Town administrator James Hagerty: “We need something realistic if we are going to continue to talk.”
Noah Asimow

Edgartown Presses Its Points on High School Funding Issue

<p>Edgartown officials doubled down on their criticism of proposed changes to the high school funding mechanism Monday.</p>

Edgartown officials doubled down on their criticism of proposed changes to the high school funding mechanism at their meeting on Monday, requesting in a letter that high school administrators focus on short-term fixes to the ailing high school building as budget negotiations for a long-term renovation remain stalled.

Last week, Edgartown representatives walked out of an all-Island finance committee meeting to protest Oak Bluffs’ proposed changes to the high school funding formula. While the high school is funded on a per-pupil basis, cash-strapped Oak Bluffs has requested an equalized-valuation structure that accounts for property values in the respective towns. The new metric would increase Edgartown’s portion of the funding by 15 per cent. It would also decrease the Oak Bluffs portion by a similar amount.

On Monday, town administrator James Hagerty explained why Edgartown left the finance committee meeting last week, saying the equalized-valuation model was not an option for the town.

“Edgartown walked off and said we need something realistic if we are going to continue to talk,” Mr. Hagerty said. “We really can’t look at how we are going to fund the high school until we look at the numbers behind it.”

Under the current funding system, every town pays approximately $29,000 per student at the high school. In a powerpoint slide, Mr. Hagerty showed that the proposed mechanism would have Edgartown paying $44,000 per student, while Aquinnah would pay $84,000 and Chilmark $144,000. Mr. Hagerty said those numbers would increase Edgartown’s budget by $2 to $3 million, and by far more if the towns eventually decide to build a new school.

“We’re talking per-pupil costs that are commensurate with some of the most elite private schools in New England,” Mr. Hagerty said.

Selectmen then voted to send a letter to schools superintendent Matthew D’Andrea, inviting him and members of the high school building subcommittee to come to the Oct. 7 selectmen’s meeting to discuss small-scale fixes to the building. The broader funding discussion was prompted earlier this year when Oak Bluffs voted against a feasibility study to renovate the high school at town meeting last April.

“Since Oak Bluffs has announced they will not back any capital expenditure without the proposed formula change, which is highly unlikely, it is time to focus attention on the deferred maintenance and repair that has been put off for too long,” the letter says in part.

Selectman Arthur Smadbeck added that he felt the safety of the building could not wait while the towns attempted to hammer out a larger funding agreement.

“I think it’s really important, short term, to get this building fixed,” Mr. Smadbeck said. “Asking three towns that have 32 per cent of the enrollment to pay 60 per cent of the bill, and three towns that have 68 per cent of the enrollment to pay 40 per cent of the bill, is not going to fly.”

Mr. Hagerty further said that spending money on a feasibility study would be a bureaucratic step rather than an effective allocation of funds.

“Where we’re at right now is we’re going to pay a consultant to consult us about how to pay for another consultant to conduct a building feasibility consultation study,” Mr. Hagerty said. “Maybe we should take that money, put it in some sort of stabilization fund, and save for HVAC, roof, and other fixes.”

Animal control officer Betsy Young Buck recommended leash restraint and fencing for a miniature dachshund that bit a town resident.
Noah Asimow
Animal control officer Betsy Young Buck recommended leash restraint and fencing for a miniature dachshund that bit a town resident.
Noah Asimow

In other business Monday, selectmen held a dangerous dog hearing after an incident that took place earlier this summer off Marchant’s Path. According to animal control officer Betsy Young Buck, resident Maria Lopez was walking her dog when she was bitten by a miniature dachshund owned by Jacqueline Robinson. Ms. Robinson was unloading groceries when her dog escaped, Ms. Young Buck said. The bite was unprovoked.

“There are differences in stories between the dog owner and the victim,” Ms. Young Buck said. “But basically what happened was that . . . the miniature dachshund ran out to Maria in the road and bit her on the shin, almost immediately.”

According to Ms. Young Buck, the bite was a three out of six on the Dunbar scale, meaning it involved one to four tooth punctures.

“This was pretty scary and upsetting,” Ms. Young Buck said.

