Tisbury Takes Up Connector Road Again

The longstanding issue of whether to build a connector road will come before Tisbury voters again at a special town meeting next week, this time in three parts, but with the total price tag unknown. The meeting begins at 7 p.m. Tuesday.

The longstanding issue of whether to build a connector road will come before Tisbury voters again at a special town meeting next week, this time in three parts, but with the total price tag unknown.

The meeting begins at 7 p.m. Tuesday at the Tisbury School. There are 12 articles on the warrant. Moderator Deborah Medders will preside.

The plan to build a bypass road connecting Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road with State Road has been discussed for decades and first formally came before the town in 2004, but has not yet passed muster with voters. The concept is to relieve traffic congestion on the Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road. At the annual town meeting last spring a proposal to spend $1.3 million for the first phase of the project failed to gain a needed two-thirds majority. An identical request will be back in front of voters Tuesday night. It calls for the town to borrow $1.3 million to build a connector road between Edgartown-Vineyard Haven and Holmes Hole Roads.

A second article seeks approval to use Chapter 90 money to build two other legs which would allow the road to exit at Evelyn Way and High Point Lane. Chapter 90 aid is allocated to towns in the commonwealth to maintain roadways An estimated dollar amount has not yet been set for the cost of building the additional roads.

A third article that relates to the connector road project would allow the town to buy or take by eminent domain a portion of land on Evelyn Way, Olga Road and Lyle Lane in Tisbury. No dollar amount is included in the article.

The finance committee recommends approval of the articles; the town selectmen have not taken a formal position on the project.

In other business on the warrant, the Tisbury selectmen are seeking approval for their plan to buy a parcel of land at 14 Pine street. The property is about four acres and backs up to the Emergency Services Facility on Spring street, where there is a leaching facility. It also abuts the superintendent’s building. The price tag for the purchase is not specified.

Selectman Tristan Israel said the board had decided to pursue the purchase because it is a rare opportunity for the town to own land close to the heart of Tisbury.

“There are no overt plans to do anything there,” Mr. Israel said. The property has a house on it, and Mr. Israel said the tract of land is large enough that multiple possibilities for future projects exist, including elder housing or additional school facilities. On the other side of the property spectrum, voters will be asked to rescind a 2008 special town meeting borrowing article for a solid waste refuse facility, since the facility was never built.

Voters will also be asked to:

• Increase the borrowing authorization by $260,000 to pay for a new leaching facility;

• Approve $36,544 for architectural design fees for a new superintendent’s building;

• Spend $305,000 to fund the repair and replacement of the Tisbury School roof;

• Appropriate $20,000 from the town waterways fund to design and build two pump-out facilities at Owen Park and the Lake street landing.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/06/2013 - 06:22

Permalink

Thomas Hodgson West Tisbury

Bringing the connector road issue up, yet again, to a special town meeting, and not to a regular town meeting, is just plain bad government. Special town meetings are almost always poorly attended. An issue like this deserves the full attention of all the town, and it should not be "back-doored" through an ill-attended meeting. Tisbury faces the prospect of having a "superminority" passing a project that many in Tisbury strongly oppose. And with a "blank check" for the rest of the town to pay later?

john smith

Last spring the connector road was voted on after 5 hours and two nights of town meeting. There were about two-thirds of the amount of people who were there the first night. It always gets a "yes" vote by more than 50% of the attendes, who also have strong feelings about it. It passed in the ballot box so it's not getting "back-doored" by a "superminority".

Joe Tisbury

You bet it is being brought up again, as The Current TDPW Director Fred Lapiana was never taught the meaning of the word No as a child. He also is retiring from the DPW as well as the Island at the end of this month and wants this, his perceived legacy authorized before he leaves. Also probably hoping one of the legs can be called Lapiana Lane. As brought up at a previous Town Meeting by Marie Laursen, with photographic evidence, Mr. Lapiana wants this so bad he has instructed his staff to do preliminary heavy equipment work on the proposed roads, previously, under the excuse that the water dept. had to run a line there. That is true, but as her photos showed, no need was there for a 40-60 foot new dirt road to accomplish that! And now, since then, you should go check out what Mr. Lapiana has had his staff do since then! All that will be needed is to send in the pavers to start slapping down the asphalt as they have been working on it every day. Mr. Lapiana states we can pay for it with 2 years worth of chapter 90 State Money as our 5 year plan is about done. LOOK at the existing town roads people. There are MANY that need work,Centre Street and many others that have been neglected, the jokingly called Canal Street ( Lagoon Pond Road) needs major drainage improvements all before NEW Roads of any kind should be considered.

Wise old owl Tisbury

Seems like we should just let the DPW to just continue as they are to build the road at no expense since they have already begun... Let it be a dirt road and see if it works before paving it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/06/2013 - 12:29

Permalink

Dan Chilmark

Since when does Town government think that asking for authorization to build new roads and purchase lands, without stating the price of such authorizations, is ok? Sure, here's the ok to spend any amount of tax dollars that you want. Either someone at Town Hall is lazy, or there're too scared to state the total eye-popping price. This is bad government, period.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/10/2013 - 13:40

Permalink

Katherine Tisbury

Tisbury town fathers seem to be very "taking"-happy these days. Selectmen have also instructed the Planning Board to develop its "vision" for Cromwell Lane, so that they can then instruct the town assessor and town counsel to do what is necessary to get it.

Let's put a hold all takings that are needed to fulfill anyone's "vision"---such "visions" almost by definition does not serve a generally perceived public purpose--- and solve actual problems via transparent government.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.