MVC Takes Steps to Review Bingo Hall

<p>The Martha&rsquo;s Vineyard Commission has set a hearing to review the tribe&rsquo;s proposed bingo hall.

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission is taking steps to review the Wampanoag tribe’s proposed bingo hall as a development of regional impact (DRI).

MVC executive director Adam Turner said on Thursday night that the commission has tentatively set a May 22 meeting with the tribe and a June 6 public hearing to begin review of the project.

The tribe has already cleared four acres it owns off Black Brook and State roads in Aquinnah for the planned bingo hall, although no construction has begun yet.

The town, tribe and commission have been jousting for weeks, both in and out of court, over whether review by the regional land use commission is required, among other things. Aquinnah and Chilmark have both made formal referrals to the commission.

The tribe has strongly objected to the referrals, saying they contravene the tribe’s sovereign rights which have been affirmed by the highest U.S. courts.

In a May 8 letter sent to tribal chairman Cheryl Andrews-Maltais, Mr. Turner said the commission would follow normal procedure for projects referred to the commission by towns, “because this constitutes a mandatory referral.”

Outlining procedure, he said the commission normally holds a meeting with DRI applicants to discuss application requirements and review site plans. He scheduled that meeting with the tribe for May 22, and also scheduled a land use planning meeting for June 3 and a public hearing for 7 p.m. on June 6.

“The commission will receive testimony from all interested persons with respect to the proposed development and would, of course, welcome the tribe’s participation in the public hearing process,” Mr. Turner wrote. “You should be aware that, under the commission enabling act, the commission has authority to commence an action or other proceedings necessary to enforce its statutory authority with respect to any decision it may issue.”

At the meeting Thursday evening, Mr. Turner and commission chairman Doug Sederholm said they had received no response from the tribe.

“Since sending that letter we have heard nothing,” Mr. Turner said.

“They have not challenged us. They are ignoring us,” Mr. Sederholm said.

Ms. Andrews-Maltais could not be immediately reached for comment Friday.

Mr. Turner said commission counsel had reviewed the letter and agreed with the proposed course of action.

“We had hoped to find a way forward where we simply addressed the impact of the proposed development,” Mr. Turner said. “But we have referrals from two towns. We have to go back and complete our work. I don’t relish this, but I have a responsibility to the referrals that we got.”

He continued: “I hope we can come to some accommodation with the tribe and I totally respect what they are trying to do up there. We hope to still come to an agreement with them.”

At the site of the proposed bingo hall, there are no signs of activity. Signs posted around the property warn against non-tribal trespassers, while blackout screens have been hung over the chain-link fence that separates the property from State Road.

Meanwhile, arguments are set to be heard on May 31 in U.S. District Court on Boston on the latest legal skirmish between the town and the tribe over the scope of the court rulings that gave the tribe the right to build a gambling facility. In a motion filed in early April attorneys for the town asked the court to clarify that, notwithstanding a higher court ruling giving the tribe the right to build a bingo hall, the tribe needs to obtain a town building permit before beginning construction.

In response, the tribe said the motion is simply another ploy by the town to deny the tribe its sovereign rights.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/17/2019 - 17:14

Permalink

Eric Vineyard Haven

Anybody should be able to use their property the way they see fit, if the tribe believes having a bingo hall is best use so be it. I am not looking forward to seeing bunch of old white poeple telling the poeple who came first what is best.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/17/2019 - 18:08

Permalink

charlie callahan so boston/edgartown

The tribe owns the land,what right does anyone have to tell them what they can and can't do. What about the slugs who build $20,000,000 mansions and do exactly what they want and some of these things don't exactly look like they should have been allowed on a place like this. They don't exactly blend in. Leave the tribe alone

John

Evidently, it is okay for you to say Mansions are not eyesores and call gamblers degenerates. However the Gazette won't allow me to call your mansions and I swore and refer to leftist liberals. I really wish all comments were accepted on this forum without the paper being biased. My comments earlier we're not published because they must have gone against the liberal views of the newspaper.

