<p>The ink is drying on the final version of a Chilmark bylaw to regulate house size that is now set for a vote at the annual town meeting in April.</p> <p>The planning board ratified a final version of the bylaw on Monday. Town counsel Ronald H. Rappaport will review the language in the coming weeks.</p>
The ink is drying on the final version of a Chilmark bylaw to regulate house size that is now set for a vote at the annual town meeting in April.
The planning board ratified a final version of the bylaw on Monday. Town counsel Ronald H. Rappaport will review the language in the coming weeks.
If it is approved, the bylaw, which creates a ratio of building size to land area, will require a special permit from the zoning board of appeals for new building projects over 3,500 square feet. Home size would be capped at 6,000 square feet per three-acre lot, the minimum zoning in Chilmark. The square footage is calculated by gross living area and includes all finished structures on the property. The board had previously considered a 4,000-square-foot threshold, a number that drew mixed reactions at a public hearing last month. Substandard lots would also be regulated by the bylaw. For one-acre lots, for example, the special permit process would begin at 3,000 square feet. Homeowners would be allowed an additional 250 square feet per additional acre. Existing homeowners whose living area exceeds the threshold would be allowed a one-time exception to increase the home size by five per cent.
The board also modified a proposed definition for a detached bedroom. If approved, homeowners would be allowed one 400-square-foot detached bedroom. No definition on detached bedrooms exists in the current zoning bylaw.
The bylaw establishes a list of checks and balances for the zoning board to consider, including impact of the project to existing rural character, landscaping, natural buffer areas and lighting.
The board closed the comment period after last month’s public hearing, but the written comment period remained open until Monday afternoon. The board received 17 letters of comment on the bylaw, nearly all in favor of regulating house size. The next step will be for voters to decide. “This has been unbelievable. We’ve done good, guys,” planning board chairman Janet Weidner said Monday.

Comments
This is appalling. Three
Caroline New YorkThis is appalling. Three acres capped to 6,000 square feet? Three acres is alot of land by most town's standards. I lived on the Vineyard for 35 years, 3-5 folks, so don't write back and say because I have a New York address now I don't know what I'm talking about. I left because of my ailing mother, not because I got tired of the Vineyard. I worked on all kinds of conservation efforts for those 35 years but not once did I ever stop to think that a town would go so far as to regulate my house size.
How do the realtors feel about this, you know, the ones who are going to have to tell wealthy new buyers that they can't have a big house?
Good luck with all that.
Caroline - seriously, you don
Carol California (now, but was Chilmark)Caroline - seriously, you don't think house size should be regulated?? That's crazy - it's regulated everywhere out here, and I'm quite sure it was regulated in Boston, where I've also lived. It's more normal than not to regulate house size. If you don't know that, you've likely never built a house. House size within a certain size range is essential to community character in urban areas, and in an area like Chilmark (or anywhere up-Island), of COURSE it has a huge (haha) impact on local ecology. Not to mention carbon footprints, folks, and slapping solar panels on the roof doesn't really mitigate all that.
Some conservationist you are, if you area shocked - shocked, I tell you - by house size regulation!
like you, I lived on (attended high school on) MVI - I left for better career opportuntities, like most in my graduating class.
Caroline: welcome to the
steve edgartwonCaroline: welcome to the "peoples republic"....how could you not see this coming??
treading lightly on the land
john burton vermonttreading lightly on the land takes class which is in short supply where the wealthy and the vain live.
Add new comment