Whaling church was full on Thursday for the annual Hutchins Forum, entitled Race-ing Obama: Unraveling Criticism of the First Black President.
Mark Alan Lovewell

Hutchins Forum Draws Large Crowd and Divided Opinions

A sense of excitement filled the Old Whaling Church on Friday evening as visitors from around the country filtered in for the 14th annual Hutchins Forum, sponsored by the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University.

The annual Hutchins Forum in Edgartown took a critical, complex and at times emotional look at Barack Obama’s presidency over the last six years.

A sense of excitement filled the Old Whaling Church on Thursday evening as visitors from around the country filtered in for the 14th annual forum, sponsored by the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University.

Civil rights pioneer and award-winning journalist Charlayne Hunter-Gault conceived this year’s forum, Race-ing Obama: Unraveling Criticism of the First Black President. She also served as moderator.

Journalist Charlayne Hunter-Gault moderated the event.
Mark Alan Lovewell
Journalist Charlayne Hunter-Gault moderated the event.
Mark Alan Lovewell

While many other presidents have received “tough, even harsh criticism,” none have been attacked with the ferocity of many of Mr. Obama’s most angry critics, she said.

“We need today to look at the ways and the whys of such blatant racist attacks, but also criticisms – valid or not,” she said. The two-hour discussion explored the issues of race and racism, and also examined Mr. Obama’s foreign and domestic policies.

The five-member panel included many influential voices in the news media. It was also joined by professor Lawrence D. Bobo, chairman of the Department of African and African American Studies at Harvard, who offered closing remarks.

The panelists did not dwell on the racially motivated attacks themselves, choosing instead to examine what they believed were legitimate criticisms of the President and his policies, in the context of race and the public’s opinion of Mr. Obama.

Armstrong Williams, a television and radio host, said that personal attacks on the President represent a small minority opinion that most people have moved beyond. “I find it to be silly because there are so many issues that you can legitimately challenge and disagree with the President on,” he said.

Amy Holmes and Armstrong Williams were panelists at the discussion, which at times grew heated.
Mark Alan Lovewell
Amy Holmes and Armstrong Williams were panelists at the discussion, which at times grew heated.
Mark Alan Lovewell

“There will always be people who are hateful in the world,” said Charles Blow, a New York Times columnist. “The President, I think, sets a great example of how to deal with that, which is that you don’t always stay on it.” He added that Mr. Obama has acknowledged the likelihood that many of his critics, as well as his supporters, are motivated by race.

The conversation quickly delved into Mr. Obama’s foreign and domestic policies.

News anchor and CNN contributor Amy Holmes believed Mr. Obama’s presidency is in “free-fall.” She pointed out that “a lot of political watchers [are] extremely concerned that this President seems disengaged and uninterested in the matters at hand – including members of his own party.”

Donna Brazile, a commentator for CNN and ABC, saw things differently. “It’s not a free-fall,” she said. “It is the August of every summer of my adult life in politics, when somehow or another everything that appears on television becomes a crisis. This is not a crisis of leadership, this is not a failure of action.”

She disagrees with some of Mr. Obama’s policies, but believes he “has been a phenomenal president, under the circumstances.” She recalled going door-to-door as a young woman, helping to register black voters in the South. “That door was not open,” she said. “Some people sacrificed, gave up their lives.”

Henry Louis Gates Jr. hosts the event each year.
Mark Alan Lovewell
Henry Louis Gates Jr. hosts the event each year.
Mark Alan Lovewell

In regard to the racial animosity shown toward the President, she said, “Much of what we’re seeing is a backlash. We’ve moved too fast too soon and people are still catching their breath. I’m being nice.”

One thing that separates Mr. Obama from President George W. Bush, she said, is his belief that an international coalition must be formed before the U.S. can engage in military intervention. She suggested that people were too quick to blame Mr. Obama for difficulties arising from that principle.

“Maybe in a world today where we still believe that we can just go in and invade somebody and beat them down with our military, that’s the solution,” she said. “That’s not the way the President behaves. He has a different approach.”

Ms. Holmes pointed out, however, that the President “unilaterally bombed Iraq over the weekend, without actually building an international coalition, and it looks like we may be getting sucked back into more extensive military action.”

Ms. Holmes added that people’s opinion of Mr. Obama was likely more influenced by their perception of his leadership qualities than by the effectiveness of his foreign policy. His failure to pass gun-control legislation and his shifting positions on Syria have caused his approval ratings to drop, she said.

Donna Brazile: "Much of what we’re seeing is a backlash."
Mark Alan Lovewell
Donna Brazile: "Much of what we’re seeing is a backlash."
Mark Alan Lovewell

Americans shouldn’t judge the President by what he has been able to get through Congress, Ms. Brazile said. “Congress is as popular as a root canal. We have one of the least effective Congresses in history.”

