MVC Data Shows Trend Toward Large Houses on Island

The total volume of residential development on Martha’s Vineyard has slowed in recent years, while the size of houses has increased.

The total volume of residential development on Martha’s Vineyard has slowed in recent years, while the size of houses has increased steadily and sometimes dramatically, data compiled by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission shows.

Data on Island home construction from the last 40 years was compiled over the winter by Bill Veno, a senior planner with the Martha’s Vineyard Commission. The work was done as the commission prepared to review and update its criteria for development referrals.

An analysis of the raw data paints a striking picture of development trends on the Island over the past four decades, including the increasing square footage of new homes and volume of new construction.

Pulled from assessors records in the six Island towns, the data includes nearly every residential building constructed on the Island between 1980 and 2018. It divides home construction into four different categories: under 4,000 square feet, between 4,000 and 5,000 square feet, between 5,000 and 6,000 square feet, and above 6,000 square feet. West Tisbury was not included in the square footage analysis because the town's database could not be configured at a necessary level of detail. The report does not include renovation data.

Mr. Veno estimated that the Island in total has about 17,000 residential buildings. More than 50 per cent of them have been built in the past four decades, accounting for more than 10 million square feet of new construction, not including home renovations or additions.

The data also shows that in Edgartown, which has seen the most development since the 1980s, average home size increased by about 30 per cent in the 2000s when compared to the last two decades of the 20th century, from an average of 1,699 square feet between 1980 and 1999 to an average of 2,230 square feet between 2000 to 2018. Oak Bluffs home sizes increased 10 per cent during the same time period. In Tisbury, the average home size increased 26 per cent.

But even more striking than the increase in average home size is the increase in the percentage of homes being built that are over 4,000 square feet. Between 1980 and 1999, 6,014 homes were built on the Island. Only three per cent, or 217 houses, were over 4,000 square feet. Between 2000 and 2018, 323 of the 2,861 homes that were built on the Island were over 4,000 square feet, accounting for 12 per cent of home building. And there have been twice as many homes built that are over 6,000 square feet — 66 compared to 33.

“The homes over 4,000 square feet, their numbers, basically, doubled in the last two decades,” Mr. Veno told the Gazette in an interview about the data. “And 4,000 is an arbitrary number. Going lower might make that differentiation more pronounced.”

The increases were most pronounced in Edgartown, where 62 homes over 4,000 square feet were built between 1980 and 1999. In the 21st century, the number increased to 169 — even as overall new construction decreased by about half. The only town that has not seen a two-fold increase or more in the number of homes built over 4,000 square feet is Chilmark, which adopted a strict new zoning bylaw in 2013 that limits residential construction to 3,500 square feet per three-acre buildable lot size.

The data also provides a timeline for residential development on the Vineyard over the past four decades. Beginning in the 1970s, the Island began to see a steady pattern of subdivisions that cropped up off the main roads in down-Island towns and West Tisbury. Some were properties that developers cobbled together by clearing titles and buying up small lots.

The commission was created in 1974, a first-of-its-kind regional planning agency chartered by the state legislature and introduced by Gov. Francis Sargent. The state bill was a compromise to the Nantucket Sound Islands Trust Bill, controversial federal legislation sponsored by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy that would have placed the two Islands in federal trust, much like the Cape Cod National Seashore.

The formation of the commission coincided directly with the onset of the heaviest development years on the Vineyard.

Subdivisions — all still in existence today — eventually came to line the Vineyard Haven-Edgartown Road, West Tisbury Road, County Road in Oak Bluffs and Old County Road in West Tisbury, transforming old fields and wooded areas into slices of mainland suburbia. In 1987 alone, 535 homes were built in Edgartown, the commission report shows. (It was also a time when Edgartown had pulled out of the MVC in a political squabble; the town later rejoined the commission.)

“The 20 years from 1980 to 2000 was almost the heyday,” said Arthur Smadbeck, a longtime Realtor with Priestley and Smadbeck, and an Edgartown selectman.

“It started in a little bit of a dribble in the seventies. And by the eighties, it was really cranked up,” he said.

But few of the new subdivisions had large houses over 4,000 square feet. While a stark contrast with the historic farmhouses of Chilmark sheepherders or the white-shingled whaling mansions of Edgartown, the newly-built homes were generally small and relatively affordable, allowing a middle-class buyer newfound access to the Vineyard.

By the early 2000s, a shift began to occur. Available land for large subdivisions, especially down-Island, had dried up. There was far less new construction. But the new homes being built were different.

“The house of 20 to 30 years ago was a fairly basic house that you could build with fairly basic drawings,” said Ben Robinson, a member of the Tisbury planning board and the MVC. “Now, you can get a building set that is hundreds of pages of drawings and details . . . every house that is over 2,000 or 3,000 square feet is soup to nuts, a whole different ball-game with construction.”

Mr. Smadbeck said the change began even earlier, just after World War II. The Vineyard was just two decades behind.

“In the fifties, everyone wanted your 1,200 square foot, three-bedroom, one-bath, one-car-garage home,” he said. “Fast forward to the nineties, your standard home was four bedrooms, two and a half baths, and 2,400 square feet. Today that has morphed into 3,500 to 4,000 square feet. You have this sort of expansion of what in people’s minds they think they need.”

