Mark Lovewell

To Ignore and Neglect

<p>Why has the Hall family allowed prime commercial properties in Oak Bluffs and Edgartown to become public eyesores?</p>

Why has the Hall family allowed two prime commercial properties it owns in Oak Bluffs and Edgartown to become public eyesores? Of the many mysteries of Martha’s Vineyard, this may be the most baffling.

The iconic Island Theatre on the corner of Circuit avenue in Oak Bluffs and the so-called Yellow House on the corner of Main and South Summer streets in Edgartown should be among the most attractive in-town real estate on the Island. Instead, both buildings have sat vacant for years, neglected and crumbling, quite possibly beyond repair.

The Halls are certainly smart enough to understand the business logic of spending a little to protect the value of an asset. They own enough other Island properties individually and in trusts that could conceivably be sold if they needed to raise money for maintenance and renovation. They have a wealth of contacts in the community who no doubt would be willing to help them with a plan to develop or lease the properties. And they are surely familiar with the ill will they have engendered by letting two historic buildings in heavily trafficked tourist destinations become so rundown.

Efforts to work with the Halls to repair the properties have been going on for years. That officials in both towns have been slow to take more serious action against the family is understandable. On one hand, the Halls are longtime Islanders, active in community life and quite personable in their daily interactions. They are always open to discussion, officials say, though the discussions often seem to end up back where they began.

They are also sometimes litigious, capable of tying up an opponent in long and costly legal battles. When the town of Edgartown in 2003 refused to let them remove a public shade tree on their Main street property, the ensuing court case went on for a decade before a judge finally dismissed it in 2013.

But as both the Island Theatre and the Yellow House descend into decrepitude, the blight on two picturesque village centers is getting impossible to ignore.

This week a special Board of Survey convened to assess the condition of the Island Theatre declared the building dangerous, putting increasing pressure on Oak Bluffs to take some kind of action. Under state law, the town building inspector could order the theatre demolished, with the costs of demolition assessed against the owners through a tax lien. But the selectmen want to weigh their options, including whether a special town meeting vote would be required to undertake the up-front cost of tearing it down. Perhaps they can also investigate how to landscape what remains before the tourists show up again next summer.

This may be the best next step. Though it is sad to say goodbye to a century-old structure that evokes so many fond memories, its eventual fate has been mostly sealed by the puzzling inaction of the Halls.

Can the Yellow House escape a similar fate?

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/09/2016 - 06:48

Permalink

deshandra brown Edg

All good points. Is that peeling lead paint? If so, its a public health hazard that must be dealt with immediately, whether or not the building falls down, gets demolished, or gets repaired. Time for the board of health to step in ASAP.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/09/2016 - 09:11

Permalink

EH Tisbury

As a fan of Island character, I support the towns. But as a fan of property rights, I support the Halls.

After all, Edgartown and Oak Bluffs would like the Halls to follow town wishes, spending the Halls' money. Unsurprisingly, the Halls would prefer to spend their own money as they choose.

The towns can, of course, take the Halls' property through eminent domain (whether the Yellow House or the theaters) and can proceed to do what the towns want. But--no surprise!!--that is an expensive proposition, and the towns have been unwilling to spend the money. That choice can't be blamed on the Halls. The towns could also probably work to pay what the building are worth, if they want them maintained.. no surprise, that is expensive as well.

If Edgartown would rather have had a well-maintained yellow house than a tree, the choice was theirs; Edgartown chose the tree. Blaming that outcome solely on the Halls is insensible: it takes two to tango, and the property owner is the one who actually gets to decide what to do with the property. (Given the recent spate of ugly Edgartown buildings, one might also wonder whether a non-Hall applicant would have had the same difficulty getting a tree permit. Board members are people too, with their own biases.)

Anything the Halls do would have gone before every single board and the MVC. It would have cost them hundreds of thousands just to get a permit. Every interest group around would have tried to get a word in, to tell the Halls how to spend their money. Unlike budgetary expenses, regulation is unlimited, and we have gone a bit far in telling people what they can and can't do. We should not be surprised that some folks are pushing back. When the town won't fund a theater; when the town won't buy a theater; and when the town won't allow a "historic" theater to be torn down and replaced with something which makes money... well, this amounts to a million-dollar bill for the owners. Is it a surprise that the property owners are at an impasse?

I hope this is resolved amicably. But I'm not holding my breath.

deshandra brown Edg

I'm a fan of property rights but I never support stupidity on the part of a property owner when it affects the abutting property owners. Lets see.. the town of Edgartown keeps a beneficial shade tree in place (AS they do all the time-read the paper about a recent case on Peases Point way) So what does Hall do with the yellow house? Lets it fall into disrepair, and misses out on over $100,000 per year of potential rent. They sure showed the town didn't they? As far as theaters go, didn't the Halls operate a theater on town property, above the town hall, for years? How much did they pay for that? One thing the towns all should do is require a performance bond from anyone building, demolishing, or adding onto property within the confines of the business district so it does not become a 'hole in the ground'.... that's what the mini-park was before the town made a deal to improve it. Guess who owned that?

GuyWhOwnsANose MV

There is an old quote, often mangled, but worth consideration here. "The right to your fist ends at the bridge of my nose." The concept is simple. In this case, the Halls own a structure of crumbling masonry several stories high, unreinforced, too thin for its height, with a heavy old wooden roof not attached. It sits on a popular street corner where citizens stroll. The potential energy in this decayed structure, the force built up, unrestrained, the shrapnel ready to be unleashed...that is just math. I, too, respect property rights. But I most certainly do not respect the right to threaten the safety of those on public property, or those on nearby private property. The Halls own a bomb, mathematically speaking, and it sits on the corner of Lake and Circuit. The fuse is lit. And people still defend the Halls. Property rights don't extend to the level of contempt for life and limb. A reluctant government is doing the best it can here. The Halls are sociopaths here.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.