An overhaul of the school's athletic facility has been discussed going back to 2016.
Ray Ewing

High School Principal Asks for Focus on Education, Not Turf

Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School principal Sara Dingledy has called for the regional high school committee to consider the mounting toll of its turf field litigation on the school community.

Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School principal Sara Dingledy has called for the regional high school committee to consider the mounting toll of its turf field litigation on the school community.

In a heartfelt statement at the committee meeting Monday, Ms. Dingledy said the debate over the field surface at the high school has been a source of frustration for the school and she called for the committee in the new year to refocus on education and the potential for a revamped high school building.

“Increasingly, it is affecting the image and the morale of Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School,” Ms. Dingledy said of the turf fight.

The Oak Bluffs planning board rejected the school committee’s application for a turf field in 2022. The committee appealed the denial and emerged victorious in the Land Court battle late last year. In December, the planning board voted to appeal that decision. 

“Students still don’t see meaningful progress, and staff in the building are voicing some frustration that the battle is happening with little input from or engagement with them,” Ms. Dingledy said.

The principal has tried to separate her leadership of the school from the polarizing conflict over athletic field surfaces, she told the committee.

“It does me no good as a leader to align myself in a struggle that’s divisive on the Island. However, right now we find ourselves with continued litigation and maneuvering that does not yet feel collaborative,” she said.

“I am truly agnostic about the surface — many at the high school are,” she added. 

From her point of view, Ms. Dingledy said, the main objective for the school committee should be the proposed overhaul of the regional high school in Oak Bluffs. The school recently appointed a manager for a feasibility study to look at options for an upgraded school and the Massachusetts School Building Authority stands to reimburse the district close to 38 per cent for most costs – but only if voters in all six Island towns agree to pay their share of the rest. 

“The main project on my mind … is the once in a lifetime opportunity for the Island to completely overhaul our facility with the financial support of the state. This should be the centerpiece of our collective attention,” Ms. Dingledy said, reminding the committee that leaders from all six towns agreed on a cost-sharing formula for the project a year and a half ago.

The high school’s operating budget is also threatened by community sentiment over the ongoing legal fight with the Oak Bluffs planning board, Ms. Dingledy said.

In protest over legal expenditures on the turf field case last year, annual town meetings in the three up-Island towns voted against paying their shares of the high school budget, which delayed approval of this year’s spending plan.

“This is the budget that supports teachers, gets kids into college and into technical fields within our community, welcomes new arrivals and teaches them English,” Ms. Dingledy said. 

“Enduring another season of town meetings in which the school leadership has to shadowbox an argument that has nothing to do with the general operation of the school is not something that I look forward to,” she said.

If similar votes occur this spring, the school may not be able to post job openings until the summer, adding delays to the hiring process, Ms. Dingledy said. She asked committee members to speak at this year’s annual town meetings in support of the school’s proposed $26.5 million operating budget. 

“Be present to answer questions and ensure that all people know that the operating budget is separate from the litigation and the activities related to the field,” she said.

The high school committee Monday also voted to accept a $2,000 donation for legal costs in the turf case from Terry and Anne Marie Donahue, longtime supporters of the plan for an artificial playing surface among the school’s athletic fields.

After last year’s town meeting votes, the high school committee agreed not to use its legal budget to pursue the case against the Oak Bluffs planning board.

A second $2,000 donation for the legal fees came from Islanders who did not want to be associated with the polarizing case, said school committee member Louis Paciello of Edgartown, who presented the donation on their behalf.

“A few people came to me and gave me this money. They wish to remain anonymous. I understand that this is an issue that causes concern for some in the community,” Mr. Paciello said.

After Chilmark committee member Robert Lionette raised questions about whether the bundled donation meets state requirements, the committee agreed not to vote on accepting it until the school’s legal counsel weighs in.

The school committee also voted unanimously to certify the $26.5 million operating budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, clearing the way for town meeting votes on the spending plan this spring.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/09/2024 - 17:50

Permalink

Tom Engley West Tisbury

Finally someone involved with and working at the school has stated the obvious to the rest of us it’s about the Education. I’m sure others who work at the school feel the same but the Principal has a voice and she used it and I say thank you.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/10/2024 - 08:12

Permalink

Peter Palches Oak Bluffs

Maybe I'm being simplistic, but I think there is a clear first step to take in making this High School Region a bit more functional: direct, Island-wide elections.
Wouldn't cost much.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 01/11/2024 - 14:30

Permalink

Islander61 OB

Maybe the representatives of WT and Chilmark on the school board shouldn't have put our children's education at risk by standing up and telling their towns to not pass the high school budget. That was irresponsible, wrong, and a childish temper tantrum when they didn't get their way. Ms. Dingledy should stand up and say that the turf in needed to provide the best all around education of our student athletes, that is focusing on education. BTW your headline is very misleading, she didn't say to not support the turf, she said she was agnostic about the surface. Come together and make the field renovation happen. The opposition keeps this fight going, why doesn't anyone tell them to stop? They are the ones forcing the school to pay lawyers fees.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/12/2024 - 07:21

Permalink

Holly Gleason Nashville,TN; formerly Vineyard Haven

As an adjunct college professor, this obsession with sports -- something that won't support most kids after high school, let alone college -- has opened gaps for the quality of education that our young people's future deserves. Seeing college juniors and seniors turning in written work that reads at the third grade level, it's not that they're lazy, but that teachers are stretched thin, too many students in a class, not enough time to really focus on short falls...
Updating the building, paying teachers a truly living wage AND having enough teachers, counselors and support is critical to success as critical thinkers with the ability to apply abstract reason. Indeed, making connections between the power of learning and creating opportunity, connecting with ways to support one's dreams (or pay the bills) is the cornerstone of middle and high school. Sports are fun, but education -- even when it's rudimentary -- is not just a priority, it's a gateway.
God bless Sara Dingledy for focusing the priorities over the emotional flashpoint of people wanting to be right. Here's to all those young people at MVRHS! They've got an educational leader who's truly making them and their best outcome a genuine priority now and for generations to come.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/12/2024 - 09:22

Permalink

Shawn I. West Tisbury

As a parent of MVRHS students, I wonder if the turf issue is the reason for morale issues, as the principal claims. I have watched many good teachers quit over the last few years, and watched 3 administrators jump ship, as well. I think a deep dive into what is going on is important. This school does need to focus on education and having a strong staff with good morale is key---not sure blaming that on a project is acknowledging the issues. By the way, I support grass.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 01/13/2024 - 09:10

Permalink

Elizabeth Bradley Edgartown

Thanks Ms. Dingledy, clear communication and perspective. Physical plant and staffing are non-negotiable, education is the point and athletics are a part of that among other interests. Priorities in order. now we need collaboration from stakeholders and leaders.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.