Claiming that funds were being cut for historic black colleges (a statement met by disagreement from the audience), Mr. Armstrong asked the panel what in particular the President has done for African Americans, his most loyal constituency.

“This is where policy and ideology overlaps with race tremendously,” said Mr. Blow. He pointed out that most African Americans still live in the Black Belt, a region extending from Virginia to Louisiana, and that a lack of Medicaid coverage in those areas, for example, disproportionately affects the black population.

He drew attention to the systemic forms of racism that remain from nearly 400 years of slavery in the United States. “People don’t talk about the centuries of this country endeavoring to break the black family,” he said. That process continues in the mass incarceration of young black men, largely for small crimes, he said.

He added that policies related to that issue unfold on the local and state levels, and that states in the Black Belt are controlled mostly by conservatives.

Mr. Armstrong took issue with the idea that there is nothing the President can do to address the problem. Pointing to New York city and Los Angeles as examples of cities that have taken dramatic actions to lower their crime rates, Mr. Armstrong asked if the President should take action to help his hometown of Chicago do the same.

“So now he’s the mayor of Chicago?” Mr. Blow said. He called the efforts in New York and Los Angeles “a blasphemy to justice” and likened New York’s stop-and-frisk policy to burning down the house to get rid of the mice. According to the New York Civil Liberties Union, in 2013 85 per cent of those stopped and frisked were black or Latino. As things heated up, Mrs. Hunter-Gault stepped in.

“This is not morning television,” she told the panelists.

Ms. Brazile believed that history would be fair to Mr. Obama, when we look back and see how he helped the nation recover from the Great Recession.

The recession had a disproportionate affect on African Americans, who were already suffering from unemployment, she said. Drawing a connection to cities like Chicago, she added that where people are working, there is less crime.

Mrs. Hunter-Gault asked if Mr. Obama has met the expectations of those who put him in office, especially African Americans. Ms. Holmes believed those expectations were “astronomical for this President, and no person could live up to it.”

Ms. Holmes’ assertion that Mr. Obama didn’t reach across the political aisle early in his office was met with loud derision from the crowd, and Mrs. Hunter-Gault again stepped in to restore order. In defense, Ms. Holmes pointed to the Affordable Health Care Act as an example of partisan legislation that excluded input from Republicans.

In his closing comments, Mr. Bobo said the President’s signing of the Affordable Care Act “sent a certain segment of the American populace into a lunatic zone that quite frankly a number of them have not returned from yet. There is a set of anxieties and fears and resentments that were catalyzed in that moment.”

“So we have this thing in which race, sadly was the glue,” he added. While it wasn’t the only factor, “The walls wouldn’t have gone up without that cement of racism, in this case. It would not be standing today in our way and undergirding a do-nothing, inactive Congress who has otherwise stalled a reasonable president.”

A question and answer period added to the discussion issues related to education, voter ID laws and the challenges faced by former prison inmates.

In closing, Mrs. Hunter-Gault asked the panelists to offer some personal advice to Mr. Obama. Much of their advice had to do with him getting some well-deserved rest while vacationing on the Vineyard.

Mr. Blow added that the President should not forget the power of symbolism. “Even when legislation cannot be passed, to continue to remember the incredible power of symbolism... There is a black family in the White House — is a powerful signal that I don’t think we will forget in a decade or a generation.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2014 - 17:26

Permalink

Peter Robb Holliston and Oak Bluffs

By my reading, only one person at this meeting suggested that the president might possibly have made some mistakes. The audience and panelists clearly disagreed. Indeed, the divide between people's hopes and reality--when it comes to Mr. Obama--remain as large as the Grand Canyon. And of course, the Race Card was played again and again. Don't fall into their trap. We oppose this president because of his policies and vision...not the color of his skin. Unfortunately, too many folks are unable to see beyond their own point of view.

