<p>In a letter, selectmen urged directors for the Martha’s Vineyard Film Festival to reconsider a plan to buy property off Old County Road.</p>
The West Tisbury selectmen voted Wednesday to send a letter to the board of directors for the Martha’s Vineyard Film Festival, urging members to reconsider their plan to buy a piece of residential farmland off Old County Road and convert it to a permanent home for the nonprofit festival.
“As protectors of the town of West Tisbury’s trust, this board must call to your attention the unprecedented outcry regarding your intentions,” the letter says in part.
MVFF has signed a purchase and sale agreement to buy 12.5 acres and a house at 694 Old County Road formerly belonging to the late Cynthia Walsh. The purchase price is $1.4 million, festival leaders have confirmed. A closing is set for June 22. Plans for the property were discussed informally with the town planning board in March, although nothing definitive has been presented.
But reports of the film festival’s plan to buy the property have drawn a strong public backlash, with neighbors and others balking at the prospect of what it might mean for what is now a rural residential neighborhood. For the second week in a row Wednesday, the selectmen’s meeting was packed and the MVFF purchase was on the agenda for discussion.
No members of the film festival attended the meeting, and MVFF leaders did not return telephone calls from the Gazette seeking comment Thursday morning. Later, film festival managing director Brian Ditchfield confirmed in an email that the letter had been received. “We have not had time yet to confer as a staff and board about the letter, but we take whatever the selectmen say seriously,” he said, adding: "We look forward to meeting with them. If this is not the right piece of property for us, I hope we can have a kind and open conversation about where might be.”
A statement issued by the film festival staff earlier in the week said there was misinformation, and public forums will be held in the fall to help shape a plan for use of the property.
“There are no concrete plans yet for our land purchase in West Tisbury. We are in the early stages of planning. We know that we want to conserve the forested area and consider farming some of the land, and that anything we build will be simple, barn-like, and fit the landscape,” the statement says in part.
At the planning board meeting in late March, film festival founder and executive director Thomas Bena outlined a concept that included a 6,000-square-foot barn for events, commercial kitchen and farming activities on the property. In recent interviews with the Gazette, Mr. Bena has said repeatedly that nothing is set in stone and he hopes to have a community visioning process for the project.
Last week selectman Richard Knabel issued a personal call for the film festival to reconsider the property purchase.
This week, he arrived at the selectmen’s meeting with a letter he had drafted for consideration by his colleagues. Read aloud at the meeting, the letter is framed in expressions of respect and praise for the festival and its mission, but nonetheless urges MVFF board members to revisit the issue in the face of widespread public opposition and questions about the appropriateness of the location. The Walsh property lies in the town historic district which encircles the village.
Calling the film festival “an important cultural component of the Island,” the selectmen’s letter also says in part:
“Your wish, at long last, to establish a permanent home or a headquarters for the festival is quite understandable . . . It is also understandable that you have in mind to expand both the scope and number of you annual programs, and it is for those very reasons that we write and are greatly concerned regarding your interest in the Walsh property off Old County Road. As we understand the broad outlines of your relocation plans as they have been revealed in the planning board minutes, the Island newspapers and your website, they are of such a scale as to be beyond all reasonable limits and capacities that could coexist in the long established, peaceable rural neighborhood that surrounds the Walsh parcels.”
The letter continues: “We ask only that your board consider not only our concerns, but those expressed by the community, and assesses the impacts on the small rural setting, as well as the community trust that your board and organization could easily and irretrievably lose. Of no lesser concern to your board may be the distraction and diversion of resources to your organization that a lengthy regulatory process could produce. We believe all of this is avoidable.”
On Wednesday, neighbors and residents reiterated a litany of concerns to the selectmen.
“It’s entirely possible that they’re proposing a very large scope and then hoping that when they tone it down, instead of 6,000 square feet they go to 4,000 square feet,” said Harriet Bernstein. “My suggestion would be not to give them any opportunity to scale down their project, but to not be there at all, even in a smaller version. I know that program is going to expand, it has every right to expand it’s a wonderful program, and I think that if they get a foothold, they will grow.”
Nancy Dole, a member of the town historic district commission, agreed that it is not a question of scale.
