<p>Greater transparency, expanded human services and more state funding are among the goals shared by candidates running for the Dukes County commission. Seven people are running to fill seven seats on the board next Tuesday. Four appear on the ballot, while three are running as write-ins.</p>
Greater transparency, expanded human services and more state funding are among the goals shared by candidates running for the Dukes County commission. Seven candidates are running to fill seven seats on the board next Tuesday. Four appear on the ballot, while three are running as write-ins.
Write-ins Gretchen Underwood of Oak Bluffs and Benjamin Hall Jr. are seeking their first terms on the commission. All terms run for two years.
The five candidates seeking reelection are Leon Brathwaite, John Alley, Tristan Israel, David Holway and Christine Todd, who is running as a write-in. Mr. Holway was appointed in August to replace Melinda Loberg, who left the commission when she was elected a selectman in Tisbury.
Chairman Leonard Jason Jr. and Thomas Hallahan are not seeking reelection.
Reached by phone this week, several of the candidates said their priorities for the next two years include expanding services for the elderly and vulnerable, obtaining more of the state funding earmarked for the Cape and Islands, and working to be more transparent as a public body.
The commission has been working to establish a new Center for Living, which would provide full-service day care for seniors, with a focus on caring for people with Alzheimer’s disease. “We need to get funding for that and town commissions to be on board,” said Mr. Brathwaite. Ms. Todd said that in addition to town support, the center would be responsible for much of its own fundraising.
Ms. Todd also hopes to see better services for supporting the homeless. She believed a social service coordinator would be especially useful to the Islandwide community.
“It would be good to have a point person here who could help people get different services that they need,” she said, adding that working with the same people over time would help the coordinator identify each person’s unique needs.
Mr. Israel noted the commission’s ongoing work to facilitate the healthy aging task force, which he believed will play an increasingly important role as the Island’s senior population continues to expand.
Some candidates pointed out that most of the state funding for human services on the Cape and Islands does not make it to the Vineyard. “We need somebody who is going to help get that money flowing to the Island,” said Ms. Todd. Other priorities focused on the county government itself. “I think county government needs to be more responsive to the towns and the public,” said Mr. Alley. He said county government can eliminate the duplication of efforts by having regional services.
“There are certainly detractors of the concept of county government,” said Mr. Israel. But he pointed out that the county charter study a few years ago found that most Islanders supported the county model. “I think in the end it’s a good conduit for Islandwide efforts,” he said.
Ms. Underwood said in an email that the commission “needs to be more transparent in it’s proceedings and the way the information is presented to the public.”
The newly elected board will face the additional challenge of ongoing legal disputes with the Martha’s Vineyard Airport commission, which has sought greater independence from the county, which owns the airport and appoints the airport commissioners. The county commission’s decision in September to expand the airport commission from seven to nine members is the subject of litigation.
“What I would like to see us do is sit down with the commissioners and resolve the issues and take it out of the courts, period,” said Mr. Brathwaite. “In the courts we are asking someone else to make a decision, whereas we as adults can sit down, and I think, work these things out ourselves.”
The commission is waiting for a response to a letter sent by the county chairman this month to each airport commissioner, asking for both boards to get together and try to resolve the issue out of court.
Mr. Brathwaite believed that press coverage surrounding the airport conflict had obscured some of the county’s more positive work this year.
Mr. Israel put it in stronger terms. “This dispute is deliberately portrayed by some as a turf war between the county and the airport commission,” he said. He said the county commission was “trying to do everything we can to restore confidence and restore due process at the airport.” He said the decision to expand the commission was the only tool available at the time to address the situation.
But not all commissioners felt the same way. Mr. Alley, who served on the airport commission for a number of years, said he “got to see both sides of the coin.”
“I’ve made it known to the commissioners that they need to let the airport operate as the airport,” he said. Mr. Alley abstained from voting to expand the commission.
“Whatever can be done to work out the difficulties openly with full transparency and cooperation is the way to go,” said Ms. Todd, who is currently serving on the airport commission. “The county commission is in full support of wanting to sit down and talk about it.”
