Sand mining has become hot topic on the Island.
Timothy Johnson

Towns Weigh in on Sand Mining as Comment Period Closes

Sand mining was the talk of the town in at least four Island communities this week, as officials lined up on both sides of whether to support dredging for sand in waters off the Vineyard.

Sand mining was the talk of the town in at least four Island communities this week, as officials lined up on both sides of whether to support dredging for sand in waters off the Vineyard.

A public comment period on the state’s draft Ocean Plan ends Nov. 25, and Island towns have been formalizing their positions on the plan, which designates certain areas in Vineyard and Nantucket Sound as possible donor sites for beach nourishment projects.

Of all the issues addressed in the document, the topic of sand mining has been particularly polarizing on the Island.

At one pole stands Oak Bluffs, a town that would like to restore eroding beaches with dredge spoils. On the other stands the town of Chilmark, whose leaders have opposed sand mining due to concerns about its impact on offshore habitats and fisheries.

This week, two other towns sharpened their views on the issue.

The Aquinnah selectmen agreed to send the state a letter detailing environmental concerns about the practice. Tisbury selectmen joined them, agreeing to express concerns in writing that more research was needed to assess the impacts on sea life.

“The need for more research is really what it amounts to,” said Tisbury selectman Melinda Loberg.

Oak Bluffs remains in support of the concept, but leaders in that town agreed to modify a letter sent to the state agency taking note of environmental concerns.

Town leaders said Oak Bluffs is starved for suitable sand to fill out the beaches and protect roads from storm damage.

In a wide-ranging discussion at the selectmen’s meeting Tuesday, a central conflict emerged between a desire to replenish beach sand and an intent to preserve the ocean habitat.

Shellfish constable David Grunden spoke passionately in support of expanded dredging opportunities.

He said the town is limited in its response to growing concerns about erosion, as the Department of Environmental Protection strongly discourages armoring of the seashore with sea walls or revetments.

“As we know, Oak Bluffs is basically a peninsula and it’s exposed to northeasters and they are going to continue to pound our shorefront and there are important infrastructures in town that are very exposed,” he said. The shellfish constable said if the Oak Bluffs infrastructure was not imperiled as it is, he would feel differently about sand mining.

“I would be on the other side of this argument saying not to do it, but I live in the town, I work in the town, I see the trouble that our infrastructure is in,” he said. “We need to do something to protect it . . . I think this is an option that the town should look into.”

Others present at the meeting cautioned against sand mining, due to environmental concerns.

Chilmark selectman Warren Doty traveled down-Island to share his concerns that sea life could be endangered by dredging activity.

“Every time you go and collect the sand, you are disturbing the benthic environment that is at the base of a food chain,” Mr. Doty said. “I see it as a destructive activity for our environment.”

He said the largest areas designated for sand mining are between Makonikey and Cuttyhunk off the north shore of West Tisbury, Chilmark and Aquinnah.

“The idea that we are going to stand on Menemsha Beach and see some 180-foot dredge loading up barges that will then be hauled to Hyannis, that is just appalling to us,” he said.

Oak Bluffs selectman Gail Barmakian said the town had a definite need for sand, but she had some reservations about sand mining offshore.

“Once they do this mining they are not going to go back and we could ruin our fisheries,” she said. She also questioned whether Oak Bluffs would be able to afford a dredging project.

But her board remained firm in a commitment to exploring the possibility of mining offshore sand deposits.

“I think we still strongly believe in finding a solution to our problem,” said selectman Gregory A. Coogan. “We have filled this room a few times over with people who want our necks for our lack of attention to not just the beaches but also the infrastructure and the roads.”

Fred Hancock, a resident who represents the town on the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, offered a compromise. He suggested that the town support sand mining within a three-mile limit of Oak Bluffs for use by that town only. “I don’t think any of us want to see a huge area opened up to provide sand for Hyannis and the rest of the Cape,” Mr. Hancock said.

Mr. Coogan translated. “In other words, we will use our sand, go find your own,” he said.

At meetings in other towns, officials rehashed a regional forum which was held to forge consensus among the Vineyard towns.

Until Tuesday, the town of Tisbury had not yet weighed in on sand mining and the Ocean Plan.

Selectman Melinda Loberg attended last week’s forum about sand mining, and relayed some of the information presented there.

“Both of the groups that were there, conch fishermen and fin fishermen, expressed a lot of concerns about the prospect, and their reasoning was because it could interrupt, destroy, really meddle with the egg laying and the juvenile growth,” she said. “On the other hand there is also the concern of Island towns with sea level rise, and a lot of erosion happening and the need for additional resources.”

The selectmen voted to draft a letter to submit as comment on the Ocean Plan.

In Aquinnah, officials spoke out against sand mining in waters off the coast of their town.

Selectman Juli Vanderhoop said any damage to the ocean floor would be “reprehensible,” and selectman Spencer Booker expressed concerns about disrupting the food chain, especially at the bottom of the ocean where microorganisms feed small fish.

Resident Megan Ottens-Sargent said she hoped the Island would be able to speak as one voice in opposition to sand mining near the Vineyard.