After hearing testimony from both sides, selectmen decided to accept the animal control officer’s recommendations that the dog stay on a leash at all times and remain in a fenced enclosure if off-leash. Selectmen warned that consequences would be more serious if the dog bit another victim.

“If this happens again, and this dog comes before this board, we won’t be so lenient,” Mr. Donaroma said. “We can’t tolerate this kind of action.”

Selectmen also heard from resident Jim Joyce, who voiced concerns about the town’s construction policies in the R5 zoning district downtown. He said police officers stopped him from working on an addition to his home on a Sunday and that there have been flagrant violations of the town’s 7 a.m. building start time.

“I’m on both sides of this issue,” Mr. Joyce said.

There was confusion at the meeting over town bylaws. Although the bylaws say that no work that requires a building permit can be done on Sunday, there is also a clause that appears to exempt homeowners. Regardless, Mr. Joyce requested the selectmen take action.

“Something needs to be fixed or clarified,” Mr. Joyce said. He added that the 7 a.m. start time requirement in the bylaw should have some teeth.

Selectmen agreed with the first request, and said they would consider the second one. All changes would have to be adopted with a vote at town meeting.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 09/11/2019 - 16:26

Permalink

Virginia Coogan Edgartown

Towns should pay on a per pupil system. Everyone needs to get that in their heads, and move on. By the way, the high school is in no dire need of extreme repairs. The building is old, and needs work, but it is generally fine. Make small changes, keep the lights on, and limit big spending. Island residents, yound and retired alike cannot afford a new Tisbury school, and a new high school. There will be an exodus from the island work force if costs just keep rising. We certainly do not need a new high school that may cost $100 Million. D'Andrea is misguided by these ideas.

Richard Weiss Oak Bluffs

Using the number of pupils to decide how much each town should pay towards HS feasibility studies or HS repairs is ridiculous and ultimately unworkable.
Using a random quantifier like children as the vehicle for determining each towns liability makes as much sense as basing the liability on how many trees are in each taxpayers yard or the number of cereal bowls on their shelf.
The reality is: each town should be an equal share (1/6 per town) towards HS funding because whether you have 2 kids or 20 kids attending-they still use the entire campus.
OB does recognize that equal share funding could spell financial ruin for some towns-while also recognizing that OB is not responsible for subsidizing those towns children.
This is why all interested parties from all towns should come together to discuss a solution.
What worked in 1956, 1989 and 2008 simply does not work now.

Joanne chilmark

OB is not responsible for "subsidizing" other towns' children??!! I think sir that you have that backwards. With 28 children out of around 600, Chilmark uses 28/600ths of the school. OB uses 178/600ths of the school. It's called math. If the town with 28 kids pays the same as the one with 178, the smaller town is doing the subsidizing!!! With a per pupil formula we are all paying our fair share.

T Bone Oak Bluffs

The attitude of seniors to accept deteriorating school conditions is sad. They won't approve tax dollars for maintenance, repairs, or renovations let alone new construction. Something needs to give, and it's sad that directionally the kids lose but seniors win.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 09/11/2019 - 20:54

Permalink

Edgartown Resident Edgartown

I wish Edgartown under its new leadership (Hagerty) would make public information a priority! Minutes of meetings and even notices are almost non existent! Go to the website and find what? Check back next year. Message to me as a resident is don’t ask be grateful your taxes are low. The town happily spends millions on yellow houses and airport hangers for hobbiest pilots. Is it asking too much as a resident for an updated website telling me what my leaders are going to discuss and how they reached their decision? Ya, I know, shut up and quit complaining. I am disappointed in the character of our newly hired town manager, but not surprised our selectmen are getting just what they want. Sellouts.

Edgartonian Chappy

Tying the character of an accomplished marine officer to an outdated website is a pretty tough sell...Hagerty and the Selectmen do a fine job!

