Beyond the monarchs and the milkweed a broad discussion has been unfolding on the Vineyard in recent months and weeks about the use of herbicides.
When she captured thousands of monarch butterflies on a Super 8 camera in 1973, Shirley Mayhew of West Tisbury didn’t know she was recording history. She just knew she was witnessing something beautiful and exciting, as she recounts in her engaging narrative that accompanies the film clip, published in the Gazette and on mvgazette.com last week.
Nor did anyone know about the deadly effects of DDT in the 1950s when it was used widely to kill pests on plants. A generation later Rachel Carson spelled out exactly what we had done to our environment in her groundbreaking book Silent Spring.
Viewed today, Mrs. Mayhew’s monarch butterfly film clip tells a powerful story about our changing environment. Monarch butterfly populations are in serious, possibly irreversible decline, in part because too much of their preferred nesting habitat, milkweed, has been destroyed, especially in the Midwest. On the Vineyard we still have lots of milkweed. But there are few monarchs these days and no one knows if they will come back.
Beyond the monarchs and the milkweed a broad discussion has been unfolding on the Vineyard in recent months and weeks about the use of herbicides. In Chilmark, the town is locked in a court battle with a group of riparian landowners who want to use herbicides to eradicate invasive phragmites in Squibnocket Pond. The project complies with state law but runs counter to a town bylaw that prohibits the use of herbicides, pesticides and chemical fertilizers around the coastal pond. The landowners have already won a round in court in their quest to override the bylaw, and the town will take the dispute to the state Supreme Judicial Court. It may not win.
Down-Island, a decision by the power company NStar to resume the use of herbicides to control vegetation under power lines has set off alarm bells in Tisbury where many of the power lines run through year-round neighborhoods and are located near saltwater estuaries. The Tisbury selectmen have sent a formal letter of objection to NStar. So far the power company has shown no signs that it will heed the objections.
Maybe the herbicides can be used without harm. But maybe not. In truth the long-term effects are unknown. And there are alternatives; the offending vegetation can be controlled through other means such as cutting and grazing.
It begs the question: Why take the chance?
Chilmark town leaders plan to file a home rule petition with the state legislature that would allow the town to promulgate its own pesticide regulations. Wouldn’t it be great if all Island towns joined this effort? As Islanders, we stubbornly resist regional action, but here’s a place where a show of Island unity would make a meaningful difference.
NStar leaders and the riparian owners around Squibnocket are invited to watch the butterfly film. And think about changing their hard-line stance on the matter of herbicide use. That would feel like a thousand butterflies aloft in a warm late summer breeze, whirring toward their next destination in a small miracle of nature.

Comments
Nature is more delicate and
MA Whitton Chilmark + Greenwich VillageNature is more delicate and complex than even our biggest brains can comprehend. We must all speak with one voice if we want to keep the Vineyard pristine and free from the toxic chemicals that are so worrisome in North Carolina and West Virginia. Please speak up. Yes, I am aware that a not all chemicals are the same. Glysophates are a non -selective, broad spectrum herbicide that is lethal to 50-80% of beneficial insects. When the dragonflies and swallows are gone, are we looking at super mosquitoes? Super weeds are a well-documented by-product. The US Forest Service admits it is impossible to study the effects of glysophates combined with surfactants ( the stuff that makes it stick) due to proprietary 'trade secrets'.
The Mass Environmental department admits 'all registration of theses products carries a warning against the use in known areas of endangered species". Are we the victims of bureaucratic bungling? Even the Monsanto /Dow companies admit that it should be 'considered as an option of last resort in areas where rare species are found'. Why go to the chemical option first? 5 States use goats and cows, Canada cuts under the water in June then again later in the season-black plastic, controlled burns, our neighbors are told those won't work... follow the money here, chemical application is not a one time application, at 75 thousand a pop? The EPA is tasked with regulating over 80 thousand chemicals in use, it's review of glysophates ( due in 2015) will rely on the studies paid for by Monsanto. This, despite the fact that the EPA has caught scientists falsifying data at labs hired by Monsanto on 2 occasions that we know of. Why do the Europeans appear to be banning this stuff? I understand the temptation -applying powerful chemicals on those annoying/ invasive weeds- it looks like a quick/ easy solution. Big Chem spent 55 million lobbying legislators last year, to convince them it's as safe as Mother's milk. Would our neighbors or Nstar honchos agree to sip just a shot glass of Rodeo? Even diluted? No takers? Nature plays the long game and the cost of making the wrong decision is too high. No, not in real estate values, a pretty view, cheap energy at the cost of wildlife- the real cost is in the contamination of wells, the lands it drifts onto, the unintended victims, the endrocine system disruptions to human and wildlife and yes, those fluttering, tender banners of late summer, the Monarchs. I don't understand why this has to end up in a lawsuit, why we can't be smart and creative and come together to make a reasoned decision for this pond and for all the creatures that enjoy it. Yes, the 'sprayers' may win on a legal technicality but then, we all lose. Please speak up. Call now.
There is a crass saying,
T Miller West TisburyThere is a crass saying, something like you don’t “blank” where you eat. How do we consider spraying herbicides in the habitat of such delicate wildlife, the birds, and butterflies and rabbits, otter’s turtles and yes even the deer. How could we consider spraying when so many of us living on this remarkable island have private wells for our drinking water? Are we so quick for a shortsighted answer and so lacking discussion, and creativity that we cannot come up with a solution that is not about eliminating one nuisance only to kick the can down the road. And where does this stop; there are no second chances once we head down this path.
Add new comment