Wrong Place, Right Place

<p>I have been a vocal opponent to the siting of a Chappy cell tower on Sampson avenue.

I have been a vocal opponent to the siting of a Chappy cell tower on Sampson avenue. I might be the most visible in our group, but I am not alone.

I would like to ask the citizens of Edgartown, and of Martha’s Vineyard, to consider for a moment this literally monumental decision to erect a 120-foot tower on Chappy.

The tower has been touted for its public safety benefits and we agree. We know a cell tower would be highly beneficial to public safety for everyone on Chappy. No one opposes that.

But a tower, for everyone’s benefit, required for public safety — just like a police or fire station — belongs on town land.

Throughout this process, selectmen and planning board, town manager and others, all testified that a tower on Chappy belongs on town land. It still does.

Siting a tower on town land is safer, less impactful, more compliant and more equally shares the burden of a tower across all the residents of Martha’s Vineyard, Edgartown and Chappy. Placing the cell tower in the woods, away from peoples’ homes, preserves the quiet enjoyment, and safety, of everyone’s home on Chappaquiddick. That’s all we really ask.

A cell tower is not forever. It is not like a house which could exist for hundreds of years, but has a finite life span — 20, 30, 40 years.

Making town land available for a cell tower now is not forever. And in the future, determining when to remove the tower is best left in the hands of the residents of the town. Maybe 20 years from now, maybe 50, but it should be up to the town and its residents to make that determination.

The tower should be owned by a corporation with the resources to remove the tower and all of the ground-based infrastructure in the future. A company with resources to not simply remove the tower, ship it off the Island, and dispose of it properly, but to restore and remediate the site; our stewardship of this precious landscape demands that.

People focus on the upper reaches of a tower as its impact. It’s a 10-story structure, like other towers everyone is going to see it, and that is the true cost of the cell phones we all carry.

But the tower itself is only one component of a cell tower. It’s the ground-based infrastructure — air conditioning systems running day and night, generators being exercised every week, ongoing repairs and construction, maintenance and upgrades, and the noise and traffic associated with all of that for each carrier — that will adversely impact the quality of life in our quiet, little least-affluent, year-round neighborhood.

One thing my neighbors and I are certain of, is that this tower will never get any smaller. It will only grow, with larger generators, air conditioners and ground-based sprawl, and will very likely go even higher in the future. Federal law permits a 20-foot height extension, by right. AT&T can change generators and air conditioning systems at will, increasing the noise, without any review whatsoever.

Putting a tower, for everyone’s benefit, on town land is the tough decision that those in government are charged to make, but ultimately, it is a better, safer, decision. It’s the right thing to do for everyone.

Putting the tower on town land deprives no one of coverage, improves public safety for everyone and shares the burden more equally among residents for the next 20 years.

This is not a decision that should be made out of exhaustion or apathy. This is not NIMBY; we ask the tower be moved just a half mile, not across the island.

This is your neighbors asking you to share this burden with us.

That can only happen by siting the tower on one of the large, town-owned sites on Chappaquiddick, in the woods away, from everyones’ homes. And that can only happen with your help.

We ask you to please join us as we work tirelessly to uphold our stewardship of this most special place we are fortunate enough to call home. We ask that this tower be placed on town land, for everyone’s benefit.

Rob Strayton

Chappaquiddick

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/06/2018 - 14:40

Permalink

Jim nyc

In its own way this underlines the one issue the Town and the tower's vested parties continue to avoid addressing. A number of citizens/ our neighbors are being subjected to very negative conditions and possibilities and it has been clearly established that this does NOT NEED to happen. There are better options on Chappy and while Mr. Strayton has been subjected to criticism, invective, and false accusations he has continued to bring facts, experts, reason, transparency and and accountability to help a better decision be made on this issue. He deserves better --- his effort is to preserve the character of a beautiful and distinctive part of the Island. Our Chappy neighbors deserve better. Why does the Town continue to avoid info sharing, evade providing it rationale, and continue to hold deliberations behind closed doors? I applaud and give thanks for Mr. Strayton's grit and tenacity to protect our Island and to ask the Town to do so -- it use to be this was what everyone wanted in a terrific neighbor!