Benjamin Hall Jr. is a former member of the airport commission who was not reappointed this year. “As a former airport commissioner, I was extremely concerned about the wasteful litigation that has been ongoing, and I want to step in and I want to fix that situation,” he said. “The other reason is that a real comprehensive review of what the county does and can do and should be doing needs to be brought further down the field and a decision brought to voters.”

Comments
Please say it ain't so! Mr.
No Way tisburyPlease say it ain't so! Mr. Hall can't even maintain his own properties and he's running for County Commissioner! He is still upset about not being reappointed to the Airport. He and John Alley helped to initiate the ridiculous lawsuits to begin with. The County just wanted a sit down which they refused. I recommend writing in Lenny Jason he is respected and has a long history of knowledge.
Mr. Hall should own up to the
Mr. Hall? Oak BluffsMr. Hall should own up to the fact that he is part of the problem at the airport. He was on the airport commission when it decided to file suit since the commission did not want information about its dealings made public. Ben really? 'the wasteful litigation that is ongoing'? Stop filing complaints. Government is all about transparency as well as checks and balances. The airport commission has been negligent in its duties by giving one person too much authority with no oversight from the commission. Stop blaming everyone else for problems created by the airport at the airport! Lenny Jason is the voice of reason...write him in!
Dear "No Way:" I would
Benjamin Lambert Hall, Jr. EdgartownDear "No Way:" I would respectfully ask that in expressing you very welcome opinion, that you kindly include accurate facts about me. The lawsuits are ridiculous, but I did not initiate these suits. I'm pretty sure I had vacated my Airport Commission seat prior to the initiation of any suits, except those by a former employee against the Airport Commission on whose suspension and discharge decisions I did NOT even participate. I was not on the Airport Commission when the County Commissioners wanted to hold a joint meeting to discuss the recent litigation between the boards. As to my not being re-appointed, I was told in no uncertain terms by certain County Commissioners that I would receive sufficient votes to be re-appointed if I agreed to vote a certain way on a matter involving how personnel at the Airport would be supervised. In my humble opinion, such a vote was NOT in the best interests of the Airport, and contrary to my obligations to the very organization to which I had a sworn fiduciary duty to protect. I stood my ground, as I felt was my duty, to protect the Airport, to which I had sworn allegiance, from what I saw as unnecessary County interference, and, as a result of not playing ball with those who want to gut the very valuable distinct separation of operations of the Airport from the County, I believe I was not re-appointed. I was NOT re-appointed because I maintained an independent point of view that tried to remain objective with my eye on the Big Picture. I would NOT sacrifice the very existence of an organization for the sake of a vote to be re-appointed. I believe that signal also was one that was not welcomed and was a threat to those who would want to control the Airport through proxy. The County Commissioners appoint the Airport Commissioners for any reason they so choose. Once appointed for three years, the County Commissioners, as the appointing authority are entitled to regular reports and to ask appointees to seek their advice. However, the County Commission does not rule the Airport Commission as a puppet master. I have no ill will about not being re-appointed, just disappointment. I would have enjoyed continuing to serve at the Airport and believe my participation there was exemplary. I continue to hold my head high knowing in my heart I acted only honorably and in the best interests of the people of this County, where I was born, where my ancestors came and planted multiple sets of European roots, where succeeding dozens of generations were born and where the next generation proudly has been born. But, as to those ridiculous lawsuits, certain actions at the County level forced the hand of the Airport Commissioners with whom I commiserate. Millions of dollars of state and federal funding received by the airport for not only improvements, but also for operations, depend on an absolutely independent airport operating without County interference by way of Grant Assurances signed by both the Airport Commissioners and the County Commissioner before initial funding was even provided for these absolutely essential improvements. These grant funding governmental agencies have expressed a great deal of concern about these recent actions at the County level that challenge Airport independence. This funding is essential to continue regular improvement programs to continue to meet ever increasing levels of regulation. If the Airport doesn't meet federal and state regulations, it cannot operate. It makes no sense to jeopardize the existence of the Airport. It is my belief that if the Airport had not acted to protect those interests, that, these governmental agencies would view the Grant Assurances as having been breached (by the County) and that