<p>Oak Bluffs selectmen clashed with their town hall building committee as they work to revamp the new town hall project that came in over bid last month.</p>
Oak Bluffs selectmen clashed with their town hall building committee Tuesday over lines of authority as they try to move forward with a revamped town hall construction project.
When bids were opened last month, the lone qualified bid came in $1.7 million over the $7.8 million appropriated for the project.
On Tuesday building committee chairman Bill McGrath told the selectmen that architects and the project manager had gone back to the drawing board and come up with a new plan.
“We have identified about $1.7 million in cuts that would allow the town hall to go forward,” Mr. McGrath said. “It brings us down to within budget.”
He said cost savings were achieved by eliminating a basement and a roof dormer and using less expensive materials for finish work inside the building.
“From all appearances, it’s going to be the same building we have been planning and talking about,” Mr. McGrath said.
He said the building committee had voted to move ahead with the project by advertising and preparing bid specifications.
But selectmen Gail Barmakian and Brian Packish questioned whether the building committee had the authority to take the next step.
“The selectmen decide whether to go forward,” Ms. Barmakian said. “The decision, I believe, would rest with this board.”
Selectman Brian Packish said the board would need written documentation of the cost-saving changes. “I’m personally not willing to accept $1.7 million was found, and just trust me,” he told Mr. McGrath. “I know you cannot delete $1.7 million from the project and expect to be providing the exact same shiny apple that was promised.”
Selectman Greg Coogan had another view.
“This board needs to remember that we have not injected ourselves into [the building committee’s] decisions day to day with this process,” he said. “They’re the ones spending all the time on this, and I do feel that they are the ones ultimately made the decision in the beginning and will make a decision on this. Staying with their timeline is pretty important.”
With the town project manager estimating that the cost of the project goes up $40,000 for each month of delay, Mr. McGrath said time is of the essence.
“Each two-week delay is going to push us out into never-never land for building it,” he said. “We are struggling with inflation that’s going on. It’s a tough market out there. If we’re going to have a town hall we need to move.”
Mr. Packish disagreed, pointing for example to the temporary trailers on site which were supposed to be occupied by now by town hall workers while construction got underway.
“Haste concerns me,” he said. “We’ve got empty trailers out there all summer that we’ve got to pay for because we got way out in front of a process.”
Mr. McGrath said he would provide documentation by Wednesday morning, and selectmen set a special meeting with the building committee for Friday afternoon for further discussion.
In other business Tuesday, the selectmen got an earful from residents who are unhappy over the fence under construction at the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank’s Trade Wind Fields Preserve.
“What we’re seeing happening at Trade Winds represents a failure,” said Mark Jenkins. “It represents a failure to some extent of the people that used it. It represents a failure on the part of the land bank. There was an opportunity to stop that and come up with a solution. The land bank said we are not doing to do that, we are not going to work with you. They just bulldozed ahead.”
There was a call for the selectmen to take action.
“You are the highest elected officials in Oak Bluffs,” said Phil Cordella. “This is happening in Oak Bluffs. You could pass a motion to direct the land bank to take the fence down. This is an organization that’s way out of control.”
Selectmen said they have no authority over the land bank.
“It’s a legislative body, and it would appear it’s out of our purview,” said selectman Michael Santoro. “It’s unfortunate that they’re not listening. We’re neighbors; they’re not acting neighborly.”
Last week the board had invited land bank executive director James Lengyel to attend the meeting, but instead he sent a two-page letter outlining the land bank’s reasons for the fence, which aims to protect the fragile sandplain grassland that has become trampled from overuse.
“As a last resort, the land bank has accepted that the only way to achieve its conservation goals is the separate the grassland from the recreational trails with a fence,” Mr. Lengyel wrote.
Some selectmen expressed dismay that Mr. Lengyel did not attend the meeting after having been invited.
“I think it’s healthy, responsible and respectful to appear at a meeting of the highest board in the town to have an open dialogue,” Mr. Packish said. “The land bank had a responsibility to appear here. I will leave that invitation open. If they choose to, that’s great, if they choose not to, that’s unfortunate.”
Selectmen took no other action but agreed to seek a meeting with land bank commissioners and the town’s land bank advisory board in the near future.
The board also denied permission to a photographer to post private signs on Town Beach, popularly known as the Inkwell.
Photographer Michael Johnson had posted the signs that included his photograph of the Polar Bears, an iconic group that meets for swimming and breakfast at the Inkwell in the summer months. Mr. Johnson makes the picture available for sale.
