Tisbury school was built in 1929. New school is budgeted at $46.8 million.
Mark Alan Lovewell

Tisbury Tackles New School Decision at Town Meeting

After years of debate and planning on the future of the Tisbury school, the town will vote at annual town meeting on whether to fund a $46.6 million new school project.

After years of debate and planning on the future of the Tisbury school, the town will vote at annual town meeting on whether to fund a $46.6 million new school project.

The discussion of the school is expected to be lengthy and well-attended. The town is preparing to provide an overflow room with a deputy moderator if necessary.

“Rest assured, anyone who is going to have a question about the school is going to have an opportunity to ask that question,” Tisbury town moderator Deborah Medders said on Monday at a meeting for the school building committee. She said the committee would have 10 minutes to present the plan before she opened up the floor at town meeting.

Critics of the project say enrollment has declined recently.
Mark Alan Lovewell
Critics of the project say enrollment has declined recently.
Mark Alan Lovewell

The school project will require the town to borrow funds, so it will need a two thirds majority at town meeting to pass. It will need a simple majority in a subsequent ballot vote on April 24. The vote is also tied to a Proposition 2 1/2 override.

Following a competitive vetting process, the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) has committed to funding about $14.6 million of the project with state tax revenue, or about 31 per cent of the total projected cost, pending approval at town meeting. That leaves the town responsible for just under $32 million.

If passed, this would be the most expensive municipal project in the town’s history, according to town treasurer Jon Snyder. Mr. Snyder estimated it would cost the town an additional $13.5 million in interest to borrow its portion of the required funds. Tisbury taxpayers would see a property tax increase of $108.20 per $100,000 of property value to fund the project and would continue to see higher taxes to pay for the project for about 20 years.

The proposal calls for building a new school on the same campus as the existing building on William street in Vineyard Haven, on the east side of the lot. Classes would continue in the current school during construction. After completion of the new school (planned for August 2021), the old building would be demolished. The school building committee has hired the Boston firm Daedelus Projects, which also managed the West Tisbury Library build, for the role of project manager, as required by the MSBA.

“We’re partnering with someone who has enormous experience,” said school building committee chairman Colleen McAndrews.

The new school would be larger than the existing one, and the emphasis is on flexibility. In the design, prepared by Turowski Architects, there are moveable walls between classrooms and multiple fluid gathering areas. The boundary between indoors and outdoors also becomes permeable with art and science classrooms situated adjacent to rooftop spaces.

The building is designed for use for the next 50 years as required by the MSBA, according to lead architect Peter Turowski. There is an engineering science room, separate rooms for vocal music and instrumental music, a second-floor library and media center, and a new pre-K classroom. A community entrance would provide access to the new gymnasium and cafeteria for meetings and events. The roof would be designed to accommodate solar panels in the future, according to Mr. Turowski. And the design would allow the school to host shared services programs for students with special needs, according to superintendent Matthew D’Andrea. Those programs are currently all hosted by the Oak Bluffs, Edgartown and West Tisbury schools.

“I want to invest in the future of this Island,” Ms. McAndrews said after her most recent committee meeting. Her four children all went to the Tisbury School. “Nobody wants to see this [existing] building come down, but it has outlived its useful life as a school. A school is not meant to be a historical building. It’s meant to be a functional building.”

But among opponents of the project, the historical significance of the existing school building is a sticking point, along with questions about the planning process, and the unprecedented cost of the proposed school.

“There’s a wastefulness to removing a functioning, historic building,” said Ben Robinson, chairman of the Tisbury planning board, who also attended the school as a child.

The existing building was completed in 1929. According to Tisbury treasurer Mr. Snyder, the original school cost the town about $185,000. The town budget in 1930 was about $105,000. Enrollment included a high school and totalled more than 350 students.

