Hospital Citizen Survey Finds More Transparency Needed

More transparency, accountability, responsiveness: these are chief concerns from a recent survey about the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital.

More transparency, accountability and responsiveness, especially from board members: these are the chief concerns of people who responded to a recent survey about the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital.

Circulated last month by an ad hoc citizen group, the survey drew 535 responses to a brief set of questions testing public opinion about the Island’s hospital. Board governance and the desire for a public meeting were the primary issues raised.

Among those who responded to the survey, 78 per cent said they would attend an open public meeting with hospital leaders to discuss future direction. The number jumped to 90 per cent when factoring in the people who said they would not attend the meeting but only for logistical reasons such as lack of child care.

Asked about the survey, interim president and chief executive officer Timothy Walsh said board leaders have begun to meet with small, select groups of community members. But beyond that he had little comment about the survey results.

“We’re doing some community meetings. We’re busy with the search,” he said, referring to the search for a new president and CEO.

Hospital trustees found themselves at the center of controversy beginning in early June and running through most of the summer over the abrupt firing of president and chief executive officer Joseph Woodin after just one year on the job.

The citizen group formed partly in response to the controversy and has met with hospital leaders a number of times in recent months. Group members say they do not purport to represent the wider Vineyard community but are interested helping the hospital achieve more success, especially in the areas of community engagement and strategic planning.

The survey was circulated last month in Island newspapers and online. Results were released this week.

Among those who said they would attend a meeting with the hospital, the topic they would like most to see discussed (88 per cent) is who makes decisions about the hospital’s direction. A high percentage of the same group (87 per cent) listed hospital involvement with community health as a primary topic for discussion.

“The results are clear,” said Victor Capoccia,” a member of the citizen group who has a broad background in health care.

Bruce Bullen, another member of the group who also has a long background in health care as a former executive with Harvard Pilgrim and the former head of Medicaid for Massachusetts, among other things, agreed.

“I think it’ pretty clear there’s a lot of concern about the responsiveness of the board to the community,” he said. “One of the things I think would help is the formation of a formal community advisory committee,” he added, noting the success of such a committee at the Nantucket Cottage Hospital. “That would be a good step,” Mr. Bullen said. “Also the board needs to take a look at how it operates and have a consultant come in and talk about their practices . . . . The board hasn’t been refreshed in some time, there should be more turnover. I don’t think the board has done a bad job, but there are other aspects to a community hospital.”

Meanwhile, the search for a new president and CEO has reached the final stages with three strong candidates in the running for the top post, Mr. Walsh said.

A severance agreement with Mr. Woodin remains unsettled, he said.

Last week, the hospital distributed a fall/winter newsletter as an insert in Island newspapers, which included information about hospital visits as well as summary financial statements for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30. It is the first time in several years that the hospital has included financial information in a public report. The statement shows the hospital running in the black. Total operating revenue for the 12-month period was $85.5 million while total expenses were $84.9 million. Fundraising for the year totaled $1.6 million, and net gains on investments were reported as $4 million.

By contrast, the Windemere Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Facility continues to post large losses. Windemere reported total operating revenue of $6.8 million and total expenses of $8.3 million, ending in a loss of $1.5 million. Fundraising for the year added only $19,000, and no investment income was reported.

Mr. Walsh said the financial situation at Windemere remains precarious.

“It’s a huge problem. And it’s growing,” he said. With 61 residents, the nursing home is full, he said. But 90 per cent of the residents are on Medicaid whose reimbursements have been static since 2012. And costs continue to climb, especially given the need to hire large numbers of so-called travelers because there is not enough skilled labor on Island to staff the nursing home. “The travelers are hurting us — 65 per cent of the staff is travelers,” Mr. Walsh said. He said for now Windemere is being subsidized from the hospital side, while analysis of the problems remains ongoing.

In annual statistics, the hospital had 14,348 emergency room visits, 30,335 primary care visits, 192,841 laboratory tests, 41,124 physical therapy treatments between Oct. 1 2016 and Sept. 30 2017. And 142 babies were born.

The newsletter also includes a story about telemedicine, an interview with chief medical officer Dr. Peter Pil about the opioid crisis on the Island and step-by-step instructions on how to use Naloxone, the overdose reversal drug.

Mr. Capoccia called the newsletter a good first step for the hospital in making more information readily available to the public.

“I would say the newsletter was a beginning,” he said. “It was the first time I had seen financial information published, but that’s half the equation — it’s not the listening part, it doesn’t give people an opportunity to be heard who have something to say.”