“It’s not that people are going to be happier with 100 cars instead of 200 cars,” she said. She asked the selectmen whether the historic district commission ought to send their own letter to the film festival board.“I feel very badly about the abutters in that area and everyone in the district who so wholeheartedly joined into it and willingly put restrictions on themselves, it’s so sad to see,” Ms. Dole said. “We need to stand by [the abutters] no matter what part of town we live in.”
Mr. Knabel suggested if the historic district commission does draft a letter, to send it before next Wednesday when he reported the film festival board will be meeting.
In the end the three selectmen voted unanimously to sign and send the letter. The letter was sent by email Thursday morning, town administrator Jennifer Rand confirmed.
The letter is addressed to eight board members for MVFF: Steve Bernier, chairman, Jeffrey Kusama-Hinte, Mitch Rubin, Anne Evasick, Thomas Bena, Joanna Cole, Dawn Porter and Henry Louis Gates Jr.

Comments
I'm glad to hear that The
West Tisbury Resident West TisburyI'm glad to hear that The MVFF are open to talking. They are a good organization and I hope they get a home. Let's all help them find the right location!
I don't live in West Tisbury,
Just wondering... EdgartownI don't live in West Tisbury, but I wonder why a historic and residential district has homes across the street with swimming pools and a tennis court (visible from the road). Just down the road is a commercial business (Granary Gallery) which on Google Earth shows 11 cars in the parking lot and not far from there is a bed and breakfast.
As for traffic, isn't this road the primary method of getting to the West Tisbury School? Certainly, the hundreds of students/parents, buses, deliveries, faculty and administrators that go to the school along with the numerous extracurricular activities that take place there must generate a large amount of vehicle traffic. This is hardly a seldom-used country road.
Also bothersome is the choice of language used by the people in opposition. They're engaging in half-truths at best, gross exaggeration, name-calling, innuendo and the like. It's hard to believe or support any group that utilizes those types of tactics.
You've made this same post in
elisha wiesner chilmarkYou've made this same post in several threads now so I'll try to answer it although I assume you're not actually looking for an answer even if you're Just Wondering..... That tennis court has been there as long as I can remember. Probably longer than I've been alive. Certainly before it was a historic district. The Grannery Gallery has also been there, under several names, for generations! I don't believe there is any regulation against a swimming pool in the historic district but I could be wrong about that. I also have no idea when it was built. There is definitely zoning regulations against a new commercial facility. As for the school traffic, it's, you know, closed in the summer. The time of the year when traffic is an issue and the MVFF is doing the bulk of it's events.
Thank you for your answer. I
Just wondering... EdgartownThank you for your answer. I did post it on one other article, but no one chose to answer. However, it does seem that you're confirming the area isn't really of historical significance and isn't non-commercial (Gallery and B&B). Nor is it a quiet road. The school creates traffic for nine months a year and then, my guess, is that the MVFF would have their events during the other three months when the school traffic wasn't present. Seems it would probably generate a lot less traffic than the school.
When I read some of the descriptions of the property I thought people were talking about a different area than the one I drive by several days a week. Then when I saw the vitriol being spewed about the owners and what they were going to do I started to think about other projects that had been shutdown, delayed, and made far more expensive by people just against any type of change or development. I'm thinking of the Stop & Shop in VH, The roundabout, bike paths/shoulders up-island, the bowling alley in OB, etc.
I have no personal stake in this project. I do believe it will benefit the Island community if it is built (even if it isn't at the proposed location). If the planned use falls outside of the zoning regulations then there should be a request for a variance and either approval or disapproval based on the town's bylaws. However, if what they're doing is allowed within the regulations than it should be allowed and the town should work with them to make sure it's done properly.
To Just wondering, "I did
IslanderTo Just wondering, "I did post it on one other article, but no one chose to answer. "
that is not true. You got basically the same answer before as you just got from Elisha Wiesner.
Grandfathered pre-zoning-regulation businesses (GRanary Gallery) and approved uses (a swimming pool for a home; a B&B in a residential area) are basically irrelevant to this discussion. The proposed use is not residential.
Just one note on how historic
Thomas Hodgson WTJust one note on how historic this area is. The Old County Road area is one of the oldest settled areas in town. That area contains many of the original proprietors' lots, which were long and narrow, extending from Mill brook to the woodlands in back, each lot perfect for a farm or homestead.