“It is the best commercial for Oak Bluffs that Oak Bluffs could have,” he told the selectmen.
But the selectmen declined to make an exception to town policy.
“The town does not allow private permanent signs on public property,” Ms. Barmakian said.

Comments
Only in Oak Bluffs... dudes
Ben OBOnly in Oak Bluffs... dudes do everyone a favor and keep the old town hall!!!
Right on Ben!! What is wrong
Guy OBRight on Ben!! What is wrong with the existing Town Hall?
It is a fair question. I'd
Dude OBIt is a fair question. I'd say it is a game of chicken. How long until one single motivated disabled person reminds the disability compliance folks in Boston that the town promised to fix this stuff twenty years ago and didn't? How long until one single motivated employee complains to workplace safety people in Boston about the asbestos dust and fumes from broken furnaces and all the other stuff in the report about the condition of the building? How long until one single motivated job applicant in a wheelchair applies and can't be accommodated and sues? What will interest rates be (they are LOW now but were LOWER two years ago) and what will construction costs be (they were HIGH then but HIGHER now)? What will the lawsuit(s) cost? The town has managed fine without fixing the ADA stuff for twenty years. There appears to be no enforcement. No workers seem to have complained. Jobs are filled without the help of the disabled. But oh boy, if you are wrong, this might get mandated fast and cost twenty five million bucks when all is said and done. I'll leave it to you to do the math and figure your own odds. I've left out all moral arguments, all arguments about being a competitive employer, all arguments about town hall experience, on purpose. These days, much of our country doesn't care about those things, even if I do. I'm just providing a money-centric view.
We may have gone too far to
Sara Crafts Oak BluffsWe may have gone too far to even think about renovating the current town hall. However it does seem like a lot of the problems there have to do with sometimes bizarre attempts at efforts to redo the interior architecture by people not qualified to do that. Since we have the trailers, why not move into them and gut the current town hall and rebuild it adhering to plans drawn up by people who can project a reasonable interior architecture? Seems like that would cost less than tearing it down and rebuilding it.
Fair question. I am pretty
Dude OBFair question. I am pretty sure they did the math on a renovation and found that it would cost more to bring it into compliance than knocking down and building new. I am not supporting that study. I really don't know if it was done right. I do know it was addressed directly. Seemed to me it was putting a new engine, transmission, seat belts, airbags, pollution control, antilock brakes and traction control in an old rusted out fiat.
I voted for the new town hall
Bert Oak BluffsI voted for the new town hall based on the (2) primary factors provided to me : (1) As it was presented to us in illustration and description in the Power Point presentation by the building committee chairman and (2) At a cost of $9 Million . If the cost of $9 Million can only be achieved by significantly altering the original design and specifications then I would ask for further dialogue and voter approval instead of trying to hasten the process . I don't support Ready , Fire ....Aim.
Seems fair, but risk is high
Dude OBSeems fair, but risk is high talking more and at length without action, as I pointed out above. Maybe move into the temporary, knock down the old building, and offer the voters options next year? Keep the trailers until then. Offer the voters the same town hall project at whatever it really costs, a functional legal cheap alternative (no architecture, prefab, steel hanger, whatever) for less money, or keep the trailers and move them to the site? Game of chicken with the current setup is worth real worry. But voters deserve a voice given the change. Or so I think.
Wait a year until the boom is
charlie callahan so boston/edgartownWait a year until the boom is over and these contractors will be cutting their prices in half
Couldn't agree more that
Dude OBCouldn't agree more that these building costs can't last. But in the words (maybe paraphrased) of a smart lefty "the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." I have established the risks...rising financing costs, labor costs, and material costs, and most importantly the risk of "you must do this now" from authorities beyond our shores. It is a gamble. Waiting. With very serious financial implications if the bet is wrong. I am not saying you are wrong. I am asking you weigh the possible outcomes against your conviction town halls will be on sale next year.
Let's call i like it is...
Paying Attention OBLet's call i like it is....Brian Packish is the primary reason you are not looking at a fine new town hall today at a cost many millions of dollars less than the current appropriation let along the excessive bid. Everyone does realize Packish threw away a year's worth of work and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of planning because he didn't like the esthetics of the first town hall design....right? Vineyard Commission referral? Really? A town building a regional impact...give me a break...better yet give me the millions you have cost the Town. The original design should have been bid with the fire station and built with or immediately after as the professionals advised. Wake up OB..this guy is not doing you any favors and costing you millions.
Add new comment