As for the next step for the citizen group, Mr. Capoccia said the group will meet again, but at this stage its work may well be done. “I think the question really is where does the board go from here?” he said. “It’s not our job to do the community meeting, it’s not our job to carry all the messages . . . . this board needs to take some responsibility or change itself enough to take some responsibility so they can go somewhere.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/24/2017 - 08:35

Permalink

Islander Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts

My main question is this. In December of 2006, Tim Walsh testified before the State’s Public Health Council that 80% or more of the Board of Trustees would be Islanders. I do not consider a wealthy board member from MGH who lives in Brookline or Chestnut Hill with a Summer home on the Island an Islander. If you’re not a registered voter in Dukes County, you’re not an Islander. As of 2006, this applied to many of Tim’s “Islanders”. I wonder if it still does, or if he would swear, under oath, that it does not.

Nelson Sigelman Vineyard Haven

The Islanders you disparage were in large part responsible for funding the construction of a new hospital building with a price tag of near $50 million (not to mention numerous other Island projects).
I am not familiar with the current board but I know something of the previous one.
John Ferguson, a seasonal West Tisbury resident and former CEO of Hackensack University Medical Center, brought considerable skills to his tenure on the board, and drawing on considerable resources he oversaw the successful hospital transformation from a ramshackle wood building to a modern facility.
To name another individual, seasonal Chilmark resident Dr. Andrew Warsaw, former MGH chief of surgery, also served on the board. Since retired, he is a world-class surgeon much in demand yet he was willing to share his time and knowledge to help provide a hospital that for its size is unique in terms of the level of care it provided. The list goes on.
The Island is fortunate to have a generous and talented seasonal population. To suggest we ought to designate them second-class Islanders (except when it comes to paying property taxes) or set a quota for your designated «real » Islanders is shortsighted.

rt ob

I'm not sure the op was intending or even did disparage the off island people serving so well as they might on the board, but instead was simply stating that Mr. Walsh testified before our legislature that the board would be made up 80% of islanders, but in fact is not. Whether these people who stop down dow a few months a year serve the community well is not in question, only Mr. Walsh's assertions.

Islander Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts

The Record in Hackensack, New Jersey, awoke to its worst nightmare recently when one of its biggest advertisers pulled all of its ads.

The reason?

The paper and its Web site, www.northjersey.com, ran a stinging investigative piece about Hackensack University Medical Center and the insidious conflicts of interest its top management and its board members have. The story took particular aim at hospital CEO John P. Ferguson and two contractors on the board, Joseph Sanzari and J. Fletcher Creamer Jr.

. . .

The same week the story ran, the hospital took the unusual step of pulling all of its advertising from The Record, its Web site and other publications owned by the newspaper's corporate owner, North Jersey Media Group. It also banned the newspaper from hospital property.

The hospital spokeswoman should have been paid Julia Roberts wages for this performance. Nancy Radwin said, "We constantly evaluate and change our media plan to be certain we are effectively positioning our message and that it is cost-effective."

This is something that should be written about by every major publication in the area because it is egregious and the type of bullying tactic that one would expect from a strip club that had been exposed as a prostitution ring not a hospital facing justifiable criticism for the financial ties of its board members.

Congratulations to reporter Mary Jo Layton for taking on a tough story and sticking with it. And congratulations to Malcolm A. Borg, chairman of the board of North Jersey Media Group, for standing up for Layton and refusing to back down.

"No one from HUMC has told us that any of our stories have been incorrect," Borg said. "We have been doing our job, fairly and accurately....We will be above the fray; we will continue to follow these stories. And, we will continue to report on all the good that is still being done at the hospital."

That's the kind of corporate ownership newspapers - and hospitals - should be lucky enough to have.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/24/2017 - 11:09

Permalink

Bill Edgartown

It appears to me the Hospital Board is out-maneuvering the Citizen's Group (see latest MVH Newsletter). They're even trying to position themselves as leaders on the substance abuse problem here on the Island, which, with Joe Woodin gone, is simply smoke and mirrors. I feel the only way to really get the attention of this Board is with LEVERAGE ... licensing requirements, donor support, calculating financial impact on future operations, going directly to Partners, etc. If the goal of the Citizen 's Group is simply "greater transparency", I think that's an easy one for the Board to handle. If it's getting them in front of the community at an Island-wide meeting, I think we're going to have to provide them with some incentives.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/28/2017 - 09:36

Permalink

Fish Crow

How about Partners answering some basic questions, transparently of course:

(1) Why was Woodin fired and who initiated this move? How much money has Partners spent to deal with this situation? Thank you board members.

(2) How much money does Partners spend to indemnify/insure the Board members?

(3) What is Partners doing to bring another year-round GP here?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.