A Vineyard Gazette article from 1930 describes the dedication ceremony for the school and the sense of hope the building represented to the residents of Tisbury: “The same spirit of dedication, not only of the building itself, but of future endeavor in the cause for which the building was erected, dominated the ceremony from the opening prayer... to the close.” A gymnasium was added in the late 1930s shortly after the school was built. There was another major renovation in the 1990’s with the addition of a new library, new kindergarten classrooms, and science labs. In 2002, the school began using an external modular classroom that houses many learning support services, including support for students who do not speak English as their first language and remedial reading programs.

School principal John Custer attended kindergarten at the Tisbury School in the late 1970s and stayed through eighth grade.

School principal John Custer said he is confident a new building is needed to keep up with modern standards.
Mark Alan Lovewell
School principal John Custer said he is confident a new building is needed to keep up with modern standards.
Mark Alan Lovewell

“I get the sentimental connection to this building,” he said in his office last week. The small meeting room outside his door now doubles as a teaching space. But he said he is confident a new building is necessary to keep up with modern education standards and methods, and that confidence largely comes from the MSBA.

“An objective group, the MSBA, a very competitive process, decided that our school needs improvement just by virtue of them accepting us into this process,” he said.

The Tisbury School applied to the state school funding program in 2014 and was rejected. They applied again in 2015 and were invited into the process early the next year. Concerns with the existing building are outlined in Mr. Custer’s application to the MSBA, dated April 2015. Much of the application focuses on overcrowding in the school.

Among critics of the project, there has been some skepticism about the existence of overcrowding when school-wide enrollment has declined since Mr. Custer first submitted his application. In October of 2014, there were 335 students at the school according to school census data provided by the administrative staff. Last October, that number was closer to 300 students. Based on enrollment projections from the MSBA, the new school has been designed for a K-8 population of 285 students.

The school will be designed to serve fewer students than the current one does, but at more than 76,000 square feet, the proposed building would be more than 30 per cent larger than the existing school.

Mr. Custer recently clarified that while general enrollment at the school has decreased, programs like English language learning support and special education have seen increases, and space is severely limited. Currently, special education lessons for all nine grades take place primarily in two rooms. Mr. Custer said the presence of three to four teachers in those spaces and multiple lessons happening at the same time can be distracting for students. The modular unit outside the building, Mr. Custer said, is not an appropriate learning space and has drawn criticism from state education authorities. There are currently more than 65 students at the school who are English learners according to school census numbers.

Mr. Custer also noted the limited capacity of the gymnasium, the stage, and the nurse’s office. The current cafeteria can accommodate just 80 students at a time, meaning children have to take rotating lunches about 20 minutes long.

As part of the MSBA process, the school building committee was required to consider alternatives including renovation of the existing building and constructing a new school at a different site. That research found that a base repair of the existing school (which would not relieve overcrowding issues) would cost about $23.5 million. An addition and renovation of the existing school with the educational programs the committee decided on was estimated to cost about $50 million.

The school committee chose to build an entirely new facility, partially to avoid disrupting students’ learning environment during construction, according to MSBA board meeting documents from last August. Concerns about environmental impacts of building at another site led the committee to choose building on the current site.

Ben Robinson said he would rather the town have the option of renovating the existing building and adjusting the proposed educational programs to lessen the cost of the project. The MSBA supports renovations and additions as well as new school construction projects, and requirements can be more flexible in addition/renovation projects than in construction of a new school. The significant cost of the project, especially as the town faces renovation needs at the town hall and discussions get underway about a campus-wide overhaul at the high school, has given many community members pause. At a meeting earlier this month, Tisbury selectmen declined to officially sponsor the warrant article for the school, with Selectman Tristan Israel confirming he is against the project.

Melinda Loberg, who represents selectmen on the school building committee, told the Gazette that she is nervous about the project. “It’s not easily predicted how this will turn out,” she said. “I think there’s very much passion and support on part of people closely affiliated with the school, faculty, and parents. But the cost is a big consideration to taxpayers. Already our tax rate is higher than any other towns on the Island.”

At public forums this week to educate Tisbury residents about the proposal, reactions ranged. At the Vineyard Haven library Tuesday evening, community members asked about science and music facilities and about projected school enrollment. They commended the school building committee for their work.