Andrew Martha's Vineyard

If anyone has the right to use their property as they want, our lovely island will be trashed, like so many places we have worked hard to not become. I'm contemplating a high rise apartment building, strip mall and homeless shelter on my lot next to your houses with flashing neon lights. Does that impact you? Of course it does so let's not be stupid here. Rules and zoning are in place to help preserve and protect our biggest assets, the place we love, and ensure we all understand a common framework to abide by. It's an unfortunate reality we are an attractive vacation destination to clueless individuals who feel entitled and justified to build weekend mansions but until we cap house sized, modify our zoning or try to enforce intelligent design concepts we are stuck with the rules we have. A casino with busing of seniors from boats and bus lines will choke our small island roads more than they already are. Can we really imagine that they will get enough people in to make this escapade financially feasible? Or, is this a posturing by the tribe in an effort to get the government to yield to granting them the ability to do this in the big world with a higher chance of success, while we the impacted observers sit by ans watch. I am all for the tribe creating successful ventures and making money. They could be growing pot of exploring other potentially high profit avenues that neither mar the landscape nor choke the roadways. We should all want them to be financially successful and continue to be the stewards of the land. This casino is a folly that will be creating a few jobs and possibly some profit at the expense of many. Of course some oversight is due here.

John

If preserving the nature & land from pollution & congestion was actually the goal of the people running the government on this Island, ferries bringing thousands of gas guzzling cars would have been banned long ago. Instead, buses & electric golf carts would be the ONLY vehicles allowed. Septic systems would have been banned instead replaced by sewer systems with treatment plants. Town government would be replaced with Island-wide government, schools, police, fire & rescue. The tribe is following federal law, which dreams marijuana illegal, although Massachusetts lawmakers ignore that!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/18/2019 - 07:03

Permalink

Frank Brunelle Vineyard Haven

The MVC has a lot of nerve. The Beach Road development is a project brought on, conceived of, financed by, and completely controlled by the Martha's Vineyard Commission as their development. This project has never had a DRI. Now, we learn, that Paul Foley the DRI director who clearly stated that a DRI was necessary for this project is gone - no longer with the Commission. Nothing has been reported on this but to those who knew Paul Foley he was the voice of reason and will surely be missed greatly and in fact, rightfully, should have become the Director in some peoples' opinions - many in fact. And still, no DRI on the Beach Road project which is dangerous, expensive and damages multiple properties and the working harborfront. All of it not reviewed as it would not come to pass if it were, or so it would seem to be the reason why it was aovided all these years - 10 to be exact - despite multiple petitions we might add.

T Bone OB

And people clutched their pearls over the rotary, too. Frank’s full disclosure should include that his property is impacted by this project — he may have additional incentive to be overly vocal.

David Chilmark

What does this post by Mr. Brunelle have to do with the article? Doesn't Mr. Brunelle own property that will be directly impacted by the project he refers to? Shouldn't he disclose this if he's going to comment out of context?

Down Islander

People who are impacted by a development are not therefore prohibited from commenting on the development. Just as agencies who are pushing a certain development are not prohibited from commenting on it---nor are they challenged to be 100% neutral. Viz., constant quoting of Bill Veno regarding the Beach Road development. Of course they are not "neutral." Why should they be? Who is? "Disinterested" in most development and land use issues are those who don't care either way.

Often those who are the most impacted are the ones who know the most about a project, down to the nitty-gritty details, and have put in the most time and effort attending meetings, etc. Of course the individuals who push for particular developments without necessarily living on the same street have their own reasons. They are not "neutral." They might not even live on Martha's Vineyard!
Regarding Paul Foley's departure from the MVC: I am devastated to hear this. IMO he was the best person on the Commission staff: truly dedicated to the Vineyard and to the MVC's mission. Was his leaving reported? Absolutely unacceptable that someone who had worked for the Commission so well and for so long departs to a thundering silence. Truly a great loss to the Commission and the Vineyard.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/18/2019 - 13:59

Permalink

Tom West Tisbury

What a waste of time on the part of the MVC. The tribe has already established clear to the US Supreme Court that they can build this casino

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/18/2019 - 17:50

Permalink

Jim Ob

One of the problems is the tribe will be using the town’s emergency services and not paying for it. They expect everything for free

Mark Edgartown

The town should cut off access to services and infrastructure unless they pay their fair share and act as good neighbors. Creating an eyesore that attracts degenerate gamblers is in nobody’s interest.

