The Martha’s Vineyard Airport is running well in the black as the busiest months of the year come to a close, treasurer Richard Knabel reported.
The Martha’s Vineyard Airport is running well in the black as the busiest months of the year come to a close.
At a meeting of the airport commission Thursday, board treasurer Richard Knabel reported a first quarter operating surplus of more than $2.1 million — about $1 million more than the airport had in late 2018.
“We are in a much better position this year than we were a year ago, and cash flow, if not wonderful, is at least fine at the beginning of the lean time of year,” said Mr. Knabel. He projected the airport will end 2019 with a surplus of $1.1 million.
Speaking to the Gazette by phone Friday, Mr. Knabel explained that expenses were down for the first quarter of the fiscal year compared with 2018. Last year the airport had capital expenses related to FAA-required studies and mitigation of land in an area of the business park the commission wants to develop for non-aviation uses.
Also last year the commission incurred a slew of unanticipated costs for cleaning up PFAS, a chemical found in firefighting foam that turned up monitoring wells and drinking water south of the airport. Plus there were higher legal bills from litigation with the owners of the former Airport Mobil station, who shut down and dismantled the gas station after their lease was not renewed.
That litigation remains ongoing.
At the meeting Thursday, airport manager Cindi Martin told commissioners air traffic is also up.
“October was up eleven and a half per cent over last year in terms of aircraft operations,” she said, adding: “We’ve had four strong months despite two northeasters back to back.”
In other business, with their leases expiring at the end of the year, the two rental car companies that do business at the airport won initial approval from the commission to renew operations under new three-year contracts to be signed next month.
Concessionaires Hertz, which operates three rent-a-car brands — Dollar, Hertz and Thrifty — from the same counter, and Vineyard Enterprises Inc., representing the Avis and Budget brands, submitted proposals that together will bring the airport a guaranteed minimum revenue of $18,813.65 a month, or $225,763.75 annually.
The two companies will each pay $31,999.50 rent for their terminal counter and office space and $3,120 for four “ready” and 20 “preferred” parking spaces.
Hertz is guaranteeing the airport an annual minimum revenue of $80,514.75 and Vineyard Enterprises, Inc. is guaranteeing $75,010.
These guarantees may be exceeded by the airport’s share of the rental agencies’ gross receipts, Mr. Knabel told commissioners.
The Hertz contract could also bring in an additional $10,600 for seasonal parking in airport Lot C, where in past summers a single rental vendor has taken up to 25 per cent of available spaces. This dollar estimate is based on $1.06 per square foot, according to a summary from the airport commission’s land use subcommittee.
“That was a good job Cindi did, recognizing the revenue opportunities,” subcommittee chairman Peter Wharton said.
As the high bidder, Hertz gets first choice of counter selection, after which the commissioners are expected to sign both contracts at their Dec. 12 meeting.

Comments
Now, with a bit more funding
Mr. B. ChilmarkNow, with a bit more funding in hand, could we please move ahead with adding a right-turn lane at the airport's exit onto the EDG/WT Road? Might some government funding be available as this is the only access road to the site? Could at least the plans be drawn up...if they are not already? The right turning lane that was added at the Barnes Rd. intersection works well.
Great idea. Here's another
here we go again edgGreat idea. Here's another thought. Put a police officer at the exit during the arrivals of the JetBlue and American EMB190 aircraft. They seem to land at the same time and traffic is backed up to the terminal.
Where is the coverage about
High Flyer VHWhere is the coverage about the additional scheduled flights next summer to/from Washington National airport?
The quotes from Mr. Knabel
Dean Rosenthal EdgartownThe quotes from Mr. Knabel and others come close to indicating that we are in a for profit business and are also interested in increasing traffic. I want to register the opinion that with over $1 million dollars in surplus, we are not Morgan Stanley or the Trump Corporation — there are no shareholders and the goal is to provide service in coordination with the FAA for islanders and visitors to the island, not run up millions. We are NOT here to make money. We are here to make sure we are operating in the black, absolutely. It's a good, necessary thing. But the goal, with 1 million in surplus, is not indefinitely increased revenue. This is a local, small airport. The last airport manager wanted to turn us into Logan. Her inspiration did not end well, which is not a threat, but rather an observation as to the island’s needs and wishes with respect to the actual needs. There is a reason for us to have an airport and to manage it well.
The current surplus in
Richard Knabel West TisburyThe current surplus in airport operating funds is a bit misleading. It represents the three busiest (summer) months at the airport. That surplus has to carry us through the lean winter (low activity months) to the end of our fiscal year (June 30) which is just after the next summer season begins. The airport’s revenue stream, like its operations, is very seasonal. At the moment the airport has no reserves to cover unanticipated expenses, such as we had last (fiscal) year, and we have essentially a break-even budget. Yes, we are in the black, which is fortunate, but it’s definitely not a ‘profit’ as that term is normally used.
A modest proposal: How about
tom hodgson wtA modest proposal: How about we just get rid of the airport? Acres and acres or blacktop could be removed. The amount of noise and pollution it brings from operations and from jet and plane traffic is not good for our aquifer or for our health or for the planet. With FAA regulations no longer applying, other activities could take place out there....the business park could be expanded, and it would again be legal to put some housing out there.
Creative minds could no doubt find many other uses for over a square mile (688 acres) of Vineyard land.
The airport land (just over
Richard Knabel West TisburyThe airport land (just over one square-mile) was federal land until it was given to Dukes County in 1959 for the specific purpose of a commercial airport. It’s not at all clear that what you’re suggesting would be possible if air operations were to end. The land would likely revert back to the federal government. Ceasing air operations would be a major hit to the Island’s economy, and cut an important link to the mainland during emergencies.
Add new comment