On Wednesday night at the Katharine Cornell Theatre, the crowd was more hesitant. Audience members voiced concerns about the additional costs of maintaining the new, larger school, including the hiring of an additional custodian. They asked about when the next renovations would be necessary on systems in the new building.

The MSBA requires town approval of the project within 120 days of their offer date. Mr. Snyder says the town has spent about $650,000 on planning so far. If Tisbury voters reject the project, they stand to lose MSBA funding and face starting over. Regardless of whether the town passes the project next month, school principal Mr. Custer says changes will need to happen.

“Something still will need to be done about the school,” he said.

There will be an information session presented by the League of Women Voters on Wednesday, April 4 at 7 p.m. at the Tisbury Senior Center, and on Saturday, April 7 at 10 a.m. there will be an information session in the Tisbury school gymnasium followed by student-led tours.

Budget and square footage figures in this story have been corrected to reflect the most recent estimates for the new school. Originally the story cited older estimates.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2018 - 03:37

Permalink

Emily

Bigger is not better. It's a fine solid building
Listen to reason. Leave it alone. Build an addition.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2018 - 09:55

Permalink

Rich Vineyard Haven

46,000,000 for 300 students is over $150,000 per student. Ridiculous waste of money. Build an addition.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2018 - 10:10

Permalink

Christine VH

I agree with Emily, and as a tax payer I won't vote for it. Has anyone ever pitched the idea of a middle school annex to the school? Put the library & cafeteria and a science lab in it and you've freed up allot of space in the school....

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2018 - 10:32

Permalink

BG Tisbury

While the case may be made for school improvements, I am against any plan that demolishes the old school building. I think many would have preferred the option of renovation/addition of the present building or, perhaps, build off site and transform the current school into a town campus. We could sell off the senior center, donate or sell the present town hall to the preservation trust, tear down the police station for much needed parking, eliminate the "temporary" trailers at the annex and move all town functions to the school building. With that option, we should have built new at the Holmes Hole Road site. I believe when that site was voted down, not many people realized that it meant demolishing the present school building.
Regardless of the planning issues, we cannot afford this tax increase. I have many elderly friends and neighbors that are struggling to stay in their homes. This new building, as designed, is too rich for us at this time. Maintenance will be costly.
If it must be done, do it off site and build a more practical, easy to maintain building, similar to the present building but larger as needed.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2018 - 11:28

Permalink

Albie Scott Santpoort Zuid, NL.

As a resident of Newburyport for 30 plus years, and having seen the problems that have arisen there with new school buildings built during the 80's, I would urge caution to the voters of Tisbury.
New is not necessarily better, both in terms of design, use, and dependability. (Just look at the shambles the SSA has made over the years with it's choice of new boats)
I would think that the fact that the proposed new school building has sealed windows would raise flags.
Resfurbish the existing, and add on for expansion where needed.

Mary McDonald Newburyport

Newburyport doesn’t have any schools built in the 80s. The new High School project, built in 2000,however, is already proving to be not ideal for current needs. Planning for schools needs to be much more flexible. Whether they choose new or renovation, moveable walls and furnishings will give many more options for ever shifting demographics.

Katherine Scott

Same observation re Falmouth High School, built in the seventies or the eighties. Meanwhile, the old Lawrence School (with incremental upgrades) is still going strong (Falmouth Town Meeting is held in the Lawrence School gym---with stage). Many of the problems of the new Falmouth High School building were related to the HVAC system and poor air quality.
Wikipedia, Falmouth High School:
"In recent years, Falmouth has undergone several periods of major renovation, which ran into the dozens of millions of dollars. These renovations came under intense scrutiny at several points and were plagued by constant setbacks, which included poor construction and architecture, massively exceeding the proposed budget, exceeding the proposed completion date, and several breach-of-contract suits against the school committee, architects, contractors and firms involved. Initially, the project was supposed to cost $67 million and take two years to complete, but the project ended up costing $87 million, $20 million over budget, and took almost six years to complete.[4]"