John

Are you one of those degenerate gamblers playing the stock market? Invest in our government bonds, or do we need a world war for people to do that?

Mark Edgartown

The stock market and other capital markets drive economic growth by efficiently allocating capital to job creators. To say investing is gambling is a grossly unfounded characterization. Real gambling is an addictive way for people to lose money in a game of chance that unfortunately has a tendency to destroy lives. Don't need it on MV, simply google the correlation between casino gambling and increased crime and you will find numerous studies by both liberal and conservative outlets.

R Scott Patterson Edgartown

Perhaps this Bingo Hall will attract all the gamblers currently living and gambling every single day all day long at every single business that sells lottery tickets. The gamblers are already here folks and I have no problem with the tribe taking their money instead of the state doing it.

John

Everyone uses the emergency services. How is this any different, other than the people in Chilmark & Aquinnah who want that end of the Island to themselves?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/19/2019 - 00:36

Permalink

Richard Whittaker Ossining

Do the proponents of tribal sovereignty on Martha’s Vineyard think they can expel their ancestral guilt by supporting the laissez-faire construction of the Bingo Hall?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/19/2019 - 08:12

Permalink

R Scott Patterson Edgartown

I hope the tribe continues with their plans and sues the towns/MVC for every penny they have to spend on this nonsense.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/19/2019 - 08:37

Permalink

Kelcey Oak Bluffs

The MVC is like an island bully, I hope the tribe teaches this bully a lesson.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/19/2019 - 14:28

Permalink

Up Island Resident Chilmark

As much as I dislike the MVC, it was designed to save the Island from ignorant development. Most people will ruin their land if left to themselves, just drive along State Road in VH. The tribe's casino will never be successful if they ignore the wishes of Islanders. In fact, many of the local tribe members also fear this new casino in their town.I'm in favor of a casino, but place it in a town that needs the revenues and not on an Island.

WashAbhorred Edgartown

Yes, Stop & Shop was going to ruin Vineyard Haven with a new building. The MVC is controlled by a bunch of people sometimes with conflicting interests and sometimes with no other motive than flexing their power.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/20/2019 - 09:09

Permalink

BIll Virginia

In America, everyone does NOT have the right to do whatever they want with their land: Zoning laws specifically limit that. They also trigger certain reviews when they impact the public with traffic, excess waste, noise, etc. What a shame that everyone cannot cooperate in the process.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/20/2019 - 19:08

Permalink

hugh weisman chilmark & New York

They can have a Bingo hall. That's settled by the Supreme Court, But that doesn't necessarily allow them to build without comply with local and state codes, land development to prevent erosion, loss of endangered species, and all the other regulations put in place to protect people and this island.

R Scott Patterson Edgartown

Maybe if the towns had approached the Tribe by accepting the fact that they have the legal right to build a casino and they just want some input into how it will affect the community as a whole instead of pretending that the Tribe doesn't have that right the response from the Tribe would have been different.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/21/2019 - 05:52

Permalink

Chip Coblyn OB

I especially liked the line about the Tribe ignoring the wishes of Islanders; irony, hypocrisy and condescension in one sentence.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/21/2019 - 08:45

Permalink

nita Fandray Pittsburgh

I am just wondering if the Tribe is ignoring the wishes of the Tribe? That may be the fundamental issue here.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/21/2019 - 09:27

Permalink

Donna Russell Rochester

The "jousting" has gone on for centuries, ever since a bunch of lost Europeans stepped on east coast land. It was, is and should always be sovereign land of the Original People. Give it back. Pay reparations and rent. Problem solved. So easy. Bingo.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/21/2019 - 22:50

Permalink

Dick Oak Bluffs

I can already smell the lawyers fees the MVC is getting ready to incur. This will be an ugly and expensive fight. If I were betting, I'd pick the tribe/Feds to win vs. MVC.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.