Edgartown had strong words and instituted a daily fine against a Katama Bay homeowner who illegally had nearly 20 trees cut down on his property.
Edgartown had strong words and instituted a daily fine against a Katama Bay homeowner who illegally had nearly 20 trees cut down on his property.
The town’s conservation commission voted last week to institute the fine until John E. Waldron and his wife Amanda Waldron submit a restoration plan. Fines will run at a max of $300 a day for the alleged chopping of 19 mature cedar trees at the $31.6 million property.
Members of the commission were blunt with the Waldrons’ lawyer at the Oct. 8 meeting, saying they were insulted that the Waldrons directly disobeyed the commission’s orders on what trees could be cut in the protected wetlands area.
“Everything in the buffer zone has been removed with the exception of one oak tree,” said Geoff Kontje, a commissioner. “And you can’t make the argument that the owners were not aware of what they were doing…This is an intentional and willful disregard for what we required them to do in writing.”
Robert McCarron, an attorney for the Waldrons, acknowledged that his clients would be on the hook to resolve the issue.
“I talked with my client. He understands there would be some form of a fine,” he said. “He understands there needs to be restoration. He is committed to doing restoration in a manner that furthers the interests of the bylaw.”
Mr. Waldron’s New York City home address listed in town assessor records has been reported to be owned by a John E. Waldron who is now the president and COO at Goldman Sachs. The investment banker has posted on social media about hosting events on the Vineyard, but Mr. McCarron did not return a request for comment to confirm if the Katama Bay property owner was indeed an executive at Goldman.
The conservation commission first noticed an issue with the trees at the Edgartown property in April, when the conservation agent found the trees standing between the 15,000 square-foot home and the bay had been removed.
Aerial photos of the property indicate that the cutting had taken place over a number of years since the Waldrons built the home in 2022, according to the commission.
The town sent a violation letter to the Waldrons in August that called on the owners to halt any further cutting and submit a restoration plan within 30 days. No plan had been submitted as of Wednesday, said Kara Shemeth, the conservation agent.
While acknowledging the need for restoration, the Waldrons’ attorney did question the legitimacy of the commission’s ability to oversee historic views. The trees in the area that were chopped down were estimated to be about 60 years old, causing Mr. McCarron to wonder if that really counted as historic and if it would even fall under the commission’s jurisdiction.
“The historic views here are grassland,” he said, adding that the provision was “probably the weakest” in the commission’s bylaws.
Mr. Kontje pushed back on that line of reasoning, saying that the trees were also in a wetland buffer zone which is supposed to be left untouched.
“This is within our jurisdiction,” he said. “The idea is that this buffer zone is there to protect the wetlands, give the wetlands a place to migrate to.”
Coming to the commission without a plan, and then questioning the validity of the town’s bylaws, didn’t sit well with some commissioners.
“I feel a little bit insulted to hear about our laws aren’t valid,” said John Piekos, a commissioner.
If the Waldrons disagreed with the violations, they could have appealed the decision, he said.
“You really should have come with a plan tonight and you didn’t, and I believe that fines should start tomorrow,” Mr. Piekos said.
The commission set a new deadline of Nov. 5 to submit a restoration plan, along with a description of the work and a cost estimate. Fines would continue until the plans are submitted.

Comments
I suppose if you can afford
Chris EdgartownI suppose if you can afford the small fines, you'll pay for a better water view from your house. At least make the fines retroactive to when the trees were cut down.
The Conservation Commision is
katamapoint EdgartownThe Conservation Commision is an important commission but in this case they have it wrong. The owners attorney is correct in saying that the trees are not "historic". I have personal knowledge of grassland views that are no longer there. In 1980 or so, The Gazette published a story about the Katama Plains. They showed an aerial photo of the area near Katama Point. I still have that photo. The area at that time had unobstructed views of the bay and ocean for property owners from as far away as the northerly intersection of Edgartown Bay road and Katama Point Road. The views from my house were to the east and south looking over the bay to Chappy and the ocean. I can provide the photo if its not in the Gazette archives. Flash forward to the present time and you cannot recognize the area as giant trees of all kinds have taken over the area. Mostly planted my new owners. The views are now gone. So the Commission should reconsider its standards about what is "historic".
Except they disobeyed the
tom BostonExcept they disobeyed the commission's orders as to which trees they could cut down. If they wanted to appeal the commissions order, there are appropriate avenues to do just that. They didn't bother (and willfully so).
Exactly, and that’s a hard
HEATHER SIBLEYExactly, and that’s a hard stop.
Sounds like private property
TB VHSounds like private property and the meaning of ownership are now subjective to a collective. We all agree that there are reasonable limits but if you can't cut trees on your won property, especially when doing doesn't impact erosion or an abutter, then we're really just paying high prices for a version of use, and high rents (taxes).
Guide books and MV history books writing about the ecology and climate zones on the island make a big deal about the souther grasslands and plains. Let the "owners" restore those grasslands and plains....
These established cedar trees
Deborah Mello Orazem EdgartownThese established cedar trees served to hold the soil as tides rose with climate change. The homeowners’ action affects the entire neighborhood and sets a dangerous precedent for our fragile island. We are entitled to receive a restoration plan that must be approved by Conservation before the fines stop, and the fines should be implemented immediately. On Summer Street, Edgartown, in front of the Charlotte Inn, back in the 70’s or 80’s, at least one fully grown towering tree was purchased and successfully replaced a diseased one of the same size. The Katama owners should be required to count the stump tree rings, assess their age, and replace the cedars within a speedy time frame. Thank you for this critically important news story and to our Conservation agent and Commission.