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2018 - 16:55

Permalink

Island Resident Island Resident

Is it time to talk about a regional middle school? Why can't the conversation go towards building a middle school 7,8,9, near the high school, and adding a new Superintendents office at that site. Seems reasonable to me. If Tisbury town members want to raise taxes for the next 20 years, as our island population is most likely NOT rising, then, sure, build a new school. But, an approach to constantly remodel the town schools (next may be west tis and chilmark) is not the answer. We need a middle school!!!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 03/31/2018 - 10:18

Permalink

Island resident Vineyard Haven

Mr. Robinson, do you have any children attending the Tisbury School? If no, why not? And how exactly do you plan to adjust the education program to the existing space if Tisbury has already been cited for non-compliance for several years?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/01/2018 - 08:57

Permalink

Tisbury Tax payer Tisbury

I think we should eliminate the school and join with West Tisbury. The number of students will steadily decrease over the next 20 years so this concept is flawed. Taxes are high enough now.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/01/2018 - 17:05

Permalink

Kenny, VH

I can’t for a moment think spending $46.8M on this project is a good idea. Tisbury taxes are out of control as compared with the other Towns on the Island, and until we see better leadership for the Town this is an extravagance that we simply can’t afford. I agree with “Island Resident”, if we build anything it should be a regional middle school. We live on one Island, and it is about time we look at the costs of all these redundancies, and develop regional plans where they make sense. BTW: can somebody in the Tisbury highway department clean up the barrel of trash that is on Lamberts Cove Road? Granted it is on private property, but it is an eyesore that has been present for over a year.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 10:11

Permalink

Philip Vineyard Haven

NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!!!! Tisbury taxpayers would see a property tax increase of $108.20 per $100,000 of property value to fund the project and would continue to see higher taxes to pay for the project for about 20 years.
ANY SELECTMEN IN FAVOR OF THIS MUST BE REPLACES FORTHWITH!!!!!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/03/2018 - 09:40

Permalink

Vineyard Haven Resident Vineyard Haven

I am a retired early educator and am in complete agreement that the current school is out of compliance and needs replacing. I have been inside the school and have seen for myself the terrible conditions for learning. HOWEVER...it makes no sense to me to spend $32M of taxpayer money for a school for fewer than 300 students. That is insane. Our little island towns cannot continue to fund these multi-million dollar projects. As much as each town loves its individuality and independence, we cannot sustain this kind of spending. I like the idea of a regionalized middle school or even merging Tisbury with West Tisbury schools. Our tax rate is the highest on the island and we get very little services...our streets are dirty, the downtown is crumbling, the port is a mess. Another plan needs to be explored for the school. It does not get my vote.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/03/2018 - 18:03

Permalink

Rich Vineyard Haven

The article states that almost 1/4 of the students (65 of 285) have some need of separate facilities because they are "English learners". With our Federal government's recent attention to both decreasing immigration, and increasing deportations, might this be a temporary situation that will, over the next few years, resolve itself? Surely makes no sense to build a massive structure to address an issue that may be only a short-term problem.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/03/2018 - 18:24

Permalink

CS Tisbury

I would like to point out a few numbers for consideration. I looked up the average price per square foot for new school buildings. This is what I found http://www.ncef.org/pubs/spm_2014.pdf. It states that the median price was $201.79 per square foot to build an elementary school in 2014. Tisbury is asking for $582.28 per square foot. At that time the median price per student is $30,551, Tisbury is asking for $161,403.50 per student. The average square footage per student was 149.6, Tisbury is asking for 277.2 sq/ft per student. The chart shows a 79,623 sq ft building that cost $15,850,000, Tisbury is asking for $46,000,000 for a building of roughly the same size. I realize that these figures are at least five years old and I also realize the costs associated with building on the Vineyard, but this is a dramatic increase. The taxpayers cannot and should not pay for the dreams of an architect and committee, we should demand a cost effective and practical building. Please, consider the folks that cannot afford this tax increase. It is unfair to sit at town meeting and consider affordable housing for some, while at the same time making it extremely difficult for our elderly population, who are on fixed incomes, to stay in their homes. Please vote no on the new Tisbury school as proposed.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/04/2018 - 10:55