The simple fact is that this
Neighbor WTThe simple fact is that this is NOT a commercially zoned lot. This piece of land is in a neighborhood and is zoned RU. All we ask is that the MVFF respects our town's zoning and doesn't try to "pull one over" by using a loophole to build a commercial venture in a neighborhood. We cannot have this precedent set on our island, which is an amazingly unique and special place. Also, I just want to point out that the MVFF keeps talking about how "low key" their operation will be. They claim it won't be a megaproject, but I really don't believe this. The Walsh property was divided into two lots (approx 5 and 7 acres). If they wanted to do some kind of small community center, why would a nonprofit spend all that money buying BOTH lots?!?! If they didn't have plans to expand now and in the future, wouldn't 5 or 7 acres be sufficient? Why did they need all 12?
I could only guess that them
Just wondering... EdgartownI could only guess that them buying all 12 acres may have been a way to ensure that their project would have a sufficient buffer/privacy from neighbors and the road? That's certainly one of the things that could be stipulated by the town. However, if the area isn't zoned for this type of project than it shouldn't be allowed.
Let's hope the MVFF takes
Miguel Samuel de Braganca West TisburyLet's hope the MVFF takes this letter to heart and allows the sentiments expressed to guide them towards reconsideration of the purchase. They are a great organization, deserving of a home, but the Walsh Property is not the right place for it.
Mr. Knabel is right to call for support of the abbutters. All property owners and renters who value the rural character of their homes and neighborhoods should oppose the metholodogy that the MVFF is using. It would send a message to any organization with a vision for a rural home that they can position themselves as an educational non-profit to circumvent local zoning restrictions.
At that point, any piece of land is fair game for development- regardless of where you live. Lets not support setting precedent that exposes the entire island to mega projects in the coming decades. Some might argue "this is not a mega project, it's a barn," however it will grow to become one if MVFF gets an opportunity to touch this land. 6,000 sq feet is already a mega project for the neighborhood.
I hope the MVFFs next steps include searching for a location appropriately zoned for their plans. I also hope, that until that time, they consider using West Tisbury's existing community infrastructure (Library, Grange Hall, Ag Hall, Field Gallery, WT Elementary, Charter School) to help them deliver on their wonderful mission.
"June 2, 2016 - Anne Cagney
Jesse Chase Chilmark"June 2, 2016 - Anne Cagney Miller, a/k/a Anne M. Cagney, and Bank of America NA, trustees of the JAMES F. CAGNEY JR. Trust, sold 73 Tabor House Road, Chilmark for $430,000."(Real Estate Transactions/MVTimes.com) -- Could there be a more PERFECT up-island location for The Martha's Vineyard FILM Festival?!?! The CAGNEY property represents both tremendous film and Vineyard historical resonance -- a living homage to the natural, creative, artistic, inspiring and rejuvenating spirit that has defined Martha's Vineyard for generations as a beloved, extraordinary and visionary arts community.
As a resident of West Tisbury
Ina Andre West TisburyAs a resident of West Tisbury I would like to thank the Board of Selectmen for their thoughtfulness and leadership on this issue.
we're gonna build a wall..
brian white tisburywe're gonna build a wall...and chilmark's gonna pay for it....;-)
hee-hee . . . good one!
Juleann West Tisburyhee-hee . . . good one!
I love the wall comment. It
Brenda Oak BluffsI love the wall comment. It seems to me like a bunch of rich white people screaming not in my backyard and calling a non-profit "commercial." I hope these guys get a home. They deserve it. I love it when they come to OB. Every event of there's that I've been to has been powerful and educational. I know it's got no farmland, but it'd be great to see them buy the Island theater at the end of Circuit Ave.