Edgartown Resident Edgartown

I am not challenging Mr. Hagerty’s service as a marine. I admire his sacrifice to our country, and thank him for protecting my freedoms selflessly. I don’t challenge his intellect or drive; a Masters in Business Administration is a hard won degree that certainly benefits our bottom line. The thing is, that outdated website is his responsibility. The bigger thing is, the website is perfectly adequate for posting meeting agenda and minutes. The point I was making was not about the ease of use of the website. It was that the content was not there. The freedoms Mr. Hagerty so selflessly defended as a Marine aren’t a priority in this administration. The technology is there. Where is the leader that tells his charge “shine a bright light on what we are doing. Post your agenda and write your minutes so our citizens know what their government is up to.”? Easily accessible agenda and minutes are central to our freedoms. I can’t imagine doing anything else in his shoes. I had high hopes his hiring would mark the change we all needed in this town, and I have been severely disappointed. I should just shut up though, my government is acting in my best interest and I am told all I need to know. Also, I don’t believe our Selectmen are acting in our (residents) best interest. That whole contract to rebrick downtown sent off island and thrown back as a subcontracting to our esteemed supplier of five figure bouquet sets to Goldman Sachs weddings stank to high heaven. His response to the challenge was arrogant, no surprise there. And Real Estate agents to big money folk are fine at their jobs but sure don’t strike me as true public servants. I guess I can hope and pray that an antique appraiser is familiar with my daily challenges as a regular working class guy. There is a problem here, Hagerty is likely the solution, and he needs to take a risk and demand the town show what it is up to. Or not. In which case my original comment stands.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/12/2019 - 10:01

Permalink

B.T. Vanderhoop Chilmark

I don't usually comment on the state of schools, but I believe that regionalization needs to be addressed. I(nstead of two big project ( new HS and Tisbury School), look at plans to develop a high school with either 8-12, or a wind that is 7-8, and 9-12. Additionally there can be a designated Superintendent office on the new campus by the high school. Bring it all together. Cut costs on staffing, grounds, maintenence, and align the teaching frameworks from 6-12. This is very simple. the feasability study should be looking at a regional middle schooll model, not just a new high school. Come on D'Andrea get with the program: be a leader. The West Tisbury school also will need upgrades in a few years. is everyone ready for that?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/12/2019 - 11:29

Permalink

Jane, Edgartown Voter Edgartown

To "Edgartown Resident":
First, you ,if you are a voter, and others of us voters are the ones who make ALL financial expenditure decisions, including Katama Airport and the Yellow House. It's called a Town Meeting. Are you a voter? Financial decisions have nothing at all to do with the Town Manager. That's the most idiotic thing I've heard in a long time.
RE disseminating public information on the Town's website? The basic contact info is there. You can attend weekly meetings. You obviously read the newspapers online and can get weekly updates if you're too lazy to attend these public meetings. Public Notices by law are published with the required notice.
I think you have a personal beef with Mr. Hagerty who is doing a splendid job. You don't identify yourself. I think you are a Town Employee, and one that may have personnel issues. Am I correct?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/12/2019 - 21:25

Permalink

Edgartown Resident Edgartown

I am not a town employee, I am a voter, and I am not lazy. I am busy, but not too busy to pay attention to the goings on of government in my town. I am an early adopter of technology, and in my race to be efficient in being both a good citizen, good earner for my family (still growing there), and a good neighbor I sometimes hope my town government will share my priorities. Might be too much to ask. To be clear, I am asking for agenda and minutes to be posted in a timely manner on the town website. It is not a legal obligation of the town. But it is a way of involving more people who are too busy surviving to walk by town hall to peer at public notices (many of which are missing and none of which comply with state open meeting law since doors are locked and they aren’t in view after town hall hours). Pretty clear I touched a nerve when I complained that an effort isn’t being made to let people know what is going to happen, and an effort isn’t being made to let people know what happened, emphasis on not just the decisions made but how they were arrived at (good minutes as required by law). You gotta show up, say your name, and face the consequences of rocking the boat? That is your message. I am asking for a bright big light to be shined on the discussions and decisions, so I don’t have to be a hero just to know the facts. The strong arm message in your response just proves my point. Message is shut your mouth, nothing wrong with not meeting fundamental civil rights requirements of legally published notices or good clear minutes. Ugly.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.