jack schimmelman Oak Bluffs

This may be true for you Mr. Robb. I don't doubt your sincerity. But when you have the entire leadership of the opposition party actually meet the night of your inauguration to conspire that NOTHING will pass that the President proposes, there is something more at play than just disagreement with policy; policy that has not yet been employed not to mention distinctly articulated. When you have massive demonstrations bankrolled by billionaire brothers of white middle class americans in Washington D.C. holding up signs of the President that are clearly bigoted spewing hate on a level you wouldn't say in public in most places in this country, that is something more than just disagreement with policy. I am a supporter of Mr. Obama, but I disagree with many things he has done or more accurately has not done. But what I know for a fact is that the opposition in this country has attacked this President with a ferocity that goes beyond politics. The head of the minority party in the Senate said that his only agenda was to make Mr. Obama a one term president. Perhaps that had nothing to do with race, but to close one's eyes to the hatred spewing out of people's mouths in public arenas such as social media is to ignore a cancer that is inhabiting our collective consciousness and we do so at a great risk. I have read on Island social media some of the most hateful, bigoted speech toward the President that I have ever read or heard from anywhere in this country. It is shameful. And so, what I wish to say to those who are immersed in such a misery, you are only diminishing one person -- the one you see in the mirror. We should be thankful we have a President who resists the generals every time there is a hiccup in the world; a President who believes diplomacy, politics still have a place in world affairs. That alone will assure his place in history as extraordinary compared to the criminals who conducted wars on our behalf based on the BIG LIE(s).

Peter Robb Holliston and Oak Bluffs

Dear Jack,

You raise some good points, unlike the panelists at the Hutchins Forum last week. Indeed, there has been evidence of racism since Mr. Obama won the presidency in 2008. There are pictures to prove it. I do feel that those people represent a tiny percentage of Americans who didn't vote for Obama. (The press has always looked for the most dramatic/shocking images.) Regarding PAC and other money, the Democrat Machine is a well-oiled monstrosity that is funded from rich folks in Hollywood, Silicon Valley and the vast union network that rakes in millions from members. So I don't think it's fair to focus on only one side's fundraising sources: it's all too much money. I am no fan of Mr. Bush and he certainly made plenty of mistakes. I will say he had the support of Congress and our allies when we first went in to Iraq. All the evidence suggested there were weapons of mass destruction etc. Even the Israelis believed it. But I do think there are plenty of options short of war that work. Mr. Obama's Lead from Behind strategy is failing and his reactions are consistently too late and have shaken our allies. I am truly worried about the next two years.

ed darden washington, dc

Well, Peter Robb, I suspect that, if we made a grid of President Obama's policies and vision, and you then were asked to point out which and why you found any or everyone of them as objectionable, I doubt that you could honestly point to many at all. Why? Because much of his "policies and vision" were his attempts to mirror Republican initiatives and cater to them in hopes of growing bipartisan coalitions. These were, more often than not, met with complete rejection by Republicans, even for measures that Republicans had initiated or once supported. We all know the litany of those failed attempts at partnership.

Furthermore, by making a grid, the objectivity of its structure will avoid much of the rhetorical complaints that do not use solid examples as rational bases.

In the vernacular, "Put up or shut up" when you make broad complaints about "policies and vision."

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2014 - 17:35

Permalink

Peter Robb Holliston and Oak Bluffs

I would like to amend my first post by saying there appears to be two people in the room who felt Mr. Obama has made some mistakes (rather than one person).

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2014 - 18:54

Permalink

Ted

As always - follow the money. Who stands to gain by convincing people that the booger-bear of racism is hiding behind every bush? It's fairly obvious that Obama could not have been elected twice without the votes of a large number of white people. If "racism" were to magically disappear overnight, each of the people on the panel (with the possible exception of Amy Holmes) would be out of work. This level of self interest makes me deeply suspicious of their motives.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2014 - 22:08

Permalink

Brian Smith West Tisbury

As a victim of the Affordable Care Act I am one of the " certain segment of the American populace into a lunatic zone that quite frankly a number of them have not returned from yet"
Obama Care is terrible for the working family. Incredibly expensive for lousy coverage.
I'm not a lunatic, nor racist. The President is a person like anyone else and by far the worst President for the working man that this country has ever seen.

Jack Schimmelman Oak Bluffs

Mr. Smith, it is true what you say about some parts of "Obamacare." But the cost of national health insurance program depended on two factors. The active participation of most if not all states in order to ensure the largest pool so that prices would be driven down and the adherence of the private insurance companies to a promise they made to the President to keep their costs down due to the inflow of millions more customers. I don't have the exact number of states who have refused to accept funding of Medicaid or opted out of Obamacare, but I believe it's around 26. At least half the country. That makes the pool much smaller and others have to pay for the lack of numbers not to mention the unfortunates who cannot get any insurance because of their state's refusal to accept federal help in coverage. The insurance companies reneged on a deal with the President and so many prices did go up. I think it was a fool's errand to try to make a deal with the insurance companies, but because there was such an opposition not only from Republicans but people in his own party (Max Bacchus and company) to a single payer system, Obama had little choice but to make a deal with the devil. I have friends who feel the same way as you do and I tell them the same thing and they don't believe me. But the fact is Obamacare has afforded insurance to millions who did not have it before and ultimately that's a good thing as that trend will continue to grow until those prices start to go down and be more controlled.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/19/2014 - 08:00

Permalink

Chris Mara Edgartown

I do chuckle at residents of Massachusetts who blame the President for the Affordable Care Act and call themselves "victims" of it. Here in Massachusetts we've had a more far reaching health care reform since 2006 and all residents have been subject to it. I've always felt that we've been held hostage by health insurance companies who have no incentive to control any healthcare costs and in fact the opposite is true. I believe that most (not all) critics of the President at the end of the day just can't except a African American President leading the armed forces...