Mr. Smadbeck said code words such as chef’s kitchen, have cemented themselves in the Island real estate vernacular. “When someone says chef’s kitchen, it doesn’t mean that a chef owns it,” he said. “What they’re signaling is that it is a big kitchen . . . It’s got granite countertops and stainless steel and the giant, Subzero fridge. People have been getting bigger and better and better and bigger.”

Mr. Veno said the increasing number of large homes on the Vineyard mirrors a national trend. Meanwhile, residential home construction and how much it should be regulated continues to be a hotly debated issue on the Vineyard. “The large house issue, it touches a lot of people’s buttons, in both directions,” Mr. Veno said.

“But that’s what regulation is all about. What is an appropriate level of regulation. That’s the hard part.”

A previous version of this article stated that West Tisbury was not included in the analysis because of a flaw with the town data. The West Tisbury database was not able to be configured at a level of detail needed for square footage analysis, so it was not included. This has no bearing on the accuracy or completeness of the town’s assessment data, the MVC clarified.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 10/16/2020 - 06:56

Permalink

Harriet West Tis

Let the MVC at least put the brakes on this at the high end. Castles breed caste systems.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 10/16/2020 - 06:57

Permalink

John Aldeborgh Edgartown

The MVC and the building regulations that have been put in place over the past 25 years guarantee that affordable housing is a thing of the past on Martha’s Vineyard. My family have been land owners on the island since 1939, We built a 1800 sq ft home on a piece of land give to us by my parents in 1994 that had an all cost, including furniture, of $130K. This last year, as we prepared for retirement, we got a quote to add a 700 sq ft addition, as well as upgrade the kitchen and 3 bathrooms and replace the electric heat with a proper HVAC system, after spending $40K on drawings and engineering studies needed to satisfy the permitting process, the quote was $1M, not an exaggeration. We had it in our minds the project might cost $400K, we decided not to put on the addition. The island has regulated itself into a place where only the very rich can afford to build, one inevitably byproduct are the very large homes. Martha’s Vineyards regulation derived exclusivity and resulting building costs, has been engineered over the past half century. We’ve dug this hole ourselves and are now addicted to the tax revenues the crazy real estate values generate. The road back to affordable looks difficult.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 10/16/2020 - 07:16

Permalink

Marie Edgartown

No one wants to tell a person what they can and cannot do with their property The problem is not with the large homes. They are beautiful and function for the modern family. The problem lies in the fact that Martha’s Vineyard has allowed the large developments to happen without taking care of the infrastructure and remembering who we are. We are a fragile island. If we allow the building of the large homes and restrict the use to the family then that may work. What we have are large homes being rented by a number of people under the guise of one family. So there lies your problem MV. So we have choices. Fix the infrastructure. Make sure all sewage, water, roads are inline then you can build away if that is what makes us feel special. Otherwise realize our limits and live within them.

Beth West Tisbury

Thank you Marie
The town's still have restrictions on pumping septics. This not only impacts the environment but also can caused damage to existing septic systems. This is a big expense for existing home owner. Issuing permits for large homes without aggressively dealing with problems like this is irresponsible and negligent. Waiting for septics to overflow on the ground, backing up in a home, or the smells in a home is not dangerous to put environment but is an overall health risk. Fix what's broken first, then issue permits.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 10/16/2020 - 15:32

Permalink

Lorraine Edgartown

Not all large dwellings are showplaces in essence. Large families, many children, their partners, their children, soon one has an alarming number of little rascals and progeny. Are they supposed to sleep in the woods? on the beach? in tents in the back gardens? I think not. Many of these dwellings are never rented, are not used as businesses, but as summer homes for large, large families. Not everyone dislikes large families. Some are even delighted to be large families.

Matt Edgartown

Yes, and with any large family it always nice to have activities. And that's why multiple "large family" homes on this island have regulation size bowling alleys in the basement. As nice as I can say this I think you comment is a little out of touch.

Lorraine Edgartown

Matt, as nice as I can say this, we do not have a bowling alley, we do not have a pool, we go to the beach, we bicycle rather than drive much of the time, we do not have huge SUV's, we are just a large family who need bedrooms. If that is o k with you. I think your comment to be a little hurtful.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/17/2020 - 11:44

Permalink

Islander Martha’s Vineyard

Builders want to retain the right to build monstrosities, affect delicate ecosystems, and in general make the island into Manhattan or Boston in exchange for their living. Let’s be frank about their needs because they are the ones controlling things and they can’t see the forest for the trees. The almighty dollar. The builders have a right to a living, but there is a middle eay, it is not an unlimited Shangri-La so they can get rich. It’s not a complicated formula.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10/17/2020 - 14:28

Permalink

Islander Too

I was raised in an antique Cape (yes, a museum piece) along with three siblings. That is, a family of six lived there quite happily. When the property was sold, in the eighties, the idea was to demolish the antique Cape because it was "too small for a family." What rot.
Americans are space junkies.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.