Rob Strayton Chappy

Jim, thank you for your support. It has been a long hard road, but thankfully I have had the support of people like you, neighbors, family and people across Chappy, across the Island and across the country that have provided advice and encouragement, written letters, and collected petition signatures, along the way. I could never do it alone, so thank you to everyone that has contributed their time and assistance. We have over 600 signatures on our Change.org petition, and we have over 100 signatures on our petition we will present to the Selectmen on Monday. AT&T continues to harass me and the spectre of a lawsuit hangs over me, but this issue, this literal monument, is too important to Chappy, and to Martha's Vineyard today, and long into the future, to be cowed by AT&T's fancy lawyers. I was forced to sign their agreement, but I will not be silenced. I, and all those I represent, know that we will only have one chance to get this right, and we are asking everyone that loves Martha's Vineyard to stand with us and ask the Planning Board to deny this application, and to ask the Selectmen to follow-through on the 2015 RFP and let David Grain, another Islander committed to doing what is right for Martha's Vineyard, build the tower on town land, for everyone's benefit. Thank you everyone, and let's hope the Planning Board comes to its senses Tuesday night! Be a Hero; Vote NO!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/06/2018 - 19:16

Permalink

Jennifer Clark Scottsdale Arizona

If the issue is safety and coverage then the site should not be in the middle of the most densely and least affluent neighborhood on Chappy. If the issue is about political corruption and payoffs well??? There are several proven sites that provide greater coverage and less impact on the people who live on the island. The question is who is being served here? Mr. Strayton has shown repeatedly that all interests and objectives can be met by moving the tower site except perhaps those that stand to benefit financially or politically. It sickens me that on this unique island with it’s charm and character that there is even a debate on this topic.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 09/08/2018 - 14:11

Permalink

Sailboat Bob from Boston

For 50 years, I have sailed to, ferried to, rented on and fished hundreds of times on Chappaquiddick Island, solely to enjoy its rare bucolic beauty and the stillness of its natural purity. There are no other places like it anymore. It is a one-of-a-kind. On my walks I often pass Sampson Avenue and, in recent years, was quick to notice that crummy-looking tower-- and the ugly housing compound it sits on -- that immediately deface what is in fact the "gateway" road to the Island's interior, a road that is itself still, wild and beautiful and that should forever offer a preemptive signature memory for all who visit, owner or guest. The tower was a desecration then, is a desecration now, and will be garish reminder tomorrow of the insensitivity of Edgartown's leaders. This man Strayton has it right. Anyone who walks deep into the Island can see it's raw, undisturbed sylvan nature. Strayton seems to grasp intuitively that a small scar on a prominent site does maim something beautiful forever. His is the virtue of fighting to preserve what oafs and ham-handed AT&T seem bent on destroying, for this will be a very large scar, a forever defacement if allowed to proceed. I don't know who is backing Strayton's effort, but it must be someone with deep pockets and ever deeper love of Chappy. Do not let them fill in their effort to preserve the beauty, safety and flawlessness of this Island jewel. Stick the tower on one of the many hidden town sites already approved for such an appurtenance. Don't quit on us, Mr. Strayton.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 09/08/2018 - 14:22

Permalink

Chris Hallgren Chappy & Somerville

I agree with Rob’s position on the tower siting. I have yet to hear a reason why the proposed site is the best alternative. Those advocating the Sampson Ave site simply name the benefits of better cell coverage. As Rob points out, no one is arguing against better coverage. We are however, demanding an appropriate location for the infrastructure. And the middle of a neighborhood with houses on small lots is the opposite of an appropriate location.
Many thanks to Rob for his extensive efforts to shine a light on a murky process.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/10/2018 - 18:27

Permalink

Lisa Chappy

As a homeowner on Chappy, I'm shocked that the Town of Edgartown would consider allowing such an intrusive and potentially dangerous tower to be built on the front lawn of a small home plot. It makes no sense. There are far better sites for this tower. We all want cell coverage, but endangering Chappy neighbors is not the way to do it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/17/2018 - 22:30

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

Glad to see this was approved and all the new people who bought and moved next door to a tower did not win out. Also I note properties are still being bought and sold near the tower so not everyone agrees with the above opinions.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.