You see this all over the
tom BostonYou see this all over the place now. Super wealthy people just doing what they want as far as cutting down trees. Nantucket, MV, Maine, etc, etc. The fines are nothing but an annoyance. It's worth it to them to get what they want
Most people don’t realize
Nick giliberto TisburyMost people don’t realize that the majority of trees today on the island, and across the the north east, are all over crowded and never reach the level of maturity and proper crown development within the competition of a closed canopy forest. An oak that has grown through the succession of historical fire and grazing on the landscape will live 5x as longer and produce more benefit for wildlife. There are too many trees and too much shade, and not enough quality trees.
Today there are TOO MANY
Robert Brown EdgartownToday there are TOO MANY HOUSES and not enough trees and shade
What on earth does your reply
tom BostonWhat on earth does your reply have to do with my post: that these super wealthy people chopping down tries illegally? So if we all took your stance on there are too many trees, should we all just chop down all the trees we want because we are right and the commissioners (or whomever) are wrong? And can that apply to more than just tree cutting?
I wonder if his insurance
Ken Edg.I wonder if his insurance company will cover him with the buffer cut down.
Need to add two or three
Carol formerly ChilmarkNeed to add two or three zeroes to that $300 daily fine.
Just stop this
15,000 square feet Martha’s VineyardJust stop this ostentatiousness.
The Sandplain grassland
Nick Giliberto TisburyThe Sandplain grassland ecosystem is the original landscape since the recession of the ice age on the island. Historically, less trees covered the glacial outwash because the ecological succession of frequent burning on the land. Too many trees will shade out these rare native wildflower, as we see with most of the island where meadows once existed the entire island, have now become vine infested tick factories as the result of improper land management or just neglect of the land in general. The conservation commission needs to help clueless homeowners with proper tree thinning to promote biodiversity, but they also shouldn’t be stuck in the dogma of doing nothing at all is better than tending to the landscape responsibly.
I agree. The island is
Sara Piazza EdgartownI agree. The island is totally overgrown with too many trees and bushes. It's like a jungle. I especially have a problem with those walls of evergreens that people plant around their property to circumvent the six foot fence rule. They are everywhere. They're not native and these walls of evergreens are just plain ugly. What are people hiding? Yes, bring back our open views and let the sun shine and the wind blow.
QUESTION--- This is not the
Bill Ryan Edgartown/New JerseyQUESTION--- This is not the first person to do this type of thing, and it causes me to wonder...Shouldn't the tree people who removed the trees have some exposure? This work is their livlihood and no doubt they work hard! BUT, shouldn't they be required to know if the correct permits have been granted before removing the trees? Seems to me if they knew they weren't in the clear and that they might suffer some consequences that this type of thing might stop.
This is a very good point.
John Aldeborgh KatamaThis is a very good point.
Sara, I agree completely.
Lorraine EdgartownSara, I agree completely. The unbridled planting of arbor vitae huge,tall trees to circumvent the six foot fence rule is abhorrent to me. They cut off sunlight and breeze to these old clapboard houses, which is damaging to the edifice; they are, quite frankly, ugly. And no, beauty is not only in the eye of the beholder, Edgartown was never meant to be like the Hamptons and Palm Beach. White picket fences, herbaceous borders, the free and open passage of sunlight and breezes, a good thing. If people are so concerned with being looked at, buy a house out in the country. Downtown Edgartown is being ruined with the mindless planting of these huge barriers.
Exactly. I’m old enough to
Sara Piazza EdgartownExactly. I’m old enough to remember when neighbors would speak to neighbors across the fence and hand over a cup of sugar once in a while, and when people enjoyed interacting with the passing public. I still do.
Very well said, Sara. We are
jose Oak BluffsVery well said, Sara. We are witnessing a huge decline in civility all across our nation, in virtually every aspect of our lives. I also remember a time when neighbors knew how to disagree with each other in a civil and constructive way, without hiring lawyers to stake out some legal position. And sadly, legal outcomes often favor the wealthy who view fines and legal expense as cost of doing business to get the outcome they want. There was a time not so long ago when neighbors exercised more forbearance (self sacrifice, self governance, decency, civility) over decisions/actions that could have a negative impact on their neighbors and community. This forbearance was not driven by some judge's ruling, but rather because civility/decency mattered more than it does today, and it was the right thing to do. This was what we were taught at the dinner table, in our schools and in our churches/synagogues. Although all of us were and are imperfect, our neighbors were still our neighbors and worthy of respect, even if we disagreed with them.
First, I see nothing wrong
John Aldeborgh KatamaFirst, I see nothing wrong with challenging the regulations and the Commission shouldn’t be offended, it’s a fundamental right in a free society. Second, as someone 69 years old and who is a 3rd generation Katama resident, the grasslands, with the views they afforded, were far more pervasive and very beautiful. Third, it’s very frustrating to have rules imposed on you as to what you can do with your own land. Finely, I’m slowly coming to believe we’re being actively spied on by these government and quasi government agencies, something unacceptable based on my values.
It might be a good idea to
Katherine Scott TisburyIt might be a good idea to challenge a bylaw before you violate it, not as an afterthought after you get caught.
Does the Katama Association
Johanna Hynes katamaDoes the Katama Association 'leadership' have an opinion on this brazen act of illegal tree cutting? Seems like a topic that falls under the KA mission to preserve the iconic rustic charm and natural beauty of Katama.
Goldman Sachs and sacks of
Erica EdgartownGoldman Sachs and sacks of gold. It's what our island has become. This will not be the last time something like this happens.
Add new comment