Peter Robb Holliston and Oak Bluffs

Dear Chris,

Obamacare is no laughing matter. My wife has lost two doctors this year. Our primary care doctor, like many others, stopped taking any more Medicare patients two years ago. Studies also show that doctors are leaving the profession in record numbers in MA and elsewhere because of Obamacare. (The MA budget is burdened every year now because of Masshealth. If you saw the actual figure, you would faint.) And the kicker is that the bill comes due after the 2016 elections. Funny how that happened.... And thanks for proving my point by playing the Race Card. It's the only card left for most Dems to play after the disastrous 6 years we've endured....

Bob Oak Bluffs

This president should indeed be excepted from leading the armed forces, but I think you probably meant to write "accept". I don't like THIS African-American president leading the armed forces. I did approve of Colin Powell leading the armed forces. It's interesting that you can be so comfortable making such a generalization about such a disparate group of people. Every time someone decides to make an unfounded accusation of racism, the term loses a little more meaning. There are those of us who no longer even hear it as anything more than background noise.

Brian Smith West Tisbury

Obamacare has gutted ( in addition to Deval Patrick ) the Massachusetts health care reform act of 2006. It's now a whole different beast. Insurance companies pay your bills but the government is in charge of your premiums and what the policy offers. They don't even have the capability to send you a bill each month. And they regularly send you cancellation notices for non-payment even though you pay on time. It's a disaster, just like this president. I do not give a damn about Obama's race, I do give a damn that so many Americans are intimidated to not speak up for the fear of being labeled a racist.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/19/2014 - 08:39

Permalink

Dee Hamden

I thought the issue was directed towards the visual media images of the President and how he and his family are visually portrayed by over all mass media in a demeaning way-which bleeds back to old stereotypes now playing out in 21st century media. The title Racing Obama was two fold and not crying or trying to play the race card~

Peter Robb Holliston and Oak Bluffs

Dear Dee,

I read this differently. In nearly every case, the panelists went after ordinary people, not the media (opponents of Obamacare, Tea Party etc.) The media has carried water for the president since 2008. Only recently have some outlets become more critical in their coverage. (Big holdouts remain the Boston Globe, NYT, Washington Post, SF Chronicle, Denver Times and Seattle Times to name just a few. Lots of smaller market papers are still tight with Obama.)It is a scary time when average folks are scared to speak out. IRS anyone?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/19/2014 - 13:01

Permalink

BG Edg

This well written article clearly exposes how clueless the Obama supporters are. Mr.Bobo must be covered by one of the union health care plans 'exempt' from the "Affordable Health Care act'. This "Obamacare' is a disaster for single payers, and destroyed the best health care system in the world. If you are a cancer patient, you no longer have your CT scans and bloodwork covered. There are now large deductibles in the thousands of dollars that must be be met annually, and 30% plus co-pays thereafter. More significant, there is no longer an ability to go 'out of network'. So if you are unfortunate enough to have a relapse, you can no longer go to Sloan Kettering for an expert unless you're rich. If you are a male and get prostate cancer, you no longer have to option of choosing proton beam therapy at Loma Linda in California. Those are facts Mr. Bobo. I suggest you choose your words more wisely than calling every cancer patient a member of a lunatic zone. And as far as his lies, 'if you like your plan you can keep it' is the biggest lie. My good plan, that I paid for, that allowed me out of network coverage is NOT available since the insurance company could not continue it with his mandates. Lunatic zone?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 08/22/2014 - 12:19

Permalink

Ellen Jennings Oak Bluffs

Physicians are not leaving the profession because of Obamacare so I am not sure where that comment stems from. Physicians are leaving because of the continuing decrease in reimbursements as well as the negative impact that electronic records have an already overburdened lifestyle. The average physician I know is mid to late career and suddenly forced to spend 3 or 4 hours every night finishing up electronic records. This, in addition to seeing fewer patients due to electronic records as well as lower reimbursement for the patients seen is going to cause more and more physician flight. The push for EHR began long before we ever knew of Obama and has nothing to do with his administration. Quite frankly for those physicians who remain in medicine Obamacare will assure them of a more than steady flow of patients.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.