.

Meanwhile, in other business Tuesday, the general manager said the recent elimination of longtime maintenance and engineering director Carl Walker’s position is a positive, with the department coming under the authority of director of marine operations Mark Amundsen.

“I feel strongly that this change will not only begin the process of making the authority’s structure less flat . . . but also aid in communication in our operations department,” Mr. Davis said.

“The engineering staff and the vessel crews will be under the same command now,” he added.

He briefly mentioned Mr. Walker, whose 24-year career with the Steamship Authority ended abruptly earlier this month.

“I do want to take this time to thank him for his years of service,” Mr. Davis said.

Also Tuesday, governors received an update on work at the Woods Hole terminal, part of a sweeping reconstruction project that has swelled in cost to at least $10 million more than its original $60 million price tag.

Ms. Tierney balked at approving an $885,681 change order for BIA Studio, the Boston-based architects designing the terminal and its much-discussed ticket building.

“I don’t feel comfortable approving it,” she said of the firm’s bill.

“I think they need to participate a little bit more in taking a little bit of a haircut, as we have,” Ms. Tierney said, referring to rising costs that have added to the project’s expense over two years of revisions to the building design.

Her colleagues on the board agreed to table the change order for a month and ask Mr. Davis to have the architects’ billing reviewed by a qualified third party.

On Wednesday, the boat line will air the newest, single-story design concept for the terminal building at two open house sessions at the Palmer avenues offices, from 3 to 4 and 6 to 7 p.m. Diagrams are posted online.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/21/2020 - 21:34

Permalink

Read my Lips SSA territories

in 2014 the SSA's "Credit card" limit was raised from $75 to 100 million. Now they're bumping up against that. What's next? $125 million? $150 million? This 10 year capital plan GM Davis mentions? Where is it, how often is it updated, can we see it? What's ahead? I have such low confidence in this SSA leadership. Who can we trust to hear the truth on where everything is? Thank you, MV Gazette for keeping us informed.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/21/2020 - 22:26

Permalink

Henry West Tisbury

Upon reading this article and as an island resident, I feel somewhat embarrassed that I don’t know more about the steamship authority structure, fiscal budget and mandate. It seems to me that even though the SSA has been given preferential treatment regarding their tax obligations from a decades old agreement with the government, they’re somewhat of a runaway train. Put aside all of the delays, settlements, firings and disfunction over recent years. The governors have just approved to issue bonds that will effectively max out their allowable ability under a Patrick agreement. What’s next? An SSA shutdown until the state legislature will approve of another “debt ceiling increase”? Will fares increase to an ungodly level? I feel if the ferry service becomes too expensive, not only will it drive away tourists, from which almost everyone on the island benefits, but cost of goods will be so high it will drive away the year round population. I’m just saying, where is the accountability?
Without being red/ blue partisan, can anyone objectively describe to me how this model is sustainable in its current state? What is the interest rate on the bonds and how long are the terms? What are the maturity dates on said bonds? And how much matures when? How long would it take the SSA to pay back $100M in bonds, theoretically? (I am aware that most businesses has revolving debt). And how does the interest rates on the bonds affect the increase in fares on top of the usual increase of fiscal expenditures?

I’d like to hear from some people who are in the know.....Driscoll?

Cue the double speak and ambiguity........

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/22/2020 - 07:31

Permalink

John Graham MV

If I recall correctly, the WH terminal required a major redrafting as there was an outcry over the first design. Redrafting and change work orders, which are approved by the client, add up quickly. To then suggest that you’re not going to pay when that cost is directly related to indecision and a lack of a clear vision on the part of the SSA is rather absurd.

Mike WT

Almost 900k for design changes is a lot for a 60m project. We work on 100m projects regularly. That would be close to 30% of our total fee. I wish we could get a CO of that size for design changes. The original fee must be huge. My understanding is that this has not been finalized.Meaning they are still in design development. Apparently there is no oversight or control of the process. The PCO for the changes had to have been presented by the design firm. If they did the work it must have been approved. Clients that approve changes do so knowing the costs. How do the governors now say they are questioning the cost- no matter how absurd. Not a good practice.

OK, but..... MV

Uh, we're talking a $10 million cost overrun here. That's the absurdity. It's complete fiscal insanity. The tone deafness of this SSA Board and it's leadership costs us in so many ways, everyday.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/22/2020 - 08:29

Permalink

Jim Edgartown

What is wrong with the existing building in Woods hole, it works? We are just running in to buy a ticket, we don't need a museum!!!
This is just crazy! I hope someone steps in the Governor? Rep? Senator?
This is a total joke! We need better leadership. Where is Marc Hanover in all this??????
The SSA needs a total makeover with the leadership. Once the public sector gets wind of this, things might change.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.