Voters will decide next week whether to take a fresh tack on the long-stalled town hall renovation project.
Oak Bluffs voters will decide next week whether to take a fresh tack on the long-stalled town hall renovation project and approve an all-new $13.3 million plan to overhaul the ailing town offices on School street.
The annual town meeting begins at 6 p.m. Tuesday at the Tabernacle. Face masks and social distancing are mandatory. Moderator Jesse (Jack) Law 3rd will preside. There are three articles on a special town meeting warrant and 20 articles on the annual town meeting warrant. A quorum of 50 voters is required to convene the meeting.
All Island towns postponed their annual town meetings this year due to the pandemic, and most have cut back their warrants to only essential spending items. In Oak Bluffs, the warrant has been cut in half with many items delayed to the fall.
“Just the things we needed to move forward for now,” town administrator Robert Whritenour said.
The major spending item on the warrant is the new package for renovating the old town hall, after years of starts and stops with plans.
The town went back to the drawing board last year.
The new plan was unveiled at the selectmen’s meeting Tuesday with a video tour by Ned Collier and Stephen Moore of Icon Architects. Extensive interior and exterior renovations would result in a three-story town hall with a large board room, conference rooms, private offices for town officials and an elevator to service all three floors. The current building was formerly a town school and has seen no significant renovations for decades.
But the architect’s final cost estimates of $14.3 million were beyond the town’s comfort zone, selectmen said. So the group went to work to cut back on some of the more expensive elements in the plan, including a geothermal heating and cooling system, a generator and some landscaping details. That brought the cost down to $13.3 million.
Mr. Whritenour said Wednesday that if voters approve the new project, $9.8 million previously appropriated for the new town hall will be rescinded. The money was never spent when bids came in later well above budget.
If the project is approved on the town meeting floor it will also need approval in the ballot box two days later to exempt the debt from the provisions of Proposition 2 1/2.
In an interview and follow up emails with the Gazette this week, Mr. Whritenour said he’s confident that careful due diligence has been done with the project, and he said this is a good time for the town to borrow money, with interest rates at historic lows.
“I think the feeling is that we have hit the sweet spot . . . to create a good value for the town,” he said in an email. “I think the design is actually superior in serving the public in a simple and accessible way that preserves charm of the existing structure.”
He added: “Our feeling is that maybe the time is now to knock this project out as both construction costs and interest rates will go nowhere but up from here.”
In general this will be a conservative year for spending, Mr. Whritenour said.
A $32.4 million annual town operating budget will see few increases. “No major changes, it’s primarily level funded from the previous year,” he said of the budget which was pared back by about $500,000, taking into account an anticipated drop in revenues this year.
When the decision was made to postpone the annual town meeting, town leaders took the extra time to scrutinize every line item in the budget.
“People should be confident that this is a very lean budget,” Mr. Whritenour said.
Spending items that remain intact include $25,000 to enhance building maintenance in town, $15,000 for tree work and $12,000 to help the fire department improve evening weekday and weekend duty coverage. With guidance and direction from the new fire chief Martin Greene, the town will add a part-time fire prevention officer to help with inspections. And a specialized emergency rescue team will be trained for out-of-the-ordinary fire and rescue calls such as hazardous material incidents, vehicle extractions and confined space rescues.
“It will help be an additional professional resource for our community,” Mr. Whritenour said.
With union contracts expiring this year, salary freezes town employees are likely.
“Discussions are continuing, it does not look good for COLAs [cost of living increases],” Mr. Whritenour said, noting that the no-frills budget includes no funds for cost of living increases.
Voters will be asked to approve some $2 million in capital spending for a downtown sidewalk improvement project.
Funded by low-interest bonds with no use of free cash, the expenditure would be a sensible investment in the future right now, Mr. Whritenour said.
“Downtown sidewalks is a pretty important project, even more so given the problems we’re having with social distancing,” he said, adding: “We have substandard sidewalks, they’re far too narrow.” He continued:
“We’re very fortunate that we have a downtown that’s a full-time year-round downtown . . . investment in these important public infrastructure elements can help make the downtown a better place to do business so that can help us bounce back from some of the economic impacts of the pandemic as well.”

Comments
Is this the right time to
Peter Koesler Oak BluffsIs this the right time to expect the OB community to approve a $13 MM new town hall project when its residents and business community are just being hit hard by a virus pandemic? When people are out of jobs and OB runs a budget deficit with no reserves to finance town hall? Have you explored impact of work from home on your building footprint for potential saves and downscaling? Frankly, right now, there seem to be other priorities that seek funding and stimulus.