To address your points in
mark reisman west tisburyTo address your points in order: 1) Too bad you decided to use the "rich white people" attack. It's unfair and divisive. Actually, West Tisbury is quite a diverse socio-economic part of the island, and the voters in the town who approved the zoning restrictions and the creation of an historic district represent a wide mix of people. Moreover, West Tisbury is quite generous in hosting the entire island for a wide range of entertainment. The library, the Grange, Ag Hall, Polly Hill and other land and buildings in West Tisbury are open to the whole island. 2) "Non-profits" often engage in activities that are commercial and are zoned as such, including movie theatres and commercial kitchens; for example, as has been pointed out before, the national football league is a non-profit, but it makes a lot of money selling tickets, tv rights and merchandise. It is both a commercial enterprise and and a non-profit organization. 3)I agree with you and many others who have suggested that the mvff could make good use of the Island theater in Oak Bluffs (as well as other existing facilities, including those listed above in West Tisbury and others throughout the island.) It is true that at the Island theatre they may run into logistical issues continuing a two-tier ticket pricing system (couches for those who pay more, seats for others), but perhaps they could think of other ways of raising funds that do not privilege "a bunch of rich white people," as you put it in your comment.
Mark, your comments are well
Lorraine EdgsrtownMark, your comments are well reasoned and to the point. I,too, took umbrage with the "rich white people" comment. There is no room in a civilized discussion for such language. I find it offensive
I am amazed at this entire
Paul Adler West tisburyI am amazed at this entire process. No public presentation of any project was ever made by the film society yet it was condemned by our selectman without one public hearing? I am neutral on the concept but elected officials condemning a project without one public hearing is a lack of due process and sets a bad precedent
Sort of the point I've been
Washashore EdgartownSort of the point I've been making. All the solutions that these people make are down island. "Away from us you unwashed types" or back to Chilmark. Very NIMBY. They're not letting anyone give any ideas but their own. They really should be ashamed of themselves. Over on the Islanders Talk FB page they're using terrible language and personal insults. Though I don't know the social-economic situation of everyone against the MVFF, the comment that West Tisbury is diverse for the island is probably a not true. This all really strikes me as bullying behavior.
Wait, who's the bully? The
Brian B Oak BluffsWait, who's the bully? The group that is about to drop $1.4m on land and $2+mill in infrastructure to build a movie theater, commercial kitchen, have a circus and a 75+car parking lot in the middle of a residential neighborhood? Instead of engaging people they have decided to use a tax strategy loophole to skirt zoning, not include any abutters, neighbors or residents of the town they want to be part of, but the residents who live there and don't want it are bully's? Come on man, if someone wanted to do this in my neighborhood I would do whatever it takes to stop them.. I think your pointing your finger at the wrong "bully".
Actually Paul, there was a
Ebba Hierta West TisburyActually Paul, there was a public presentation to the WT Planning Board, during which the Film Festival said they planned to build several structures, including a 6000-square-foot building to house their movie theater and food service operation. And they believe the town zoning regulations that would prohibit this type of business development does not apply to them. This is what the WT Board of Selectmen rejected - large scale business development in an historic district zoned for residential use. Any way he Film Festival spins it, it is still a wildly-inappropriate project in a residential neighborhood. And my thanks go to our selectmen for their leadership here. This project isn't going to happen so please spare us all the expense and agony of a long court battle and withdraw the idea.
For clarity's sake, I'd like
Steve McQuiggan ChilmarkFor clarity's sake, I'd like to correct Paul Adler's use of the term "film society". The Martha's Vineyard Film Society is an entirely different organization which operates the Film Center and Capawock theater in VH, plus the Strand in OB. They were the target of an oblique insult by the director of TMVFF when he made his "strip mall" comment.
Yes, and the young Film
Jackie ChilmarkYes, and the young Film Center operated by the non-profit MV Film Society, has just won Best Movie Theater Festival or Series from Best of the Vineyard 2016-- 4th year in a row. Imagine, after only 4+ years in existence, without skirting zoning regulations, without imposing on neighbors, without giving RESERVED seating couches to big donors, without separate, early entrance to crowded films for people who pay more, the Film Center, not to be confused with MVFF, wins the admiration, appreciation and respect of islanders.
Let us step back and observe
Rex Treadwell EdgartownLet us step back and observe lucidly. An organization whose stated mission is to build community is told by a community We Don't Want You Here, Please Relocate Somewhere Else. Why would any sensible organization do anything other than politely withdraw the proposal and switch to a suitably zoned and receptive area?
I fully support the MVFF...
Mary WTI fully support the MVFF....Maybe we can add some affordable housing along with the project.
Gazette: Are you closing down
IslanderGazette: Are you closing down or discouraging further comments on this topic?
Add new comment