Permalink

CB VH

I’m terms of tax payer money, this is one project that would not go over budget — the proposed amount is the max and includes room for overages. Additionally there is a solid plan in place for the build and design that has taken input from the entire community for the past 2+ years and has representation from the community on the project committee. You are right, this town needs a lot of things and doesn’t seem to get much done and I don’t see that changing soon. This is one thing we DO need now and for the future to make the town a sustainable place to live for families in the years to come. I have a kid at the school who will be gone long before the debt is paid off. Tisbury School has a great program with wonderful staff — it’s time to give the staff and kids the appropriate tools for teaching and learning in the 21st century. Stop putting expensive patches on a crumbling building with a design that no longer serves the purpose. The longer we wait the more expensive it is going to be to do this right. And when else does the state give us $14 million toward a build? Let’s not let this mimic the affordable housing issues around here that never get addressed.

Islander Too

"And when else does the state give us $14 million toward a build? "

Not "give." Tisbury gets to make up this "gift" in ca. $13.5 million in interest. And that is not the only uncovered cost.
Not a good deal.

Islander Too

"In terms of tax payer money, this is one project that would not go over budget — the proposed amount is the max and includes room for overages. Additionally there is a solid plan in place for the build and design that has taken input from the entire community for the past 2+ years. . ."

If only . . .!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/04/2018 - 14:14

Permalink

Tisbury Voter 2

RE "Concerns about environmental impacts of building at another site led the committee to choose building on the current site." With all due respect I beg to differ. The public record does not support this statement. In pursuit of the dream of a brand-new school virtually on top of the Manter Well site, the BC and its chair thought nothing of undoing decades of work by the Town, Land Bank, and conservation orgs to protect the well site along with surrounding contiguous conservation lands, including old growth woodlands. Article 97 of Mass laws protects conservation lands from later development. At a meeting on May 1, 2017, by which time it was obvious that the Building Committee wanted new construction right next to the Tisbury’s Manter Well, Colleen McAndrew was questioned directly: Wouldn’t Article 97 prevent development of those conservation lands? She responded that she had checked with Town Counsel, and there was no legal obstacle to developing that site. Well, this was only because of a recent legal technicality whereby deeds to conservation lands must be modified in a certain way. This hairline crack in the legal protection of Tisbury’s conservation lands was a barn door through with the BC hoped to drive their new construction project. In March 2017 MVC planners informed the committee in an email: “Both the Tashmoo Well property and the Manter Well property are in the Tashmoo Watershed. Tashmoo is an ‘impaired’ watershed with a very limited nitrogen loading budget which may be problematic for your proposal if it is not on the sewer.” In plain English: Ain’t gonna happen. Nevertheless the committee continued to aim for the Manter Well site, also in public forums, until the site was finally rejected by just one vote some months later. Building on the BC’s preferred site would have involved major new transportation and other infrastructure. Yet the the MSBA “Site Standards” emphasize avoiding “adverse impacts, and states clearly: “Adverse impact shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: the need to provide new sewers, roads, transportation facilities, water supply, water connections, and other public infrastructure to the site.” www.massschoolbuildings.org/sites/default/files/edit-contentfiles/Docum…, Section 2.05, (2) and (3).

Therefore I think it is fair to say that environmental considerations---aside from maybe holding some nature classes outside---did not appear to enter into the thinking of the Building Committee as it pursued its dream of a brand-new school in a “natural” setting.

As for a brand-new school in a town setting, demolishing a sizable 90-year-old brick structure is itself a major environmental impact, and is a a negative lesson for children and the wider community regarding waste of valuable materials, sunk costs, and labor, not to mention health issue raised by such demolition.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.