Saturday night’s engine failure aboard the ferry Martha’s Vineyard has been traced to a poor installation job by an electrician working on the vessel’s recent $17 million refurbishment.
Saturday night’s engine failure aboard the ferry Martha’s Vineyard has been traced to a poor installation job by an electrician working on the vessel’s recent $17 million refurbishment.
“The initial problem was a wire on a generator that was improperly crimped by an electrical vendor,” Carl Walker, director of maintenance and engineering for the Steamship Authority, told the boat line’s board of governors Tuesday morning.
After the wire made contact with the engine block and arced, the generator went offline. An alarm and monitoring system had been installed but not activated, so the boat crew had no knowledge that the generator was no longer sending power.
“It started as a smaller problem, but cascaded to a bigger problem,” Mr. Walker said. The alarm system has since been activated, he said, and the cost of repairs will be borne by the contractor, Senesco Co.
The ferry Martha's Vineyard was cleared by the Coast Guard to resume service Monday.
General manager Bob Davis said 72 passengers, 11 crew and three food service workers were aboard the Martha’s Vineyard at the time of the failure, which took place about 15 minutes into the 8:30 p.m. run from Vineyard Haven to Woods Hole. The vessel was towed back to port, where it arrived at almost 2 a.m.
“We apologize to our passengers who were on the boat that night,” Mr. Davis said. He also thanked Tisbury Towing and Transportation, which tugged the ferry back to Vineyard Haven, and the terminal employees and boat crew.
Marc Hanover, governor for Martha’s Vineyard, also praised the crew of the Martha’s Vineyard for their conduct during the emergency.
“The situation was handled flawlessly as far as I’m concerned,” Mr. Hanover said. Islanders who were on the boat told him afterward that crew members handed out sheets and blankets to make pillows for the children on board and kept everyone well informed, he added.
“It was exemplary of how we should treat our passengers,” Mr. Hanover said.
This was the board of governors’ first-ever meeting in the conference room at the boat line’s new administration building on Palmer avenue in Falmouth. Outside the floor-to-ceiling window at the back of the room, ladders and toolbags were still in evidence.
It was an unusual meeting in one other respect: There were two boards and two chairmen at the table. The Port Council, a seven-member body representing all the port towns affected by boat line operations, had missed so many meetings due to weather that the two groups decided to meet jointly Tuesday morning.
Both bodies were unanimous on all items, which included creating the new position of communications director at the Steamship Authority; issuing new RFID commuter cards, to be called Lifeline Cards, with a minimum of five trips per card; and hiring a new general counsel, Terence Kenneally, to replace Steven M. Sayers when he retires in July.

Comments
Who checked the work? Okay,
Washabhhored EdgartownWho checked the work? Okay, anyone can miss checking a crimp, but why is there no backup system and why was the alarm not activated? My guess is there are other problems lying in wait. Let's hope the next time isn't a disaster.
The SSA need to do a better
Bruce EdgartownThe SSA need to do a better job with communication. This also means at the terminals. The Captains and Agents need to get the word out to all dock workers so they can communicate with the customers. Overall the SSA does a great job IMO.
What happened to the
Chris KatamaWhat happened to the explanation of a faulty fuel pump? Never made sense to me that a fuel pump could cause a complete power failure - engine difficulty, yes, but complete loss of power, no. This seems much more reasonable. Let's hope this forces a more thorough examination of the core systems.
Is this a case of 'low bidder
deshandra brown EdgIs this a case of 'low bidder gets the job'? I'd guess not for 17 million. Why no systems redundancy? Isn't that why there are TWO engines... and for TWO engines to be disabled by a SINGLE (commonly shared?) generator is inexcusable. What sort of marine architect designed this vulnerable system? Fortunately it did not happen on a rough day or the outcome may have been different.
Comical reading the comments,
JESSE VHComical reading the comments, So if your alternator in your vehicle fails what happens?
Your ignorance is inexcusable.
Do the watch engineers have
Marine Engineer Woods HoleDo the watch engineers have rounds made of the engine room where temperature and pressures are taken and compared to past rounds to determine if temperatures, pressures, and flows have altered at all and if so for what reason. Are they simply relying on a computer screen.
Add new comment