Before we spend $13m on a new
Tired of Mediocracy Oak BluffsBefore we spend $13m on a new town hall, let’s work on making improvements in how some of the departments, especially the building inspectors office, service taxpayers. Emails and phone calls go unanswered. It is embarrassing. If they are short-staffed and overwhelmed, hire another support person. If they just don’t want to serve the public, find a different place to work.
What a classic Catch 22.
Islander MVWhat a classic Catch 22. Taxpayers won’t fund the government due to bad service. So the town hall crumbles. Potential employees won’t work there because the building is disgusting and beyond repair and it is very clear nobody cares about their work conditions. Plus, they would get paid way less in OB than other towns, and they are under constant attack for being part of the mess. Who the hell would ever take a leap of faith to try to fix it? Why would anybody work in that disgrace of a building where permanent records rot, and bathrooms make a Chappy August porta potty seem quaint? Then again, why would any taxpayer give discretionary money at the ballot box to reward the government employees that don’t serve them as they expect? Sounds like 3.5 billion in property is exposed to a true meltdown. How sad. Towns nationwide can and have gone bust in under such circumstances. Glad I don’t own property there. Suddenly, two hundred bucks a year doesn’t sound so expensive.
Not my town, but this has a
Mark EdgartownNot my town, but this has a very SSA feel to it. Geothermal heating and cooling was originally included? What other goodies are they trying to cajole tax payers into funding?
Oak Bluffs Town Hall
Bill McGrath Oak BluffsOak Bluffs Town Hall
I’ve been involved with the effort to “do” Town Hall since 2012. There have been several studies, presentations, Town Meeting and ballot votes, Planning Board reviews, MV Commission referral, bids and rebids. But for an unfortunate decision by the Board of Selectmen to require an unnecessary debt- exclusion ballot vote in November 2018, Oak Bluffs would have moved into a new Town Hall in April 2020 for a total cost of $11.1 million. Included in the bid price was increased parking, improved drainage, betterments to School Street, and connectivity with both the Library and Public Transportation.
I have followed with considerable interest the purchase, planning, and review of the Red Cat building on Kennebec Ave, particularly with-regard-to the owner’s decision to build new versus renovating an historic building. I support that decision. Would that the same owner have used the same logic and bully pulpit with-regard-to the taxpayers’ money for the Town Hall.
The current design takes a broken, insignificant structure and promises to turn it into a building with architectural features of a gentrified tenement in South Boston. Contrast it with the surrounding structures of the Library and Good Shepherd Parish building. Certainly, it will be up to code and the layout sufficient for current day Town business. But for fifty years does Oak Bluffs want an expensive, out of character, eyesore at the corner of Pacific Ave and School Street?
Many questions remain. As of today there are real cost numbers for this proposal. $13.4 million, only 20 percent more than the $11.1 million bid contract in November 2018. What features will be shortchanged to preserve the illusion of “cheaper to renovate”? Will the site work for the renovation remain under the purview of the DRI decision by the MV Commission? Will the vastly different economic environment of 2020 and uncertain future impact the willingness of Town voters to support any project? These are questions for Selectmen to answer before asking the voters to consider gentrification of 55 School Street. I watched the video presentation.
I don’t support putting lipstick on a Pig.
As a “summer person” since
OB taxpayer OBAs a “summer person” since 1940, I have never objected to paying my fair share of real estate taxes to the Town of OB. I see it as a duty, not objectionable if operated fairly. The very notion of spending $13 million compared to a much less expensive renovation—especially when OB taxpayers are all suffering economic and emotional distress—is preposterous on its face. Slow down, folks! This is not the time or the place to be spending $13 million when the current Town Hall is so conveniently and pleasantly located.
I guess you gotta be thankful
Islander MVI guess you gotta be thankful you got your money’s worth and then some back when this was a great place to be. 1940 was 80 years ago. I admire your stamina (I barely have the stomach for a hopeless on line tax debate now, and can’t imagine doing so while I am at least 80 years old. My hat is off to you!) Meanwhile, count your blessings that OB fulfilled its noble purpose in recent decades, so if it falls all to pieces now it really doesn’t matter. Another town somewhere else will take its place.
This isn’t a question of the
Human Bean MVThis isn’t a question of the building being conveniently or pleasantly located. The address isn’t going to change. It is however an issue of convenient, pleasant and, most importantly, legal access. The building in its current state has no ADA access or accommodations. Continuing to knowingly restrict ready access to government by disabled persons is shameful and must be addressed.
Add new comment