“It’s about working together,” she said.

Comments on the 2014 draft Ocean Plan are due by 5 p.m. on Nov. 25. Written comments should be sent to the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management, ATTN: Ocean Plan, 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02114. Comments can also be sent by email to [email protected].

Ivy Ashe and Alex Elvin contributed reporting.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/21/2014 - 07:54

Permalink

Douglas Korves Edgewater, NJ

In the ocean's "hood", there is always a bigger fish. Whales once sat on the edge of oblivion to support the Vineyard but, live on. They moved around the ocean inspite of the men from Edgartown, Vineyard Haven, New Bedford, Boston and Sag Harbor.
Species nearly extinct, are back on the Grand Banks. Conversely, their is always a smaller marine life, from the plankton to the protoplankton.

I marvel at the naysayers who believe with such certainty that a thimble of water will destroy the alkalinity of the ocean and start a cascade that will affect their organic brevi latte.

As a past owner of a home on island and a continuing visitor of the Vineyard for almost 40 years, I believe our island is being asked for some of the deposits back that the people of this island have placed in "The First Ocean Bank of Security and Resiliency".

There have been significant investment in our waters and precious few withdrawals. Compare this with how we have withdrawn our principal from our "land bank."

I often regret the arguments that stopped the greatest potential planning project of New York City, a proposal for an 10 mile long continuous park along the Hudson River. Westway would have been built over a new highway sunk in the river within the bulkhead line. Like Boston's "Big Dig", there would not have been a perimeter highway and a continuous green belt and river access. But no!!! The blues and stripers swim up the Hudson, to spawn in the silt and sand and deposits of heavy metals and PCB's of the Fortune 500. They then swim out into the Lower Bay and head North by Norteast to appear in Vineyard waters for our pure MV entertainment.

The counter argument was that the infill construction would interrupt their migratory patterns. These patterns are interrupted often by growing populations of other species, by anchored ships, and new bridges as well. They could not possibly have figured out to "keep left" and continue to spawning grounds ahead.

Protoplankton and plankton will flow with the water, shell fish multiply (even in the Hudson), fish will avoid the area, or swim around the barges and the windmills. They may even feed on the moss, seaweed, and critters living on the pylons.

I have a few ignorant questions to ask? Does a flooding river irreparably damage the land or does nature reorient? Is disaster solely man-made or are there natural disasters caused by wind and weather attacking civilization or opening barrier beaches to the sea? Is there not a reappearing island of sand off Nantucket that we could borrow sand from? And finally, who was burning fossil fuels 12,000 years ago that caused the glaciers to melt and a organism called man, Aquina, Nantucket, Pequoit, etc., turned a toehold into the extinction of the saber tooth, Mastedon?

"Long out the lines....and the dredges."

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/21/2014 - 09:27

Permalink

Mr. B Chilmark

“The idea that we are going to stand on Menemsha Beach and see some 180-foot dredge loading up barges that will then be hauled to Hyannis, that is just appalling to us,” he said.

He speaks for me, even if you substitute Oak Bluffs for Hyannis.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/21/2014 - 11:35

Permalink

F DA Connecticut

I have been a summer visitor to the Island for forty years. Unfortunately, I could not afford to buy. We love the Island. My daughter called it "Her Happy Place".
The northeast has been covered with at least five glaciers,the last being 10,000 years ago. In fact the ice was 1,000 feet thick. Long Island,Cape Cod,Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket were created by the deposition of sand left by the melting of the glaciers. There wasn't any human life as we know it then. My goodness, who caused the climate warming? No one was burning coal or doing any of the nasty things people are saying that is causing it now. It must have been the fish. Help Oak Bluffs, mine the sand. Nature made the island and now is trying to take it back. Do not let it happen.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/21/2014 - 11:49

Permalink

john osborn edgartown

Mother nature built the vineyard and is slowly taking it away. Let's not hurry up the process. If any sand mining is done the south shore should have priority. The loss of sand there is happening at an alarming rate.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/21/2014 - 12:39

Permalink

Herb Roskind Scottsdale, AZ

As a 38 year East Chop resident, I support mining the sand near the lagoon new bridge and adding it back to where it originally cam from. It came from the beaches of East Chop. We could use the sand for protection, beauty, and enjoyment. Whatever is growing there now was not prior to the sands being eroded from our beaches and placed there. It is an opportunity to bring it back to where it belongs.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/25/2014 - 11:35

Permalink

Ted OB

We weren't "starved for suitable sand to fill out the beaches and protect roads from storm damage." last spring when the town beaches were nourished with the very sand that the folks on East Chop were happy to take off our hands. No - that sand wasn't good enough for some folks, so they pitched a fit until the town removed it. Now we're hearing that there are no other alternatives, and the decision to move the sand has put our infrastructure at risk.

Ted OB

Indeed. They were willing to risk causing a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum, Marty! All because the new sand, precious commodity that it is, was judged to be aesthetically displeasing by a self appointed beach committee. The town chose to listen to this faction, and the Selectmen now must take ownership of the ill-advised decision to move that sand.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.