essential funding could easily be reduced or eliminated. There are hosts of other airports nationwide that could use the funding we get. I have no illusions and believe that all involved honestly believe their positions are correct. But, they are entrenched. The County has repeatedly been told by their own counsel they were wrong, so they chose new counsel. This litigation is wasting resources that could be used for so many other worthy causes - helping battle homelessness or helping to make housing affordable or dealing with our aging in place population or the ravages of mental illness. I want to see those funds being put to good use! I could care less about re-appointment. We have a crisis but it certainly wasn't caused by the Airport Commission, nor by the actions to protect the airport. It's the hub of our second most important mode of transportation and incredibly valuable to the economic fabric of the island. Why put it at risk? The County Commission could be an island wide organization to spearhead so many island wide efforts. Its inability to prove to the seven towns it serves that it spends the money it receives from them wisely impedes the possibilities! The expenditure of funds to fight the Airport on these issues only underscores that perception. The great potential of the County to provide a needed regional lead in so many areas need to be more thoroughly analyzed and efforts undertaken to make them so! I hope you will re-consider your opposition to my hope to have an opportunity to see that through as a County Commissioner. Thanks. Ben
Mr. Hall, I see you writing a
concerned tisburyMr. Hall, I see you writing a novel the size of war and peace about how the County Commissioners have tried to take control of the airport and you say you didn't want to be reappointed to the airport commission after you were not reappointed in Feb. But yet you submitted your name for consideration when peter bettencourt resigned. If not interested why submit your name? It seems from your statement that you are very pro airport and believe they are doing a great job running it. How many lawsuits does the airport have going right now including the Roskin case? Why won't the airport meet with the County? As an airport commissioner did the thought of a multi-million business not have a standard employee handbook protecting airport assets and staff seem like a liability? We know you worked on it forever, but as a lawyer, you did not see a possibility of a lawsuit? And if the granting agencies are worried they should be filing the lawsuit, not the people that the commissioners appointed. The County doesn't need another Mr. Flynn plant, the County already has one. I do wish you the best of luck though.
We all trust the Gazette to
Truth in Reporting? West TisburyWe all trust the Gazette to report at least some form of the truth. But then why is Jeff Kristal telling people he's not a write-in candidate for Dukes County Commision? He says no one from the Gazette ever so much as tried to speak with him. Why then is the Gazette reporting such false information? Seems like the Gazette is trying to influence an election with lies? Has island politics devolved into that of old time Chicago? Wow! The island is sinking....
The story has been corrected,
EditorThe story has been corrected, thanks to the reader for pointing out the error.
Dear "Concerned:" Excellent
Benjamin Lambert Hall, Jr. EdgartownDear "Concerned:" I worked so hard to make clear my positions that I must have done a poor job by the rather negative tone to your comments. I apologize if that is the case. I do not understand how you could view me as a "Mr. Flynn plant" since I was appointed by, as I recall, a unanimous vote of the County Commissioners some three and a half years ago. Please do not be afraid of the independent voice I bring to the governing seats I have been elected or appointed to fill over the decades. I am a good listener and, as a lawyer, am very attuned to making sure we have as transparent a government as possible. Do not fret however, as I do not take attacks like these personally and do not visit the politics of retribution. But, thank you for the opportunity to respond and further clarify my positions. You ask some good questions and I will do my best to answer them. Governing is a series of difficult choices but one must key an eye on whom we are serving and what is in their best interests. Freedom is a responsibility one cannot take lightly. As an Airport Commissioner, I was one of seven and respected the opinions of my fellow commissioners. We didn't always agree and I firmly believe that that process of open debate and considering multiple points of view makes for better government. I didn't say perfect, but I'll take the form of government we have any day, even though I do not always agree with the positions of those whom we elect or appoint. I entered the position about 3 and a half years ago and served for just over three years until my appointment was up. The Airport is fiscally sound and is making significant headway toward needed improvements. It serves as a successful gateway to the island and provides well-paying jobs. Through the Business Park it serves as an economic engine not only for the businesses there, but also for the airport itself. There were many aspects to airport operations with which I wanted a deeper involvement as I was critical of how certain matters were undertaken and that is why I sought to be re-appointed, without conditions and without sacrificing the independent point of view I brought to the job. One term as an Airport Commissioner is an education in airport operations. I learned along the way that to be able to build a consensus to make those changes, one would likely need to serve more than one term. If re-appointment meant however that I had to vote against my judgment or conscience then I would not do it. Please don't try to portray my interest in making the airport even better as some sort of self-serving agenda. When I was appointed as an Airport Commissioner, the Board was involved in several legal matters, some of which I believe were resolved (I think Roskin was settled during my tenure), and others which continue to pend. Others commenced after my tenure. It is part of our governmental process that parties have the right to appeal decisions of actions or omissions with which they do not agree to the courts. The number of lawsuits hardly indicates whether anything is right or wrong with airport operations. Yes, I gave over a hundred of hours of my time to drafting a rough draft (really as the basis for discussion and comment and eventually for further refinement by Airport labor counsel) of a comprehensive written set of policies for non-union, non-contract employees at the Airport, of which there were, I believe, at one time, as many as three. However, do not think the laws and statutes governing the workplace did not already provide a solid basis of regulations to guide the interaction between the employees and the management. The policy manual I worked to develop was only intended to provide a central place where one could look to see what the law is, and what policies were already in place, as well as a place for the adoption of other revised policies and procedures to be incorporated as they were adopted by the Airport Commission after review and advice of labor counsel. In your reference to Mr. Flynn, the current Airport manager who serves under a multi-year contract, it is apparent you are not a fan. The Airport Commission contracted with Mr. Flynn to manage the airport and all of its multi-faceted affairs before I was appointed to the Airport Commission by the County Commission. I had no participation in voting to contract with him as he was already there. He is thus a contract employee and is subject to the same employment laws as are the other employees, including their protections, including, notably, privacy. Employers must protect the privacy of their employees, failure for which there are statutory and other legal penalties. As a manager of such a large operation, his decisions and mannerisms are bound to make some with whom he interacts unhappy. You sound like a friend of one with whom Mr. Flynn may not have had such a mutually agreeable interaction. As a human being, we are all full of faults and could do better, and need to continue to strive to do better. His contract is approaching its expiration date and I would expect that the Airport Commission would review and debate, as is its charge, the best course of action to take in the best interests of all of those served by the airport, and not just of a few. I understand the process is to establish a study/search committee for the purpose of reviewing the job description and establishing criteria for a new contract, regardless of who the Airport Commission seeks to employ. Then, a search will take place and Mr. Flynn, as I understand it, can be invited to participate as an in-house candidate, or others can be sought or both. Mr. Flynn may or may not prove to be the best candidate after this process have been undertaken. Such time would be an opportune moment for persons aggrieved to bring their honest opinions about what has been wrong at the airport and how the manager, whomsoever might be contracted, could make things better. I am sure the Airport Commissioners will take those opinions into account in deciding whether to ask Mr. Flynn to stay on, or to contract with another person. If I am elected a County Commissioner, rest assured that I would work hard to appoint candidates to the variety of positions the County appoints who are smart, interested, engaging, and have a critical and independent point of view who will act with as much objectivity as possible. I would NOT, as was visited upon me, try to impair a prospective Airport Commissioner's objectivity with any requirement or promise that they would vote in any particular manner as a pre-condition to appointing them. I might suggest how I would like to see them vote, but bear no illusions, my only power, as a Dukes County Commissioner, I believe, is to vote on the appointment and then to have the appointee available to provide reports and to receive our comments. Once done, I can only use the pulpit to comment on the decisions made by the appointee, so long as they are legal. Lastly, why would the Granting Agencies bother with a lawsuit? They hold the purse strings.... they just give those a good tug and we on the island suffer. Let's get on with the real business of making a difference. Again, thanks for allowing me to clarify my positions and to answer your questions. I hope I may have earned your trust and your vote! Ben
Add new comment